Topic: [ANN] Revamped PinkCoin (PC / PINK) PoS | Multipool | Fundraiser | Anonymous - page 107. (Read 207035 times)
May 29, 2014, 10:58:21 AM
your replies made me confortable staying a pink millionaire ...
May 29, 2014, 10:51:32 AM
May 29, 2014, 10:38:10 AM
the team should post their identity ...
always good for trust
no irc channel?
hompeage not impressive
FUD / scam accusations
i think its risky :| (first noob impression)
IRC channel is on the way, read previous posts about the special group. always good for trust
no irc channel?
hompeage not impressive
FUD / scam accusations
i think its risky :| (first noob impression)
Also it is better to post here than on IRC.
May 29, 2014, 10:34:58 AM
the team should post their identity ...
always good for trust
no irc channel?
hompeage not impressive
FUD / scam accusations
i think its risky :|
always good for trust
no irc channel?
hompeage not impressive
FUD / scam accusations
i think its risky :|
These guys are the real deal; I'm sure you'll be hearing from the group today.
May 29, 2014, 10:27:50 AM
the team should post their identity ...
always good for trust
no irc channel?
hompeage not impressive
FUD / scam accusations
i think its risky :| (first noob impression)
always good for trust
no irc channel?
hompeage not impressive
FUD / scam accusations
i think its risky :| (first noob impression)
May 29, 2014, 10:26:26 AM
bought in at peak .. 
im all in
developers, i pray to god u wont scam me
high risk, high reward
and its sure Pink comes to Cryptsy and Polo soon?
sounds to good to be true
high risk? not really, we're just leaving the first station.. next step is poloniex, however we need higher volume which is a matter of time.im all in
developers, i pray to god u wont scam me
high risk, high reward
and its sure Pink comes to Cryptsy and Polo soon?
sounds to good to be true
Developers are doing great job and the community is small but generous and trustfull
May 29, 2014, 10:22:31 AM
bought in at peak ..
im all in
developers, i pray to god u wont scam me
high risk, high reward
and its sure Pink comes to Cryptsy and Polo soon?
sounds to good to be true
im all in
developers, i pray to god u wont scam me
high risk, high reward
and its sure Pink comes to Cryptsy and Polo soon?
sounds to good to be true
May 29, 2014, 09:52:10 AM
I'm in the Pink! #PinkCoin for 17SAT!
welcome!! and absolutely great buy at a great price!
May 29, 2014, 08:57:02 AM
Wow! You guys did a lot of work. Everything looks so professional and polished. So, you're not making a new coin and keeping the old one, right? I think that's a good idea. I love the coin, as is.
I found a minor discrepancy. At http://www.stayclassy.org/fundraise?fcid=320114 you're raising $20k, but at http://www.pinkcoin.info/ you say only $10k.
Also, the link posted here in the OP for the nbcf doesn't actually work and I didn't see PC mentioned on their site or shop.
Finding http://www.xxx.xxx/ in the OP was surprising, but hey I'm not complaining.
All in all looks like a job well done!
I found a minor discrepancy. At http://www.stayclassy.org/fundraise?fcid=320114 you're raising $20k, but at http://www.pinkcoin.info/ you say only $10k.
Also, the link posted here in the OP for the nbcf doesn't actually work and I didn't see PC mentioned on their site or shop.
Finding http://www.xxx.xxx/ in the OP was surprising, but hey I'm not complaining.
All in all looks like a job well done!
Pictures good! Coins is also good!
May 29, 2014, 08:47:04 AM
I tried the anonymous transaction function. It doesnt't work, all it does is send the coins to a different address, and from there it comes right into your primary address, and it is all viewable at the block explorer.
Scamcoin.
Scamcoin.
I literally just discovered this as well and have sent a message to the dev about how we can go about fixing it. It's an experimental proof of concept and the dev is new to crypto, but a highly skilled and talented developer nonetheless. We should indeed have looked more closely at the blockchain and done more testing before release to double-check his work and I apologize for that. I will personally work closely with the dev to ensure proper anonymity is achieved and see that it gets fixed today. Please stand by on my word. We had no intentions of misleading anyone.
As soon as I discuss the code with the dev, and we set a course of action in motion I will put together a whitepaper explaining exactly how the anonymous function works for complete transparency.
EDIT: For clarity and transparency, from what I found it looks like the current implementation basically forwards the coins to the destination. It provides a simple mask for the transaction, but it's easy to trace back through the block-chain if you know what to look for. There was supposed to be a mixing that takes place but obviously that's not happening right now.
EDIT 2: After playing with the daemon I'm willing to bet it's a silly configuration mistake that's stopping the mix from taking place in the first place. I can't confirm that with the dev right now as he's asleep (I'm the only one awake right now apparently), and I can't make the change personally, but that's what it looks like to me.
Looks like an honest mistake, and I'm sure there are some other cool features you guys are rolling out too. Looking forward to see how this coin grows with this new team!
May 29, 2014, 07:56:02 AM
Pinkcoin faucet has reached it's 3000th payout!
allmost 500.000 coins have been given out allready. 825.000 still to giveaway.
http://pinkcoin.altcoinfaucet.net/stats/ (for info)
http://pinkcoin.altcoinfaucet.net/ (for a pinkcoin payout)
allmost 500.000 coins have been given out allready. 825.000 still to giveaway.
http://pinkcoin.altcoinfaucet.net/stats/ (for info)
http://pinkcoin.altcoinfaucet.net/ (for a pinkcoin payout)
May 29, 2014, 07:07:30 AM
What about a public funding for mintpal voting? Pushing Pinkcoin to the top would attract new investors and increasing volume means poloniex .
May 29, 2014, 06:56:54 AM
I tried the anonymous transaction function. It doesnt't work, all it does is send the coins to a different address, and from there it comes right into your primary address, and it is all viewable at the block explorer.
Scamcoin.
Scamcoin.
I literally just discovered this as well and have sent a message to the dev about how we can go about fixing it. It's an experimental proof of concept and the dev is new to crypto, but a highly skilled and talented developer nonetheless. We should indeed have looked more closely at the blockchain and done more testing before release to double-check his work and I apologize for that. I will personally work closely with the dev to ensure proper anonymity is achieved and see that it gets fixed today. Please stand by on my word. We had no intentions of misleading anyone.
As soon as I discuss the code with the dev, and we set a course of action in motion I will put together a whitepaper explaining exactly how the anonymous function works for complete transparency.
EDIT: For clarity and transparency, from what I found it looks like the current implementation basically forwards the coins to the destination. It provides a simple mask for the transaction, but it's easy to trace back through the block-chain if you know what to look for. There was supposed to be a mixing that takes place but obviously that's not happening right now.
EDIT 2: After playing with the daemon I'm willing to bet it's a silly configuration mistake that's stopping the mix from taking place in the first place. I can't confirm that with the dev right now as he's asleep (I'm the only one awake right now apparently), and I can't make the change personally, but that's what it looks like to me.
i think it can only mix if there are more than 1 transaction in there. i don't really know tho.
Yeah. I think he might have been trying to use the accounts feature, but it doesn't work by default in POS coins, you have to enable it and disable staking. We'll get it figured out.
I need to grab a few hours of sleep myself before the guys wake up and we can get this taken care of, but in the meantime I offer you this information for your own peace of mind:
My personal pinkcoin address is PTz9c7gsDu14FnD6tPFFUPy9rihVXH7GTx. You can see it in the blockchain here: http://chainz.cryptoid.info/pc/address.dws?88988.htm
I purchased and transferred 3.7m pinkcoins to my personal account for staking shortly after launch of our anon. You can see that in the blockchain here: http://chainz.cryptoid.info/pc/tx.dws?334037.htm
Looking at the blockchain for my personal wallet, you can clearly see that:
A) I've been holding for a while and they're not on an exchange.
B) I don't play the pump & dump game with PinkCoins. I hoard them, and occasionally give small amounts away.
C) I bought and moved coins *off* the market after the release of anon.
As part of the core team here I promise we are doing our absolute best, not only for the coin and our community, but also for the charities we currently support and will support in the future.
May 29, 2014, 06:36:08 AM
I'm in the Pink! #PinkCoin for 17SAT!
Congratulations! Welcome to the community XD
Thanks. If only the wallet would sync quicker! I'm 20 days behind!
May 29, 2014, 06:33:01 AM
I tried the anonymous transaction function. It doesnt't work, all it does is send the coins to a different address, and from there it comes right into your primary address, and it is all viewable at the block explorer.
Scamcoin.
Scamcoin.
I literally just discovered this as well and have sent a message to the dev about how we can go about fixing it. It's an experimental proof of concept and the dev is new to crypto, but a highly skilled and talented developer nonetheless. We should indeed have looked more closely at the blockchain and done more testing before release to double-check his work and I apologize for that. I will personally work closely with the dev to ensure proper anonymity is achieved and see that it gets fixed today. Please stand by on my word. We had no intentions of misleading anyone.
As soon as I discuss the code with the dev, and we set a course of action in motion I will put together a whitepaper explaining exactly how the anonymous function works for complete transparency.
EDIT: For clarity and transparency, from what I found it looks like the current implementation basically forwards the coins to the destination. It provides a simple mask for the transaction, but it's easy to trace back through the block-chain if you know what to look for. There was supposed to be a mixing that takes place but obviously that's not happening right now.
EDIT 2: After playing with the daemon I'm willing to bet it's a silly configuration mistake that's stopping the mix from taking place in the first place. I can't confirm that with the dev right now as he's asleep (I'm the only one awake right now apparently), and I can't make the change personally, but that's what it looks like to me.
i think it can only mix if there are more than 1 transaction in there. i don't really know tho.
Yeah. I think he might have been trying to use the accounts feature, but it doesn't work by default in POS coins, you have to enable it and disable staking. We'll get it figured out.
May 29, 2014, 06:15:01 AM
I tried the anonymous transaction function. It doesnt't work, all it does is send the coins to a different address, and from there it comes right into your primary address, and it is all viewable at the block explorer.
Scamcoin.
Scamcoin.
I literally just discovered this as well and have sent a message to the dev about how we can go about fixing it. It's an experimental proof of concept and the dev is new to crypto, but a highly skilled and talented developer nonetheless. We should indeed have looked more closely at the blockchain and done more testing before release to double-check his work and I apologize for that. I will personally work closely with the dev to ensure proper anonymity is achieved and see that it gets fixed today. Please stand by on my word. We had no intentions of misleading anyone.
As soon as I discuss the code with the dev, and we set a course of action in motion I will put together a whitepaper explaining exactly how the anonymous function works for complete transparency.
EDIT: For clarity and transparency, from what I found it looks like the current implementation basically forwards the coins to the destination. It provides a simple mask for the transaction, but it's easy to trace back through the block-chain if you know what to look for. There was supposed to be a mixing that takes place but obviously that's not happening right now.
EDIT 2: After playing with the daemon I'm willing to bet it's a silly configuration mistake that's stopping the mix from taking place in the first place. I can't confirm that with the dev right now as he's asleep (I'm the only one awake right now apparently), and I can't make the change personally, but that's what it looks like to me.
i think it can only mix if there are more than 1 transaction in there. i don't really know tho.
May 29, 2014, 06:13:10 AM
Keep my over 230k PC for marketing, giveaways etc. I don't want them back.
Was thinking about converting them to BTC and then pushing the mintpal voting but it's like nothing, not worth in my opinion.
Was thinking about converting them to BTC and then pushing the mintpal voting but it's like nothing, not worth in my opinion.
May 29, 2014, 06:10:44 AM
I'm in the Pink! #PinkCoin for 17SAT!
Congratulations! Welcome to the community XD
May 29, 2014, 06:08:25 AM
I'm in the Pink! #PinkCoin for 17SAT!
May 29, 2014, 04:39:58 AM
I tried the anonymous transaction function. It doesnt't work, all it does is send the coins to a different address, and from there it comes right into your primary address, and it is all viewable at the block explorer.
Scamcoin.
Scamcoin.
I literally just discovered this as well and have sent a message to the dev about how we can go about fixing it. It's an experimental proof of concept and the dev is new to crypto, but a highly skilled and talented developer nonetheless. We should indeed have looked more closely at the blockchain and done more testing before release to double-check his work and I apologize for that. I will personally work closely with the dev to ensure proper anonymity is achieved and see that it gets fixed today. Please stand by on my word. We had no intentions of misleading anyone.
As soon as I discuss the code with the dev, and we set a course of action in motion I will put together a whitepaper explaining exactly how the anonymous function works for complete transparency.
EDIT: For clarity and transparency, from what I found it looks like the current implementation basically forwards the coins to the destination. It provides a simple mask for the transaction, but it's easy to trace back through the block-chain if you know what to look for. There was supposed to be a mixing that takes place but obviously that's not happening right now.
EDIT 2: After playing with the daemon I'm willing to bet it's a silly configuration mistake that's stopping the mix from taking place in the first place. I can't confirm that with the dev right now as he's asleep (I'm the only one awake right now apparently), and I can't make the change personally, but that's what it looks like to me.
Jump to: