Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN] [QRK] Quark | Core 0.10 upgrade - page 65. (Read 1031025 times)

hero member
Activity: 868
Merit: 1000
October 12, 2014, 10:28:33 AM

I am not satisfied to see Quark in the company of names as: Smiley

LiteCoinDark,
ShadowCash
CloakCoin
VertCoin
ViaCoin
Fibre
...



It's ranked higher than these coins
sr. member
Activity: 294
Merit: 250
★777Coin.com★ Fun BTC Casino!
October 12, 2014, 09:34:09 AM
Hi guys. Please join the growing list and list Quark on the new CoinBlab crypto social network: http://coinblab.com

Here is an example page: http://coinblab.com/page/dogecoin

CoinBlab also has groups, events, blogs, and IM! Also create an account and secure your username first too!
hero member
Activity: 1470
Merit: 608
Vave.com - Crypto Casino
October 12, 2014, 09:21:08 AM

I am not satisfied to see Quark in the company of names as: Smiley

LiteCoinDark,
ShadowCash
CloakCoin
VertCoin
ViaCoin
Fibre
...

hero member
Activity: 868
Merit: 1000
October 12, 2014, 04:58:34 AM
notice our price is always bid?

what?

Quote
There is no hurry here.

what?

Quote
The pressure is on the other side, every day they lose more and are forced into some sort of action

what?

Quote
Meanwhile the Crypto currency groups are being defined and merging together.

what?

Quote
Quark is listed for a lot of different product it will probably be in a group.

what?

Just stop posting

hero member
Activity: 798
Merit: 1000
‘Try to be nice’
October 11, 2014, 11:05:53 PM
Poor netox you are either a victim or a participant, great progress is actually being made notice our price is always bid?

People general ignore this thread because these idiots are chatting to themselves.

There is no hurry here.

The pressure is on the other side, every day they lose more and are forced into some sort of action
Meanwhile the Crypto currency groups are being defined and merging together.

Quark is listed for a lot of different product it will probably be in a group.



legendary
Activity: 2044
Merit: 1008
October 11, 2014, 02:06:30 PM




What I experienced was that the developers didn't listen to the foundation or community.
The developers could only be contacted by one person: Kolin.
Even simple questions were never answered by Max unless you asked the questions via Kolin.

That is why Victor has chosen to cooperate with Kolin. Victor realized that was the only way to get contact with Max and get things done for Quark.


I think that you need to point out that this was a misconception because it wasn't true that Max couldn't be contacted only by Kolin - that's only what Kolin made it look like: as if he had a special contact to him. Particularly because Max didn't answer mails for like at least half a year. We found out later from Max that in fact he thinks Kolin is a weirdo.

Anyway it is true that Victor cooperated with Kolin because of this misconception. Kolin likes to state that he is some sort of nodal point ib the community and many - including me - believed that. Others still believe it. He will deceive more people with his sick behaviour sobI think it us good to point it out again and again and do some research just like Orm does.

Thanks!

Max indeed clarified this is a misconception during the last IRC meeting (and an e-mail, which was published at reddit). I hope that it is true and Max will show that he listens more to people from the community :-)
For me words alone are not enough.


The days where Kolin had some control over Quark like he did back then are over. The community woke up and agreed on his bann from Quarks subreddit, this was also brought to the attention of Crypto members outside the Quark community. His greed and games cost him to lose his reputation and i think Max is aware of this aswell. As Max stated he is open for new ideas and would grant access to the code if they are supported by the community, he only said that he has limited time for it and only will maintain the code. So things doesn't have to go through kolin at all.

Meanwhile Quark is still in top 20 and above hundred of other coins including

Anoncoin
Reddcoin
Cloakcoin
Vertcoin
Myriadcoin
Qora
Stealthcoin
Feathercoin
Primecoin
Zetacoin
Novacoin
Viacoin
Vericoin
Maxcoin
Worldcoin
Megacoin
LitecoinDark
Terracoin
Fibre
Shadowcash
Digitalcoin

I wish we all could regroup again and put history behind and work on this baby, because it is a pretty special Crypto and a fair price to get in to make some gains financially aswell. Maok joined and has done a good job maintaining the Quark brand so kudos to him.

I got an e-mail from Vic aka mcphervi where he gave me the registration e-mail with shaqfu perks so that i can get access to shaqfus members area to promote quark amongst gamers and give new ideas for the game (quark related) So if anyone wants to support this or has new suggestion for the game they need to buy a perk first to get access to the forum. Perks are pretty cheap i believe from $5 or $15 and up. Would be nice to have couple of us showing some presents at their forum. The game goes live late next year.
hero member
Activity: 487
Merit: 500
October 11, 2014, 01:12:33 PM




What I experienced was that the developers didn't listen to the foundation or community.
The developers could only be contacted by one person: Kolin.
Even simple questions were never answered by Max unless you asked the questions via Kolin.

That is why Victor has chosen to cooperate with Kolin. Victor realized that was the only way to get contact with Max and get things done for Quark.


I think that you need to point out that this was a misconception because it wasn't true that Max couldn't be contacted only by Kolin - that's only what Kolin made it look like: as if he had a special contact to him. Particularly because Max didn't answer mails for like at least half a year. We found out later from Max that in fact he thinks Kolin is a weirdo.

Anyway it is true that Victor cooperated with Kolin because of this misconception. Kolin likes to state that he is some sort of nodal point ib the community and many - including me - believed that. Others still believe it. He will deceive more people with his sick behaviour sobI think it us good to point it out again and again and do some research just like Orm does.

Thanks!

Max indeed clarified this is a misconception during the last IRC meeting (and an e-mail, which was published at reddit). I hope that it is true and Max will show that he listens more to people from the community :-)
For me words alone are not enough.

EDIT: and as long as Adam (the developer of Quark) is tweeting this
@Kolin_Quark hahaha interesting thread; if only they knew, if only. https://twitter.com/Kolin_Quark/status/519637122475511810
(Scroll the tweets in the link provided)

Then I think we need to find out something what we still don't know.
sr. member
Activity: 396
Merit: 250
October 11, 2014, 11:32:24 AM




What I experienced was that the developers didn't listen to the foundation or community.
The developers could only be contacted by one person: Kolin.
Even simple questions were never answered by Max unless you asked the questions via Kolin.

That is why Victor has chosen to cooperate with Kolin. Victor realized that was the only way to get contact with Max and get things done for Quark.


I think that you need to point out that this was a misconception because it wasn't true that Max couldn't be contacted only by Kolin - that's only what Kolin made it look like: as if he had a special contact to him. Particularly because Max didn't answer mails for like at least half a year. We found out later from Max that in fact he thinks Kolin is a weirdo.

Anyway it is true that Victor cooperated with Kolin because of this misconception. Kolin likes to state that he is some sort of nodal point ib the community and many - including me - believed that. Others still believe it. He will deceive more people with his sick behaviour sobI think it us good to point it out again and again and do some research just like Orm does.
hero member
Activity: 487
Merit: 500
October 11, 2014, 11:19:29 AM



As long as I don't know the truth about Quark (who is really controlling Quark (is it decentralized or one person??))
I'm sorry but this doesn't make any sense, controlling Quark ? From what perspective? protocol/market/socially?? Please do search for the truth but so far you only spread theories which are almost or as worst as that Kkk scammer conspiracy theories about Bitcoin...

Maybe explain this a little bit.
I can only talk from my own experience.
Some background: I was never a member of the foundation, but I had very close contacts with the foundation.
What I experienced was that the developers didn't listen to the foundation or community.
The developers could only be contacted by one person: Kolin.
Even simple questions were never answered by Max unless you asked the questions via Kolin.

That is why Victor has chosen to cooperate with Kolin. Victor realized that was the only way to get contact with Max and get things done for Quark.

To my opinion this is not a decentralized way of working for Quark.

If that is different now, then that is a big move forward for Quark :-)
sr. member
Activity: 392
Merit: 250
October 11, 2014, 10:14:38 AM

Let's just get this all out in the open , deal with it and then forget about it. The origins of the coin and those involved are not all that important at this stage to me. I feel that whatever the start only a few well known hash whales that had bots monitoring the board grabbed it all up and then lost interest and dumped. DI told bill, he brought in a ton of investors, they grabbed a little of each and sit on it. There is not much for sale. Little sells and buys make the price fluctuate a lot. The vast majority never comes near the market.

That's your opinion and I respect that. You can always ignore me just like "maok" is doing if you are irritated by my posts.
I don't react on comments from sockpuppets of DI (like "nixon99" and "Hilux74")
As long as I don't know the truth about Quark (who is really controlling Quark (is it decentralized or one person??))

I haven' ignored you, but I asked politely not to quote scammer's posts.

Like cryptohunter I don't understand what you are trying to accomplish, some of your points have been refuted, like the big purse holders doing 100K transactions(turned out to be exchanges) or the mining from day 1(turned out that anybody could mine); while the rest of your points have never been proven like `sockpuppets`(we couldn't because we don't have access to btctalk logs or reddit logs..)

As for shakezula he helped Max in the initial phase of Quark and from there on Max has admitted to be involved in development of other coins as well but like you know very well from the chats few months ago Max stated that he will continue to support Quark and has done so until now. Quark may have got the initial idea of multiple hashing from Sifcoin(you can read that in Max interview as well) but has implemented the extra 3 random algos which is what makes Quark unique. Later on Max also implemented protection against double spends attacks and has maintained and is continually upgrading the code.


As long as I don't know the truth about Quark (who is really controlling Quark (is it decentralized or one person??))
I'm sorry but this doesn't make any sense, controlling Quark ? From what perspective? protocol/market/socially?? Please do search for the truth but so far you only spread theories which are almost or as worst as that Kkk scammer conspiracy theories about Bitcoin...
sr. member
Activity: 392
Merit: 250
October 11, 2014, 09:41:58 AM

Why is the content of website http://www.quarktalk.cc/ partially closed for public? (without logging in)

This is not good practice.



Which part is closed? When i'm logged out i can still see all sections (quark talk, quark core, intentional and other)

It seems Project  Development section only.
Its not closed, anyone interested can participate and thats the point of that category.
hero member
Activity: 1470
Merit: 608
Vave.com - Crypto Casino
October 11, 2014, 08:41:20 AM

Why is the content of website http://www.quarktalk.cc/ partially closed for public? (without logging in)

This is not good practice.



Which part is closed? When i'm logged out i can still see all sections (quark talk, quark core, intentional and other)

It seems Project  Development section only.

hero member
Activity: 487
Merit: 500
October 11, 2014, 08:35:06 AM


This is all very interesting but really what are we trying to demonstrate here?
Read the posts of "digitalindustry". He tells you these answers. https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.9162675


Can you just spell out your hypothesis here so we can analyse it once and for all? I'm not saying you're correct or incorrect.
No I jumped into conclusions too fast in the past. I have learned from that, and still make mistakes sometimes.
For example "r3wt" is indeed present in the beginning but he is not the scammer as outlined by "igotaids".  Accountname "reb0rn21" (whoever that was, but I have my thoughts) was the scammer from day 1.

QRK started as a scam? and those involved were somehow got unfair advantage?  - i don't think even if that was the intention it worked out like that.


I think other people had different thoughts about that: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.2774780
--> to me this sounds like "mining monopoly" and who is screaming that he hates mining monopoly so much?
I read the posts of DI differently, because I know he likes to do self reflection. (telling that I am a troll, but in fact he is the troll etc)

But this link doesn't proof anything. Still seems that pretty much people (including you) could mine Quark from day 1.

All of this seems fairly improbable since stephen lamb took more or less the vast majority of easy coins along with a couple of other hash whales. These people to my knowledge dumped them all pretty soon after,reducing the price to arond 60 sats and keeping it down below 200 sats for some time.
Maybe you are right. It's one of the things I try to find out.


Let's just get this all out in the open , deal with it and then forget about it. The origins of the coin and those involved are not all that important at this stage to me. I feel that whatever the start only a few well known hash whales that had bots monitoring the board grabbed it all up and then lost interest and dumped. DI told bill, he brought in a ton of investors, they grabbed a little of each and sit on it. There is not much for sale. Little sells and buys make the price fluctuate a lot. The vast majority never comes near the market.

That's your opinion and I respect that. You can always ignore me just like "maok" is doing if you are irritated by my posts.
For example I try not to react on comments from sockpuppets of DI (like "nixon99" and "Hilux74")

Oh and don't get me wrong. I liked the videos of Bill still very much because I had bought my Quark before Bill Still was promoting it. I experienced it as a very well marketing strategy.
The low sell orders are very worrisome (to me). Maybe you are correct that the vast majority never comes to the market, but as long as you can't do much more with Quark other than speculating at exchanges I don't really believe that.

How's the steam games project going?


As long as I don't know the truth about Quark (who is really controlling Quark (is it decentralized or one person??)), I am not involved in any Quark projects. Best is to ask maok or macduro.
legendary
Activity: 2044
Merit: 1008
October 11, 2014, 08:08:02 AM

Why is the content of website http://www.quarktalk.cc/ partially closed for public? (without logging in)

This is not good practice.



Which part is closed? When i'm logged out i can still see all sections (quark talk, quark core, intentional and other)
hero member
Activity: 1470
Merit: 608
Vave.com - Crypto Casino
October 11, 2014, 06:28:53 AM


ha it's like watching one of those little ant farms.

Some more to watch for you:

If someone still was in doubt whether Kolin was not aware about Quark or mining Quark from day 1:

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.2777607

Also see that "Spoetnik" was interested in Quark just one post after Kolin lol

This is all very interesting but really what are we trying to demonstrate here?


Can you just spell out your hypothesis here so we can analyse it once and for all? I'm not saying you're correct or incorrect.

QRK started as a scam? and those involved were somehow got unfair advantage?  - i don't think even if that was the intention it worked out like that.

All of this seems fairly improbable since stephen lamb took more or less the vast majority of easy coins along with a couple of other hash whales. These people to my knowledge dumped them all pretty soon after,reducing the price to arond 60 sats and keeping it down below 200 sats for some time.

Let's just get this all out in the open , deal with it and then forget about it. The origins of the coin and those involved are not all that important at this stage to me. I feel that whatever the start only a few well known hash whales that had bots monitoring the board grabbed it all up and then lost interest and dumped. DI told bill, he brought in a ton of investors, they grabbed a little of each and sit on it. There is not much for sale. Little sells and buys make the price fluctuate a lot. The vast majority never comes near the market.

How's the steam games project going?




I remember that at the beginning of the Quark there was attempts to steal Quarks from miners or  careless wallet owners. Some thief(ves) made fake wallet in order to steal Quarkcoins.

This does not mean Quark is scam at all.

Unfortunately I have involved in mining Quarks after few months, not from beginning.

legendary
Activity: 2100
Merit: 1167
MY RED TRUST LEFT BY SCUMBAGS - READ MY SIG
October 11, 2014, 06:20:32 AM


ha it's like watching one of those little ant farms.

Some more to watch for you:

If someone still was in doubt whether Kolin was not aware about Quark or mining Quark from day 1:

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.2777607

Also see that "Spoetnik" was interested in Quark just one post after Kolin lol

This is all very interesting but really what are we trying to demonstrate here?


Can you just spell out your hypothesis here so we can analyse it once and for all? I'm not saying you're correct or incorrect.

QRK started as a scam? and those involved were somehow got unfair advantage?  - i don't think even if that was the intention it worked out like that.

All of this seems fairly improbable since stephen lamb took more or less the vast majority of easy coins along with a couple of other hash whales. These people to my knowledge dumped them all pretty soon after,reducing the price to arond 60 sats and keeping it down below 200 sats for some time.

Let's just get this all out in the open , deal with it and then forget about it. The origins of the coin and those involved are not all that important at this stage to me. I feel that whatever the start only a few well known hash whales that had bots monitoring the board grabbed it all up and then lost interest and dumped. DI told bill, he brought in a ton of investors, they grabbed a little of each and sit on it. There is not much for sale. Little sells and buys make the price fluctuate a lot. The vast majority never comes near the market.

How's the steam games project going?

hero member
Activity: 1470
Merit: 608
Vave.com - Crypto Casino
October 11, 2014, 06:19:22 AM

Why is the content of website http://www.quarktalk.cc/ partially closed for public? (without logging in)

This is not good practice.

hero member
Activity: 798
Merit: 1000
‘Try to be nice’
October 11, 2014, 06:10:54 AM


ha it's like watching one of those little ant farms.

Some more to watch for you:

If someone still was in doubt whether Kolin was not aware about Quark or mining Quark from day 1:

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.2777607

Also see that "Spoetnik" was interested in Quark just one post after Kolin lol

yep i own the whole quark market its all me - also i'm the time traveler that Satoshi wished he was.

because I set that comment up to look like i thought it was an instamine - see how smart i am?

so as a result i own all the Quark in existence, I cloned Bill Still , (the real Bill is still alive he's in a different star system) (this explains his reluctance to talk about Quark) (I control this Bills mind)

I also then mind controlled all his supporters.

and just think,  i would have gotten away with it as well if it wasn't for "silvermetal" the guy that couldn't get a job so applied to troll the internet.

you have changed the world.
hero member
Activity: 487
Merit: 500
October 11, 2014, 05:58:04 AM


ha it's like watching one of those little ant farms.

Some more to watch for you:

If someone still was in doubt whether Kolin was not aware about Quark or mining Quark from day 1:

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.2777607

Also see that "Spoetnik" was interested in Quark just one post after Kolin lol
legendary
Activity: 2100
Merit: 1167
MY RED TRUST LEFT BY SCUMBAGS - READ MY SIG
October 11, 2014, 05:49:58 AM
I think Quark is still doing pretty impressive with being a top 20 coin (counting non mineable coins and IPO aswell) after so many coins have been released. Still higher ranked than;

Anoncoin
Reddcoin
Cloakcoin
Vertcoin
Myriadcoin
Qora
Stealthcoin
Feathercoin
Primecoin
Zetacoin
Novacoin
Viacoin
Vericoin
Maxcoin
Worldcoin
Megacoin
LitecoinDark
Terracoin
Fibre
Shadowcash
Digitalcoin and many others and just around 0.00005 it would bet at top 10, but i wanna see ATH  Smiley

qrk is very stable due to the fact most investors will not sell for years or until they turn a profit on their 20k sats buy in. If we had some ongoing projects and reasons to buy in  you would see prices quickly climb.
Pages:
Jump to: