Even in bitcoin, the steady majority of people want only profit, they are not interested in the fundamental meaning of this system.
These are the realities, perhaps this is a problem for the crypto world. But this platform offers more simple things, what people need.
Topic: [ANN] re:factor - New Asset in Global Crypto Economy - page 2. (Read 2056 times)
In fact, it is very difficult to guess which project will be successful, we can only make assumptions. For example, I was very skeptical about Shivom or Tron. But these projects are developing and those who have invested in them in the early stages are very happy.
Good idea. But I think that financial projects have an advantage over those projects that are oriented to industrial production or something like that.
In fact, it is very difficult to guess which project will be successful, we can only make assumptions. For example, I was very skeptical about Shivom or Tron. But these projects are developing and those who have invested in them in the early stages are very happy.
Good idea. But I think that financial projects have an advantage over those projects that are oriented to industrial production or something like that. I like it when developers take care of users and offer them a variety of options. This is good for those who prefer to use flexible strategies in their work.
It would be nice if there was a downgrade tool. Something like a default swap.There are a few marketplaces and exchanges for trading receivables . Let's take a look at re:factor key differences.
Should a buyer of goods (debtor) fail to make a payment in a specified period of time, most of the platforms require supplier of goods (receivables seller) to repay the debt instead. Such transactions are said to be executed with recourse to receivables sellers.
Unlike on other platforms, sellers on re:factor platform can benefit from using non-recourse model. In such case a seller will get protection against debtors’ bankruptcy or late payment in addition to receivables financing. When sellers choose any of this two models (recourse or non-recourse), re:factor informs investors about the seller’s request, recommends maximum risk exposure limits and provides professional advice on associated risks. Based on that information investors will be able to make a deliberate decisions about proposed investment. A seller will be able to switch from non-recourse to a recourse transaction to facilitate the trade, should investors be unwilling to accept the risks.
Re:factor may also offer investors a bad debt protection service, so investor could obtain a right to claim a delayed payment not only to seller, but sequentially to re:factor as well. Needless to say, such option sufficiently lowers investment risks.
I think investors will be happy about this. With the help of these features they will be able to choose the most convenient strategy for themselves and manage the risk.Should a buyer of goods (debtor) fail to make a payment in a specified period of time, most of the platforms require supplier of goods (receivables seller) to repay the debt instead. Such transactions are said to be executed with recourse to receivables sellers.
Unlike on other platforms, sellers on re:factor platform can benefit from using non-recourse model. In such case a seller will get protection against debtors’ bankruptcy or late payment in addition to receivables financing. When sellers choose any of this two models (recourse or non-recourse), re:factor informs investors about the seller’s request, recommends maximum risk exposure limits and provides professional advice on associated risks. Based on that information investors will be able to make a deliberate decisions about proposed investment. A seller will be able to switch from non-recourse to a recourse transaction to facilitate the trade, should investors be unwilling to accept the risks.
Re:factor may also offer investors a bad debt protection service, so investor could obtain a right to claim a delayed payment not only to seller, but sequentially to re:factor as well. Needless to say, such option sufficiently lowers investment risks.
I see that half of the amount planned for the presale has already been collected. A good result for such a complex market.
Yes, it can be regarded as a success. Given that the ICO is not yet completed, it can be assumed that this is not the final figure.I see that half of the amount planned for the presale has already been collected. A good result for such a complex market.
I can assume that if the market was more positive, then the number of tokens sold would be much larger. These are the realities, perhaps this is a problem for the crypto world. But this platform offers more simple things, what people need.
and what is the profit to ordinary investors or speculators in such a project? if you soberly look at the chance that the project will make a profit and grow stronger than the rest of the market is still very small i think. can this negative view of the market but i try to soberly assess the chances and here it is not good with them.
I see that half of the amount planned for the presale has already been collected. A good result for such a complex market.
Yes, it can be regarded as a success. Given that the ICO is not yet completed, it can be assumed that this is not the final figure.
Reserve
Really. Bitcoin began as an ideology. I think that in today's world, few people can be attracted by ideology. The advantage of this project is that it offers a more understandable thing - the profit from using the platform.
Even in bitcoin, the steady majority of people want only profit, they are not interested in the fundamental meaning of this system.and what is the profit to ordinary investors or speculators in such a project? if you soberly look at the chance that the project will make a profit and grow stronger than the rest of the market is still very small i think. can this negative view of the market but i try to soberly assess the chances and here it is not good with them.
Really. Bitcoin began as an ideology. I think that in today's world, few people can be attracted by ideology. The advantage of this project is that it offers a more understandable thing - the profit from using the platform.
Even in bitcoin, the steady majority of people want only profit, they are not interested in the fundamental meaning of this system.You are comparing different areas. Bitcoin requires special skills and understanding of the principles of crypto currency, but this system, provided a friendly interface is created, will be easier to use.
Really. Bitcoin began as an ideology. I think that in today's world, few people can be attracted by ideology. The advantage of this project is that it offers a more understandable thing - the profit from using the platform.MelhE7
Many people lost money on the collapse of real estate in 2008, but we do not say that real estate sucks. Each project should be evaluated individually. In any circumstances, there are projects that will grow and make a profit.
Many people lost money on the collapse of real estate in 2008, but we do not say that real estate sucks. Each project should be evaluated individually. In any circumstances, there are projects that will grow and make a profit.
the question is how the team assesses the risks if there is a good plan even on a fall you can earn. i think the idea is normal, but for this market you need a couple more drivers to pull up large investors.
But in the developing countries, a high level of inflation. Therefore, sometimes the exchange rate of the local currency falls sharply against the dollar. This will be an additional reason to use the tokens of this platform.
Yes, with the help of the platform it will be possible to work in the markets of developing countries, to receive a high income, but at the same time not to take great risks.BittyBoBitty
Apparently with the implementation of the project, the turnover of money on the platform will be very large. Do you plan to create own exchange for this reason?
This is a separate business, you can talk about this after the platform starts working in several countries. Perhaps it will happen very quickly because it has a huge potential.Apparently with the implementation of the project, the turnover of money on the platform will be very large. Do you plan to create own exchange for this reason?
I see that half of the amount planned for the presale has already been collected. A good result for such a complex market.
Yes, it can be regarded as a success. Given that the ICO is not yet completed, it can be assumed that this is not the final figure. 
tilecuwi
Yes, some projects sell all tokens to funds and large investors. I do not think this is the right approach. It is best to distribute tokens between a large number of people so that the price of the token is determined more efficiently.
Yes, some projects sell all tokens to funds and large investors. I do not think this is the right approach. It is best to distribute tokens between a large number of people so that the price of the token is determined more efficiently.
I see that half of the amount planned for the presale has already been collected. A good result for such a complex market.
An interesting idea, I think in the future when the main functionality of the platform will be realized, developers will consider this possibility.
Perhaps this should be considered in advance because it is a very profitable scheme and there is no point in sharing your revenues with third-party projects.Jump to: