So transaction security is actually reliant on the subsequent transaction volume for the overall network?
I imagine if the attacker simply chooses to mount his attack during a period of negligible transaction volume (thus low weight build-up on the legitimate tangle).
Yes, we assume that there is a constant flow of transactions. If it's not the case then merchants should rise confirmation threshold during such hours.I imagine if the attacker simply chooses to mount his attack during a period of negligible transaction volume (thus low weight build-up on the legitimate tangle).
Like, if you send your Nexus to wrong address, it will not be received until the receiver signature is verified and will return back to your account.
It is said on media that mentions about exxor on their website
