Topic: [ANN] profit switching auto-exchanging pool - www.middlecoin.com - page 504. (Read 829908 times)

i am curious whats that coin with 504K diff showing in cgminer...

thanks   (that´s it)

why 13?

H20 looks like another Record setting day???    

Should we get use to this??  

password is -p x not -p 1pw 

Set all your intensity's to 13

I´m using this : (there is -p 1)
C:\cgminer\cgminer.exe --scrypt -o middlecoin.com:3333 -u 13s2LkBUu6gQBApWb9CFwiKbMnkVSKaYwf -p 1pw --intensity 18,18,19 --gpu-fan 65,65,75 --gpu-engine 1050,1050,950 --gpu-memclock 1350,1350,1200 --thread-concurrency 8192,8192,5760 --worksize 256 -g 1

but if i put there stratum+tcp://  = like :
C:\cgminer\cgminer.exe --scrypt -o stratum+tcp://middlecoin.com:3333 -u 13s2LkBUu6gQBApWb9CFwiKbMnkVSKaYwf -p 1pw --intensity 18,18,19 --gpu-fan 65,65,75 --gpu-engine 1050,1050,950 --gpu-memclock 1350,1350,1200 --thread-concurrency 8192,8192,5760 --worksize 256 -g 1

I have 0 kh/s

Agree...  H20 if there was someway you could post this each day it would be great and help us to "see" a bit clearer..

on mine, I have to add "-p x" to the end. For some reason, cgminer needs a password, even if it's not used.

adding the stratum+tcp:// makes it connect faster I believe, because it doesn't have to try the old protocol.

I just join this pool yesterday. .. And i have a question?
Is this correct ? :
C:\cgminer\cgminer.exe --scrypt -o middlecoin.com:3333 -u 13s2LkBUu6gQBApWb9CFwiKbMnkVSKaYwf    (mining on this) (but 9507 accepted  , 2517 rejected   -  last hour)

because if i put "stratum+tcp:"    like : 

C:\cgminer\cgminer.exe --scrypt -o stratum+tcp://middlecoin.com:3333 -u 13s2LkBUu6gQBApWb9CFwiKbMnkVSKaYwf

this is not working to me, I have 0 kh/s

Yeah at least we could try 256 diff.. People is having a lot of rejects..

Great poll... just got highest payout for a single day.. .

 [13-08-03 15:57:33] Stratum from pool 0 detected new block
 [2013-08-03 15:57:37] Network diff set to 43.3K
 [2013-08-03 15:57:37] Stratum from pool 0 detected new block
 [2013-08-03 15:57:42] Network diff set to 43.3K
 [2013-08-03 15:57:42] Stratum from pool 0 detected new block
 [2013-08-03 15:57:51] Network diff set to 43.3K
 [2013-08-03 15:57:51] Stratum from pool 0 detected new block
 [2013-08-03 15:57:54] Network diff set to 43.3K
 [2013-08-03 15:57:54] Stratum from pool 0 detected new block
 [2013-08-03 15:58:02] Network diff set to 43.3K
 [2013-08-03 15:58:02] Stratum from pool 0 detected new block
 [2013-08-03 15:58:08] Network diff set to 43.3K
 [2013-08-03 15:58:08] Stratum from pool 0 detected new block
 [2013-08-03 15:58:10] Network diff set to 43.3K
 [2013-08-03 15:58:10] Stratum from pool 0 detected new block
 [2013-08-03 15:58:11] Accepted c0caf223 Diff 939/512 GPU 0 pool 0
 [2013-08-03 15:58:16] Network diff set to 43.3K
 [2013-08-03 15:58:16] Stratum from pool 0 detected new block


Let's just try diff 256 or 128 for  a day just to see if it improves payouts  

I know it shouldnt matter based on propability but I just hate seeing my rig being late
submitting share when already a new block comes along.. .

Thanks. It's been fixed.

The website statistics has not been updated for 30 minutes.

Confirmed. I made 0.2229 btc/day with my 5mhs. And I want you post this information everyday so I know if my rig have any problems ! Thank you !

Congrats miners on the biggest payout yet. Over 26 BTC. Some recent news about FeatherCoin (apparently https://www.unocs.com/) had prices surge, and was mined very profitaby for hours. Due to switching miners like us, the difficulty of several coins was decreased. So when FeatherCoin's difficulty adjusted, we jumped.

In addition, there is a new coin that's been very nice to us.

We averaged 574.7 MH/s accepted + rejected for the last day, and our payout was 26.07 BTC. So our profits were 0.0454 BTC per day per MH/s. This number only includes payouts, and not immature or unexchanged balances. It is accurate over the long term (several days) but will fluctuate if only calculated on a daily basis like this.

If you're mining for more than 12 hours, there's essentially no difference between 512-diff and lower diffs. I don't see how the higher diff would warrant the work it would take.

Anyone know why the difficulty of the coin mining keeps changing like every minute right now?  Is it jumping around a lot?

Also any thoughts on why one of my cards that is doing 400 khash, would have more accepts than another card with 650 khash?  Plus my on-line hash rate is dropping.

Thanks.

JR

Agree..  I am close to 0.07 today..   

Hi H2O,

I agree with you that difficulty does not affect rejects, and it does not affect profit. The only thing that should affect rejects is how often blocks are changing, how quickly your server notifies us, and how quickly we submit shares to you.

The purpose of using a lower difficulty is to increase the accuracy that your server considers us to be working (ie, variance). As difficulty goes up, the variance between what your server considers our hashrate to be, and our actual hashrate, increases.

Over the long haul, pool difficulty is meaningless. I may get lucky and produce more 512+ difficulty shares than statistics would suggest (where my MH/s on your server would show higher than reality), or unlucky (where my MH/s on your server would show lower than reality). Over enough time, it should all even out.

As an extreme example, we could say that, over the long-haul, solo mining BTC (super high difficulty) is just as profitable as pool mining BTC (low difficulty). Probably even more profitable because there would be no pool fees. But pools exist to share the luck over many people, reducing individual variance.

So who is to say what a reasonable difficulty is that balances server load with the desire for low variance? Well obviously that's your call, and the ideal is vardiff to set low difficulty for smaller rigs and high difficulty for larger rigs. But your 512 difficulty is well out of the norm for smaller rigs.

Sidenote: I really do like your pool, I don't mean to be difficult (no pun intended). But you asked for a logical argument for lowering difficulty, so there you are