Cool! Let us know what he says. Would be cool to get it added BEFORE the launch.
Sent him a pm, will update when he replies
Topic: [ANN] [QRK] Quark | Core 0.10 upgrade - page 62. (Read 1031025 times)
Sent him a pm, will update when he replies
I do agree with the point that being part of the blocknet will give quark maybe some exposure and expand it's community? Since quark as of right now has no active dev team, it's just max and he only maintains the code nothing more.
As I remember, Max said he might implement new ideas to the wallet if somebody has good ideas and good piece of code.
That's the thing i don't think there is someone with new ideas and a code, there is only max. Also other coins on features wise are ahead, so quark needs to come up with something new and rather not be a follower since if won't have much effect when other coins already have it. So maybe joining forces and join block net will be a good idea?
It might be, at least for marketing
But most important thing is the use value - using quark as money in real economy.
Not many shops accept Quark, but being part of the blocknet doesn't hinder Quark in using it as money though. Quark can benefit from block nets features too. If blocknet is succefull then great if it's not then quark will stay quark as it is.
The only incentive to use Quark (and thats a big one that sets Quark apart from all other coins) is ShaqFu, this project can make Quark huge if promoted correctly aswell. Until then i don't see other projects, cool features added by a 'quark dev team' so to speak. ShaqFu is also the main reason i'm holding, but it's coming late 2015 and thats so long, so in the meanwhile we can benefit from blocknet.
Cool! Let us know what he says. Would be cool to get it added BEFORE the launch.
I do agree with the point that being part of the blocknet will give quark maybe some exposure and expand it's community? Since quark as of right now has no active dev team, it's just max and he only maintains the code nothing more.
As I remember, Max said he might implement new ideas to the wallet if somebody has good ideas and good piece of code.
That's the thing i don't think there is someone with new ideas and a code, there is only max. Also other coins on features wise are ahead, so quark needs to come up with something new and rather not be a follower since if won't have much effect when other coins already have it. So maybe joining forces and join block net will be a good idea?
This is true. Quark is just sitting around getting left behind IMO. If it does not get teamed with BLOCKNET I am going to sell. I have a fair amount of quark and don't really want to sell but right now its stagnating. Who would be the person to add it to BLOCKNET?
Contact with ATCSECURE over PM, i'll send him a message
Some ideas to implement in wallet:
-block explorer
-list of shops
-chat??? i am suspicious about it cause of potentially security issues
-exchanges data and analysis
...
Some of other coins already have this.
-block explorer
-list of shops
-chat??? i am suspicious about it cause of potentially security issues
-exchanges data and analysis
...
Some of other coins already have this.
So, when is China going to buy QRK?
I do agree with the point that being part of the blocknet will give quark maybe some exposure and expand it's community? Since quark as of right now has no active dev team, it's just max and he only maintains the code nothing more.
As I remember, Max said he might implement new ideas to the wallet if somebody has good ideas and good piece of code.
That's the thing i don't think there is someone with new ideas and a code, there is only max. Also other coins on features wise are ahead, so quark needs to come up with something new and rather not be a follower since if won't have much effect when other coins already have it. So maybe joining forces and join block net will be a good idea?
This is true. Quark is just sitting around getting left behind IMO. If it does not get teamed with BLOCKNET I am going to sell. I have a fair amount of quark and don't really want to sell but right now its stagnating. Who would be the person to add it to BLOCKNET?
I do agree with the point that being part of the blocknet will give quark maybe some exposure and expand it's community? Since quark as of right now has no active dev team, it's just max and he only maintains the code nothing more.
As I remember, Max said he might implement new ideas to the wallet if somebody has good ideas and good piece of code.
That's the thing i don't think there is someone with new ideas and a code, there is only max. Also other coins on features wise are ahead, so quark needs to come up with something new and rather not be a follower since if won't have much effect when other coins already have it. So maybe joining forces and join block net will be a good idea?
It might be, at least for marketing
But most important thing is the use value - using quark as money in real economy.
I do agree with the point that being part of the blocknet will give quark maybe some exposure and expand it's community? Since quark as of right now has no active dev team, it's just max and he only maintains the code nothing more.
As I remember, Max said he might implement new ideas to the wallet if somebody has good ideas and good piece of code.
That's the thing i don't think there is someone with new ideas and a code, there is only max. Also other coins on features wise are ahead, so quark needs to come up with something new and rather not be a follower since if won't have much effect when other coins already have it. So maybe joining forces and join block net will be a good idea?
I do agree with the point that being part of the blocknet will give quark maybe some exposure and expand it's community? Since quark as of right now has no active dev team, it's just max and he only maintains the code nothing more.
As I remember, Max said he might implement new ideas to the wallet if somebody has good ideas and good piece of code.
Two questions about Blocknet :
- why it's beneficial to quark ?
- does the ITO worth it ? (it's divident ?)
- why it's beneficial to quark ?
- does the ITO worth it ? (it's divident ?)
I wouldn't invest. 99.9% of all the IPOs (and to be cute ICOs and now ITO) have been simple scams. Once BLOCKNET or SUPERNET get beyond being nothing but hot air, flowcharts, whitepapers and roadmaps then take another look.
There is no benefit to Quark only bullshit.
You could be indeed right, we can always jump on it. Best is to wait and see how far it goes since most of the coin that are on it are pretty unknown
Actually, most of the coins involved have innovations such as stealthcoin and so on. That is why they have been chosen I believe. Quark also has inovation too and should be there as well I reckon.
from the thread:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.9285952
I see a few posts that are harping on why certain coins were chosen to join Blocknet. Some are citing small marketcap blah blah blah.
Atcsecure mentioned that the development of the technology was priority. With this in mind, let us take a look at what each of the coins represented in the Blocknet Foundation have done…in no particular order.
SSD – First steganograpic anon transaction over mobile. This means that you can embed a transfer of SSD into an image that you take from your mobile and not have it traced – the image doesn’t suggest that a transaction has occurred. That is pretty freaking stout in my opinion. Development ongoing.
XST – World’s First anonymous SMS transaction. Again, a mobile transaction that is anonymous. Development ongoing (this is a theme with everyone here so I won't repeat it).
APEX – In wallet developments – everything from social networking to casinos. Aggressive dev team with an eye towards enabling web merchant transactions within their wallet.
UTIL – Content filtering to protect exit nodes from malicious and illegal content. A great business feature.
SWIFT – geoSwift, a way to GPS locate and connect sellers/buyers via mobile.
LXC – Working on BlueTooth transactions…meaning mobile transactions without internet connection. Sidechain research and implementation planned.
FIBRE – An Aggressive dev team that has already created their own OS and have integrated FibreLock (an android style password system that renders keyloggers obsolete) into a BTC Modded wallet in addition to their own.
NHZ – Asset Exchange and further expansion of NXT code.
XC – Working on some cool stuff with a dev who has proven himself through a mountain of accusations. Not sure I need to list the features and development here.
The best part of my summaries are this – it’s not comprehensive!!! It’s a miniscule aspect of what each coin has to offer and not a complete picture of what each respective coins developers are capable of. My point was to make an attempt to list a unique feature of each coin to demonstrate the very broad based level of expertise represented here. There are many talented devs here with many ‘firsts’ represented. All of them together can combine into a seamless user experience that can’t be claimed ANYWHERE. All of these features together create a potential user experience that is unrivaled and will be for some time.
The marketcap of each coin, at this time, is irrelevant to me. That is not what defines their worth. The devs are pretty stout and it is the technology that is being developed that is the main issue and what will drive their relevance.
None of the posts that I see are even focusing on what the development teams are doing. That needs to be corrected.
In fact, Blocknet has a group of talented people who will collaborate on making something that is something that Crypto has never seen before. And I think that is something that isn't being done elsewhere.
Atcsecure mentioned that the development of the technology was priority. With this in mind, let us take a look at what each of the coins represented in the Blocknet Foundation have done…in no particular order.
SSD – First steganograpic anon transaction over mobile. This means that you can embed a transfer of SSD into an image that you take from your mobile and not have it traced – the image doesn’t suggest that a transaction has occurred. That is pretty freaking stout in my opinion. Development ongoing.
XST – World’s First anonymous SMS transaction. Again, a mobile transaction that is anonymous. Development ongoing (this is a theme with everyone here so I won't repeat it).
APEX – In wallet developments – everything from social networking to casinos. Aggressive dev team with an eye towards enabling web merchant transactions within their wallet.
UTIL – Content filtering to protect exit nodes from malicious and illegal content. A great business feature.
SWIFT – geoSwift, a way to GPS locate and connect sellers/buyers via mobile.
LXC – Working on BlueTooth transactions…meaning mobile transactions without internet connection. Sidechain research and implementation planned.
FIBRE – An Aggressive dev team that has already created their own OS and have integrated FibreLock (an android style password system that renders keyloggers obsolete) into a BTC Modded wallet in addition to their own.
NHZ – Asset Exchange and further expansion of NXT code.
XC – Working on some cool stuff with a dev who has proven himself through a mountain of accusations. Not sure I need to list the features and development here.
The best part of my summaries are this – it’s not comprehensive!!! It’s a miniscule aspect of what each coin has to offer and not a complete picture of what each respective coins developers are capable of. My point was to make an attempt to list a unique feature of each coin to demonstrate the very broad based level of expertise represented here. There are many talented devs here with many ‘firsts’ represented. All of them together can combine into a seamless user experience that can’t be claimed ANYWHERE. All of these features together create a potential user experience that is unrivaled and will be for some time.
The marketcap of each coin, at this time, is irrelevant to me. That is not what defines their worth. The devs are pretty stout and it is the technology that is being developed that is the main issue and what will drive their relevance.
None of the posts that I see are even focusing on what the development teams are doing. That needs to be corrected.
In fact, Blocknet has a group of talented people who will collaborate on making something that is something that Crypto has never seen before. And I think that is something that isn't being done elsewhere.
I think contrary of you.
Coins involved in BlockNet have cool features. I don't think that features are needed for being money. Money does not need to be cool.
And I think coin market capitalization is very important. Because coins are not money.
Still.I do agree with the point that being part of the blocknet will give quark some exposure which it doesn't have and expand it's community? Since quark as of right now has no active dev team, it's just max and he only maintains the code nothing more. I think quark has nothing to lose anyway.
Two questions about Blocknet :
- why it's beneficial to quark ?
- does the ITO worth it ? (it's divident ?)
- why it's beneficial to quark ?
- does the ITO worth it ? (it's divident ?)
I wouldn't invest. 99.9% of all the IPOs (and to be cute ICOs and now ITO) have been simple scams. Once BLOCKNET or SUPERNET get beyond being nothing but hot air, flowcharts, whitepapers and roadmaps then take another look.
There is no benefit to Quark only bullshit.
You could be indeed right, we can always jump on it. Best is to wait and see how far it goes since most of the coin that are on it are pretty unknown
Actually, most of the coins involved have innovations such as stealthcoin and so on. That is why they have been chosen I believe. Quark also has inovation too and should be there as well I reckon.
from the thread:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.9285952
I see a few posts that are harping on why certain coins were chosen to join Blocknet. Some are citing small marketcap blah blah blah.
Atcsecure mentioned that the development of the technology was priority. With this in mind, let us take a look at what each of the coins represented in the Blocknet Foundation have done…in no particular order.
SSD – First steganograpic anon transaction over mobile. This means that you can embed a transfer of SSD into an image that you take from your mobile and not have it traced – the image doesn’t suggest that a transaction has occurred. That is pretty freaking stout in my opinion. Development ongoing.
XST – World’s First anonymous SMS transaction. Again, a mobile transaction that is anonymous. Development ongoing (this is a theme with everyone here so I won't repeat it).
APEX – In wallet developments – everything from social networking to casinos. Aggressive dev team with an eye towards enabling web merchant transactions within their wallet.
UTIL – Content filtering to protect exit nodes from malicious and illegal content. A great business feature.
SWIFT – geoSwift, a way to GPS locate and connect sellers/buyers via mobile.
LXC – Working on BlueTooth transactions…meaning mobile transactions without internet connection. Sidechain research and implementation planned.
FIBRE – An Aggressive dev team that has already created their own OS and have integrated FibreLock (an android style password system that renders keyloggers obsolete) into a BTC Modded wallet in addition to their own.
NHZ – Asset Exchange and further expansion of NXT code.
XC – Working on some cool stuff with a dev who has proven himself through a mountain of accusations. Not sure I need to list the features and development here.
The best part of my summaries are this – it’s not comprehensive!!! It’s a miniscule aspect of what each coin has to offer and not a complete picture of what each respective coins developers are capable of. My point was to make an attempt to list a unique feature of each coin to demonstrate the very broad based level of expertise represented here. There are many talented devs here with many ‘firsts’ represented. All of them together can combine into a seamless user experience that can’t be claimed ANYWHERE. All of these features together create a potential user experience that is unrivaled and will be for some time.
The marketcap of each coin, at this time, is irrelevant to me. That is not what defines their worth. The devs are pretty stout and it is the technology that is being developed that is the main issue and what will drive their relevance.
None of the posts that I see are even focusing on what the development teams are doing. That needs to be corrected.
In fact, Blocknet has a group of talented people who will collaborate on making something that is something that Crypto has never seen before. And I think that is something that isn't being done elsewhere.
Atcsecure mentioned that the development of the technology was priority. With this in mind, let us take a look at what each of the coins represented in the Blocknet Foundation have done…in no particular order.
SSD – First steganograpic anon transaction over mobile. This means that you can embed a transfer of SSD into an image that you take from your mobile and not have it traced – the image doesn’t suggest that a transaction has occurred. That is pretty freaking stout in my opinion. Development ongoing.
XST – World’s First anonymous SMS transaction. Again, a mobile transaction that is anonymous. Development ongoing (this is a theme with everyone here so I won't repeat it).
APEX – In wallet developments – everything from social networking to casinos. Aggressive dev team with an eye towards enabling web merchant transactions within their wallet.
UTIL – Content filtering to protect exit nodes from malicious and illegal content. A great business feature.
SWIFT – geoSwift, a way to GPS locate and connect sellers/buyers via mobile.
LXC – Working on BlueTooth transactions…meaning mobile transactions without internet connection. Sidechain research and implementation planned.
FIBRE – An Aggressive dev team that has already created their own OS and have integrated FibreLock (an android style password system that renders keyloggers obsolete) into a BTC Modded wallet in addition to their own.
NHZ – Asset Exchange and further expansion of NXT code.
XC – Working on some cool stuff with a dev who has proven himself through a mountain of accusations. Not sure I need to list the features and development here.
The best part of my summaries are this – it’s not comprehensive!!! It’s a miniscule aspect of what each coin has to offer and not a complete picture of what each respective coins developers are capable of. My point was to make an attempt to list a unique feature of each coin to demonstrate the very broad based level of expertise represented here. There are many talented devs here with many ‘firsts’ represented. All of them together can combine into a seamless user experience that can’t be claimed ANYWHERE. All of these features together create a potential user experience that is unrivaled and will be for some time.
The marketcap of each coin, at this time, is irrelevant to me. That is not what defines their worth. The devs are pretty stout and it is the technology that is being developed that is the main issue and what will drive their relevance.
None of the posts that I see are even focusing on what the development teams are doing. That needs to be corrected.
In fact, Blocknet has a group of talented people who will collaborate on making something that is something that Crypto has never seen before. And I think that is something that isn't being done elsewhere.
I think contrary of you.
Coins involved in BlockNet have cool features. I don't think that features are needed for being money. Money does not need to be cool.
And I think coin market capitalization is very important. Because coins are not money.
Still.Two questions about Blocknet :
- why it's beneficial to quark ?
- does the ITO worth it ? (it's divident ?)
- why it's beneficial to quark ?
- does the ITO worth it ? (it's divident ?)
I wouldn't invest. 99.9% of all the IPOs (and to be cute ICOs and now ITO) have been simple scams. Once BLOCKNET or SUPERNET get beyond being nothing but hot air, flowcharts, whitepapers and roadmaps then take another look.
There is no benefit to Quark only bullshit.
You could be indeed right, we can always jump on it. Best is to wait and see how far it goes since most of the coin that are on it are pretty unknown
Actually, most of the coins involved have innovations such as stealthcoin and so on. That is why they have been chosen I believe. Quark also has inovation too and should be there as well I reckon.
from the thread:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.9285952
I see a few posts that are harping on why certain coins were chosen to join Blocknet. Some are citing small marketcap blah blah blah.
Atcsecure mentioned that the development of the technology was priority. With this in mind, let us take a look at what each of the coins represented in the Blocknet Foundation have done…in no particular order.
SSD – First steganograpic anon transaction over mobile. This means that you can embed a transfer of SSD into an image that you take from your mobile and not have it traced – the image doesn’t suggest that a transaction has occurred. That is pretty freaking stout in my opinion. Development ongoing.
XST – World’s First anonymous SMS transaction. Again, a mobile transaction that is anonymous. Development ongoing (this is a theme with everyone here so I won't repeat it).
APEX – In wallet developments – everything from social networking to casinos. Aggressive dev team with an eye towards enabling web merchant transactions within their wallet.
UTIL – Content filtering to protect exit nodes from malicious and illegal content. A great business feature.
SWIFT – geoSwift, a way to GPS locate and connect sellers/buyers via mobile.
LXC – Working on BlueTooth transactions…meaning mobile transactions without internet connection. Sidechain research and implementation planned.
FIBRE – An Aggressive dev team that has already created their own OS and have integrated FibreLock (an android style password system that renders keyloggers obsolete) into a BTC Modded wallet in addition to their own.
NHZ – Asset Exchange and further expansion of NXT code.
XC – Working on some cool stuff with a dev who has proven himself through a mountain of accusations. Not sure I need to list the features and development here.
The best part of my summaries are this – it’s not comprehensive!!! It’s a miniscule aspect of what each coin has to offer and not a complete picture of what each respective coins developers are capable of. My point was to make an attempt to list a unique feature of each coin to demonstrate the very broad based level of expertise represented here. There are many talented devs here with many ‘firsts’ represented. All of them together can combine into a seamless user experience that can’t be claimed ANYWHERE. All of these features together create a potential user experience that is unrivaled and will be for some time.
The marketcap of each coin, at this time, is irrelevant to me. That is not what defines their worth. The devs are pretty stout and it is the technology that is being developed that is the main issue and what will drive their relevance.
None of the posts that I see are even focusing on what the development teams are doing. That needs to be corrected.
In fact, Blocknet has a group of talented people who will collaborate on making something that is something that Crypto has never seen before. And I think that is something that isn't being done elsewhere.
Atcsecure mentioned that the development of the technology was priority. With this in mind, let us take a look at what each of the coins represented in the Blocknet Foundation have done…in no particular order.
SSD – First steganograpic anon transaction over mobile. This means that you can embed a transfer of SSD into an image that you take from your mobile and not have it traced – the image doesn’t suggest that a transaction has occurred. That is pretty freaking stout in my opinion. Development ongoing.
XST – World’s First anonymous SMS transaction. Again, a mobile transaction that is anonymous. Development ongoing (this is a theme with everyone here so I won't repeat it).
APEX – In wallet developments – everything from social networking to casinos. Aggressive dev team with an eye towards enabling web merchant transactions within their wallet.
UTIL – Content filtering to protect exit nodes from malicious and illegal content. A great business feature.
SWIFT – geoSwift, a way to GPS locate and connect sellers/buyers via mobile.
LXC – Working on BlueTooth transactions…meaning mobile transactions without internet connection. Sidechain research and implementation planned.
FIBRE – An Aggressive dev team that has already created their own OS and have integrated FibreLock (an android style password system that renders keyloggers obsolete) into a BTC Modded wallet in addition to their own.
NHZ – Asset Exchange and further expansion of NXT code.
XC – Working on some cool stuff with a dev who has proven himself through a mountain of accusations. Not sure I need to list the features and development here.
The best part of my summaries are this – it’s not comprehensive!!! It’s a miniscule aspect of what each coin has to offer and not a complete picture of what each respective coins developers are capable of. My point was to make an attempt to list a unique feature of each coin to demonstrate the very broad based level of expertise represented here. There are many talented devs here with many ‘firsts’ represented. All of them together can combine into a seamless user experience that can’t be claimed ANYWHERE. All of these features together create a potential user experience that is unrivaled and will be for some time.
The marketcap of each coin, at this time, is irrelevant to me. That is not what defines their worth. The devs are pretty stout and it is the technology that is being developed that is the main issue and what will drive their relevance.
None of the posts that I see are even focusing on what the development teams are doing. That needs to be corrected.
In fact, Blocknet has a group of talented people who will collaborate on making something that is something that Crypto has never seen before. And I think that is something that isn't being done elsewhere.
Two questions about Blocknet :
- why it's beneficial to quark ?
- does the ITO worth it ? (it's divident ?)
- why it's beneficial to quark ?
- does the ITO worth it ? (it's divident ?)
I wouldn't invest. 99.9% of all the IPOs (and to be cute ICOs and now ITO) have been simple scams. Once BLOCKNET or SUPERNET get beyond being nothing but hot air, flowcharts, whitepapers and roadmaps then take another look.
There is no benefit to Quark only bullshit.
You could be indeed right, we can always jump on it. Best is to wait and see how far it goes since most of the coin that are on it are pretty unknown
Two questions about Blocknet :
- why it's beneficial to quark ?
- does the ITO worth it ? (it's divident ?)
- why it's beneficial to quark ?
- does the ITO worth it ? (it's divident ?)
I wouldn't invest. 99.9% of all the IPOs (and to be cute ICOs and now ITO) have been simple scams. Once BLOCKNET or SUPERNET get beyond being nothing but hot air, flowcharts, whitepapers and roadmaps then take another look.
There is no benefit to Quark only bullshit.
Two questions about Blocknet :
- why it's beneficial to quark ?
- does the ITO worth it ? (it's divident ?)
- why it's beneficial to quark ?
- does the ITO worth it ? (it's divident ?)
The benefits to quark or any other coin he answered in the 2nd question, also another benefit i think quark can use the features of blocknet aswell
what is ITO?
I found: Initial Token Offering
Same as ICO = Initial Coin Offering
Same as IPO = Initial Public Offering
Two questions about Blocknet :
- why it's beneficial to quark ?
- does the ITO worth it ? (it's divident ?)
- why it's beneficial to quark ?
- does the ITO worth it ? (it's divident ?)
So BLOCKNET is a copy of SUPERNET? 
Can we get quark signed up with BLOCKNET? Its an amazing idea. Lets not get left behind: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/annblocknet-truly-decentralized-exchange-token-ecosystem-infrastructure-829576
I got the following answers form Blocknets OP:
Q - Can other coins, like Quark be added?
Quote
Yes other coins are welcome to join. By all means, make contact with ATCSECURE over PM.
It is more likely that other coins will be added after the ITO than before, but it's worth a try anyway.
It is more likely that other coins will be added after the ITO than before, but it's worth a try anyway.
Q - Can you elaborate in short what advantages and disadvantages (if any) it would give to a coin (this case Quark) if it would be part of the Blocknet?
Quote
- The Blocknet massively expands a coin’s user base. It is analogous to a product’s reach once it has a retail website, versus before it has one.
- The Blocknet is a revenue-generating platform for cryptocurrencies to offer their services.
- The above two factors significantly increase the use-value of a coin, and, by implication, will significantly increase its price.
Also, the Blocknet does not "take" any features away from participating coins. It's simply a platform for coins to convert their tech into usable services.
- The Blocknet is a revenue-generating platform for cryptocurrencies to offer their services.
- The above two factors significantly increase the use-value of a coin, and, by implication, will significantly increase its price.
Also, the Blocknet does not "take" any features away from participating coins. It's simply a platform for coins to convert their tech into usable services.
Sounds good, what do you guys think?
Jump to: