[ANN] Ravencoin [RVN] PoW GPU Mining | Asset Transfer Blockchain (Updated ANN) - page 211.

GTX2070

newbie

Activity: 1

Merit: 0

Quote from: melpheos on April 09, 2018, 12:29:57 PM

Running a test with 4 different miners of my rigs 6*1070ti 70% 200/600
suprminer 1.6
enemy 1.3
enemy 1.5 (dev fee 1%)
ccminerx16rx16sv0.4 which shows as 2.2.5

Following address for result. Currently Enemy 1.5 wins.
The difference between the best (enemy 1.5) and the worse ~~ccminerv0.4~~(enemy 1.3) is less than 4% but the test is only 24 hours so i need to wait to get more accurate data.
The difference not being too large i'll let it run for a few more days.

suprminer 1.6 https://ravenminer.com/?address=RK4sggMC5JCikjmx87U4ocFvmcLitiQ3jc
Enemy 1.5 https://ravenminer.com/?address=RQJdZCc3GPCARPRzCgDUmXb2X2HHx7csnv
Enemy 1.3 https://ravenminer.com/?address=RDvuNay9x4E6DnbxUrSBzW3sP4sDmWXLj4
ccminerx16rx16sv0.4 https://ravenminer.com/?address=RQyqEs27NNe5cEbGb4FdHDm9iQ3Uhno1NT

If you have other version you know are performing well let me know and i can test it over a few days if the difference is not too large on the downside

Edit : next will be https://github.com/Ravencoin-Miner/Ravencoin/releases

Thank you. And what do you say about the miner A1_min3r

Falacio

newbie

Activity: 50

Merit: 0

Quote from: melpheos on April 09, 2018, 12:43:10 PM

Quote from: Falacio on April 09, 2018, 12:39:29 PM

Quote from: melpheos on April 09, 2018, 12:29:57 PM

Running a test with 4 different miners of my rigs 6*1070ti 70% 200/600
suprminer 1.6
enemy 1.3
enemy 1.5 (dev fee 1%)
ccminerx16rx16sv0.4 which shows as 2.2.5

Following address for result. Currently Enemy 1.5 wins.
The difference between the best (1.5) and the worse ccminerv0.4 is less than 4% but the test i only 24 hours so i need to wait to get more accurate data.
The difference not being too large i'll let it run for a few more days.

suprminer 1.6 https://ravenminer.com/?address=RK4sggMC5JCikjmx87U4ocFvmcLitiQ3jc
Enemy 1.5 https://ravenminer.com/?address=RQJdZCc3GPCARPRzCgDUmXb2X2HHx7csnv
Enemy 1.3 https://ravenminer.com/?address=RDvuNay9x4E6DnbxUrSBzW3sP4sDmWXLj4
ccminerx16rx16sv0.4 https://ravenminer.com/?address=RQyqEs27NNe5cEbGb4FdHDm9iQ3Uhno1NT

If you have other version you know are performing well let me know and i can test it over a few days if the difference is not too large on the downside

Very interesting test. I'm using suprminer, and I was very happy. But I'd like to try enemy 1.5. Do you have a link to the release? I coun't find it in github

The are all there
https://coinguides.org/ravencoin-x16r-miner-list/

Thanks for the link. But I don't like closed sources...
I've just donwloaded both Ravencoin Miner and Zealot/Enemy and only this one made nod32 pop up.
Both being a zip with a miner inside...

melpheos

jr. member

Activity: 557

Merit: 5

Quote from: Falacio on April 09, 2018, 12:39:29 PM

Quote from: melpheos on April 09, 2018, 12:29:57 PM

Running a test with 4 different miners of my rigs 6*1070ti 70% 200/600
suprminer 1.6
enemy 1.3
enemy 1.5 (dev fee 1%)
ccminerx16rx16sv0.4 which shows as 2.2.5

Following address for result. Currently Enemy 1.5 wins.
The difference between the best (1.5) and the worse ccminerv0.4 is less than 4% but the test i only 24 hours so i need to wait to get more accurate data.
The difference not being too large i'll let it run for a few more days.

suprminer 1.6 https://ravenminer.com/?address=RK4sggMC5JCikjmx87U4ocFvmcLitiQ3jc
Enemy 1.5 https://ravenminer.com/?address=RQJdZCc3GPCARPRzCgDUmXb2X2HHx7csnv
Enemy 1.3 https://ravenminer.com/?address=RDvuNay9x4E6DnbxUrSBzW3sP4sDmWXLj4
ccminerx16rx16sv0.4 https://ravenminer.com/?address=RQyqEs27NNe5cEbGb4FdHDm9iQ3Uhno1NT

If you have other version you know are performing well let me know and i can test it over a few days if the difference is not too large on the downside

Very interesting test. I'm using suprminer, and I was very happy. But I'd like to try enemy 1.5. Do you have a link to the release? I coun't find it in github

They are all there
https://coinguides.org/ravencoin-x16r-miner-list/

Falacio

newbie

Activity: 50

Merit: 0

Quote from: jesser509 on April 09, 2018, 12:36:23 PM

Quote from: melpheos on April 09, 2018, 12:29:57 PM

Running a test with 4 different miners of my rigs 6*1070ti 70% 200/600
suprminer 1.6
enemy 1.3
enemy 1.5 (dev fee 1%)
ccminerx16rx16sv0.4 which shows as 2.2.5

Following address for result. Currently Enemy 1.5 wins.
The difference between the best (1.5) and the worse ccminerv0.4 is less than 4% but the test i only 24 hours so i need to wait to get more accurate data.
The difference not being too large i'll let it run for a few more days.

suprminer 1.6 https://ravenminer.com/?address=RK4sggMC5JCikjmx87U4ocFvmcLitiQ3jc
Enemy 1.5 https://ravenminer.com/?address=RQJdZCc3GPCARPRzCgDUmXb2X2HHx7csnv
Enemy 1.3 https://ravenminer.com/?address=RDvuNay9x4E6DnbxUrSBzW3sP4sDmWXLj4
ccminerx16rx16sv0.4 https://ravenminer.com/?address=RQyqEs27NNe5cEbGb4FdHDm9iQ3Uhno1NT

If you have other version you know are performing well let me know and i can test it over a few days if the difference is not too large on the downside

Hey I would appreciate if you threw Ravencoin Miner v2.5 into your comparisons

https://github.com/Ravencoin-Miner/Ravencoin/releases

I'll give it a try also

Falacio

newbie

Activity: 50

Merit: 0

Quote from: melpheos on April 09, 2018, 12:29:57 PM

Running a test with 4 different miners of my rigs 6*1070ti 70% 200/600
suprminer 1.6
enemy 1.3
enemy 1.5 (dev fee 1%)
ccminerx16rx16sv0.4 which shows as 2.2.5

Following address for result. Currently Enemy 1.5 wins.
The difference between the best (1.5) and the worse ccminerv0.4 is less than 4% but the test i only 24 hours so i need to wait to get more accurate data.
The difference not being too large i'll let it run for a few more days.

suprminer 1.6 https://ravenminer.com/?address=RK4sggMC5JCikjmx87U4ocFvmcLitiQ3jc
Enemy 1.5 https://ravenminer.com/?address=RQJdZCc3GPCARPRzCgDUmXb2X2HHx7csnv
Enemy 1.3 https://ravenminer.com/?address=RDvuNay9x4E6DnbxUrSBzW3sP4sDmWXLj4
ccminerx16rx16sv0.4 https://ravenminer.com/?address=RQyqEs27NNe5cEbGb4FdHDm9iQ3Uhno1NT

If you have other version you know are performing well let me know and i can test it over a few days if the difference is not too large on the downside

Very interesting test. I'm using suprminer, and I was very happy. But I'd like to try enemy 1.5. Do you have a link to the release? I coun't find it in github

melpheos

jr. member

Activity: 557

Merit: 5

Quote from: jesser509 on April 09, 2018, 12:36:23 PM

Quote from: melpheos on April 09, 2018, 12:29:57 PM

Running a test with 4 different miners of my rigs 6*1070ti 70% 200/600
suprminer 1.6
enemy 1.3
enemy 1.5 (dev fee 1%)
ccminerx16rx16sv0.4 which shows as 2.2.5

Following address for result. Currently Enemy 1.5 wins.
The difference between the best (1.5) and the worse ccminerv0.4 is less than 4% but the test i only 24 hours so i need to wait to get more accurate data.
The difference not being too large i'll let it run for a few more days.

suprminer 1.6 https://ravenminer.com/?address=RK4sggMC5JCikjmx87U4ocFvmcLitiQ3jc
Enemy 1.5 https://ravenminer.com/?address=RQJdZCc3GPCARPRzCgDUmXb2X2HHx7csnv
Enemy 1.3 https://ravenminer.com/?address=RDvuNay9x4E6DnbxUrSBzW3sP4sDmWXLj4
ccminerx16rx16sv0.4 https://ravenminer.com/?address=RQyqEs27NNe5cEbGb4FdHDm9iQ3Uhno1NT

If you have other version you know are performing well let me know and i can test it over a few days if the difference is not too large on the downside

Hey I would appreciate if you threw Ravencoin Miner v2.5 into your comparisons

https://github.com/Ravencoin-Miner/Ravencoin/releases

Was about to add it to my post. Will probably replace enemy 1.3 in 24 hours

melpheos

jr. member

Activity: 557

Merit: 5

Quote from: WickedPigeon on April 09, 2018, 12:34:31 PM

Quote from: melpheos on April 09, 2018, 12:29:57 PM

Running a test with 4 minutes of my rigs 6*1070ti 70% 200/600
suprminer 1.6
enemy 1.3
enemy 1.5 (dev fee 1%)
ccminerx16rx16sv0.4 which shows as 2.2.5

Following address for result. Currently Enemy 1.5 wins.
The difference between the best (1.5) and the worse ccminerv0.4 is less than 4% but the test i only 24 hours so i need to wait to get more accurate data.
The difference not being too large i'll let it run for a few more days.

suprminer 1.6 https://ravenminer.com/?address=RK4sggMC5JCikjmx87U4ocFvmcLitiQ3jc
Enemy 1.5 https://ravenminer.com/?address=RQJdZCc3GPCARPRzCgDUmXb2X2HHx7csnv
Enemy 1.3 https://ravenminer.com/?address=RDvuNay9x4E6DnbxUrSBzW3sP4sDmWXLj4
ccminerx16rx16sv0.4 https://ravenminer.com/?address=RQyqEs27NNe5cEbGb4FdHDm9iQ3Uhno1NT

If you have other version you know are performing well let me know and i can test it over a few days if the difference is not too large on the downside

4 minutes? Why 4 minutes, isn't that a little short? Maybe 12 hours.

I didn't have the time to correct before you posted. It's 4 miners :p

jesser509

newbie

Activity: 68

Merit: 0

Quote from: melpheos on April 09, 2018, 12:29:57 PM

Running a test with 4 different miners of my rigs 6*1070ti 70% 200/600
suprminer 1.6
enemy 1.3
enemy 1.5 (dev fee 1%)
ccminerx16rx16sv0.4 which shows as 2.2.5

Following address for result. Currently Enemy 1.5 wins.
The difference between the best (1.5) and the worse ccminerv0.4 is less than 4% but the test i only 24 hours so i need to wait to get more accurate data.
The difference not being too large i'll let it run for a few more days.

suprminer 1.6 https://ravenminer.com/?address=RK4sggMC5JCikjmx87U4ocFvmcLitiQ3jc
Enemy 1.5 https://ravenminer.com/?address=RQJdZCc3GPCARPRzCgDUmXb2X2HHx7csnv
Enemy 1.3 https://ravenminer.com/?address=RDvuNay9x4E6DnbxUrSBzW3sP4sDmWXLj4
ccminerx16rx16sv0.4 https://ravenminer.com/?address=RQyqEs27NNe5cEbGb4FdHDm9iQ3Uhno1NT

If you have other version you know are performing well let me know and i can test it over a few days if the difference is not too large on the downside

Hey I would appreciate if you threw Ravencoin Miner v2.5 into your comparisons

https://github.com/Ravencoin-Miner/Ravencoin/releases

WickedPigeon

member

Activity: 345

Merit: 16

Quote from: melpheos on April 09, 2018, 12:29:57 PM

Running a test with 4 minutes of my rigs 6*1070ti 70% 200/600
suprminer 1.6
enemy 1.3
enemy 1.5 (dev fee 1%)
ccminerx16rx16sv0.4 which shows as 2.2.5

Following address for result. Currently Enemy 1.5 wins.
The difference between the best (1.5) and the worse ccminerv0.4 is less than 4% but the test i only 24 hours so i need to wait to get more accurate data.
The difference not being too large i'll let it run for a few more days.

suprminer 1.6 https://ravenminer.com/?address=RK4sggMC5JCikjmx87U4ocFvmcLitiQ3jc
Enemy 1.5 https://ravenminer.com/?address=RQJdZCc3GPCARPRzCgDUmXb2X2HHx7csnv
Enemy 1.3 https://ravenminer.com/?address=RDvuNay9x4E6DnbxUrSBzW3sP4sDmWXLj4
ccminerx16rx16sv0.4 https://ravenminer.com/?address=RQyqEs27NNe5cEbGb4FdHDm9iQ3Uhno1NT

If you have other version you know are performing well let me know and i can test it over a few days if the difference is not too large on the downside

4 minutes? Why 4 minutes, isn't that a little short? Maybe 12 hours.

melpheos

jr. member

Activity: 557

Merit: 5

Running a test with 4 different miners of my rigs 6*1070ti 70% 200/600
suprminer 1.6
enemy 1.3
enemy 1.5 (dev fee 1%)
ccminerx16rx16sv0.4 which shows as 2.2.5

Following address for result. Currently Enemy 1.5 wins.
The difference between the best (enemy 1.5) and the worse ~~ccminerv0.4~~(enemy 1.3) is less than 4% but the test is only 24 hours so i need to wait to get more accurate data.
The difference not being too large i'll let it run for a few more days.

suprminer 1.6 https://ravenminer.com/?address=RK4sggMC5JCikjmx87U4ocFvmcLitiQ3jc
Enemy 1.5 https://ravenminer.com/?address=RQJdZCc3GPCARPRzCgDUmXb2X2HHx7csnv
Enemy 1.3 https://ravenminer.com/?address=RDvuNay9x4E6DnbxUrSBzW3sP4sDmWXLj4
ccminerx16rx16sv0.4 https://ravenminer.com/?address=RQyqEs27NNe5cEbGb4FdHDm9iQ3Uhno1NT

If you have other version you know are performing well let me know and i can test it over a few days if the difference is not too large on the downside

Edit : next will be https://github.com/Ravencoin-Miner/Ravencoin/releases

mindrust

legendary

Activity: 3276

Merit: 2442

Quote from: MokraCota on April 09, 2018, 09:23:42 AM

yup, Binance for example wants one milion (so I've heard) of a coin, before it get's listet. All those exchanges want coins in return of publishing them.

WoW, greedy motherfuckers. Forget it then. Let them eat shit. Let's focus more on the development side. The community will get even bigger and soon they'll have to add this coin because they'll lose money every second if they don't. We'll get atomic swaps soon too and then centralized exchanges will be no more. Let them have their fun while it lasts.

MinermanNC

legendary

Activity: 2198

Merit: 1000

Quote from: mindrust on April 09, 2018, 08:51:04 AM

When will this coin get listed on a (at least) mid-size exchange? (something like cryptopia) It already has a bigger&more active community than many alts out there. Why are exchanges still ignoring this project? Undecided

Ya that's a great question. Wondering that myself lol

suortti

newbie

Activity: 13

Merit: 0

what is the different between pool.threeeye.info and stratum.threeeyed.info? Which one i should use?
Every .configs says pool.threeeye and website says stratum.threeeye

B-MoneyXcan

hero member

Activity: 633

Merit: 500

B Money Prepaid Mastercard bmoney.io

Poloniex would be a nice target for Raven. Considering the new moves they made and their enjoyment of new tech. May be a good home

MokraCota

newbie

Activity: 25

Merit: 0

yup, Binance for example wants one milion (so I've heard) of a coin, before it get's listet. All those exchanges want coins in return of publishing them.

SolsticeFV

newbie

Activity: 23

Merit: 0

Quote from: mindrust on April 09, 2018, 08:51:04 AM

When will this coin get listed on a (at least) mid-size exchange? (something like cryptopia) It already has a bigger&more active community than many alts out there. Why are exchanges still ignoring this project? Undecided

I think 2 things from what I have read. I could be wrong but this is what I have read over the last few months:

1. Devs are not that worried about exchanges until later this year

2. Exchanges like Cryptopia charge a large fee to list a coin. There was no ICO or premine. Basically, someone in the community would have to pay the fee.

mindrust

legendary

Activity: 3276

Merit: 2442

When will this coin get listed on a (at least) mid-size exchange? (something like cryptopia) It already has a bigger&more active community than many alts out there. Why are exchanges still ignoring this project? Undecided

icezer0z

full member

Activity: 144

Merit: 102

ravenminer.com has been giving me issues this past weekend. Connection timeout for 16hrs...2nd time this has happened. not sure if it's DNS related on my end or what.

Lister

sr. member

Activity: 532

Merit: 250

Quote from: redzep on April 08, 2018, 04:33:52 PM

Hi

i have had same problem with ThreeEyed no payements last few days at all, and share total keeps resetting, moved to http://yiimp.eu for time being

and again hope i get coins they owe me, this like third pool for this coin now

I have same problem. Immature: 3828 rvn
Official Community Pool - scam?

bluebiker21

newbie

Activity: 22

Merit: 0

Forgive me if this has already been asked.

The whitepaper states - "The cost to create assets will be 500 RVN to create any qty of an asset".

Are there any plans to have this scaled in line with block reward halving? i.e. Future block reward = 2500 RVN/asset creation = 250 RVN.

If this is not the case, are we to expect parties to pay more in line with the increase in the value of RVN? Or will they only use this to create a greater amount of assets?

Interesting question,

I went through the roadmap as well, and wondered about 5 RVN per asset.
5 RVN is fixed whatever the value of the asset.

hmmmm looks like RVN is more suited for expensive assets, not cheap ones. Especially if the prices picks up.

Topic: [ANN] Ravencoin [RVN] PoW GPU Mining | Asset Transfer Blockchain (Updated ANN) - page 211. (Read 1170617 times)