any test for 1.10？
nothing yet.. haven't been mining RVN the past week. as soon as come back to it, I'll run another test
looking another testing here, nice posting man!
Topic: X16R - RVN - Miner head to head test log (Read 7649 times)
nothing yet.. haven't been mining RVN the past week. as soon as come back to it, I'll run another test
looking another testing here, nice posting man!
Hi,
anyone has had a chance to test enemy 1.10 against suprminer 1.6?
I have been watching them for a few days, it seems that enemy is slightly ahead, just a feeling, but no solid testing my side.
Has anyone tried the performance of the other implementations e.g. xevan etc?
Thanks and nice thread!
anyone has had a chance to test enemy 1.10 against suprminer 1.6?
I have been watching them for a few days, it seems that enemy is slightly ahead, just a feeling, but no solid testing my side.
Has anyone tried the performance of the other implementations e.g. xevan etc?
Thanks and nice thread!
JackIT, do you have performed tests based on different components of the GPUs?
I want to know the result on how performs one and the same technology but with different specifications.
And if anyone can perform such test, that would be very helpful.
2 GPUs, with different specifications:
Dual GTX1060-O3G Dual GTX1060-O6G
GPU/Boost: 1594MHz/1809MHz 1594MHz/1809MHz
RAM: 3GB GDDR5/192bit 8008MHz 6GB GDDR5/192bit 8008MHz
* Obviously, the GPU/Boost is the same for both GPUs, would that mean same speed of mining?
* If all parameters are identical with exception of the RAM (3GB & 6GB), how would that reflect to the mining?
I want to know the result on how performs one and the same technology but with different specifications.
And if anyone can perform such test, that would be very helpful.
2 GPUs, with different specifications:
Dual GTX1060-O3G Dual GTX1060-O6G
GPU/Boost: 1594MHz/1809MHz 1594MHz/1809MHz
RAM: 3GB GDDR5/192bit 8008MHz 6GB GDDR5/192bit 8008MHz
* Obviously, the GPU/Boost is the same for both GPUs, would that mean same speed of mining?
* If all parameters are identical with exception of the RAM (3GB & 6GB), how would that reflect to the mining?
As of memory is not really a bottleneck for X16r, it shouldn't be noticeable.
There is no DAG things in X16r so memory capacity doesn't impact performance (like it does/did with ETH).
You will probably see different result if you cannot apply same OC on both cards (due to opposite ASIC quality).
Great! Thanks for the info, it is very helpful.
I have to read more about the algos.
any test for 1.10？
nothing yet.. haven't been mining RVN the past week. as soon as come back to it, I'll run another test
What are you Mining? (If I may be so bold as to ask)
any test for 1.10？
nothing yet.. haven't been mining RVN the past week. as soon as come back to it, I'll run another test
any test for 1.10？
Quote
I'm limited with 1000W PSUs.
I could try a test with 80% PL maximum.
I could try a test with 80% PL maximum.
That would be great! Also, whatever temp limit you might feel comfortable with might help too.
Quote
Conclusion: underclocking mem could gain you slightly better reward.
With that power limit in place, this would make sense. Since mem adds to the power load, underclocking the memory would have the core throttled later. Have you tried this same test with higher limits (100% or higher)?
I'm limited with 1000W PSUs.
I could try a test with 80% PL maximum.
Quote
Conclusion: underclocking mem could gain you slightly better reward.
With that power limit in place, this would make sense. Since mem adds to the power load, underclocking the memory would have the core throttled later. Have you tried this same test with higher limits (100% or higher)?
Sorry for polluting your thread, JackIT, but I've made 2 tests with 2 identical rigs that I want share.
I wanted to know if mem underclock (-502) would underperform mem 0 performance.
Results looks interesting.
Rigs have same mobo, cpu, ram, ssd, psu, risers and 6 x ASUS STRIX 1070TI.
Tests were done with Enemy 1.09b and last exactly 24 hours.
All cards are set: 70% Power limit (126W), 70C Temp Limit, Core Clock: +100
1. test:
RIG1: ASUS_L: Memory Clock: -502, 291.49613601 RVN
RIG2: ASUS_R: Memory Clock: 0, 293.82484280 RVN
After 1. test RIG2 with higher mem clock gets advantage of 0.007988, or less than 1%.
2. test:
RIG1: ASUS_L: Memory Clock: 0, 287.17642980 RVN
RIG2: ASUS_R: Memory Clock: -502, 295.71330164 RVN
Looks like RIG2 is even more faster with mem clock -502.
Advantage of 0.029727, or 2.97%.
RIG2 looks faster despite of identical hardware.
Conclusion: underclocking mem could gain you slightly better reward.
I wanted to know if mem underclock (-502) would underperform mem 0 performance.
Results looks interesting.
Rigs have same mobo, cpu, ram, ssd, psu, risers and 6 x ASUS STRIX 1070TI.
Tests were done with Enemy 1.09b and last exactly 24 hours.
All cards are set: 70% Power limit (126W), 70C Temp Limit, Core Clock: +100
1. test:
RIG1: ASUS_L: Memory Clock: -502, 291.49613601 RVN
RIG2: ASUS_R: Memory Clock: 0, 293.82484280 RVN
After 1. test RIG2 with higher mem clock gets advantage of 0.007988, or less than 1%.
2. test:
RIG1: ASUS_L: Memory Clock: 0, 287.17642980 RVN
RIG2: ASUS_R: Memory Clock: -502, 295.71330164 RVN
Looks like RIG2 is even more faster with mem clock -502.
Advantage of 0.029727, or 2.97%.
RIG2 looks faster despite of identical hardware.
Conclusion: underclocking mem could gain you slightly better reward.
JackIT, do you have performed tests based on different components of the GPUs?
I want to know the result on how performs one and the same technology but with different specifications.
And if anyone can perform such test, that would be very helpful.
2 GPUs, with different specifications:
Dual GTX1060-O3G Dual GTX1060-O6G
GPU/Boost: 1594MHz/1809MHz 1594MHz/1809MHz
RAM: 3GB GDDR5/192bit 8008MHz 6GB GDDR5/192bit 8008MHz
* Obviously, the GPU/Boost is the same for both GPUs, would that mean same speed of mining?
* If all parameters are identical with exception of the RAM (3GB & 6GB), how would that reflect to the mining?
I want to know the result on how performs one and the same technology but with different specifications.
And if anyone can perform such test, that would be very helpful.
2 GPUs, with different specifications:
Dual GTX1060-O3G Dual GTX1060-O6G
GPU/Boost: 1594MHz/1809MHz 1594MHz/1809MHz
RAM: 3GB GDDR5/192bit 8008MHz 6GB GDDR5/192bit 8008MHz
* Obviously, the GPU/Boost is the same for both GPUs, would that mean same speed of mining?
* If all parameters are identical with exception of the RAM (3GB & 6GB), how would that reflect to the mining?
As of memory is not really a bottleneck for X16r, it shouldn't be noticeable.
There is no DAG things in X16r so memory capacity doesn't impact performance (like it does/did with ETH).
You will probably see different result if you cannot apply same OC on both cards (due to opposite ASIC quality).
JackIT, do you have performed tests based on different components of the GPUs?
I want to know the result on how performs one and the same technology but with different specifications.
And if anyone can perform such test, that would be very helpful.
2 GPUs, with different specifications:
Dual GTX1060-O3G Dual GTX1060-O6G
GPU/Boost: 1594MHz/1809MHz 1594MHz/1809MHz
RAM: 3GB GDDR5/192bit 8008MHz 6GB GDDR5/192bit 8008MHz
* Obviously, the GPU/Boost is the same for both GPUs, would that mean same speed of mining?
* If all parameters are identical with exception of the RAM (3GB & 6GB), how would that reflect to the mining?
I want to know the result on how performs one and the same technology but with different specifications.
And if anyone can perform such test, that would be very helpful.
2 GPUs, with different specifications:
Dual GTX1060-O3G Dual GTX1060-O6G
GPU/Boost: 1594MHz/1809MHz 1594MHz/1809MHz
RAM: 3GB GDDR5/192bit 8008MHz 6GB GDDR5/192bit 8008MHz
* Obviously, the GPU/Boost is the same for both GPUs, would that mean same speed of mining?
* If all parameters are identical with exception of the RAM (3GB & 6GB), how would that reflect to the mining?
Mega Like for this topic!
However, im concerned about efficiency per Watt, try with 65% ~ 80%PL
However, im concerned about efficiency per Watt, try with 65% ~ 80%PL
Why is that important? As long as it's profitable, I mine at 100 pl because otherwise I don't earn as much as I could. Why leave capacity unused, even if it is somewhat less profitable above 80 pl...
Some people like to factor in cost in electricity. But if that coin goes from $0.05 to $10, that cost savings actually hurts you. I'm with you on running it at most optimal point of hash rate instead of hash per kwh. But for each there own, so I ain't bashing opinions on savings.
Well, a lot of home miner are limited global power wise more than investment wise, so it can make sense to have best efficiency per card.
Absolutely agree! Depending on the electricity cost, everyone should decide for his rigs what is best - max power or balanced Hash/Kwh.
The difference between $0.1/KwH and $1/KwH is kinda bothering when looking for profit.
Really great post, much appreciated ...
I would left you some merit if I had some spendable. Good job.
With different Rigs - have I to set the value for difficulty for each Rig?
Example:
Rig 1: 40 MH/s -> d=20
Rig 2: 65 MH/s -> d=32.5
Rig 3: 35 MH/s -> d=17.5
or the full account?
d = 70?
Example:
Rig 1: 40 MH/s -> d=20
Rig 2: 65 MH/s -> d=32.5
Rig 3: 35 MH/s -> d=17.5
or the full account?
d = 70?
Hi, people here are not so good with answer on questions so I have to ask on the same question a second time,
so I have also mining rigs and I have two, each have 40 mh/s so difficulty must be 20 for each rig or 40 for 1 account ?? I thing that is realy good question
? so pls for answer, thanksIf you are using a stratum-proxy : d=40.
If not, each rig must ask his own stratum difficulty.
Note that some pool have minimum stratum difficulty (15 for ravenminer.com) and others ignore this parameter.
So if I understand right stratum difficulty (d=) must be manualy se on 40 for each rig ? thanks
In fact i'm not sure if you know what is a stratum-proxy. It's a software somewhere on your network between your rigs and the pool. It's dispatching work to your rigs and concentrating shares to the pool.
We will assume that you don't use this kind of stuff, so you should set each rig password with d=20.
Mega Like for this topic!
However, im concerned about efficiency per Watt, try with 65% ~ 80%PL
However, im concerned about efficiency per Watt, try with 65% ~ 80%PL
Why is that important? As long as it's profitable, I mine at 100 pl because otherwise I don't earn as much as I could. Why leave capacity unused, even if it is somewhat less profitable above 80 pl...
Some people like to factor in cost in electricity. But if that coin goes from $0.05 to $10, that cost savings actually hurts you. I'm with you on running it at most optimal point of hash rate instead of hash per kwh. But for each there own, so I ain't bashing opinions on savings.
Well, a lot of home miner are limited global power wise more than investment wise, so it can make sense to have best efficiency per card.
With different Rigs - have I to set the value for difficulty for each Rig?
Example:
Rig 1: 40 MH/s -> d=20
Rig 2: 65 MH/s -> d=32.5
Rig 3: 35 MH/s -> d=17.5
or the full account?
d = 70?
Example:
Rig 1: 40 MH/s -> d=20
Rig 2: 65 MH/s -> d=32.5
Rig 3: 35 MH/s -> d=17.5
or the full account?
d = 70?
Hi, people here are not so good with answer on questions so I have to ask on the same question a second time,
so I have also mining rigs and I have two, each have 40 mh/s so difficulty must be 20 for each rig or 40 for 1 account ?? I thing that is realy good question
? so pls for answer, thanksIf you are using a stratum-proxy : d=40.
If not, each rig must ask his own stratum difficulty.
Note that some pool have minimum stratum difficulty (15 for ravenminer.com) and others ignore this parameter.
So if I understand right stratum difficulty (d=) must be manualy se on 40 for each rig ? thanks
With different Rigs - have I to set the value for difficulty for each Rig?
Example:
Rig 1: 40 MH/s -> d=20
Rig 2: 65 MH/s -> d=32.5
Rig 3: 35 MH/s -> d=17.5
or the full account?
d = 70?
Example:
Rig 1: 40 MH/s -> d=20
Rig 2: 65 MH/s -> d=32.5
Rig 3: 35 MH/s -> d=17.5
or the full account?
d = 70?
Hi, people here are not so good with answer on questions so I have to ask on the same question a second time,
so I have also mining rigs and I have two, each have 40 mh/s so difficulty must be 20 for each rig or 40 for 1 account ?? I thing that is realy good question
? so pls for answer, thanksIf you are using a stratum-proxy : d=40.
If not, each rig must ask his own stratum difficulty.
Note that some pool have minimum stratum difficulty (15 for ravenminer.com) and others ignore this parameter.
With different Rigs - have I to set the value for difficulty for each Rig?
Example:
Rig 1: 40 MH/s -> d=20
Rig 2: 65 MH/s -> d=32.5
Rig 3: 35 MH/s -> d=17.5
or the full account?
d = 70?
Example:
Rig 1: 40 MH/s -> d=20
Rig 2: 65 MH/s -> d=32.5
Rig 3: 35 MH/s -> d=17.5
or the full account?
d = 70?
Hi, people here are not so good with answer on questions so I have to ask on the same question a second time,
so I have also mining rigs and I have two, each have 40 mh/s so difficulty must be 20 for each rig or 40 for 1 account ?? I thing that is realy good question
? so pls for answer, thanks Jump to: