Topic: [ANN] [SAFE] Safecoin - Community Edition of Solana - page 58. (Read 60085 times)
I answered you very directly.
ComputerGenie, you still don't get it, do you?
No, because not one person has given an honest, direct answer to the most important question I asked:
...
Explain, exactly, how creating valid blocks, which are recognized by consensus, can "do harm to Safecoin" (especially since it's "Secured by Bitcoin")....
Explain, exactly, how creating valid blocks, which are recognized by consensus, can "do harm to Safecoin" (especially since it's "Secured by Bitcoin")....
Can you point me to the place where they created mutability in notSafecoin? 
It was block 236,000 for Komodo if that's what you want to call a rollback.
Kind of strange like trying to explain something like human behaviour to some authistic kid.
That I have to cover the blocks of my miners because the centralization of this coin destroyed immutability.
You have no pool, are not involved with this coin in any way, and only here to spread FUD. Says the scammer who just opened another new account to talk bullshit and fud and troll.
You are a kind of funny guy. Accusing people here that they have all new accounts and you are also almost a newbie (became a Jr. just yesterday??).
You are so wrong on so many levels, it almost hurts.
But hey, I don't have anything against some entertainment value.
Unfortunately the fun wears off, if you have nothing else to say, I am getting bored.
Can you point me to the place where they created mutability in notSafecoin?
It was block 236,000 for Komodo if that's what you want to call a rollback.
What are you complaining about exactly?
That I have to cover the blocks of my miners because the centralization of this coin destroyed immutability. 
It was block 236,000 for Komodo if that's what you want to call a rollback.
This isn't an alternate account.
That I have to cover the blocks of my miners because the centralization of this coin destroyed immutability.
You have no pool, are not involved with this coin in any way, and only here to spread FUD. Says the scammer who just opened another new account to talk bullshit and fud and troll.
What are you complaining about exactly?
That I have to cover the blocks of my miners because the centralization of this coin destroyed immutability. How much they pay you to be that active here? Safecoin is not your thing, you are a KMD fan boy so you can just leave. Come back in 30-60 days and maybe i will donate to you some SAFE coins. Have a nice day!
What are you complaining about exactly?
That I have to cover the blocks of my miners because the centralization of this coin destroyed immutability. That I have to cover the blocks of my miners because the centralization of this coin destroyed immutability.
You have no pool, are not involved with this coin in any way, and only here to spread FUD. From 1000 miners...
Hyperbole much? What are you complaining about exactly?
That I have to cover the blocks of my miners because the centralization of this coin destroyed immutability. From 1000 miners you are the only one complaining about the community decision. This is what happen when you use bad info form KMD guys. When you start investing something (time, money, btc, hashpower, etc) in X project you also need to follow all the official "social media outlets" of that X project. It's just common sense.
What are you complaining about exactly?
That I have to cover the blocks of my miners because the centralization of this coin destroyed immutability. Ask jl777 for reimbursement, or is it CryptoLuck07? I can't keep it straight
What are you complaining about exactly?
That I have to cover the blocks of my miners because the centralization of this coin destroyed immutability. You appear to only be speaking about this now since I've mentioned it...
DUH, genius, htf was I supposed to know about it before you mentioned it (given that it happened in 1 random centralized grouping of 1 random social media outlet)? Was there a clairvoyance app also released and I missed out on that too?What are you complaining about exactly?
That being said, I think there needs to be a bit more clear disclosure about what exactly safecoin is adding (other than "komodo" -> "safecoin" text changes). Saying that safecoin devs are "working hard" on atomic DEX is quite a bold statement that I would imagine cannot be proven as I doubt they are.
If the "hard work" is to simply git pull from the komodo repos, that's ok as long as you admit this. However if you are misrepresenting that you are doing the work when it is simply copying our work... Well I will call you out on that.
If the "hard work" is to simply git pull from the komodo repos, that's ok as long as you admit this. However if you are misrepresenting that you are doing the work when it is simply copying our work... Well I will call you out on that.
I’m just a random miner that took a few days break from Ravencoin...but why are you posting from multiple accounts? Seems like manipulation and confirming that this story contains more truth that I initial thought:
http://blog.bluemeanie.net/2014/10/nxtautodac-jl777-stolen-nxt.html?m=1
As long as safecoin is a responsible fork, I dont have anything against it.
That being said, I think there needs to be a bit more clear disclosure about what exactly safecoin is adding (other than "komodo" -> "safecoin" text changes). Saying that safecoin devs are "working hard" on atomic DEX is quite a bold statement that I would imagine cannot be proven as I doubt they are.
If the "hard work" is to simply git pull from the komodo repos, that's ok as long as you admit this. However if you are misrepresenting that you are doing the work when it is simply copying our work... Well I will call you out on that.
safecoin is indeed the first komodo fork done externally that I am aware of, so as that it is a milestone. Just stay honest and dont cross the line into misrepresentation.
We are watching.
That being said, I think there needs to be a bit more clear disclosure about what exactly safecoin is adding (other than "komodo" -> "safecoin" text changes). Saying that safecoin devs are "working hard" on atomic DEX is quite a bold statement that I would imagine cannot be proven as I doubt they are.
If the "hard work" is to simply git pull from the komodo repos, that's ok as long as you admit this. However if you are misrepresenting that you are doing the work when it is simply copying our work... Well I will call you out on that.
safecoin is indeed the first komodo fork done externally that I am aware of, so as that it is a milestone. Just stay honest and dont cross the line into misrepresentation.
We are watching.
You appear to only be speaking about this now since I've mentioned it...
DUH, genius, htf was I supposed to know about it before you mentioned it (given that it happened in 1 random centralized grouping of 1 random social media outlet)? Was there a clairvoyance app also released and I missed out on that too?You would not have been able to open your wallet version for the past 2 days as that's when the updates began.
I'm not sure what kind of haphazard pools you are used to, but those of us that run stable, legitimate pools don't "open our wallets" daily, we run a daemon and script address configurations on an as needed, per-miner basis. The daemons stay running in a headless server mode, that's the entire point of a daemon.
KMD = 0
Very "smart" guys and "dedicated" and "honest". Scam project? More than 1 mounth old and still no rush for linsting. How can you be that silly and say this "Don't loose your money on this pump and dump scam?"
Now i know for sure that you fear this project!
Very "smart" guys and "dedicated" and "honest". Scam project? More than 1 mounth old and still no rush for linsting. How can you be that silly and say this "Don't loose your money on this pump and dump scam?"
Now i know for sure that you fear this project!
That being said, I think there needs to be a bit more clear disclosure about what exactly safecoin is adding (other than "komodo" -> "safecoin" text changes). Saying that safecoin devs are "working hard" on atomic DEX is quite a bold statement that I would imagine cannot be proven as I doubt they are.
If the "hard work" is to simply git pull from the komodo repos, that's ok as long as you admit this. However if you are misrepresenting that you are doing the work when it is simply copying our work... Well I will call you out on that.
If the "hard work" is to simply git pull from the komodo repos, that's ok as long as you admit this. However if you are misrepresenting that you are doing the work when it is simply copying our work... Well I will call you out on that.
Jump to: