Nice news on the wallet but I see the blockchain is downloaded! Is this even possible to function on a phone as the blockchain grows?
I think we need a lite version.
IAS
Topic: [ANN] [QRK] Quark | Core 0.10 upgrade - page 199. (Read 1031025 times)
Good News Everyone!! Quark Mobile Wallet by Hash Engineering: Beta Release today! 
http://quarkfoundation.cc/forum/viewtopic.php?f=18&t=273&start=30#p1574
* And I will add just as I did on the other forums: Hash Engineering has been extremely fast and professional in all his/their communications, and I am so pleased and surprised that it is getting done this quickly. They have worked diligently on all aspects of this app, and kept us apprised of all updates, glitches, progress etc. I know this app is not even out yet, but if you love this app, did not donate to the 15K bounty(admittedly not much right now) and feel so inclined...You may donate to his address listed in his signature in the thread..Just a suggestion
http://quarkfoundation.cc/forum/viewtopic.php?f=18&t=273&start=30#p1574
* And I will add just as I did on the other forums: Hash Engineering has been extremely fast and professional in all his/their communications, and I am so pleased and surprised that it is getting done this quickly. They have worked diligently on all aspects of this app, and kept us apprised of all updates, glitches, progress etc. I know this app is not even out yet, but if you love this app, did not donate to the 15K bounty(admittedly not much right now) and feel so inclined...You may donate to his address listed in his signature in the thread..Just a suggestion
http://quarkfoundation.cc/forum/viewtopic.php?f=18&t=299 Released!
Please be warned, this is a very new app that we must test and test...and test again. **Use very small amounts of QRK only..
Awesome can't wait to use it. Would love to see a payment processor in works
Good News Everyone!! Quark Mobile Wallet by Hash Engineering: Beta Release today!
http://quarkfoundation.cc/forum/viewtopic.php?f=18&t=273&start=30#p1574
* And I will add just as I did on the other forums: Hash Engineering has been extremely fast and professional in all his/their communications, and I am so pleased and surprised that it is getting done this quickly. They have worked diligently on all aspects of this app, and kept us apprised of all updates, glitches, progress etc. I know this app is not even out yet, but if you love this app, did not donate to the 15K bounty(admittedly not much right now) and feel so inclined...You may donate to his address listed in his signature in the thread..Just a suggestion
http://quarkfoundation.cc/forum/viewtopic.php?f=18&t=273&start=30#p1574
* And I will add just as I did on the other forums: Hash Engineering has been extremely fast and professional in all his/their communications, and I am so pleased and surprised that it is getting done this quickly. They have worked diligently on all aspects of this app, and kept us apprised of all updates, glitches, progress etc. I know this app is not even out yet, but if you love this app, did not donate to the 15K bounty(admittedly not much right now) and feel so inclined...You may donate to his address listed in his signature in the thread..Just a suggestion
Qrk is proving it's stability in prices and it's value as a currency as opposed to gasoline (PPcoin) and gold (Bitcoin/Litecoin).
As of scrypt ASIC -- go and pre order 10 of these --
https://alpha-t.net/product/scrypt-asic-miner/
And when you loose your money, don't come complaining.
There's another scam going on --
https://litecointalk.org/index.php?topic=2702.0
Their 'IPO' just started. The board developer's only job is to respond to the investors to make them believe that he's working on it.
In fact it proves that he's not working at all.
As of scrypt ASIC -- go and pre order 10 of these --
https://alpha-t.net/product/scrypt-asic-miner/
And when you loose your money, don't come complaining.
There's another scam going on --
https://litecointalk.org/index.php?topic=2702.0
Their 'IPO' just started. The board developer's only job is to respond to the investors to make them believe that he's working on it.
In fact it proves that he's not working at all.
Think back to when BTC went ASIC, that eventually was responsible for a lot of hashing power moving to LTC.
Now we have LTC JUST starting to go ASIC. It is not as big as when BTC went ASIC (as SCRYPT won't see the huge jumps in hashing power with an ASIC), but I really think this is going to point a lot of people
looking for coins that are relatively ASIC proof. Sure an ASIC can be built for most coins but not till the price warrants that.
Quark is in a unique position for our inflation rate is extremely low relative to other coins. So, getting quark is really only feasible through
purchase and not mining. e.g. I have an AMD FX8350 going at 850kh/s and only mine 3 or so coins a day. (Not good at this price for me.)
If LTC does go the way of ASICs (as one MUST consider energy consumption here) and if Smelter progresses with Quark mining on GPU's, I wonder if that will increase interest in Quark?
