Topic: [ANN] re:factor - New Asset in Global Crypto Economy - page 3. (Read 2056 times)

the question is how the team assesses the risks if there is a good plan even on a fall you can earn. i think the idea is normal, but for this market you need a couple more drivers to pull up large investors.

I like it when developers take care of users and offer them a variety of options. This is good for those who prefer to use flexible strategies in their work.

Diversification is very good, but being in a near-monopoly position in any of the markets is also very profitable 

Really. Bitcoin began as an ideology. I think that in today's world, few people can be attracted by ideology. The advantage of this project is that it offers a more understandable thing - the profit from using the platform.

You are comparing different areas. Bitcoin requires special skills and understanding of the principles of crypto currency, but this system, provided a friendly interface is created, will be easier to use.

This is a separate business, you can talk about this after the platform starts working in several countries. Perhaps it will happen very quickly because it has a huge potential.

I think that it is not necessary to invent something new, it is enough to use the opportunities that the platform will provide and make a profit.

An interesting idea, I think in the future when the main functionality of the platform will be realized, developers will consider this possibility.

Maximum decentralization is an ideal to which all projects should be striven, I agree with you. I think in this project, taking into account the fact that huge sums of money will turnover through it, we will gradually come to this.

I think investors will be happy about this. With the help of these features they will be able to choose the most convenient strategy for themselves and manage the risk.

@MelhE7
I agree with you, there are such problems, but a lot of people got profit on ICO. And the general capitalization of the market is growing. This means that this is a lucrative market.

Fuck ICOs . Many members lost money on that shit without accountablity to the scammers or devolpment teams as promised .

I think that this is not necessary. In the sphere that the team has chosen, there is already so much money that it will be very difficult to master. Why think about other markets when there is still a lot of work in this market.

An interesting system, I think you should pay great attention to the compliance of this scheme with the legislation of the countries in which it will be applied. If this is done and all problems are prevented, the project will have a great future.

I would be glad of that. Some projects do this in a similar way even if they have enough investors. Just in order to maintain their positive image.

The concept has already been developed, the team has to conduct an ICO and complete the implementation of the project, I hope we will see its work soon.

There are a few marketplaces and exchanges for trading receivables . Let's take a look at re:factor key differences.

Should a buyer of goods (debtor) fail to make a payment in a specified period of time, most of the platforms require supplier of goods (receivables seller) to repay the debt instead. Such transactions are said to be executed with recourse to receivables sellers.

Unlike on other platforms, sellers on re:factor platform can benefit from using non-recourse model. In such case a seller will get protection against debtors’ bankruptcy or late payment in addition to receivables financing. When sellers choose any of this two models (recourse or non-recourse), re:factor informs investors about the seller’s request, recommends maximum risk exposure limits and provides professional advice on associated risks. Based on that information investors will be able to make a deliberate decisions about proposed investment. A seller will be able to switch from non-recourse to a recourse transaction to facilitate the trade, should investors be unwilling to accept the risks.

Re:factor may also offer investors a bad debt protection service, so investor could obtain a right to claim a delayed payment not only to seller, but sequentially to re:factor as well. Needless to say, such option sufficiently lowers investment risks.

But in the developing countries, a high level of inflation. Therefore, sometimes the exchange rate of the local currency falls sharply against the dollar. This will be an additional reason to use the tokens of this platform.

The number of people is not important, the number of active users is important. 0.5% of the total population is too optimistic. Even 0.5% of people do not use bitcoin, then why they will use re: factor?

It turns out that the investor will have the opportunity to choose asset taking into account the level of risk? It will be very convenient, with the appropriate analysis it will be possible to raise the level of income.