[ANN] RoyalCoin - ROYAL - page 5. | Bitcointalksearch.org

kaicrypzen

hero member

Activity: 1344

Merit: 656

Quote from: Ardenyham on October 14, 2016, 10:35:13 AM

About the Escrow. I want to say the ICO is done (as I said in the OP). and the coin is in Exchange now.. so there is no sense in doing escrow anymore.

Yes indeed ... Yet all those coins whose ICO was held on c-cex that plummet to 1 sat ... By the way what's up with the prices and the amounts? Did we get any numbers concerning the total supply or the ICO price?

Quote from: Ardenyham on October 14, 2016, 10:35:13 AM

about the Source codes and white papter, I'll ask the Devs and update the OP. they must have the source codes... (as I said I've been hired as a community manager. I am not fully updated with that)

Edit:
Soruce code: https://github.com/royalnath/Royal

it is already in the OP.

Sorry to say, but that source code looks more like a joke than anything else, all the bitcoin, novacoin, zerocoin, ppcoin related files that it contains were pushed 2 days ago, I doubt it was ever built. Some files still have other coins' names in them ....

I think you must have some faith in this coin for being its community manager. Let's say I am a potential investor, can you give me any reason to invest in it?

Quote from: Ardenyham on October 14, 2016, 10:35:13 AM

and about my Trust feedback. I would ask you to read my feedback also(I've return to that guy). that feedback giving with a fake false reference and there is nothing truth about that.

Yes, I was a bit hasty about that, sorry.

ParmaBTC

legendary

Activity: 1218

Merit: 1002

Quote from: googlebtc on October 14, 2016, 10:55:57 AM

X13 I thought was pretty good

nice post.... in line with your history....
thanks

googlebtc

sr. member

Activity: 434

Merit: 250

X13 I thought was pretty good

spain cool

hero member

Activity: 590

Merit: 500

EMIRG,SPORT,NCL,XMO, ROYAL I think it is the same person Wink

Dassi

sr. member

Activity: 252

Merit: 250

@kevin1234a Nice picture...

I was thinking, what is the price and market volume of royal coin at present?

ParmaBTC

legendary

Activity: 1218

Merit: 1002

Quote from: Ardenyham on October 14, 2016, 10:35:13 AM

Quote from: kaicrypzen on October 14, 2016, 10:25:46 AM

Quote from: Ardenyham on October 14, 2016, 08:40:00 AM

BTW. C-cex already Added the Coin to its Exchange. I don't think there is any Concern Remains.

Sorry but I think all the concerns remain. On the first thread run by doctor877, I wrote this https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.16524681:

Quote from: kaicrypzen on October 11, 2016, 05:28:45 AM

In my opinion, this coin being listed on c-cex, the dev (or their representatives) having contacted c-cex (or not), c-cex approving the code, the dev being somehow renowed, the address having 50, 100 or 1000 BTC seem all irrelevant to establish trust within the community.

To me, what seems relevant is:
- A reputable escrow (even though it seems projects turned out to be scams even with that).
- A code base (a github account).
- A technical (white) paper.

For the time being, none of what I mentioned above seem to be satisfied (please correct me if I missed something).

Here are examples of recent crowdsales on c-cex:
https://c-cex.com/?p=xmo-btc
https://c-cex.com/?p=ncl-btc

(Check the sell orders and draw your own conclusions.)

I am not saying this project will turn out like those ... These are just examples of projects that lacked escrow, code and a technical paper.

Can you please address my concerns?

By the way we didn't get any statement from doctor877 about what really happened, moreover you have a trust feedback that says:

Quote

This UID has been bought and sold a number of times, you should do due diligence if considering trading as it may not be with the same person you previously did business with. (ie Alt of bazar165g u=316318 on 03 April 2016, 18:29:58)

About the Escrow. I want to say the ICO is done (as I said in the OP). and the coin is in Exchange now.. so there is no sense in doing escrow anymore.

about the Source codes and white papter, I'll ask the Devs and update the OP. they must have the source codes... (as I said I've been hired as a community manager. I am not fully updated with that)

and about my Trust feedback. I would ask you to read my feedback also(I've return to that guy). that feedback giving with a fake false reference and there is nothing truth about that.

Edit:
Soruce code: https://github.com/royalnath/Royal

it is already in the OP.

Quote from: ParmaBTC on October 14, 2016, 08:40:57 AM

Quote from: Ardenyham on October 14, 2016, 08:40:00 AM

Code:

<---Start Signature--->
I am Ardenyham Owner of this account from Bitcointalk and today's date is 14/10/2016
<---Address--->
1JVsG2jbFjteiRgLS9Svjw9UMK33xVTkKd
<---Signature--->
Hz8EqM/R5EO92Y7g2eC4mKhyKuUdfEHd31LPnPLApIRAcYotoCeBYtRe8+lqmgcp91ur9ldWbJzAJMyVOtDuUrU=
<---Signature End--->

http://www.coinig.com/?adr=1JVsG2jbFjteiRgLS9Svjw9UMK33xVTkKd&msg=I+am+Ardenyham+Owner+of+this+account+from+Bitcointalk+and+today%27s+date+is+14%2F10%2F2016&sig=Hz8EqM%2FR5EO92Y7g2eC4mKhyKuUdfEHd31LPnPLApIRAcYotoCeBYtRe8%2Blqmgcp91ur9ldWbJzAJMyVOtDuUrU%3D

so....
could you sign a message from another address i found to be your?

15xmRfv9KxFqQdZf2bkXsWRGKDe6YtDwKT

thanks

I

If you want to clear all fakes here its very easy

sign a message from another address i found to be your?

15xmRfv9KxFqQdZf2bkXsWRGKDe6YtDwKT

If you do it there will be not doubt about you...

kevin1234a

legendary

Activity: 1162

Merit: 1000

Decentralizing Jesus on the Blockchain

Ardenyham

legendary

Activity: 980

Merit: 1000

Don't Hesitate to Tip me for My Helps and Guides.

Quote from: kaicrypzen on October 14, 2016, 10:25:46 AM

Quote from: Ardenyham on October 14, 2016, 08:40:00 AM

BTW. C-cex already Added the Coin to its Exchange. I don't think there is any Concern Remains.

Sorry but I think all the concerns remain. On the first thread run by doctor877, I wrote this https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.16524681:

Quote from: kaicrypzen on October 11, 2016, 05:28:45 AM

In my opinion, this coin being listed on c-cex, the dev (or their representatives) having contacted c-cex (or not), c-cex approving the code, the dev being somehow renowed, the address having 50, 100 or 1000 BTC seem all irrelevant to establish trust within the community.

To me, what seems relevant is:
- A reputable escrow (even though it seems projects turned out to be scams even with that).
- A code base (a github account).
- A technical (white) paper.

For the time being, none of what I mentioned above seem to be satisfied (please correct me if I missed something).

Here are examples of recent crowdsales on c-cex:
https://c-cex.com/?p=xmo-btc
https://c-cex.com/?p=ncl-btc

(Check the sell orders and draw your own conclusions.)

I am not saying this project will turn out like those ... These are just examples of projects that lacked escrow, code and a technical paper.

Can you please address my concerns?

By the way we didn't get any statement from doctor877 about what really happened, moreover you have a trust feedback that says:

Quote

This UID has been bought and sold a number of times, you should do due diligence if considering trading as it may not be with the same person you previously did business with. (ie Alt of bazar165g u=316318 on 03 April 2016, 18:29:58)

About the Escrow. I want to say the ICO is done (as I said in the OP). and the coin is in Exchange now.. so there is no sense in doing escrow anymore.

about the Source codes and white papter, I'll ask the Devs and update the OP. they must have the source codes... (as I said I've been hired as a community manager. I am not fully updated with that)

and about my Trust feedback. I would ask you to read my feedback also(I've return to that guy). that feedback giving with a fake false reference and there is nothing truth about that.

Edit:
Soruce code: https://github.com/royalnath/Royal

it is already in the OP.

szafa

hero member

Activity: 812

Merit: 500

C-cex already listed royalcoin https://c-cex.com/?p=royal-btc price funny.

kaicrypzen

hero member

Activity: 1344

Merit: 656

Quote from: Ardenyham on October 14, 2016, 08:40:00 AM

BTW. C-cex already Added the Coin to its Exchange. I don't think there is any Concern Remains.

Sorry but I think all the concerns remain. On the first thread run by doctor877, I wrote this https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.16524681:

Quote from: kaicrypzen on October 11, 2016, 05:28:45 AM

In my opinion, this coin being listed on c-cex, the dev (or their representatives) having contacted c-cex (or not), c-cex approving the code, the dev being somehow renowed, the address having 50, 100 or 1000 BTC seem all irrelevant to establish trust within the community.

To me, what seems relevant is:
- A reputable escrow (even though it seems projects turned out to be scams even with that).
- A code base (a github account).
- A technical (white) paper.

For the time being, none of what I mentioned above seem to be satisfied (please correct me if I missed something).

Here are examples of recent crowdsales on c-cex:
https://c-cex.com/?p=xmo-btc
https://c-cex.com/?p=ncl-btc

(Check the sell orders and draw your own conclusions.)

I am not saying this project will turn out like those ... These are just examples of projects that lacked escrow, code and a technical paper.

Can you please address my concerns?

By the way we didn't get any statement from doctor877 about what really happened, moreover you have a trust feedback that says:

Quote

This UID has been bought and sold a number of times, you should do due diligence if considering trading as it may not be with the same person you previously did business with. (ie Alt of bazar165g u=316318 on 03 April 2016, 18:29:58)

pikkie

sr. member

Activity: 924

Merit: 256

Quote from: kahaiwro on October 14, 2016, 09:25:35 AM

ahahah free workers on the net.... great job

no bounty hunter here, but free translate services Grin

kahaiwro

sr. member

Activity: 260

Merit: 251

ahahah free workers on the net.... great job

basket ball

hero member

Activity: 970

Merit: 500

Quote from: Ardenyham on October 14, 2016, 09:13:34 AM

Quote from: basket ball on October 14, 2016, 09:07:04 AM

INDONESIANTRANSLATION:

INDONESIAN

Where you see our Announcement about Bounty? I already said there is no bounty.
please read the OP...
BTW I'll transfer your work to the owners. they may pay you or may not.. you did a great work BTW.

I want to say again there is no bounty..

no problem, free for you. Cheesy

Ardenyham

legendary

Activity: 980

Merit: 1000

Don't Hesitate to Tip me for My Helps and Guides.

Quote from: basket ball on October 14, 2016, 09:07:04 AM

INDONESIANTRANSLATION:

INDONESIAN

Where you see our Announcement about Bounty? I already said there is no bounty.
please read the OP...
BTW I'll transfer your work to the owners. they may pay you or may not.. you did a great work BTW.

I want to say again there is no bounty..

basket ball

hero member

Activity: 970

Merit: 500

INDONESIANTRANSLATION:

INDONESIAN

PCC

member

Activity: 70

Merit: 10

Any investment is to study

Quote from: Ardenyham on October 14, 2016, 08:21:52 AM

Update:
C-Cex Added ROYAL:

https://twitter.com/CryptoCurrEncyX/status/786916574867447808
https://c-cex.com/?p=royal-btc

You Can Start Trading.

transaction have not seen Huh

electronicash

legendary

Activity: 3234

Merit: 1055

if you give away bounties for Filipino translation thread, please reserved it for me. I'm manually translating context without using google translate. Will come back later to check your response here.

my sample: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/filipinobashluckchain-blockchain-betting-platform-ico-signature-campaign-1632306

HotAmericano

newbie

Activity: 32

Merit: 0

I'm watching for the campaign or giveaways Roll Eyes

szachta

hero member

Activity: 518

Merit: 500

Like TBC.

innominatus

full member

Activity: 126

Merit: 100

You have to get lost before you can find yourself.

Lithuanian translation reserved

Topic: [ANN] RoyalCoin - ROYAL - page 5. (Read 12472 times)