The big IF is that our price needs to appreciate a bit. When that happens, things can really change dramatically.
I also look forward to a default implementation of mining on wallets (switchable, but on for 20% of CPU or so) as that will really strengthen the network.
The variables involved with Quark, mining, ASICs, price, etc. is a bit unique and I wonder how it will all play out.
Any ideas?
IAS
Now we have LTC JUST starting to go ASIC. It is not as big as when BTC went ASIC (as SCRYPT won't see the huge jumps in hashing power with an ASIC), but I really think this is going to point a lot of people
looking for coins that are relatively ASIC proof. Sure an ASIC can be built for most coins but not till the price warrants that.
Quark is in a unique position for our inflation rate is extremely low relative to other coins. So, getting quark is really only feasible through
purchase and not mining. e.g. I have an AMD FX8350 going at 850kh/s and only mine 3 or so coins a day. (Not good at this price for me.)
If LTC does go the way of ASICs (as one MUST consider energy consumption here) and if Smelter progresses with Quark mining on GPU's, I wonder if that will increase interest in Quark?
The big IF is that our price needs to appreciate a bit. When that happens, things can really change dramatically.
I also look forward to a default implementation of mining on wallets (switchable, but on for 20% of CPU or so) as that will really strengthen the network.
The variables involved with Quark, mining, ASICs, price, etc. is a bit unique and I wonder how it will all play out.
Any ideas?
IAS
Before giving you any ideas , how did the halving affect the price?
You know , we had a little debate over nothing will happen ....
I need to rub it again , after I already made my day in the doge thread , where everybody was also hoping for the reward halving to drive the prices to the moon.
If the price won't move , you won't see any miners coming to quark , just leaving.
But , the network can be sustained with only 1 miner , if he is trustworthy. Botnets... that's a different story.
It seems like you are more concerned with being right and not finding truth? Fair to say?
It appears with the price being this low and halving happening, that there is no drive to mine or increase buying of the coin.
But on a positive note, the price went up and right around that time you disappeared...
But seriously though, you are simplifying the argument, once again, I'm afraid just to be right. And the reason I say that is because your perspectives, or rather perspective, is
apparently so narrow. I'm not saying that insultingly, rather it is just the choices you give and all that you skip over. e.g. - I mentioned ASIC's and the affect they've had, you
didn't address that. And in our last talk, you did the same - picking out pieces and not going deeper.
Because ASICs for scrypt coins , won't have any impact on quark. Nothing , zero , nada. It's like thinking about how the new strawberry harvesting machines will have an impact on bananas price.
As for that price just when I was away , if I would have been online at that time I would have sold
I'm waiting for the next pump to do it.
I don't really follow your finite way of arguing. I'm here to gain perspectives, you really give the impression that you have all the answers but through that, something is missing in your argument.
BTC going to ASICs really affected LTC, at least it appears so. Now LTC is going a bit down the same path.
All I am saying is there might be an effect from that. Disagreeing with me as strongly as you want "won't have any impact on quark. Nothing , zero , nada." and giving a fruit example, isn't exactly
adding strength to your argument. I'm not saying you are wrong, but you do a poor job of proving your point. We are in uncharted waters.
Quite a few LTC people are pretty pissed about the whole ASIC thing. I'm not, even though I support LTC. More and more people are going to be driven from ASIC coins because the costs and
risks involved are just too much. Well, if buying is more profitable than mining (pretty much across the board) and Quark can pretty much only be bought, then we very well might see
more buyers coming WHEN you include all the other benefits Quark brings.
How can you skip over all that? It makes seeing your agenda a bit easy.
And what I meant regarding the price was, you disappeared when it started to go up and you were proven wrong.
Seems like your motive here, again, is not truth, it might not even be being right, but rather to spread FUD if your posts are any indication, as well as the timing.
And I am not meaning this to be a personal attack but there is something uneasy about your posts.
Best,
IAS
Think back to when BTC went ASIC, that eventually was responsible for a lot of hashing power moving to LTC.
Now we have LTC JUST starting to go ASIC. It is not as big as when BTC went ASIC (as SCRYPT won't see the huge jumps in hashing power with an ASIC), but I really think this is going to point a lot of people
looking for coins that are relatively ASIC proof. Sure an ASIC can be built for most coins but not till the price warrants that.
Quark is in a unique position for our inflation rate is extremely low relative to other coins. So, getting quark is really only feasible through
purchase and not mining. e.g. I have an AMD FX8350 going at 850kh/s and only mine 3 or so coins a day. (Not good at this price for me.)
If LTC does go the way of ASICs (as one MUST consider energy consumption here) and if Smelter progresses with Quark mining on GPU's, I wonder if that will increase interest in Quark?
The big IF is that our price needs to appreciate a bit. When that happens, things can really change dramatically.
I also look forward to a default implementation of mining on wallets (switchable, but on for 20% of CPU or so) as that will really strengthen the network.
The variables involved with Quark, mining, ASICs, price, etc. is a bit unique and I wonder how it will all play out.
Any ideas?
IAS
Now we have LTC JUST starting to go ASIC. It is not as big as when BTC went ASIC (as SCRYPT won't see the huge jumps in hashing power with an ASIC), but I really think this is going to point a lot of people
looking for coins that are relatively ASIC proof. Sure an ASIC can be built for most coins but not till the price warrants that.
Quark is in a unique position for our inflation rate is extremely low relative to other coins. So, getting quark is really only feasible through
purchase and not mining. e.g. I have an AMD FX8350 going at 850kh/s and only mine 3 or so coins a day. (Not good at this price for me.)
If LTC does go the way of ASICs (as one MUST consider energy consumption here) and if Smelter progresses with Quark mining on GPU's, I wonder if that will increase interest in Quark?
The big IF is that our price needs to appreciate a bit. When that happens, things can really change dramatically.
I also look forward to a default implementation of mining on wallets (switchable, but on for 20% of CPU or so) as that will really strengthen the network.
The variables involved with Quark, mining, ASICs, price, etc. is a bit unique and I wonder how it will all play out.
Any ideas?
IAS
Before giving you any ideas , how did the halving affect the price?
You know , we had a little debate over nothing will happen ....
I need to rub it again , after I already made my day in the doge thread , where everybody was also hoping for the reward halving to drive the prices to the moon.
If the price won't move , you won't see any miners coming to quark , just leaving.
But , the network can be sustained with only 1 miner , if he is trustworthy. Botnets... that's a different story.
It seems like you are more concerned with being right and not finding truth? Fair to say?
It appears with the price being this low and halving happening, that there is no drive to mine or increase buying of the coin.
But on a positive note, the price went up and right around that time you disappeared...
But seriously though, you are simplifying the argument, once again, I'm afraid just to be right. And the reason I say that is because your perspectives, or rather perspective, is
apparently so narrow. I'm not saying that insultingly, rather it is just the choices you give and all that you skip over. e.g. - I mentioned ASIC's and the affect they've had, you
didn't address that. And in our last talk, you did the same - picking out pieces and not going deeper.
Because ASICs for scrypt coins , won't have any impact on quark. Nothing , zero , nada. It's like thinking about how the new strawberry harvesting machines will have an impact on bananas price.
As for that price just when I was away , if I would have been online at that time I would have sold
I'm waiting for the next pump to do it.
Hey bud, any chance you could get a graph up on your site that also shows the change in Per Coin prices over specific time periods? I think Doge benefits from newbies seeing that its market cap is almost always going up, even when Per Coin prices drop.
Nice looking site!
Think back to when BTC went ASIC, that eventually was responsible for a lot of hashing power moving to LTC.
Now we have LTC JUST starting to go ASIC. It is not as big as when BTC went ASIC (as SCRYPT won't see the huge jumps in hashing power with an ASIC), but I really think this is going to point a lot of people
looking for coins that are relatively ASIC proof. Sure an ASIC can be built for most coins but not till the price warrants that.
Quark is in a unique position for our inflation rate is extremely low relative to other coins. So, getting quark is really only feasible through
purchase and not mining. e.g. I have an AMD FX8350 going at 850kh/s and only mine 3 or so coins a day. (Not good at this price for me.)
If LTC does go the way of ASICs (as one MUST consider energy consumption here) and if Smelter progresses with Quark mining on GPU's, I wonder if that will increase interest in Quark?
The big IF is that our price needs to appreciate a bit. When that happens, things can really change dramatically.
I also look forward to a default implementation of mining on wallets (switchable, but on for 20% of CPU or so) as that will really strengthen the network.
The variables involved with Quark, mining, ASICs, price, etc. is a bit unique and I wonder how it will all play out.
Any ideas?
IAS
Now we have LTC JUST starting to go ASIC. It is not as big as when BTC went ASIC (as SCRYPT won't see the huge jumps in hashing power with an ASIC), but I really think this is going to point a lot of people
looking for coins that are relatively ASIC proof. Sure an ASIC can be built for most coins but not till the price warrants that.
Quark is in a unique position for our inflation rate is extremely low relative to other coins. So, getting quark is really only feasible through
purchase and not mining. e.g. I have an AMD FX8350 going at 850kh/s and only mine 3 or so coins a day. (Not good at this price for me.)
If LTC does go the way of ASICs (as one MUST consider energy consumption here) and if Smelter progresses with Quark mining on GPU's, I wonder if that will increase interest in Quark?
The big IF is that our price needs to appreciate a bit. When that happens, things can really change dramatically.
I also look forward to a default implementation of mining on wallets (switchable, but on for 20% of CPU or so) as that will really strengthen the network.
The variables involved with Quark, mining, ASICs, price, etc. is a bit unique and I wonder how it will all play out.
Any ideas?
IAS
Before giving you any ideas , how did the halving affect the price?
You know , we had a little debate over nothing will happen ....
I need to rub it again , after I already made my day in the doge thread , where everybody was also hoping for the reward halving to drive the prices to the moon.
If the price won't move , you won't see any miners coming to quark , just leaving.
But , the network can be sustained with only 1 miner , if he is trustworthy. Botnets... that's a different story.
It seems like you are more concerned with being right and not finding truth? Fair to say?
It appears with the price being this low and halving happening, that there is no drive to mine or increase buying of the coin.
But on a positive note, the price went up and right around that time you disappeared...
But seriously though, you are simplifying the argument, once again, I'm afraid just to be right. And the reason I say that is because your perspectives, or rather perspective, is
apparently so narrow. I'm not saying that insultingly, rather it is just the choices you give and all that you skip over. e.g. - I mentioned ASIC's and the affect they've had, you
didn't address that. And in our last talk, you did the same - picking out pieces and not going deeper.
Think back to when BTC went ASIC, that eventually was responsible for a lot of hashing power moving to LTC.
Now we have LTC JUST starting to go ASIC. It is not as big as when BTC went ASIC (as SCRYPT won't see the huge jumps in hashing power with an ASIC), but I really think this is going to point a lot of people
looking for coins that are relatively ASIC proof. Sure an ASIC can be built for most coins but not till the price warrants that.
Quark is in a unique position for our inflation rate is extremely low relative to other coins. So, getting quark is really only feasible through
purchase and not mining. e.g. I have an AMD FX8350 going at 850kh/s and only mine 3 or so coins a day. (Not good at this price for me.)
If LTC does go the way of ASICs (as one MUST consider energy consumption here) and if Smelter progresses with Quark mining on GPU's, I wonder if that will increase interest in Quark?
The big IF is that our price needs to appreciate a bit. When that happens, things can really change dramatically.
I also look forward to a default implementation of mining on wallets (switchable, but on for 20% of CPU or so) as that will really strengthen the network.
The variables involved with Quark, mining, ASICs, price, etc. is a bit unique and I wonder how it will all play out.
Any ideas?
IAS
Now we have LTC JUST starting to go ASIC. It is not as big as when BTC went ASIC (as SCRYPT won't see the huge jumps in hashing power with an ASIC), but I really think this is going to point a lot of people
looking for coins that are relatively ASIC proof. Sure an ASIC can be built for most coins but not till the price warrants that.
Quark is in a unique position for our inflation rate is extremely low relative to other coins. So, getting quark is really only feasible through
purchase and not mining. e.g. I have an AMD FX8350 going at 850kh/s and only mine 3 or so coins a day. (Not good at this price for me.)
If LTC does go the way of ASICs (as one MUST consider energy consumption here) and if Smelter progresses with Quark mining on GPU's, I wonder if that will increase interest in Quark?
The big IF is that our price needs to appreciate a bit. When that happens, things can really change dramatically.
I also look forward to a default implementation of mining on wallets (switchable, but on for 20% of CPU or so) as that will really strengthen the network.
The variables involved with Quark, mining, ASICs, price, etc. is a bit unique and I wonder how it will all play out.
Any ideas?
IAS
Before giving you any ideas , how did the halving affect the price?
You know , we had a little debate over nothing will happen ....
I need to rub it again , after I already made my day in the doge thread , where everybody was also hoping for the reward halving to drive the prices to the moon.
If the price won't move , you won't see any miners coming to quark , just leaving.
But , the network can be sustained with only 1 miner , if he is trustworthy. Botnets... that's a different story.
Think back to when BTC went ASIC, that eventually was responsible for a lot of hashing power moving to LTC.
Now we have LTC JUST starting to go ASIC. It is not as big as when BTC went ASIC (as SCRYPT won't see the huge jumps in hashing power with an ASIC), but I really think this is going to point a lot of people
looking for coins that are relatively ASIC proof. Sure an ASIC can be built for most coins but not till the price warrants that.
Quark is in a unique position for our inflation rate is extremely low relative to other coins. So, getting quark is really only feasible through
purchase and not mining. e.g. I have an AMD FX8350 going at 850kh/s and only mine 3 or so coins a day. (Not good at this price for me.)
If LTC does go the way of ASICs (as one MUST consider energy consumption here) and if Smelter progresses with Quark mining on GPU's, I wonder if that will increase interest in Quark?
The big IF is that our price needs to appreciate a bit. When that happens, things can really change dramatically.
I also look forward to a default implementation of mining on wallets (switchable, but on for 20% of CPU or so) as that will really strengthen the network.
The variables involved with Quark, mining, ASICs, price, etc. is a bit unique and I wonder how it will all play out.
Any ideas?
IAS
Now we have LTC JUST starting to go ASIC. It is not as big as when BTC went ASIC (as SCRYPT won't see the huge jumps in hashing power with an ASIC), but I really think this is going to point a lot of people
looking for coins that are relatively ASIC proof. Sure an ASIC can be built for most coins but not till the price warrants that.
Quark is in a unique position for our inflation rate is extremely low relative to other coins. So, getting quark is really only feasible through
purchase and not mining. e.g. I have an AMD FX8350 going at 850kh/s and only mine 3 or so coins a day. (Not good at this price for me.)
If LTC does go the way of ASICs (as one MUST consider energy consumption here) and if Smelter progresses with Quark mining on GPU's, I wonder if that will increase interest in Quark?
The big IF is that our price needs to appreciate a bit. When that happens, things can really change dramatically.
I also look forward to a default implementation of mining on wallets (switchable, but on for 20% of CPU or so) as that will really strengthen the network.
The variables involved with Quark, mining, ASICs, price, etc. is a bit unique and I wonder how it will all play out.
Any ideas?
IAS
It would be nice to have a column with amount of coins traded / total coins mined.
It have 'Trading Volume 24H' - 1,329,615 QRK, but don't have total coins mined
It would be nice to have a column with amount of coins traded / total coins mined.
Quark on Gox
That's one place where no coins will be listed in 3 months time , not even bitcoin.
Glad i sold my litecoins, MtGox really fucked up, but once they start to add Litecoin i see other coins including Quark added. Until then Quarks infrastructure has matured and when MtGox goes first coinbase and bitstamp will follow
It's more likely MtGox will really get down this time , and they will end all trading.
They got away with the hack , with the April crash , with the pending transfers but this might really be the end.
Pradoxically end of MtGox would stabilize the prize of Bitcoin and could reverse the trend. Problems with MtGox tore bitcoin charts many times since several months. So its end could be good for Bitcoin price in this sense.
Maybe , but don't forget that most of the media will see that as one of the biggest exchanger failing , and losing clients money in the process.
There might be a better world without gox , but it's downfall will do a lot of damage and not only to bitcoin.
Quark on Gox
That's one place where no coins will be listed in 3 months time , not even bitcoin.
Glad i sold my litecoins, MtGox really fucked up, but once they start to add Litecoin i see other coins including Quark added. Until then Quarks infrastructure has matured and when MtGox goes first coinbase and bitstamp will follow
It's more likely MtGox will really get down this time , and they will end all trading.
They got away with the hack , with the April crash , with the pending transfers but this might really be the end.
Pradoxically end of MtGox would stabilize the prize of Bitcoin and could reverse the trend. Problems with MtGox tore bitcoin charts many times since several months. So its end could be good for Bitcoin price in this sense.
Quark on Gox
That's one place where no coins will be listed in 3 months time , not even bitcoin.
Glad i sold my litecoins, MtGox really fucked up, but once they start to add Litecoin i see other coins including Quark added. Until then Quarks infrastructure has matured and when MtGox goes first coinbase and bitstamp will follow
It's more likely MtGox will really get down this time , and they will end all trading.
They got away with the hack , with the April crash , with the pending transfers but this might really be the end.
Bitcoin and other alts crashing...
I'd call it a further adjustment, part of a mini-crash/adjustment. In 10 days Stamp is down 200. Not a big deal in BTC terms, LOL.
If you look at the price of the Cryptos in terms of btc (and not $$$), they are just moving with btc, perhaps slightly losing value.
Perhaps just be a bit more selective in your words, as it comes out as FUD.
Its about sharing
Bitcoin and other alts crashing...
Quark on Gox
That's one place where no coins will be listed in 3 months time , not even bitcoin.
Glad i sold my litecoins, MtGox really fucked up, but once they start to add Litecoin i see other coins including Quark added. Until then Quarks infrastructure has matured and when MtGox goes first coinbase and bitstamp will follow
Jump to: