[ANN] Rubies (RBIES) Gaming and casino entertainment currency. - page 12.

Lanzador

full member

Activity: 140

Merit: 100

Quote from: hopenotlate on September 02, 2016, 02:48:24 AM

Quote from: JackpotRacer on September 02, 2016, 12:48:45 AM

IMHO no one should be called troll because he bought RBIES

people were sure that Moneypot will implement RBIES for the players and for investors to invest in the BR.

@gamblingbad and@ Lanzador and more people and also we bought RBIES because MP always announced RBIES coming soon!

everyone should be allowed to voice his opinion

edit
the last answer to user @Lanzador the so called troll
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.15942520

I agree with tyour post quoted above: but I would guess you agree with me that the missed Moneypot implementation is not a rubies fault but rubies developers has suffered it in spite of themselves.
It is as if a child had not been invited to a party and others people blaming on him.
Not assuming that with MP implementation their project would have definitely succeed but the fact it did not happen at the right time was an missed opportunity.

PS: he wasn't called troll for buying rubies but because of his attitude; here is a last example of it

Quote from: Lanzador on September 01, 2016, 06:57:18 PM

[snip - if they were ever legit in the first place.

Moneypot themselves stated several times rubies implementation was (is ?) about to happen: why you still accusing rubies developers of making "unlegit" claims since the beginning?
Call this attitude as you like best, I have a specific name for it.

You were relying on a MP implementation to get the volume you needed to take off before - how is it any different now? Are you guys still not relying on MP to get the volume necessary to become a legitimate cryptocurrency? I fail to see what exactly is different this time around.

hopenotlate

legendary

Activity: 3304

Merit: 1221

Top Crypto Casino

Quote from: gamblingbad on September 02, 2016, 06:28:01 AM

Stating facts is trolling? Rubies the cryptocurrency has been a failure, almost no volume and price falling since it was realeased, but not for people who invested in bb or created rubies, they made alot of selling it to the rest.

BB creating a option to invest in rubies bankroll would probaly make it more used.

I really dont understand the point of creating rubies if it was just to use it for sell shares to BB.

Sorry if I didn't explain myself properly: wasn't accusing you of trolling and apologize if it seemed so.

You have a valid point and hope owners/devs will answer your questions here.

gamblingbad

hero member

Activity: 568

Merit: 500

https://bit-exo.com/?ref=gamblingbad

Quote from: hopenotlate on September 02, 2016, 02:48:24 AM

Quote from: JackpotRacer on September 02, 2016, 12:48:45 AM

IMHO no one should be called troll because he bought RBIES

people were sure that Moneypot will implement RBIES for the players and for investors to invest in the BR.

@gamblingbad and@ Lanzador and more people and also we bought RBIES because MP always announced RBIES coming soon!

everyone should be allowed to voice his opinion

edit
the last answer to user @Lanzador the so called troll
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.15942520

I agree with tyour post quoted above: but I would guess you agree with me that the missed Moneypot implementation is not a rubies fault but rubies developers has suffered it in spite of themselves.
It is as if a child had not been invited to a party and others people blaming on him.
Not assuming that with MP implementation their project would have definitely succeed but the fact it did not happen at the right time was an missed opportunity.

PS: he wasn't called troll for buying rubies but because of his attitude; here is a last example of it

Quote from: Lanzador on September 01, 2016, 06:57:18 PM

[snip - if they were ever legit in the first place.

Moneypot themselves stated several times rubies implementation was (is ?) about to happen: why you still accusing rubies developers of making "unlegit" claims since the beginning?
Call this attitude as you like best, I have a specific name for it.

Stating facts is trolling? Rubies the cryptocurrency has been a failure, almost no volume and price falling since it was realeased, but not a failure for people who invested in bb or created rubies, they made alot of selling it to the rest.

BB creating a option to invest in rubies bankroll would probaly make it more used.

I really dont understand the point of creating rubies if it was just to use it for sell shares to BB.

romeorickl64

sr. member

Activity: 343

Merit: 250

Can anybody suggest me what should i do with my Rubies coin? i can't wait 5-6 years to get profits. should i dump my coin right now before price goes down to 10 satosi?

hopenotlate

legendary

Activity: 3304

Merit: 1221

Top Crypto Casino

Quote from: JackpotRacer on September 02, 2016, 12:48:45 AM

IMHO no one should be called troll because he bought RBIES

people were sure that Moneypot will implement RBIES for the players and for investors to invest in the BR.

@gamblingbad and@ Lanzador and more people and also we bought RBIES because MP always announced RBIES coming soon!

everyone should be allowed to voice his opinion

edit
the last answer to user @Lanzador the so called troll
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.15942520

I agree with tyour post quoted above: but I would guess you agree with me that the missed Moneypot implementation is not a rubies fault but rubies developers has suffered it in spite of themselves.
It is as if a child had not been invited to a party and others people blaming on him.
Not assuming that with MP implementation their project would have definitely succeed but the fact it did not happen at the right time was an missed opportunity.

PS: he wasn't called troll for buying rubies but because of his attitude; here is a last example of it

Quote from: Lanzador on September 01, 2016, 06:57:18 PM

[snip - if they were ever legit in the first place.

Moneypot themselves stated several times rubies implementation was (is ?) about to happen: why you still accusing rubies developers of making "unlegit" claims since the beginning?
Call this attitude as you like best, I have a specific name for it.

JackpotRacer

legendary

Activity: 1904

Merit: 1011

All Games incl Racer and Lottery game are Closed

IMHO no one should be called troll because he bought RBIES

people were sure that Moneypot will implement RBIES for the players and for investors to invest in the BR.

@gamblingbad and@ Lanzador and more people and also we bought RBIES because MP always announced RBIES coming soon!

everyone should be allowed to voice his opinion

edit
the last answer to user @Lanzador the so called troll
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.15942520

Lanzador

full member

Activity: 140

Merit: 100

Quote from: gamblingbad on September 01, 2016, 06:36:10 PM

Trade_BTC my negativity comes from that some people told Rubies would be added to mp and crowdfunded bankroll. I bought on that information. And waited long time but nothing happend. So i feel alittle fooled into buying Rubies. I dont know what to do with the rubies.

I too invested based on the assurance that MP's implementation was forthcoming. But it appears all plans for that have been put on hold - if they were ever legit in the first place.

gamblingbad

hero member

Activity: 568

Merit: 500

https://bit-exo.com/?ref=gamblingbad

Trade_BTC my negativity comes from that some people told Rubies would be added to mp and crowdfunded bankroll. I bought on that information. And waited long time but nothing happend. So i feel alittle fooled into buying Rubies. I dont know what to do with the rubies.

hopenotlate

legendary

Activity: 3304

Merit: 1221

Top Crypto Casino

Everyone is entitled their opinion and constructive criticism is always ad added value but have to agree with Trade_BTC on the trolling-sound your posts are having lately here.

Some projects have more success than others: already happened, still happens and will always happen.
No one has been forced in investing and will be in the new project.
I personally trust (until things will convince me of the contrary) this team; as I already stated they are demonstrating honesty and dedication to their projects therefore I will be happy to be involved in their future businesses.

If your intention is just to throw, undeserved in my opinion , accusations I'd suggest to stick to your words

Quote from: Lanzador on September 01, 2016, 10:15:47 AM

Well....wake me up in 5 years when you guys should be up and running.

I will personally take care of waking you up when time has come: good night until then.

Lanzador

full member

Activity: 140

Merit: 100

Quote from: Trade_BTC on September 01, 2016, 11:12:51 AM

Quote from: Lanzador on September 01, 2016, 10:15:47 AM

Quote from: gamblingbad on September 01, 2016, 05:02:34 AM

Quote from: Trade_BTC on August 31, 2016, 10:12:41 PM

Quote from: gamblingbad on August 31, 2016, 07:10:12 PM

Quote from: Lanzador on August 31, 2016, 07:08:23 PM

Quote from: Bjorn_Blockchain on August 31, 2016, 04:52:04 PM

Quote from: Lanzador on August 31, 2016, 04:42:50 PM

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: Lanzador on August 30, 2016, 04:01:18 PM

Quote from: Bjorn_Blockchain on August 30, 2016, 02:58:01 PM

Quote from: Lanzador on August 30, 2016, 10:30:00 AM

What's the latest word on Rubies v2? I see v1 has dropped another two decimal points off its price point. Why should anyone bet that v2 will turn out better?

Some clarification, Rubies will not be redone, but will be allowed to be used as one payment method for our upcoming business token. As a blockchain Rubies will exist for as long as it has users and we will support it on one of our sites unless it's no longer used. The new token will focus as a representation of all businesses that my team launches and those currently in existence. The details will be released with our whitepaper for investors, users, and general public to read once finished.

Is there an ETA on that?

It's currently being worked on right now, because there is a crowdfund portion there is some web development needed to streamline the entire process and several details to fine-tune. The crowdfunding will allow for current Rubies users to gain the new token as a courtesy to those holding it. Rubies will not be sold to gain funds though (they will be burned), this is why I'm saying as a courtesy because there is no financial gain from that portion of the crowdsale. The funds raised will be primarily used on hiring experienced developers to complete our businesses on a much faster timeline than we currently have resources to accomplish. What would take 5-6 years to complete can be done in 1-2.5 if we gain appropriate funding.

This is all the information available publicly at this time, the 2.0 token will represent a company conglomerate of all our online business ventures and benefit from this. It's going to be quite exciting, we have laid the foundation for success and can take this and all holders investments much further upon completion. Unlike other projects, investors will know ahead of time our ability to have successful business in this industry, it changes the crowdsale we hope for everyone who gets involved.

Quote from: Johann-Schmidt on August 31, 2016, 03:48:05 PM

So, what is happening to Rubies? Can you guys please give us an idea of what you will do in the next few months? Also, the wallet is not working so well. It keeps on lagging behind.

Rubies will remain in existence for as long as the public supports it, like any blockchain it is peer to peer and will survive based on this technology or not. The wallet will lag behind if it's not left open to download the new information/blocks since last opened.

The best thing to do right now is maintain a comfortable level of risk for Rubies and then with the info I posted make a determination when future details are released. Our current stakeholder program is over 50% ROI in less than a year as of tomorrow's payout, you can ask them here if you have any doubts or questions about payment history and our commitment to success for any that get involved in our work.

The goal is to have multiple strong online businesses with great marketing potential/revenues in both current and new areas of this industry and in more traditional markets. We hope many will benefit and follow us in this endeavor for success.

You're giving us a 1-2.5 year range at best for how long this development will take? Well....wake me up in 5 years when you guys should be up and running.

The new token should be finished and launched this year, but the 1-2.5 years is the completion estimate of minimum 6 profitable businesses that will be tied to it. During that time token trading, and each business will launch as they are completed, and marketing begins on each. It will be done in stages and make more sense when we launch the token and full disclosure.

Well....best of luck getting the "necessary" funding then, I can't imagine it'll be easy.

Yes rubies have been a failure so far, since moneypot never added it.

The devs gave rubies multiple uses the moneypot addition was nice but not under their control either. My guess is this new token is for all businesses under the devs full control. They have a top 5 casino out of literally thousands of sites so can count me in. I can't fault them for shit out of their control.

Betterbets could create crowdfunded rubies bankroll on their site, that would probably increase value of rubies. What 5 top casino they got?

Crowdfunded? You want us to pay for these coins while those who have made money hand over fist just sit back and profit?

He's saying put up a public rubies bankroll. You are obviously a troll in this thread what point is there otherwise to be so negative. There was no ico for rubies and the ones who bought into the stakeholder investment are doing great. Where's the negative coming from?

The one's who bought into the stakeholder investment are doing great because of the BTC dividends, not because of the great successes of Rubies. Anyone else who invested is out of luck.

Trade_BTC

hero member

Activity: 785

Merit: 502