Topic: [ANN] (QTUM) - A Scalable Smart Contract Platform w/ Proof of Stake - page 177. (Read 525459 times)

Yes, believe the media like when they reported that BFL sold a million dollars worth of hardware using BitPay as a third-party payment provider - http://www.prweb.com/releases/2013/10/prweb11283333.htm.

The only problem is that I proved beyond doubt that it was 100% fake: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bitpay-is-officially-now-an-exchange-and-no-longer-just-a-payment-provider-841416

All three entities even depicted this bitcon wallet address - https://www.walletexplorer.com/address/1QAHVyRzkmD4j1pU5W89htZ3c6D6E7iWDs - as belonging to HashTrade in demonstrating proof of the iconic transaction. That's odd! How did BFL end up with it, the same wallet address that the FTC confiscated along with BFL's computers? The same address where bitcoins from burned-in miners under the careful watch of Bruce Peterson went to, then BFL was in the process of converting them very bitcoins into cash to various banks in Sonny Vleisides' control via BitPay, a third-party payment provider, NOT AN EXCHANGE, till the FTC locked up the place and took control of NOT HASHTRADE'S wallet address.

And you wonder why Qtum isn't going to release a single address depicting a single satoshi funding their ICO. BECAUSE THE TRUTH WOULD BE REVEALED IMMEDIATELY!

The problem is the likes of cocksuckeroverflow in this space, not I.

All your team has to do is post the indisputable proof of the funds on the blockchain, as every other crypto project does to provide the most base level of transparency and to prove its naysayers wrong. It's SO EASY. The fact you guys aren't doing it speaks volumes. Plus we all know how much you guys despise Gleb, you expect us to believe you wouldn't prove him wrong in a heartbeat if you could?

Remember, your own words: "the burden of proof is on the one who declares, not on one who denies"
Qtum declared a successful ICO, we are just denying it  

Perhaps you should adhere to your own words for once, maybe then people would actually listen to what you have to say and not immediately see it as just a lie from a shill.

Everyone with some brains knows that media is payed to post articles. Cointelegraph did it before and will do it again. For some bitcoins they will post what ever you like.

PS: Gleb is not a troll, he's a scam buster! And a very good one.

  amazing guys 10million USD raised in 90 minutes !!! are you seriously ??
show Wallet address to collect funds ICO Qtum

Everyone should believe this troll, and dismiss the respected media outlets!

Finally, it's verified in the linked article - https://cointelegraph.com/news/east-and-west-what-icos-can-learn-from-qtums-successful-blitz-crowdsale - definitive proof that Qtum did indeed garner $15+ USD during its ICO - NOT!

Translated: CoinTelegraph merely echoed, like every other rag, what Team Qtum, themselves, have put forth sans proof.

Meanwhile, the likes of cocksuckeroverflow who jack off all over themselves for loving the transparency of blockchain technologies continues to have jeez dripping from their chins stemming from Qtum who continues to evade ALL questions as to where is the proof via the blockchains.

Fuckin madness!

East And West: What ICOs Can Learn From Qtum’s Successful Blitz Crowdsale
A key factor that played an important role in Qtum’s ability to raise over $15 mln within five days of its initial coin offering is the startup’s ability to sell its idea globally.
Though the startup, which provides a Turing-complete Blockchain stack, seeks to help fuel Blockchain adoption across global business sectors to bridge the gap between Blockchains and the business world, the hybrid Blockchain application platform could have failed by not striking the right cord from the start.Read more

I'll include those two numbers as well:

Qtum's ICO by the numbers:

90: First minutes of Qtum's ICO.
10,000,000: As in $10,000,000, the amount raised during the first 90 minutes of Qtum's ICO.
117: Hours for ALL the Qtum tokens to be sold on exchanges they control.
11,156: BTC used to purchase Qtum tokens.
77,081: ETH used to purchase Qtum tokens.
7,000: Total transactions to purchase Qtum tokens.
3,800: Total number of people who purchased Qtum tokens.
1.84: Average number of purchases per person procuring Qtum tokens.
15,664,829: As in $15,664,829 USD worth of Qtum tokens procured, converted to USD in spite of US citizens not allowed to participate in the sale.
8+: Number of times cocksuckeroverflow has played the race card to date to try to discredit me from relaying that we're dealing with a classic scam in the cryptocurrency space.
1,000,000+: Number of sperm cells in Qtum's jeez dripping from cocksuckeroverflow's chin.
6: Number of Chinese exchanges in Qtum's hip pocket utilized to facilitate Qtum's ICO.

0: Number of exchanges that are going to release Qtum tokens prior to September 2017, leaving 3,800 InvestQtumTards from liquidating their non-investment tokens from the nonprofit Qtum because that what mostly astute Asians do with their disposable income - tie it up for months in an entity under the control of the one and only Patrick Dai, or whatever his name is this week.

0: Number of txIDs Team Qtum has provided to date to prove that $15,664,829 USD worth of Qtum tokens were indeed purchased.

90 minutes 10 million $  
I do not think it's real

10 Million USD raised in 90 minutes!???    My crypto friends and I do not know much about Qtum but how come...??  throw in there's Gleb here that brings people the alarm... Its absolutely too good to be true!

I will be posting some proofs to now .

Qtum's ICO by the numbers:

117: Hours for ALL the Qtum tokens to be sold on exchanges they control.
11,156: BTC used to purchase Qtum tokens.
77,081: ETH used to purchase Qtum tokens.
7,000: Total transactions to purchase Qtum tokens.
3,800: Total number of people who purchased Qtum tokens.
1.84: Average number of purchases per person procuring Qtum tokens.
15,664,829: As in $15,664,829 USD worth of Qtum tokens procured, converted to USD in spite of US citizens not allowed to participate in the sale.
8+: Number of times cocksuckeroverflow has played the race card to date to try to discredit me from relaying that we're dealing with a classic scam in the cryptocurrency space.
1,000,000+: Number of sperm cells in Qtum's jeez dripping from cocksuckeroverflow's chin.
6: Number of Chinese exchanges in Qtum's hip pocket utilized to facilitate Qtum's ICO.

0: Number of exchanges that are going to release Qtum tokens prior to September 2017, leaving 3,800 InvestQtumTards from liquidating their non-investment tokens from the nonprofit Qtum because that's what mostly astute Asians do with their disposable income - tie it up for months in an entity under the control of the one and only Patrick Dai, or whatever his name is this week.

0: Number of txIDs Team Qtum has provided to date to prove that $15,664,829 USD worth of Qtum tokens were indeed purchased.


My guess is that cocksuckeroverflow is a Yellow Man with big lips and has bloody human shit on his dick covering up a tattoo of some Holy Quran verse translated into Jewish, with his balls pierced for a pair of Native American arrowheads to hang from.

Ah okay thanks. And I'm not going to defend Gleb's remarks aside from pointing out that if you are relying on ad hominems to discredit the rest of what he has said/is saying that does not bode well for you.

I'm talking about glebby's posts!

Now tell me some of his posts are not racist!

Everybody knows you are a shill, it's obvious beyond any reasonable doubt. Go along and keep reposting in blind admiration every single thing the qtum team shares in an attempt to cover up the plethora of scrutiny and criticism here. But be sure not to ask for proof of the ICO funds, as an investor you wouldn't want to ensure your investment is secure or anything like that  

Why are you NOT interested in the proof? If you want people to believe you invested in this project (and are not just a paid shill or secretly a team member) maybe you should act like any sane investor would act and demand a little (the bare minimum, really) transparency from the team?

Stackoverflow himself said that  "the burden of proof is on the one who declares, not on one who denies"

They declare to have had a successful ICO but refuse to show proof of that. We are simply denying that claim, so the burden of proof does not fall on us.

Lol @ stackoverflow playing the race card. Is that really all you have left now? Please show one instance of me being racist, I guarantee you will find none in all of my post history.

any updates about the development work and testnet?

thank you very much!

any prove for this?

i think right now.. you are just crazy

do you have a job gleb?

what you can get from this thread? just wasting your time and life here.

because not really too much people care about bitcoin or blockchain in this thread.

if you really want to troll Qtum, you should learn chinese and go to the Chinese community, since they have more people in china.

but you should be banned there.. because no one care about what you said. that's really sad.

so what on earth has gone on here? 10 million in 90minutes from a know scammer, that seems reasonable is there any blockchain proof of this please?