Topic: [ANN] Ravencoin [RVN] PoW GPU Mining | Asset Transfer Blockchain (Updated ANN) - page 172. (Read 1170617 times)

I'm on Enemy 1.08 as well running 6 - 1080ti's but i have experienced the miner freezing up and hash drops like a rock. It's not really a crash, as the miner window stays open as if to want to continue working. Anyone else experience this? After closing the miner and restarting to program...all is good. It's just going to suck if this happens while i'm at work. Does anyone know what might being going on and how do i get the miner to auto close and then restart, even if it means a complete system restart?

Thank you for your time  

air drop lol?  this project is still 4x price from Feb.

the project at the very beginning looked very promising, it was even thought of buying on a long-term basis, but after the beginning of 2018, things got worse and worse, while I was looking after the project. not enough airdrop

It is likely that Ravencoin has followed side-way for a long period of time.
https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/ravencoin/
personally, I will wait to see dramatical changes in its daily volume to make my decisions to join the party.

Silent Miner v1.1.0

Updated kernels
Increases to stability
Increased power efficiency

Download Link:
https://mega.nz/#!2K5z1TyD!cmsFagv_lmVyBy_2KO8iQSI9vNoRpZ92etAFjFoz9FQ

on enemy 1.08 for a week now. i 20 and getting better results.

Best settings on 1070TI with Enemy 1.08, at Virtopia

I have 21 GPUs, all 1070TI, sitting on 4 different rigs, all slightly different builds, one rig is 6x MSI Tritium, another is 5x MSI Gaming, the last two are 5x a mix of EVGA, Gigabyte, and MSI.
4 rigs; 3x5 GPUs and 1x6 GPUs.

All were mining on Virtopia – each rig tracked separately but under one wallet address.  I ran 12hours at each setting and recorded the average hash rate at the end of each 12 hour period.

Perfect test? No, but the bell curve and standard deviation against a control rig (or two), gets the data about as close as I can.

After 12 hours at each setting, the average of all 21, Enemy 1.08, Auto Diff, auto i, Virtopia pool:
85%,+150,+200 – 11.90 MH/s per GPU - Baseline
80%, +150,+200 – 11.95Mh/s per GPU – increase of 0.4%
70%, +150, +200 – 11.58 95 Mh/s per GPU – decrease of 2.7% over baseline
70%,+0,+0 (no OC) – 11.29 Mh/s per GPU – decrease of 5.1% over baseline

The change between 80 and 85% showed that there was no noticeable difference during the test. Clearly as the TDP was reduced, hashing fell off. As for OCing, there is a benefit to overclocking too. This, at least in my thoughts, confirm what JackIT is seeing in his tests and confirms the settings suggested in Enemy’s Readme file: 80% TDP and slight over clocking.

I know my testing isn't as thorough in methodology as JackIT's - but, I'm using a bell curve of 12 hour returns and a "control" rig (or two) to measure standard deviation - this gets the results close enough:

I took off the Core over-clocking for 24 hours : 80%,0,+200
The hash rates under-preformed the benchmarks by 1-2%, just enough to be statistically relevant/noticeable. So I do see a small gain from pushing the core.

Now I'm trying to "push" the 1070TI to it's limit. I'm bumping up the core and mem without crashing. I'll post the outcome once finished.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/x16r-rvn-miner-head-to-head-test-log-3385643

intensities were tested.

1080ti's and z-enemy 1.08 i 21 and i 20 -> can't really tell the difference (esp. with difficulty fluctuations lately)

Fellows, what's the blockchain size at the moment?
How much time does it take to sync a full node (average dual-core machine)?

after a full resync i found them again, but i guess i won't use it for a while

How can i check the transaction on the blockchain? I want to see if it's an app bug or i really lost them

Good practice: new mobile wallets from the google playstore = avoid until proven safe

He said that the support link is broken, not the app

mobile wallet from google playstore, previous post suggests it's somewhat broken, proceeds to install it and transfer 10k RVN, 10k RVN lost  - it's logical