Checked my addresses, they are both excactly the same.
CTRL+F ZUZSZ
CTRL+F ZUZSZ
One ends with 5L, and the other ends with 3L.
Topic: [ANN] profit switching auto-exchanging pool - www.middlecoin.com - page 448. (Read 829908 times)
September 25, 2013, 01:35:43 AM
One ends with 5L, and the other ends with 3L.
September 25, 2013, 01:05:39 AM
One of your addresses has a 1 after it. Typo maybe, when setting up one of your miners?
Mining here again won't clear out the small amount left on immature and unexchanged. The only thing that will do that is me fixing it, when I have time.
Checked my addresses, they are both excactly the same.
CTRL+F ZUZSZ
September 24, 2013, 05:13:18 PM
However, my dust still remains the same since last post few days ago :
0.00279188 0.00118272 0.00067502
Totals 0.00464962
Guess I have to start mining again.
Then, another remarkable issue :
I'm listed twice on the statspage ( Same BTC address twice that is )
The other listing still has a 0.00000140 unexchanged balance.
Any thoughts ?
0.00279188 0.00118272 0.00067502
Totals 0.00464962
Guess I have to start mining again.
Then, another remarkable issue :
I'm listed twice on the statspage ( Same BTC address twice that is )
The other listing still has a 0.00000140 unexchanged balance.
Any thoughts ?
One of your addresses has a 1 after it. Typo maybe, when setting up one of your miners?
Mining here again won't clear out the small amount left on immature and unexchanged. The only thing that will do that is me fixing it, when I have time.
September 24, 2013, 02:45:11 PM
I've lowered the payout threshold to 0.001 BTC.
Great news !!
However, my dust still remains the same since last post few days ago :
0.00279188 0.00118272 0.00067502
Totals 0.00464962
Guess I have to start mining again.
Then, another remarkable issue :
I'm listed twice on the statspage ( Same BTC address twice that is )
The other listing still has a 0.00000140 unexchanged balance.
Any thoughts ?
September 24, 2013, 08:22:30 AM
It looks like the "loose change" bulk payment (anything over .001) didn't actually make it, at least I didn't receive the one headed to my wallet. Or haven't yet, and it's been 11 hours or so...
Looking at the blockchain, it actually says the transaction was for MINUS 13.46 BTC.. eh?
Looking at the blockchain, it actually says the transaction was for MINUS 13.46 BTC.. eh?
What's your address? I'll check it out. PM me if you want.
September 24, 2013, 08:20:48 AM
It looks like the "loose change" bulk payment (anything over .001) didn't actually make it, at least I didn't receive the one headed to my wallet. Or haven't yet, and it's been 11 hours or so...
Looking at the blockchain, it actually says the transaction was for MINUS 13.46 BTC.. eh?
Looking at the blockchain, it actually says the transaction was for MINUS 13.46 BTC.. eh?
September 23, 2013, 09:21:56 PM
And yes, a machine with 3 GPU's could in theory be mining 3 different coins.
Only if you run three separate instances of cgminer.
September 23, 2013, 04:53:54 PM
Either way, I have the impression that any of these pools are a waste of time. Maybe these pools should have a rig with at least a single 7950 pre-mining the so called "most profitable coin" for 2 minutes before making the switch, to make sure that stalls and rejects don't eat up hash rate.
Blindingly switching according to calculations similar to what seen on coinchoose, doesn't cut it. My rig is stable, cgminer reports the same 870 Kh/s, yet HashCows mining KrugerCoin, the pool reports 160 ~ 200 for the full round. Where is the remaining hash rate going? Rejects, stalls, lag and God knows what more ...
Blindingly switching according to calculations similar to what seen on coinchoose, doesn't cut it. My rig is stable, cgminer reports the same 870 Kh/s, yet HashCows mining KrugerCoin, the pool reports 160 ~ 200 for the full round. Where is the remaining hash rate going? Rejects, stalls, lag and God knows what more ...
Agree 100% with this... as I have stated for a while, I think this pool was a great idea but the hashrate is too large for it to be effective unless he could split the hashrate up and have 80% mine LTC and 20% jump around and mine the alt-coins. 1GH/s is just too large to throw at these smaller coins even if they are the most profitable.
Yeah. 1 GH/s is way too much for some of these coins.
Part of my calculations include looking at past results of profits. So if there is a coin with some problem, that will be accounted for. I don't think pre-mining like you say would be good, because you'd lose out on that 2 minutes of profit. And past results are probably a good enough indicator.
I really want to split up the hashrate like you say. It's going to be hard to figure out how to make the payouts fair though. Do I randomly choose the people who get to mine on the smaller pool, or is it who has the lowest reject rate? And do their extra profits get distributed into the main pool?
- pick "n" coins with high profitability to mine.
- compute ratio's so that none of the coins exceed a target max rate.
- adjust "n" as needed to meet target max coin rate.
This would result in a table
coin 1 - x%
coin 2 - y%
coin 3 - z%
and x + y + z = 100
There are many ways to pick which coin to send a worker when they ask but it could be as simple as pick a number between 1 and 100.
And yes, a machine with 3 GPU's could in theory be mining 3 different coins.
September 23, 2013, 04:41:32 PM
And yet another idea: if immature and unexchanged balances are zero - this means that this guy has stopped mining.
It is nice to send already mined dust then to that miner.
It is nice to send already mined dust then to that miner.
September 23, 2013, 09:45:24 AM
That's one way to clear out the dust for a pool where no one has a login (so no one can log in and trigger a manual payout).
Another option is that if an address has not had a payout within the last 7 days, then an automatic payout occurs, no matter what the balance is.
That's a good idea.
September 23, 2013, 04:47:26 AM
That's one way to clear out the dust for a pool where no one has a login (so no one can log in and trigger a manual payout).
Another option is that if an address has not had a payout within the last 7 days, then an automatic payout occurs, no matter what the balance is.
September 23, 2013, 01:26:43 AM
Yeah. If you receive an amount less than 0.01, you can never send it anywhere without paying a fee of at least 0.0001.
I'm only speaking for myself but I don't mind .01.
Maybe have a lower payout once every week or two to clear out the inactive balances that are just dead funds in the pool.
I just looked at the graph and saw how much lower the starting balance for the pool is today! It really helped.
September 23, 2013, 12:56:25 AM
Don't such small transactions sometimes trigger fees?
Yeah. If you receive an amount less than 0.01, you can never send it anywhere without paying a fee of at least 0.0001.
That's the reason I chose 0.01 as the threshold.
You can, however, send a bunch of "outputs" all clumped together in one transaction, with only a 0.0001 fee. I.e. if a miner receives 0.005 BTC every day for 30 days, he can send all 0.015 somewhere with only a 0.0001 fee.
Also, I'm paying extra fees when sending out so many transactions. You guys aren't charged for that though.
September 23, 2013, 12:48:32 AM
I've lowered the payout threshold to 0.001 BTC.
That's one way to clear out the dust for a pool where no one has a login (so no one can log in and trigger a manual payout).
I'm not sure you're doing anyone a favor by giving them too low a payout more than once in a while -- I'd have to think about it. Don't such small transactions sometimes trigger fees?
-- But I guess .001 isn't _too_ low
September 22, 2013, 11:32:44 PM
This pool and the operator's feedback is getting better 
September 22, 2013, 09:36:06 PM
I just received a payment under .01.
If having such small transactions is an issue for anyone, and you'd rather have a larger payout less often, let me know.
September 22, 2013, 09:33:55 PM
Has the automatic payout threshold been lowered? I just received a payment under .01.
Edit: Nevermind...
Edit: Nevermind...
September 22, 2013, 09:33:20 PM
I've lowered the payout threshold to 0.001 BTC.
September 22, 2013, 02:40:51 PM
It looks like the pool made a big sale a few hours ago. Did that have anything to do with the experiment?
No. I was just watching the market and manually traded some feathercoins.
September 22, 2013, 02:39:25 PM
It looks like the pool made a big sale a few hours ago. Did that have anything to do with the experiment?
Jump to: