Topic: [ANN] Prometheus59 - a decentralized global blockchain-based supercomputer - page 19. (Read 3449 times)

Hello! Thank you for the question.

To add to Leila's reply, the basic plan for Q2 is listing on the first exchange (we are finished negotiating with CryptoBridge and should soon be listed); in Q3, two more exchanges are planned to appear; in Q4, one more exchange is planned. Summing up, there are plans for at least 4 exchanges until the end of the year. At the same time, as already mentioned, the team will review every opportunity that opens the project to a larger audience and fits the budget.

---

The testnet launch is planned for Q4. That will precede the mainnet launch.

Currently we have listing negotiating with CryptoBridge, and in further stages new exchanges are in plans.

The devs think they are at least close to the level of development with the btc creators. Lol is just ridiculous. Just look at the level of written code to understand who you are and what you want in this market.

What exchanges are you negotiating about listing your coin?

The site is listed, only 1 exchange. If you want to get a large community you need large exchanges

---

There is no perfect strategy. Will the creators of Prometheus59 succeed in realizing plans for a roadmap - we will see only in a year.

They promise to launch the main network in 2020 and then we will be able to understand how much their words are confirmed by deed

Masternode installation guides already available in P59 discord server in #guides section.

What are your main advantages over EOS? I am a supporter of this coin and everything suits me.

 

What are your main advantages that make me invest in your coin?

How many developers do you want to attract after launching the blockchain (PHASE I)? I know that Ethereum has more than 10,000 developers and they fail to make a supercomputer

The masternode collateral is 1000 P59. 100 P59 is a minimum for staking. The payback of the investment (ROI) will be available on any tracker, as P59 will be added there after listing.

Not all technical details are already shaped, but it’s already possible to point out to some differences of Prometheus59 and existing solutions:

1. Specific market pricing based on auction (not applied to Charity mission)

In Prometheus59, the so-called "marketplace" will have an auction element, which, in the event of a lack of capacity, will allow prioritizing the execution of tasks depending on the proposed payment (of course, prioritizing will not touch the Charity mission). This may be a win-win at the initial stages of development.

At the same time, if the price rises and there is a shortage of total computing power allocated for commercial tasks, the power providers will receive greater rewards proportionally to the amount of provided computing power.

Also, if there is a shortage of computing power in the network, a power renter (someone who needs computing power) can offer a higher price and thereby attract more users. In addition, users will be able to earn not only on the power provision but also on PoS. P59 will also have a task formalization system to process the maximum number of types of tasks suitable for distributed computing.

2. Specific way to determine payments for provided computing power

Payments will be formed depending on the total income of the system, but here is a fundamental nuance: all the resources allocated for Charity mission will be paid in the same way as resources used to solve commercial tasks. This will be good for marketing and drive more public attention.

3. Payments for the provided computing power, not a task
Instead of estimating the task itself by several parameters (which, for example, Golem does), Prometheus will take rely on computing power itself as an object of assessment. This will exclude the possible negative influence of certain task parameters, such as "timeout," when the task may remain unsolved.

When the marketplace object is a task, few possible outcomes are possible (for example: failed, timeout, rejected, accepted.) When the object of the marketplace is computing power, negative outcomes eliminated or even reduced totally. At the same time, the user only pays for the power he uses.

There is no point to create the new blockchain and project in common and not to be get listed anywhere - so the listing is announced not out of thin air. 

---

Q2 will be dedicated to marketing staff basically, such as Social Media Promotion (Discord, Twitter, YouTube, Medium, Reddit) & Bounties to Attract Audiences and Improve the Outreach, Advertising on Specialized Platforms, Listing on the First Exchange, Listing on Crypto Tracking Platforms. The development will take place as well, and in case of the earlier readiness, it will be released earlier.

since you generated the idea in Q1 can you tell us what's different from Elastic for example that has a working mainnet? Or Golem? Or SONM?

Any confirmation message from crypto-bridge that you already apply and pre-pay the exchange listing fees?

Or your just announcing an exchange listing out of thin air/?


You are developing a super computer but cannot come up with an android ,Raspberry pi wallet and IOS wallet sooner?

In next quarter of this year it is planned to develop Android, Raspberry Pi, IOS Wallets.

Soon we will be listed on CryptoBridge. The next two exchange are planned for Q3, however, we'll take advantage of decent possibilities if they appear. As you probably know, listings must hit audience, and the price must be reasonable as well. If that points intersect, the team will definitely review that.

PoS mining is a good alternative to ASICs mining, as for PoS its enough to have computer with downloaded and installed wallet, and definite amount of coins. 100 P59 is minimum amount to start PoS mining.

There is no UNICEF representatives in our team.

---

The starting price will be competitive typical market price, but it cannot be disclosed until P59 will not be listed on CryptoBridge. The staking rewards' schedule you can check on our web-page.