ROFL....he is getting 22.3696 MH rejected...
3.5% reject is about on par with what I get, it's not a strange value. Like it was mentioned earlier, a botnet would have a much, much higher number of rejected shares.
Topic: [ANN] profit switching auto-exchanging pool - www.middlecoin.com - page 288. (Read 829922 times)
January 09, 2014, 10:27:20 AM
January 09, 2014, 10:20:42 AM
ROFL....he is getting 22.3696 MH rejected...
3.5% reject is about on par with what I get, it's not a strange value. Like it was mentioned earlier, a botnet would have a much, much higher number of rejected shares. January 09, 2014, 09:56:04 AM
ROFL....he is getting 22.3696 MH rejected...
January 09, 2014, 09:53:09 AM
Wow, this guy with virus miner is a genius! 602Mh/s and climbing
or maybe he adds new gpu every ten minutes
Interesting how much he will gain untill his infection treated..
too bad i'm not that skilled I would split to several wallets to not raise such suspision...
or maybe he adds new gpu every ten minutes
Interesting how much he will gain untill his infection treated..
too bad i'm not that skilled
I would split to several wallets to not raise such suspision...maybe there is nothing to be suspicious of...
lmao sure.
January 09, 2014, 09:50:43 AM
Wow, this guy with virus miner is a genius! 602Mh/s and climbing
or maybe he adds new gpu every ten minutes
Interesting how much he will gain untill his infection treated..
too bad i'm not that skilled I would split to several wallets to not raise such suspision...
or maybe he adds new gpu every ten minutes
Interesting how much he will gain untill his infection treated..
too bad i'm not that skilled
I would split to several wallets to not raise such suspision...maybe there is nothing to be suspicious of...
January 09, 2014, 09:40:14 AM
Wow, this guy with virus miner is a genius! 602Mh/s and climbing
or maybe he adds new gpu every ten minutes
Interesting how much he will gain untill his infection treated..
too bad i'm not that skilled I would split to several wallets to not raise such suspision...
or maybe he adds new gpu every ten minutes
Interesting how much he will gain untill his infection treated..
too bad i'm not that skilled
I would split to several wallets to not raise such suspision... January 09, 2014, 09:36:09 AM
I get 820kh/s on my 290
surely a 290x should be the same, if not higher? and you guys are saying 780 is high?
surely a 290x should be the same, if not higher? and you guys are saying 780 is high?
I'm getting 880 stable on my 290's
wow, is that temperature normal for a 290???
I'm not running anything above low 60's (10-270x's)
Now it runs at 65C with watercooling and the same 820kH/s. If i increase intesnity the kH/s decreases. Sux...
im around 830 khash/s with my 290s on default clocks (947/1250). But the fan is running at 82% (around 4500 rpm), keeps the temperatur "cool" at about 78-80 degrees.
January 09, 2014, 09:33:05 AM
I get 820kh/s on my 290
surely a 290x should be the same, if not higher? and you guys are saying 780 is high?
surely a 290x should be the same, if not higher? and you guys are saying 780 is high?
I'm getting 880 stable on my 290's
https://i.imgur.com/r93Srsl.png
wow, is that temperature normal for a 290???
I'm not running anything above low 60's (10-270x's)
Now it runs at 65C with watercooling and the same 820kH/s. If i increase intesnity the kH/s decreases. Sux...
January 09, 2014, 09:26:29 AM
Are you guys using --failover-only in cgminer?
--failover-only: Don't leak work to backup pools when primary pool is lagging
The normal failover mechanism in cgminer will allow some work to go to the backup pools if there is a delay in getting work from the primary pool you have set. This can be as much as 10% if the pool has latency issues. It then only fails to the backup pool if the primary pool stops giving work for 1 minute. failover-only does not change the failover mechanism, but it does not allow work to go to the backup pools unless the primary pool has failed completely for at least a minute. It then will switch to the backup pool. If cgminer considers a pool dead or down, it tries to contact that pool 1 minutely.
If I have three middlecoin stratum servers defined as backup/failover servers, what would be the best? If I enable --failover-only and primary has some "minor" issues, then my workers wouldn't be "working" in the time of these "minor" issues. If I don't enable this, my workers will instantly failover to other middlecoin stratum servers, but since these might be mining different coins, shares would be lost? Is that correct? Any opinion?
--failover-only: Don't leak work to backup pools when primary pool is lagging
The normal failover mechanism in cgminer will allow some work to go to the backup pools if there is a delay in getting work from the primary pool you have set. This can be as much as 10% if the pool has latency issues. It then only fails to the backup pool if the primary pool stops giving work for 1 minute. failover-only does not change the failover mechanism, but it does not allow work to go to the backup pools unless the primary pool has failed completely for at least a minute. It then will switch to the backup pool. If cgminer considers a pool dead or down, it tries to contact that pool 1 minutely.
If I have three middlecoin stratum servers defined as backup/failover servers, what would be the best? If I enable --failover-only and primary has some "minor" issues, then my workers wouldn't be "working" in the time of these "minor" issues. If I don't enable this, my workers will instantly failover to other middlecoin stratum servers, but since these might be mining different coins, shares would be lost? Is that correct? Any opinion?
January 09, 2014, 09:21:58 AM
I get 820kh/s on my 290
surely a 290x should be the same, if not higher? and you guys are saying 780 is high?
surely a 290x should be the same, if not higher? and you guys are saying 780 is high?
I'm getting 880 stable on my 290's
wow, is that temperature normal for a 290???
I'm not running anything above low 60's (10-270x's)
January 09, 2014, 08:53:15 AM
Hi all, I'm in the process of moving from 1 rig to 2 rigs for the first time.
Are there any disadvantages in using the same BTC payout address for multiple rigs? I'm guessing it works fine (given the hashrates of some of the bigger miners!) just asking the question to see if anyone has any other thoughts.
Thanks in advance.
Are there any disadvantages in using the same BTC payout address for multiple rigs? I'm guessing it works fine (given the hashrates of some of the bigger miners!) just asking the question to see if anyone has any other thoughts.
Thanks in advance.
January 09, 2014, 08:47:24 AM
I'm loving the new Virginia server (useast), H2o. I am really hoping you plan on keeping it going. I get less than half the rejects from that one (~1.5%) compared to the standard Oregon server (~4%).
Really nice thing to have multiple servers to spread the load.
Really nice thing to have multiple servers to spread the load.
January 09, 2014, 08:37:24 AM
I get 820kh/s on my 290
surely a 290x should be the same, if not higher? and you guys are saying 780 is high?
surely a 290x should be the same, if not higher? and you guys are saying 780 is high?
I'm getting 880 stable on my 290's
https://i.imgur.com/r93Srsl.png
January 09, 2014, 08:26:01 AM
I get 820kh/s on my 290
surely a 290x should be the same, if not higher? and you guys are saying 780 is high?
surely a 290x should be the same, if not higher? and you guys are saying 780 is high?
They talk about 280x, not 290x.
January 09, 2014, 08:18:58 AM
I get 820kh/s on my 290
surely a 290x should be the same, if not higher? and you guys are saying 780 is high?
surely a 290x should be the same, if not higher? and you guys are saying 780 is high?
January 09, 2014, 08:17:25 AM
Fellow middlecoiners....I've put a post in the hardware section about my rigs that I'd appreciate some thoughts on if anyone can spare a couple of mins of their time.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/performance-difference-from-one-brand-of-reference-r9-290-to-another-406706
Thanks.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/performance-difference-from-one-brand-of-reference-r9-290-to-another-406706
Thanks.
January 09, 2014, 07:47:24 AM
getting 750kh/s on 280x DC2 TOP on BAMT
Code:
{
"pools" : [
{
"url" : "stratum+tcp://asia.middlecoin.com:3333",
"user" : "omnomnom",
"pass" : "cookies"
},
{
"url" : "stratum+tcp://middlecoin.com:3333",
"user" : "omnomnom",
"pass" : "cookies"
},
{
"url" : "stratum+tcp://eu.middlecoin.com:3333",
"user" : "omnomnom",
"pass" : "cookies"
},
{
"url" : "stratum+tcp://useast.middlecoin.com:3333",
"user" : "omnomnom",
"pass" : "cookies"
}
],
"api-listen" : true,
"intensity" : "20",
"vectors" : "1",
"worksize" : "256",
"kernel" : "scrypt",
"auto-fan" : true,
"temp-cutoff" : "81",
"temp-overheat" : "76",
"temp-target" : "71",
"expiry" : "1",
"gpu-dyninterval" : "7",
"log" : "5",
"queue" : "1",
"retry-pause" : "5",
"scan-time" : "1",
"scrypt" : true,
"temp-hysteresis" : "3",
"shares" : "0",
"shaders" : "2048",
"thread-concurrency" : "24768",
"gpu-thread" : "1",
"gpu-engine" : "1150",
"sharethreads" : "32",
"lookup-gap" : "2",
"gpu-powertune" : "20",
"gpu-memclock" : "1500"
}
January 09, 2014, 07:34:25 AM
EDIT: I am using Asus R9 280x DC2 TOP version 1, I am getting around 780kh/s for each card.
May I ask your cgminer configuration, please?
+1
780kh/s seems very high
January 09, 2014, 07:23:00 AM
EDIT: I am using Asus R9 280x DC2 TOP version 1, I am getting around 780kh/s for each card.
May I ask your cgminer configuration, please?
+1
780kh/s seems very high
January 09, 2014, 06:58:17 AM
EDIT: I am using Asus R9 280x DC2 TOP version 1, I am getting around 780kh/s for each card.
May I ask your cgminer configuration, please?
If that's so, i would also switch my 3x R9 290 to 4x R9 280X
Jump to: