Author

Topic: [ANN] Ravencoin [RVN] PoW GPU Mining | Asset Transfer Blockchain (Updated ANN) - page 152. (Read 1170617 times)

legendary
Activity: 2210
Merit: 1109
sgminer 5.5.5-gm-a - Started: [2018-05-19 17:11:06] - [0 days 01:49:49]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(5s):17.37M (avg):14.07Mh/s | A:5546  R:33  HW:0  WU:25.154/m
ST: 2  SS: 0  NB: 119  LW: 8218  GF: 0  RF: 0
Connected to stratum.minepool.com (stratum) diff 12 as user R.........................
Block: 10c80012...  Diff:20.6K  Started: [19:00:43]  Best share: 33K
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[P]ool management [G]PU management [S ]ettings [D]isplay options [Q]uit
GPU 0:  73.0C 1420RPM | 116.2K/1.435Mh/s | R:  0.4% HW:0 WU:2.577/m I:19
GPU 1:  74.0C 2024RPM | 7.547M/6.310Mh/s | R:  0.3% HW:0 WU:10.920/m I:19
GPU 2:  73.0C  421RPM | 7.855M/6.322Mh/s | R:  0.9% HW:0 WU:11.666/m I:19
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

3x MSI AMD RX580 Armor 8GB OC

GPU 0 is not performing. I don't understand, all 3 GPU connected to same PSU Coolermaster 850w Gold, total system only draws 462W from wall. Windows 10 64bit, latest AMD drivers Adrenalin Edition 18.4.1

after a restart the first 30 seconds all GPUs perform the same then GPU 0 slowly drops hashpower

Update: tried Avermore 1.4.0 miner, same problem

Update2: after complete restart of system, it gets even more weird:

GPU 0:  72.0C 1129RPM | 5.625M/5.666Mh/s | R:  0.0% HW:0 WU:8.768/m I:19
GPU 1:  74.0C 1511RPM | 5.636M/5.673Mh/s | R:  3.4% HW:0 WU:9.964/m I:19
GPU 2:  54.0C    0RPM | 2.711M/1.149Mh/s | R:  0.0% HW:0 WU:3.587/m I:19

GPU 2 is now dropping hashpower  Huh GPU 0 (and GPU 1) doing fine

Could it be something with Motherboard BIOS ? I used 3 1080TI GPUs in the past on the mobo wothout problems, maybe these "new" card give some trouble in combination with mobo? Asrock 970 extreme 4
legendary
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1091
--- ChainWorks Industries ---
Enemy Ver 1.10 (Public)

https://mega.nz/#!8bJTVAAL!o6a6CdiqBnQ4jbEQae0yuW4F3JDf24Ny7ieWjKjTXJw

For Windows (Cuda 9.1)
zealot/enemy-1.10 (z-enemy)  From: Dk & Enemy

- Fixed compatibility issues that resulted in performance degradation with some non-yiimp pools. Now you'll see the expected hashrate on them (suprnova).

- Kernels speed improvements : (1.09b vs 1.10) +1-2% total (all algos) and +1-2% for x16r &x16s.

- Support & impove new algo : Tribus (-a tribus) , recommended intensity for Tribus 20-21. +5% speed vs 1.09b ( Service release)

For Linux ( HiveOS & Ubuntu )
Cuda 8.0
https://mega.nz/#!5HoHxSYR!YgTmDLTipVSb6HEUplrV_FHFLOFDOWUuSg69kFTDrY8
Cuda 9.0
https://mega.nz/#!YGIFXZiT!cLA8C4G6Qk79MzlnQSWcI5YCMSY8Q6eLBweG92lFf-I
Cuda 9.1
https://mega.nz/#!gf4ACYjb!LKIzQitOUBi6Xn7PZ0M-HfrXqP0krNMRw5nkRfkJqyY

I'm getting over 5% higher hash rates, on 12 hour averages, with 1.10 than 1.09b. This is on 21X1070TI and 5X1070. Kind of wild, in a great way.
This is more than 33% better than 2.2.5. Which is insanely better. Yet 90% of the miners on Ravenmier are using something other than 1.10. And some 520+ miners are still on 2.2.5.
I just don't get it. Using 1.10 is like getting extra GPUs without buying them.

A large portion of those miners are linux users ...

aaand that is what the issue is, when the miner itself does not work due to incompatible components on different distros of the miner compile, like we have.

Yes - I have notified the dev, and nothing being done about it due to the fact that it requires MANY different settings to cater to the many different distros. Also probably why there has been no response as well.

#crysx
member
Activity: 345
Merit: 16
Enemy Ver 1.10 (Public)

https://mega.nz/#!8bJTVAAL!o6a6CdiqBnQ4jbEQae0yuW4F3JDf24Ny7ieWjKjTXJw

For Windows (Cuda 9.1)
zealot/enemy-1.10 (z-enemy)  From: Dk & Enemy

- Fixed compatibility issues that resulted in performance degradation with some non-yiimp pools. Now you'll see the expected hashrate on them (suprnova).

- Kernels speed improvements : (1.09b vs 1.10) +1-2% total (all algos) and +1-2% for x16r &x16s.

- Support & impove new algo : Tribus (-a tribus) , recommended intensity for Tribus 20-21. +5% speed vs 1.09b ( Service release)

For Linux ( HiveOS & Ubuntu )
Cuda 8.0
https://mega.nz/#!5HoHxSYR!YgTmDLTipVSb6HEUplrV_FHFLOFDOWUuSg69kFTDrY8
Cuda 9.0
https://mega.nz/#!YGIFXZiT!cLA8C4G6Qk79MzlnQSWcI5YCMSY8Q6eLBweG92lFf-I
Cuda 9.1
https://mega.nz/#!gf4ACYjb!LKIzQitOUBi6Xn7PZ0M-HfrXqP0krNMRw5nkRfkJqyY

I'm getting over 5% higher hash rates, on 12 hour averages, with 1.10 than 1.09b. This is on 21X1070TI and 5X1070. Kind of wild, in a great way.
This is more than 33% better than 2.2.5. Which is insanely better. Yet 90% of the miners on Ravenmier are using something other than 1.10. And some 520+ miners are still on 2.2.5.
I just don't get it. Using 1.10 is like getting extra GPUs without buying them.
full member
Activity: 144
Merit: 102
Here is some content I created to promote Ravencoin a bit...I compare a GTX 1060 and a GTX 1070 FE mining speeds...enjoy.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=422cqKBl124&t=
jr. member
Activity: 35
Merit: 1
Enemy Ver 1.10 (Public)

https://mega.nz/#!8bJTVAAL!o6a6CdiqBnQ4jbEQae0yuW4F3JDf24Ny7ieWjKjTXJw

For Windows (Cuda 9.1)
zealot/enemy-1.10 (z-enemy)  From: Dk & Enemy

- Fixed compatibility issues that resulted in performance degradation with some non-yiimp pools. Now you'll see the expected hashrate on them (suprnova).

- Kernels speed improvements : (1.09b vs 1.10) +1-2% total (all algos) and +1-2% for x16r &x16s.

- Support & impove new algo : Tribus (-a tribus) , recommended intensity for Tribus 20-21. +5% speed vs 1.09b ( Service release)

For Linux ( HiveOS & Ubuntu )
Cuda 8.0
https://mega.nz/#!5HoHxSYR!YgTmDLTipVSb6HEUplrV_FHFLOFDOWUuSg69kFTDrY8
Cuda 9.0
https://mega.nz/#!YGIFXZiT!cLA8C4G6Qk79MzlnQSWcI5YCMSY8Q6eLBweG92lFf-I
Cuda 9.1
https://mega.nz/#!gf4ACYjb!LKIzQitOUBi6Xn7PZ0M-HfrXqP0krNMRw5nkRfkJqyY


Is this going to work for Win10?


Of course
newbie
Activity: 10
Merit: 0
Enemy Ver 1.10 (Public)

https://mega.nz/#!8bJTVAAL!o6a6CdiqBnQ4jbEQae0yuW4F3JDf24Ny7ieWjKjTXJw

For Windows (Cuda 9.1)
zealot/enemy-1.10 (z-enemy)  From: Dk & Enemy

- Fixed compatibility issues that resulted in performance degradation with some non-yiimp pools. Now you'll see the expected hashrate on them (suprnova).

- Kernels speed improvements : (1.09b vs 1.10) +1-2% total (all algos) and +1-2% for x16r &x16s.

- Support & impove new algo : Tribus (-a tribus) , recommended intensity for Tribus 20-21. +5% speed vs 1.09b ( Service release)

For Linux ( HiveOS & Ubuntu )
Cuda 8.0
https://mega.nz/#!5HoHxSYR!YgTmDLTipVSb6HEUplrV_FHFLOFDOWUuSg69kFTDrY8
Cuda 9.0
https://mega.nz/#!YGIFXZiT!cLA8C4G6Qk79MzlnQSWcI5YCMSY8Q6eLBweG92lFf-I
Cuda 9.1
https://mega.nz/#!gf4ACYjb!LKIzQitOUBi6Xn7PZ0M-HfrXqP0krNMRw5nkRfkJqyY


Is this going to work for Win10?
legendary
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1012
Or you can simply mine other coins with ASIC and than buy raven...

Good idea it is worth to buy this coin while this is at early stages sometimes I mine this but most of the time I like to keep buying it is like to exchange this with other projects. This project will get real attention in future at the moment this is just moving with normal speed.
newbie
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
Or you can simply mine other coins with ASIC and than buy raven...
legendary
Activity: 3276
Merit: 2442
Concerning FPGA's Will it be ridiculously expensive to use?  I'm understanding that you need an ASIC for each algo (16 different ASICs) and then the FPGA to control them.  Only one ASIC would be used at a time wasting 15 other ASICs.  

Hopefully nobody's stupid enough to try such thing. I don't even need to mention that using them separately would be more profitable and even if someone does it, devs will just make a modification on the algo and ruin his whole setup so It won't be an issue as far as I see.
member
Activity: 336
Merit: 15
I've been mining Raven for the past month but this week has been much less profitable.  I'm mining using Nevermore and am using Pickaxe Pro as the pool.  Did something happen to cause profits to drop 30% this week? 
Profits as in coins per day or dollar per day? The price went down a bit with added difficulty or rather difficulty swings this could add up to 30% less dollar per day.
newbie
Activity: 12
Merit: 0
Hi all,

I have put my many hours of tweaking tested forked version of ccminer up here if anyone would like to use it, no dev fee just donate if you like it, all code is up, will be continuing to tweak and find any gains possible. Compiled on windows VS so windows binary is up in release folder, if someone wants to do linux feel free. I am doing starting Visual Profiler tool tweaking to see where more gains might be.

https://github.com/Nigeleyeit/ccminer-The1-x16r-s
newbie
Activity: 79
Merit: 0
Concerning FPGA's Will it be ridiculously expensive to use?  I'm understanding that you need an ASIC for each algo (16 different ASICs) and then the FPGA to control them.  Only one ASIC would be used at a time wasting 15 other ASICs.  
full member
Activity: 462
Merit: 115
I've been mining Raven for the past month but this week has been much less profitable.  I'm mining using Nevermore and am using Pickaxe Pro as the pool.  Did something happen to cause profits to drop 30% this week? 
full member
Activity: 462
Merit: 101
There's always a risk with new coins, especially when they tend to be more mysterious and not completely transparent at the beginning as to what they represent and what their plans are for the future. So there is a risk with Ravencoin as well at this point as there are still many unknown, but higher risks seem to pay well if the situation tends to turn out to be for the better.
I agree! The risk for the new currency is that all information is mysterious in the dark. It makes the community suspicious and many questions around the project.
According to a contributor, this is a reasonable project that everyone can build and contribute. Very good! But in those contributions, the builder must be screened, organize contributions so the project can grow? How does the algorithm change affect the future of the project?
newbie
Activity: 115
Merit: 0
YAS!!!  More exchange support.  Let's continue to hammering on exchanges to get that volume pumping.
full member
Activity: 1148
Merit: 132
Quote
ccminer works but its like 30 prrcent slower than z-enemy miner, or have you been able to test solo mining with z-enemy? I don't think it has the same commands either

Yes ccminer is slower but I don´t know if z-enemy supports switch "--coinbase-addr" which is necessary for solo mining. I haven´t tried it.
solo mining to wallet is a bust , after an hr or so the rigs pointed to the wallet stop submitting shares

i dont think the wallet is set up to handle 15 or more connections for a long period of time it seems to bog down.

tried wallets on serveral dedicated machines, 3 to 4 rigs per wallet seems the max, which is impractical.

a yiimp instance and local stratum seems the only way
newbie
Activity: 7
Merit: 1
Quote
ccminer works but its like 30 prrcent slower than z-enemy miner, or have you been able to test solo mining with z-enemy? I don't think it has the same commands either

Yes ccminer is slower but I don´t know if z-enemy supports switch "--coinbase-addr" which is necessary for solo mining. I haven´t tried it.
member
Activity: 345
Merit: 16
Enemy Ver 1.10 (Public)

https://mega.nz/#!8bJTVAAL!o6a6CdiqBnQ4jbEQae0yuW4F3JDf24Ny7ieWjKjTXJw

For Windows (Cuda 9.1)
zealot/enemy-1.10 (z-enemy)  From: Dk & Enemy

- Fixed compatibility issues that resulted in performance degradation with some non-yiimp pools. Now you'll see the expected hashrate on them (suprnova).

- Kernels speed improvements : (1.09b vs 1.10) +1-2% total (all algos) and +1-2% for x16r &x16s.

- Support & impove new algo : Tribus (-a tribus) , recommended intensity for Tribus 20-21. +5% speed vs 1.09b ( Service release)

For Linux ( HiveOS & Ubuntu )
Cuda 8.0
https://mega.nz/#!5HoHxSYR!YgTmDLTipVSb6HEUplrV_FHFLOFDOWUuSg69kFTDrY8
Cuda 9.0
https://mega.nz/#!YGIFXZiT!cLA8C4G6Qk79MzlnQSWcI5YCMSY8Q6eLBweG92lFf-I
Cuda 9.1
https://mega.nz/#!gf4ACYjb!LKIzQitOUBi6Xn7PZ0M-HfrXqP0krNMRw5nkRfkJqyY
newbie
Activity: 69
Merit: 0
Jump to: