Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN] QIBUCK COIN - X13 - POS/POBH - 1st Proof of Baghold and asset backed. - page 54. (Read 152969 times)

legendary
Activity: 1007
Merit: 1000
Anyone on this side know why Poloniex has frozen QBK withdrawals?  Wallet seems to be working OK.  Or did I miss something somewhere?

           Thanks 
sr. member
Activity: 345
Merit: 250
https://poloniex.com/icdrequirements

Poloniex's terms and conditions for ICO/IPO/ICD. I'm sure many people aren't aware of the strict requirements.
legendary
Activity: 1960
Merit: 1022
Nice scam coin. I hope Poloniex give back the money to the users.

Said the junior member who seems to fud everything. Nice

You have only 126 of activity, i have 420 so my opinion is better than yours?
sr. member
Activity: 252
Merit: 250
what if you launch QBK-2 coin and exchange coins in ratio 2 to 1 ?
That would do nothing.  Number of coins is irrelevant.
edit: Percentage of total is the only thing that matters.
If is irrelevant, then it can not harm and can have the effect of

Sorry.  I thought you were confused and saying the dividend would increase if you changed the numbers when it's percent of total that matters.

I think 500,000 is already a low enough number and it wouldn't have much of a psychological effect if we even decreased the number to 1000 or 100, but who knows?

not very hard to do.
 the damage can not be and can be a positive effect
many coin have been through this with success  i think no less 5000 coins .  exchage 100 to 1
Thats just rediculous. 5'000 coins? No
ok. then 1 to 2 =  250 000 coins ? 

Better
sr. member
Activity: 466
Merit: 250
what if you launch QBK-2 coin and exchange coins in ratio 2 to 1 ?
That would do nothing.  Number of coins is irrelevant.
edit: Percentage of total is the only thing that matters.
If is irrelevant, then it can not harm and can have the effect of

Sorry.  I thought you were confused and saying the dividend would increase if you changed the numbers when it's percent of total that matters.

I think 500,000 is already a low enough number and it wouldn't have much of a psychological effect if we even decreased the number to 1000 or 100, but who knows?

not very hard to do.
 the damage can not be and can be a positive effect
many coin have been through this with success  i think no less 5000 coins .  exchage 100 to 1
Thats just rediculous. 5'000 coins? No
ok. then 1 to 2 =  250 000 coins ?   then >  Maximum supply: 1.000.000 (1million) QIBUCK Coin
sr. member
Activity: 252
Merit: 250
what if you launch QBK-2 coin and exchange coins in ratio 2 to 1 ?
That would do nothing.  Number of coins is irrelevant.
edit: Percentage of total is the only thing that matters.
If is irrelevant, then it can not harm and can have the effect of

Sorry.  I thought you were confused and saying the dividend would increase if you changed the numbers when it's percent of total that matters.

I think 500,000 is already a low enough number and it wouldn't have much of a psychological effect if we even decreased the number to 1000 or 100, but who knows?

not very hard to do.
 the damage can not be and can be a positive effect
many coin have been through this with success  i think no less 5000 coins .  exchage 100 to 1

Thats just rediculous. 5'000 coins? No
sr. member
Activity: 466
Merit: 250
what if you launch QBK-2 coin and exchange coins in ratio 2 to 1 ?
That would do nothing.  Number of coins is irrelevant.
edit: Percentage of total is the only thing that matters.
If is irrelevant, then it can not harm and can have the effect of

Sorry.  I thought you were confused and saying the dividend would increase if you changed the numbers when it's percent of total that matters.

I think 500,000 is already a low enough number and it wouldn't have much of a psychological effect if we even decreased the number to 1000 or 100, but who knows?

not very hard to do.
 the damage can not be and can be a positive effect
many coin have been through this with success  i think no less 5000 coins .  exchage 100 to 1
sr. member
Activity: 252
Merit: 250
Nice scam coin. I hope Poloniex give back the money to the users.

Said the junior member who seems to fud everything. Nice
hero member
Activity: 896
Merit: 500
Nice scam coin. I hope Poloniex give back the money to the users.
sr. member
Activity: 560
Merit: 252
BitcoinerX.com - PM for Ad Info
the fact is the numbers are off and this is not a "coin" software per say: it's purely a rogue BTC/pennystock offering!:\

You keep changing your argument. I notice you have not taken me up on the suggestion to contact busoni yourself.

The numbers are not off and if you would follow the money you would see that.

And at the end of the day, the crux of your initial argument is invalid. We DO NOT have direct access to the ICO funds.
full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
BTC = FREEDOM IS OUR ONLY HOPE!

Go back to that address above. See how your mouse pointer changes when it hovers over that address? That's caled a LINK.
Click it and this amazing thing happens. You can follow the money!

I know you just want to watch QBK burn - you seem to have a hardon for it, in fact, but damn. Not that you
have any particular right to it, but for anyone else who is wondering what's up with that address, here's a
screen grab of my IRC conversation w/ busoni asking for the address in the first place, and his response to me.



Make of it what you will. I have done everything I can to prove to you all that we are not holding the ICO funds
and that we have no direct access to them.

BBmodBB - I notice that you have yet to ask busoni directly. Or perhaps you did and he confirmed what we've
been saying all along. You would never post that, of course, because it would prove we were telling the truth.

Anyone - and I mean ANYONE - is more than welcome to contact busoni over at Poloniex and ask for yourselves.
I encourage it and hope you will post his response here in the thread.


the fact is the numbers are off and this is not a "coin" software per say: it's purely a rogue BTC/pennystock offering!:\
legendary
Activity: 896
Merit: 1000
what if you launch QBK-2 coin and exchange coins in ratio 2 to 1 ?

That would do nothing.  Number of coins is irrelevant.

edit: Percentage of total is the only thing that matters.
If is irrelevant, then it can not harm and can have the effect of

Sorry.  I thought you were confused and saying the dividend would increase if you changed the numbers when it's percent of total that matters.

I think 500,000 is already a low enough number and it wouldn't have much of a psychological effect if we even decreased the number to 1000 or 100, but who knows?
sr. member
Activity: 466
Merit: 250
what if you launch QBK-2 coin and exchange coins in ratio 2 to 1 ?

That would do nothing.  Number of coins is irrelevant.

edit: Percentage of total is the only thing that matters.
If is irrelevant, then it can not harm and can have the effect of
sr. member
Activity: 466
Merit: 250
what if you launch QBK-2 coin and exchange coins in ratio 2 to 1 ?

That would do nothing.  Number of coins is irrelevant.
SYNC coin 1 coin 1 btc. other coins  500mil > 1 - 20 sat
in this situation, psychological effect of doubling the investment can be significant .
who still has baghold  will be awarded this is Baghold coin
who's weak hands holder   he regrets
This is the best reward for bagholdes
legendary
Activity: 896
Merit: 1000
what if you launch QBK-2 coin and exchange coins in ratio 2 to 1 ?

That would do nothing.  Number of coins is irrelevant.

edit: Percentage of total is the only thing that matters.
sr. member
Activity: 466
Merit: 250
what if you launch QBK-2 coin and exchange coins in ratio 2 to 1 ?
sr. member
Activity: 252
Merit: 250
So you meant getting more from dividends? I thought you were trying to aim for a higher price per coin. Cheesy

Well, the point of this coin is higher dividends so if we increase the dividend potential, the price should rise.  Also, if they buy up and burn any coin at .0001, it would set a floor and increase confidence.

I think we should cast a poll then.
legendary
Activity: 896
Merit: 1000
So you meant getting more from dividends? I thought you were trying to aim for a higher price per coin. Cheesy

Well, the point of this coin is higher dividends so if we increase the dividend potential, the price should rise.  Also, if they buy up and burn any coin at .0001, it would set a floor and increase confidence.
sr. member
Activity: 252
Merit: 250
So you meant getting more from dividends? I thought you were trying to aim for a higher price per coin. Cheesy
legendary
Activity: 896
Merit: 1000
50BTC for ATM's
11.4BTC is Spent

If we spent another 25BTC, we'd only have 13BTC Left

Not much we can do with that, so how will we actually make dividends worth it?

Well, I guess we'd have to rely on the ATMs and what is spent already?  If we're not getting a return on that, I don't see how 25 more would help.  Realize that any return you got from ATMs would be doubled because the burned coins wouldn't receive a dividend.

Then why dont we hold a poll and let the community decide? I mean since you all voted for something like anonymous wallets, burning coins will probably be voted for too...

I'm fine with a poll.  Btw, I didn't vote for an anonymous wallet.  I think that's dumb (for this coin).  I still don't understand why you're not getting the math though.

Sure i get the math, but there's no 100% guarantee that it will actually happen

?

You mean that they would actually burn them?

Any coins they burned would not receive a dividend.  Any non-burned coins would have their dividend increased by the previous dividends of the burned coins.

For instance, if the dividend was 100 BTC a year (100% profit), each coin would receive (100/500,000 =) 0.0002 BTC a year.

If 25 BTC went into burning half the coins and the dividend was only 75 BTC (100% profit), each coin would receive (75/250,000 =) 0.0003 BTC a year.

If 49.999 BTC went into burning all but one of the coins and the dividend was only 50 BTC (100% profit), each coin would receive (50/1 =) 50 BTC a year.

That's just math.
Pages:
Jump to: