Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN] [QRK] Quark | Core 0.10 upgrade - page 81. (Read 1031025 times)

hero member
Activity: 798
Merit: 1000
‘Try to be nice’
September 09, 2014, 01:46:50 AM

Can KJO be banned from this forum? His inflammatory posts are unwelcome.

DigitalIndustry might be eccentric and annoy the hell out of many people, but he makes many excellent points. He is also, unlike KJO, a supporter of QRK.


The guy doesn't even have a single negative feedback and you want him banned [from the from the entire forum] cause his posts are unwelcome from your perspective?

Do you get this butthurt often?  Is your mangina always this sore?

This isn't Red China, Bitcointalk is not communist - this forum is American where people have something called freedom of speech so we apologize if you're offended and your feelers are hurt over some guy posting his differing opinion.

FYI:  There's a nice ignore button, obviously for advanced users with some form of critical thinking so when you reach that offer of smart - feel free to push that ignore button everytime you're feeling extra buttthurt by someone's Natural Rights.

Until then, try not to overdose and die on stupidity.

Peace!

Kjo and team "salt trolls" don't believe in about freedom, they work directly for Debt money institutions, they believe that humans should not be free.

in a word they are the scum of the earth. little more than parasites, they want you to pay tax and work for them.

they don't believe in debt free money, and they don't believe that humans should have money that is not issued by a central authority into debt.

in essence they want you to be a slave.

but its all falling apart, they think by trolling here or there that they can make any difference.

they really are just as i stated unemployed former car park trolley pushers, that got fired from that job.
legendary
Activity: 3052
Merit: 1534
www.ixcoin.net
September 09, 2014, 01:25:32 AM

Can KJO be banned from this forum? His inflammatory posts are unwelcome.

DigitalIndustry might be eccentric and annoy the hell out of many people, but he makes many excellent points. He is also, unlike KJO, a supporter of QRK.


The guy doesn't even have a single negative feedback and you want him banned [from the from the entire forum] cause his posts are unwelcome from your perspective?

Do you get this butthurt often?  Is your mangina always this sore?

This isn't Red China, Bitcointalk is not communist - this forum is American where people have something called freedom of speech so we apologize if you're offended and your feelers are hurt over some guy posting his differing opinion.

FYI:  There's a nice ignore button, obviously for advanced users with some form of critical thinking so when you reach that offer of smart - feel free to push that ignore button everytime you're feeling extra buttthurt by someone's Natural Rights.

Until then, try not to overdose and die on stupidity.

Peace!
KJO
full member
Activity: 173
Merit: 100
September 09, 2014, 12:49:51 AM
Can KJO be banned from this forum? His inflammatory posts are unwelcome.

DigitalIndustry might be eccentric and annoy the hell out of many people, but he makes many excellent points. He is also, unlike KJO, a supporter of QRK.

You misunderstand me completely Cricket. At one time I held quite a few quarks and I continue to support it completely. I remain bullish on its interesting fundamentals and feel it is a great coin with a fair launch. My problem is not with quark or any of its supporters. My issues are with Kolin Evans. The way he speaks to holders and the extremely bad karma he has imprinted upon Quark is beyond disturbing.

I've come to my senses and wish to apologize to this community for stooping to kolin's level. I've edited my posts because I was in poor taste.

I watched the birth of quark. I was there during the meteoric rise. I watched incredible people like Coinmama, James, Vic, QuarkFX, Flatlands, QuarkCheck, etc, and many many more come into this community and make it a "brand" and not just a coin.

I watched the crash and held.

The more the price dropped, the more I bought.

Then I became aware of kolin's ways and his "evil sick vibe" (as quoted from a BTC whale I brought to quark's door who refused to buy after researching kolin's "public face".

Dumb money invests in coins. Smart money invests in people. It is so true.

It makes me sick to even indirectly support kolin evans so I began selling off qrk for every instance in which he exhibited unethical and/or immoral behavior not conducive to quark's reputation and community.

Today I have none left, lol.

It is the only way this can be. I call it the "Kolin Evans Effect"...I can't hold a coin with kolin evans' evil energy nor the burden of his psychological baggage on it because the weight of his actions, as the public face of quark, have a major impact on the morale and environment and thus the statistical probability of quark's success or failure.

The way he belittles and insults core holders is demonic and makes me cringe. I think about all the future potential quark buyers googling to find kolin here ready and waiting to call any of them who dares to think differently or ask questions, a "troll". It won't be long before you understand this. It is a well established pattern.

Quark is 100% community driven. The community members are the fundamentals of quark. kolin evans shits on all their faces and eventually he will shit on yours, gladly.

So when you tell me I don't support quark, well I laugh and then I abruptly give you the back of my hand sir and ask you what exactly you know about me or the list of things I have done and donated to quark.  You don't know shit.

I am a quark supporter and always have been. I am just trying to remove this cancer tumor from the body so it can begin the healing process.




 





hero member
Activity: 1470
Merit: 608
Vave.com - Crypto Casino
September 08, 2014, 09:51:46 PM

What does it mean Quark distribution for Quark community?

Boring days and I need to learn something. Maybe something new?

sr. member
Activity: 392
Merit: 250
September 08, 2014, 12:42:05 PM
Interesting work done by bronevik announced on Quark reddit, he developed a method to link lots of addresses to a single entity and can apply this algorithm on other coins as well. You might want to check it out: http://www.reddit.com/r/QuarkCoin/comments/2fl460/im_building_an_entityanalysis_service_for_quark/

and other stats regarding Quark vs Bitcoin(we don't look so good, only 8% unique addresses vs 59% bitcoin):
http://www.reddit.com/r/QuarkCoin/comments/2fqxfm/just_made_full_sql_base_of_quark_transactions/
http://www.reddit.com/r/QuarkCoin/comments/2fs6gh/another_statistic_relative_number_of_unique/

He'll soon dig out the real numbers of Quark distribution.

What do you mean by linking multiple addresses to a single entity and "unique" addresses?


Entities as in a wallet.dat which can use lots of different addresses to transact. He can bind them all together and find that entity/wallet which is the owner of those addresses. This allows to bring forward more stats of Quark and draw some valid scientific conclusions, not speculations regarding distribution etc. I'm sure brovenik will give you more details. His service could be applied to other coins as well so fascinating stuff.

Very interesting, so multiple addresses can be tracked back who their owner is. I think this would be pretty big news, since it could reveal some big wallets.

This looks limited in its logic. 

It assumes that a person has multiple addresses in a single wallet.dat.  I would assume most people split there holdings into not only separate addresses but also separate wallets.  An average user typically has a mining wallet, an 'everyday' wallet (the only one that likely contains many separate addresses for payees etc) and a cold storage wallet.  I'm sure big whales in most cryptos not just Quark have multiple cold storage wallets so they are not instantly recognized as a whale. 

As such this service really would not tell you much and/or would give false info.  How would it differentiate from UserA sending Quark to a wallet owned by UserB (from a normal transaction) as opposed to sending it to another wallet owned by UserA???  It can't.

It looks to me this is just another disguised backhanded attempt to try and discredit Quarks distribution by planting seeds of dought but not actually providing any backbone to the claim

Exactly, you won't be able to link wallet A and wallet B so easily, and just for this reason the exposure of the actual distribution of Quark would not be truly possible. What brovenik does however is link all the past address that you have used to make/receive payments for your wallet A. You can see that manually from within the explorer if you send 1000 qrk from your wallet and those are split in 3-4 addresses you will see them joined for a single larger payment, so you can safely assume those quark addresses are from the same wallet. Now if you go back enough using complex algorithms which brovenik has build you can assign most of the addresses that are linked together to a single entity/wallet. Its not speculation, its actual analysis of the blockchain. It may be wrong but if you want to dispute it you'd have to use facts not `looks` and `thoughts`.

With these sort of analysis we'll get a better view of how many unique users are interacting daily/monthly, or in the last 3 9 months etc. The important thing is this sort of analysis can be applied to Bitcoin(I assume it would take much longer due to the size of the blockchain) and other coins so brovenik work will do wonders to understand how many unique people are using/have used in the past, a specific crypto currency like Quark.
hero member
Activity: 798
Merit: 1000
‘Try to be nice’
September 08, 2014, 12:03:04 PM
Interesting work done by bronevik announced on Quark reddit, he developed a method to link lots of addresses to a single entity and can apply this algorithm on other coins as well. You might want to check it out: http://www.reddit.com/r/QuarkCoin/comments/2fl460/im_building_an_entityanalysis_service_for_quark/

and other stats regarding Quark vs Bitcoin(we don't look so good, only 8% unique addresses vs 59% bitcoin):
http://www.reddit.com/r/QuarkCoin/comments/2fqxfm/just_made_full_sql_base_of_quark_transactions/
http://www.reddit.com/r/QuarkCoin/comments/2fs6gh/another_statistic_relative_number_of_unique/

He'll soon dig out the real numbers of Quark distribution.

What do you mean by linking multiple addresses to a single entity and "unique" addresses?


Entities as in a wallet.dat which can use lots of different addresses to transact. He can bind them all together and find that entity/wallet which is the owner of those addresses. This allows to bring forward more stats of Quark and draw some valid scientific conclusions, not speculations regarding distribution etc. I'm sure brovenik will give you more details. His service could be applied to other coins as well so fascinating stuff.

Very interesting, so multiple addresses can be tracked back who their owner is. I think this would be pretty big news, since it could reveal some big wallets.

This looks limited in its logic.  

It assumes that a person has multiple addresses in a single wallet.dat.  I would assume most people split there holdings into not only separate addresses but also separate wallets.  An average user typically has a mining wallet, an 'everyday' wallet (the only one that likely contains many separate addresses for payees etc) and a cold storage wallet.  I'm sure big whales in most cryptos not just Quark have multiple cold storage wallets so they are not instantly recognized as a whale.  

As such this service really would not tell you much and/or would give false info.  How would it differentiate from UserA sending Quark to a wallet owned by UserB (from a normal transaction) as opposed to sending it to another wallet owned by UserA???  It can't.

It looks to me this is just another disguised backhanded attempt to try and discredit Quarks distribution by planting seeds of dought but not actually providing any backbone to the claim

+ 1

fungus is clearly more intelligent.

what's it all tell you?  think about these dullards , and their "objective" they clearly have to do this they put no thought into it at all..

think about that , thats amazingly bullish to me (over the medium to longer term) , clearly someone fears Frozen Bit and all the spin offs of that small DAC.
hero member
Activity: 798
Merit: 1000
‘Try to be nice’
September 08, 2014, 12:00:11 PM
Can KJO be banned from this forum? His inflammatory posts are unwelcome.

DigitalIndustry might be eccentric and annoy the hell out of many people, but he makes many excellent points. He is also, unlike KJO, a supporter of QRK.

Digitalindustry is intelligent and experienced in Crypto space. He is exasperated by imbeciles and trolls, and baits them mercilessly.


KJO is merely a hapless victim of that baiting.

let us not look for those imbecils and trolls as we might find those were REAL quark contributers which gave up on Quark because of this Kkk, his recent victims include quarkfx which has done many many things for quark, james and coinmama from quark foundation also which are about to give up because of this fraud Kkk. Looking back on old forum and other sources I can list dozens of examples of people actually contributing to projects of quark until this guy made them leave with his stupid trolling remarks and insults.

`experienced in crypto`, you made me laugh for a second, thanks. No one respects him, he attacks other coins due to his lack of knowledge. He also thinks Bitcoin will collapse, this alone shows me how fool he is, I've dealt with this fudsters for 3 years now and they still keep coming.

As for baiting, I think you got the roles reversed. He's the one mercilessly thrown out of anything quark official. Anyone is free to support Quark on its own, but I think the official Quark community should dispatch such Kkk lunatics which only purpose is to divide and repel new quarkers.

+1 The community is already dispatching from him, having guys like him trying to be in charge is not the Quark brand mentality. People should realise Quark doesn't support such acts. That's why he has been banned from /r/Quarkcoin

you must be the lead retard. - guess what glad you highlighted that  :

http://www.reddit.com/r/QuarkOmega/

feel free to not be censored here at the Quark Reddit -.

as we grow this Reddit  the trolls will follow us as the parasites they are..

i'm just watching a video documentary on fungus , they are clearly superior to you.

i honestly mean that.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cwLviP7KaAc&feature=player_detailpage

hero member
Activity: 798
Merit: 1000
‘Try to be nice’
September 08, 2014, 11:51:55 AM
Interesting work done by bronevik announced on Quark reddit, he developed a method to link lots of addresses to a single entity and can apply this algorithm on other coins as well. You might want to check it out: http://www.reddit.com/r/QuarkCoin/comments/2fl460/im_building_an_entityanalysis_service_for_quark/

and other stats regarding Quark vs Bitcoin(we don't look so good, only 8% unique addresses vs 59% bitcoin):
http://www.reddit.com/r/QuarkCoin/comments/2fqxfm/just_made_full_sql_base_of_quark_transactions/
http://www.reddit.com/r/QuarkCoin/comments/2fs6gh/another_statistic_relative_number_of_unique/

He'll soon dig out the real numbers of Quark distribution.

What do you mean by linking multiple addresses to a single entity and "unique" addresses?

Also i don't know who the OP is of this Topic, but i don't think putting "stability" in the title is a positive thing for traders/speculators. It's also untrue to call it stable.

you are trolling hard young one.

read the link with my response - a distribution of "money" can not me stable until the market can price it.

explain why Quark is not stable, you are trying to suggest the unique addresses?
legendary
Activity: 912
Merit: 1000
September 08, 2014, 11:17:20 AM
Interesting work done by bronevik announced on Quark reddit, he developed a method to link lots of addresses to a single entity and can apply this algorithm on other coins as well. You might want to check it out: http://www.reddit.com/r/QuarkCoin/comments/2fl460/im_building_an_entityanalysis_service_for_quark/

and other stats regarding Quark vs Bitcoin(we don't look so good, only 8% unique addresses vs 59% bitcoin):
http://www.reddit.com/r/QuarkCoin/comments/2fqxfm/just_made_full_sql_base_of_quark_transactions/
http://www.reddit.com/r/QuarkCoin/comments/2fs6gh/another_statistic_relative_number_of_unique/

He'll soon dig out the real numbers of Quark distribution.

What do you mean by linking multiple addresses to a single entity and "unique" addresses?


Entities as in a wallet.dat which can use lots of different addresses to transact. He can bind them all together and find that entity/wallet which is the owner of those addresses. This allows to bring forward more stats of Quark and draw some valid scientific conclusions, not speculations regarding distribution etc. I'm sure brovenik will give you more details. His service could be applied to other coins as well so fascinating stuff.

Very interesting, so multiple addresses can be tracked back who their owner is. I think this would be pretty big news, since it could reveal some big wallets.

This looks limited in its logic. 

It assumes that a person has multiple addresses in a single wallet.dat.  I would assume most people split there holdings into not only separate addresses but also separate wallets.  An average user typically has a mining wallet, an 'everyday' wallet (the only one that likely contains many separate addresses for payees etc) and a cold storage wallet.  I'm sure big whales in most cryptos not just Quark have multiple cold storage wallets so they are not instantly recognized as a whale. 

As such this service really would not tell you much and/or would give false info.  How would it differentiate from UserA sending Quark to a wallet owned by UserB (from a normal transaction) as opposed to sending it to another wallet owned by UserA???  It can't.

It looks to me this is just another disguised backhanded attempt to try and discredit Quarks distribution by planting seeds of dought but not actually providing any backbone to the claim
legendary
Activity: 2044
Merit: 1008
September 08, 2014, 10:56:43 AM
Interesting work done by bronevik announced on Quark reddit, he developed a method to link lots of addresses to a single entity and can apply this algorithm on other coins as well. You might want to check it out: http://www.reddit.com/r/QuarkCoin/comments/2fl460/im_building_an_entityanalysis_service_for_quark/

and other stats regarding Quark vs Bitcoin(we don't look so good, only 8% unique addresses vs 59% bitcoin):
http://www.reddit.com/r/QuarkCoin/comments/2fqxfm/just_made_full_sql_base_of_quark_transactions/
http://www.reddit.com/r/QuarkCoin/comments/2fs6gh/another_statistic_relative_number_of_unique/

He'll soon dig out the real numbers of Quark distribution.

What do you mean by linking multiple addresses to a single entity and "unique" addresses?


Entities as in a wallet.dat which can use lots of different addresses to transact. He can bind them all together and find that entity/wallet which is the owner of those addresses. This allows to bring forward more stats of Quark and draw some valid scientific conclusions, not speculations regarding distribution etc. I'm sure brovenik will give you more details. His service could be applied to other coins as well so fascinating stuff.

Very interesting, so multiple addresses can be tracked back who their owner is. I think this would be pretty big news, since it could reveal some big wallets.
legendary
Activity: 2044
Merit: 1008
September 08, 2014, 10:44:38 AM
Can KJO be banned from this forum? His inflammatory posts are unwelcome.

DigitalIndustry might be eccentric and annoy the hell out of many people, but he makes many excellent points. He is also, unlike KJO, a supporter of QRK.

Digitalindustry is intelligent and experienced in Crypto space. He is exasperated by imbeciles and trolls, and baits them mercilessly.


KJO is merely a hapless victim of that baiting.

let us not look for those imbecils and trolls as we might find those were REAL quark contributers which gave up on Quark because of this Kkk, his recent victims include quarkfx which has done many many things for quark, james and coinmama from quark foundation also which are about to give up because of this fraud Kkk. Looking back on old forum and other sources I can list dozens of examples of people actually contributing to projects of quark until this guy made them leave with his stupid trolling remarks and insults.

`experienced in crypto`, you made me laugh for a second, thanks. No one respects him, he attacks other coins due to his lack of knowledge. He also thinks Bitcoin will collapse, this alone shows me how fool he is, I've dealt with this fudsters for 3 years now and they still keep coming.

As for baiting, I think you got the roles reversed. He's the one mercilessly thrown out of anything quark official. Anyone is free to support Quark on its own, but I think the official Quark community should dispatch such Kkk lunatics which only purpose is to divide and repel new quarkers.

+1 The community is already dispatching from him, having guys like him trying to be in charge is not the Quark brand mentality. People should realise Quark doesn't support such acts. That's why he has been banned from /r/Quarkcoin
sr. member
Activity: 392
Merit: 250
September 08, 2014, 10:21:22 AM
Interesting work done by bronevik announced on Quark reddit, he developed a method to link lots of addresses to a single entity and can apply this algorithm on other coins as well. You might want to check it out: http://www.reddit.com/r/QuarkCoin/comments/2fl460/im_building_an_entityanalysis_service_for_quark/

and other stats regarding Quark vs Bitcoin(we don't look so good, only 8% unique addresses vs 59% bitcoin):
http://www.reddit.com/r/QuarkCoin/comments/2fqxfm/just_made_full_sql_base_of_quark_transactions/
http://www.reddit.com/r/QuarkCoin/comments/2fs6gh/another_statistic_relative_number_of_unique/

He'll soon dig out the real numbers of Quark distribution.

What do you mean by linking multiple addresses to a single entity and "unique" addresses?


Entities as in a wallet.dat which can use lots of different addresses to transact. He can bind them all together and find that entity/wallet which is the owner of those addresses. This allows to bring forward more stats of Quark and draw some valid scientific conclusions, not speculations regarding distribution etc. I'm sure brovenik will give you more details. His service could be applied to other coins as well so fascinating stuff.
legendary
Activity: 2534
Merit: 1129
September 08, 2014, 10:17:08 AM

As for baiting, I think you got the roles reversed. He's the one mercilessly thrown out of anything quark official. Anyone is free to support Quark on its own, but I think the official Quark community should dispatch such Kkk lunatics which only purpose is to divide and repel new quarkers.

OK, fair enough. The community as a whole decides, that's democracy. Then the market decides.

I don't really profess to know the answers... it is interesting to watch the outcomes.
sr. member
Activity: 392
Merit: 250
September 08, 2014, 10:05:19 AM
Can KJO be banned from this forum? His inflammatory posts are unwelcome.

DigitalIndustry might be eccentric and annoy the hell out of many people, but he makes many excellent points. He is also, unlike KJO, a supporter of QRK.

Digitalindustry is intelligent and experienced in Crypto space. He is exasperated by imbeciles and trolls, and baits them mercilessly.


KJO is merely a hapless victim of that baiting.

let us not look for those imbecils and trolls as we might find those were REAL quark contributers which gave up on Quark because of this Kkk, his recent victims include quarkfx which has done many many things for quark, james and coinmama from quark foundation also which are about to give up because of this fraud Kkk. Looking back on old forum and other sources I can list dozens of examples of people actually contributing to projects of quark until this guy made them leave with his stupid trolling remarks and insults.

`experienced in crypto`, you made me laugh for a second, thanks. No one respects him, he attacks other coins due to his lack of knowledge. He also thinks Bitcoin will collapse, this alone shows me how fool he is, I've dealt with this fudsters for 3 years now and they still keep coming.

As for baiting, I think you got the roles reversed. He's the one mercilessly thrown out of anything quark official. Anyone is free to support Quark on its own, but I think the official Quark community should dispatch such Kkk lunatics which only purpose is to divide and repel new quarkers.
legendary
Activity: 2044
Merit: 1008
September 08, 2014, 09:55:14 AM
Interesting work done by bronevik announced on Quark reddit, he developed a method to link lots of addresses to a single entity and can apply this algorithm on other coins as well. You might want to check it out: http://www.reddit.com/r/QuarkCoin/comments/2fl460/im_building_an_entityanalysis_service_for_quark/

and other stats regarding Quark vs Bitcoin(we don't look so good, only 8% unique addresses vs 59% bitcoin):
http://www.reddit.com/r/QuarkCoin/comments/2fqxfm/just_made_full_sql_base_of_quark_transactions/
http://www.reddit.com/r/QuarkCoin/comments/2fs6gh/another_statistic_relative_number_of_unique/

He'll soon dig out the real numbers of Quark distribution.

What do you mean by linking multiple addresses to a single entity and "unique" addresses?

Also i don't know who the OP is of this Topic, but i don't think putting "stability" in the title is a positive thing for traders/speculators. It's also untrue to call it stable.
sr. member
Activity: 392
Merit: 250
September 08, 2014, 09:40:09 AM
Interesting work done by bronevik announced on Quark reddit, he developed a method to link lots of addresses to a single entity and can apply this algorithm on other coins as well. You might want to check it out: http://www.reddit.com/r/QuarkCoin/comments/2fl460/im_building_an_entityanalysis_service_for_quark/

and other stats regarding Quark vs Bitcoin(we don't look so good, only 8% unique addresses vs 59% bitcoin):
http://www.reddit.com/r/QuarkCoin/comments/2fqxfm/just_made_full_sql_base_of_quark_transactions/
http://www.reddit.com/r/QuarkCoin/comments/2fs6gh/another_statistic_relative_number_of_unique/

He'll soon dig out the real numbers of Quark distribution.
hero member
Activity: 798
Merit: 1000
‘Try to be nice’
September 08, 2014, 06:29:55 AM
......

if you spot any obvious English errors don't hesitate to forward me ha ha


Happy to proof read and tidy up syntax/grammar/clarity, if you want.

One further point you didn't fully address is the impact of (potentially unlimited in number) rival currencies , which can have similar properties, and therefore are able to dilute and neutralize the effect of limited supply + fixed difficulty.

hey thank you.

yes indeed i agree on the "crypto inflation" factor perhaps better tackled in its own document.

as there are two particular variants:

1. Real alternatives
2. Fake spam created by Bank agents

the second is obviously non viable, it is always built purposely flawed.

The first i think the market will find "brands" as mentioned before, but its is more abstract*

*what i'm trying to say is "Confidence" is a strangely abstract sociological effect, and the most technically efficient system isn't always the winner, if Bitcoin was not terminally flawed (for example) it woudl certainly have a significant lead in this respect.

alas there may always be something that is technically better, but in the end its all about confidence.

regards.
legendary
Activity: 2534
Merit: 1129
September 08, 2014, 04:41:22 AM
......

if you spot any obvious English errors don't hesitate to forward me ha ha


Happy to proof read and tidy up syntax/grammar/clarity, if you want.

One further point you didn't fully address is the impact of (potentially unlimited in number) rival currencies , which can have similar properties, and therefore are able to dilute and neutralize the effect of limited supply + fixed difficulty.
legendary
Activity: 2534
Merit: 1129
September 08, 2014, 04:34:00 AM
Can KJO be banned from this forum? His inflammatory posts are unwelcome.

DigitalIndustry might be eccentric and annoy the hell out of many people, but he makes many excellent points. He is also, unlike KJO, a supporter of QRK.

Digitalindustry is intelligent and experienced in Crypto space. He is exasperated by imbeciles and trolls, and baits them mercilessly.


KJO is merely a hapless victim of that baiting.
hero member
Activity: 798
Merit: 1000
‘Try to be nice’
September 08, 2014, 02:11:33 AM
Here I respond to Proff David Yermack of Department of Finance NYU Stern School of Business, hopefully explaining how a difficulty monopoly works and what Quark did to help try to improves this.

http://kolinevans.wordpress.com/2014/09/08/answer-to-professor-david-yermack-how-the-quark-protocol-solved-the-economic-problems-of-bitcoin/




if you spot any obvious English errors don't hesitate to forward me ha ha
Pages:
Jump to: