Topic: [ANN] Revamped PinkCoin (PC / PINK) PoS | Multipool | Fundraiser | Anonymous - page 76. (Read 207034 times)

Pinkcoin is now known as PINK on these 3 exchanges.

AllCrypt
UseCryptos
Mintpal

We will keep pushing Bittrex and Polonix to do the same.

Bumped

This coin needs PR. The value is there. Since this is a community thing someone with a great PR idea should jump in, and make it happen. Maybe another push to prove again anon tech? Seems redundant, but the onslaught of new coins everyday seems to stymy any momentum PC gets in the exchanges. Everyone is chasing the next big value, but PC has it already.

One a side note* The pot calling the kettle black... If PC expects professional prices.. it's going to take a professional attitude and approach by the leaders of the community ie. The people that revived this coin.

It's going to take all of us as a community to make the Alt world right. That statement is relevant and pertinent to all honest and transparent Alt coins.

There is no official white paper, but you can get most of your information here.
http://dailypinkcoin.com/blog/innovations/anonypink/

bump

I am also new to crypto trading and would have no way of telling whether the anonymous feature is working or not. The same way I would have no Idea whether the thermostat in my house was working 100%. I like most other people who are not as technically proficient as the programmers (who can verifiably check for themselves if it works) must rely on some other persons opinion. So in my opinion this is why there is so much uncertainty as to whether the anon is working. I have found the team behind this coin to be responsive proactive and dedicated to success of this coin. I am convinced that the anon is working as I have read all posts on subject and trust the opinions of these people behind the coin and people like Jyap who is putting an unbiased view and respected source to verify this. I think these are all the right steps to convince people like me coin is legitimate and is undervalued. I am in the same boat as Pinker who is obviously smarter than me who feel another public open testing of Anon will put this topic to bed for all not convinced it works. I am willing to put some pink towards another bounty that will verify the legitimacy of the anon as the other one did too but you have to read the fine print and newbies normally cant find the fine print. Let us know if this a possibility.

The joy of unmoderated threads. I don't trust the moderated threads but the unmoderated ones come with ppl like vanilla ice who invested 300 bux and has 3 million things to share even though no one wants to read it!

Agreed. Most people trading are into the profit, not the coin itself. While the technical aspects of anon are great, most people trading don't care but in the case of altcoins where coins go on swings based on trends and interest of the holders, anon is so hot right now.

It was useful to see from the eyes of a non-technical person who is not into computer/tech but is into trading instead. I'm sure there are many of you guys and many more will be coming to crypto in the future.

Its important to take MCHammer's view and create a marketing strategy that targets the non-technical group of people. Us techies know if anon is working or not. It has to be laid out in plain English and I totally believe that a new challenge has to be put forth to the community. The best thing would probably be a new thread created in the altcoin section, not the announcement section, talking about the new challenge. qiwoman should also get involved and write another article about the new anon challenge. Expect to NOT give out the bounty.

Right now, anon is big. You need to exploit the fact that PINK has it working. That alone will draw in many more people. With those people I believe that your charities and future plans will work out that much better. If you want to be the next Doge you gotta have the community. The only way to bring them here is make them believe in the coin.

naa ... wont sell under 100
i ll wait 

PLS sell, my orders are waiting.

that escelated quickly  
i know, everybody hates me because i wrote down what was in my mind, probably too quick.
SRY
see it as a regular noob/jerk/hypster altcoin "trader" view
not more not less
i though maybe that was useful to share ( problem -> solution bla bla ), but no , stay in your dreamworld without critics
i regret nothing !

LOL... I guess the pic sums it up best What's your twitter handle? Also I don't see a PC address in your signature... i guess the positive side of the prices dipping a bit is bigger tips  

Are you just pulling those "facts" out of your ass or something? If so, please mention that they are your imagination... people might confuse it for facts when you do not explicitly mention them

I love this coin and the dev team.

No fancy promises and hype. No crazy gimmicks or pump and dump scams. They just release working features that other coins claim to work on and then offer contests to try to break it.


This coin is very undervalued and it is only a matter of time before the hype grows.

OK, first of all, I am deep in love with Pinkcoin. Or maybe already getting to the stage where love is being replaced with respect, admiration, understanding and so on as it goes in a good relationship. Although I am not into girly and childish culture, this goes way beyond and made me see pink color in a whole different way (and those great marketing possibilities!). The DEVs are doing a great work and I am really glad to see someone who is seriously trying to deliver actual results rather than just talk big. Huge respect here for you guys. Yeah, you are doing for profit too, but hey no one lives from air (well some people say they are and I don't wan't to say they are liars but most of us have to feed ourselfs somehow). And at the end of the day, other people are having profits here too and if the job is done the right way, whole society might benefit a lot from these „selfish“ bastards.

Anyway, I've been creeping around for a while and Pinkcoin made me set up an account a say my bit. That is how much I fell into this.

So here is the point. When looking into the overall strategy I really like it – dropping bombs, fully baked stuff not just some halflings and being open to the maximum extent. For everyone who is serious about looking for a "value" in that today's mess, hell of a mixture. True is, that release of the anon that was more of a concept in the beginning wasn't obviously planned that way, but it turned out into a really great ANON feature leaving other coins way behind, which is fabulous.

Then we come to the contest. I understand sonysasankan is pissed off, you guys did a great job. But I also have to thank to McHammer for explaining how a normal „trader“ or passer by sees it. My belief is, that this is really the way majority (mis)understood it, which is very unfortunate. Well, yes, you might say, you don't do it for them, but the point is that you actually do, because if a majority misunderstands something, it is the coin that is punished and you certainly care for PINK, don't you. You might see there only a short-term impact, but in reality, when people loose faith, it is damn hard to get it back. Even when it is just a misunderstanding.

So, we all know what was the problem, there was opened a contest marketed as a struggle for breaking the anon although it was actually never about breaking the anon but just about finding the password for the zip file. And these 2 are a completely unrelated things. Yes you can find the password by breaking the anon, but why would you even try to do that when there were at least 2 other super simple ways how to find the password, without even thinking about the anon. And I dare to say, that this must had been pretty obvious to anyone who ever interacted with a computer even just on a user level. And that release was the time when I was about to make my first comment too. Like, what the heck guys, are you sure? One BTC for guessing the password?

Nevermind, I understand you just wanted to make promo and people didn't get it. I would say, whatever, let's move on. Beside the fact that anon is really one of THOSE features that matter today. AND YOU HAVE A WORKING ONE! But a lot of people doubt it or don't believe it or whatever. although I personally don't care much about anon feature, it obviously helps to make impact and therefore allows to move to other, perhaps more important stuff.

Hell, I am talking too much. So let's get to the real point. I really think it would do justice to your (our;)) coin, if you make another competition, this time really for breaking the code. My suggestion how I thing this could be implemented follows:

You make anon transaction of any amount to a certain wallet. This wallet won't be zipped and hanging anywhere, because this only leads to unlocking the zip the hard way. The wallet you sent the PINK from is the one that matters. When someone brakes the anon it means, that he found out the way, how to un-anonymize the transaction and is therefore able to say with absolute certainty, where did the PINK come from. At this point he should send (no anon) a certain amount, let's say 100 000 PINK to the original wallet. When this amount comes to the original wallet, bounty (let's say 1 100 000 PINK) will be returned to the wallet that sent the agreed amount. When someone sends the amount to the wallet, he should also let everyone know on the ANN thread, incl. the info on the way of breaking the anon.

Of course, as the original wallet will most probably(?) be controlled by the devs, there is a lot of trust being placed on them by the community. Because someone might easily say, that (s)he sent the PINK to the right wallet and that the one in control of the original wallet is hiding the fact of receiving the amount. That said, once you break the code, you should be able to repeat that again and therefore verify the procedure after it's publication if anyone claims the bounty and it was not released. Besides, I believe that PINK team has the trust now, so it should be OK. Also, with the first competition, there was potentially an equal risk of the DEVs choosing different password than the one proclaimed therefore no-one being able to lockpick it - resulting in seemingly perfect anon (except for the fact that first challenge was rather about guessing the password than breaking anon - repeating the important stuff). Yeah, and the wallet you sent the PINK from should have unspecified amount on it so that it is not possible to look it up in the richlist.

I guess yo guys see the difference, you would send your money only at the moment you are really sure about the wallet – meaning you broke the anon. Or you would have at most, say 10 guesses, to stay in the black numbers. Depends on the ratio of bounty x the amount of PINK one has to send to the original wallet.

Or you can just create some web app, where you can make guesses, but again, guesses must be paid.

In this case, all PINK from invalid guesses might go right to the charity, which would be nice. This can be done also in the first case, but we all would have to agree, that if we receive unexpected bonus of the size corresponding with the competition (which might easily happen ), we forward it to some donation wallet.

Or you can anon-resend the amount to another wallet every month and reveal the wallet address that was the original one so that everyone sees, that the wallet actually exists.

You are welcome to elaborate any way you want on this proposal. Seems to me like something to be easily implemented with a possibly noticeable impact.

If you read it all the way here, congrats, hope it was worth it, if not, sorry for your time. But, stay PINK.

Oh and pointing at some older post, supporting the PC → PINK transition – them gotta love it.