[ANN] [SFR] SaffronCoin | Latest Version - 1.4.2/2.6.2 | Mandatory Wallet Update - page 178.

hughjays77

hero member

Activity: 728

Merit: 504

The only person fooling themselves is you. Wink

Nearly 1/2 of the top 20 coins[coinmrktcap] have had a spec change at one point or the other especially when algorithms are changed and/or added. Its quite normal.

Quote from: neurorit on June 17, 2014, 11:28:56 AM

I'm just curious whether somehow you guys are either kidding yourselves or just blinded by petty greed, but do you really expect to attract new investors after cutting the inflation by 67%? Anyone with any wits about them is going to see that as a redflag and avoid putting money into SFR. Ever hear of the notion of fair distribution? Instead your devs tried for a shortcut rewarding early adopters but by doing so you've limited the use of your coin to a pump n dump. Which is exactly what happened. You can't change the rules in the middle of the game and be expected to be taken seriously.

saffroncoin

hero member

Activity: 560

Merit: 500

Quote from: neurorit on June 17, 2014, 11:28:56 AM

I'm just curious whether somehow you guys are either kidding yourselves or just blinded by petty greed, but do you really expect to attract new investors after cutting the inflation by 67%? Anyone with any wits about them is going to see that as a redflag and avoid putting money into SFR. Ever hear of the notion of fair distribution? Instead your devs tried for a shortcut rewarding early adopters but by doing so you've limited the use of your coin to a pump n dump. Which is exactly what happened. You can't change the rules in the middle of the game and be expected to be taken seriously.

The 67% was not done for any gain. There was a flaw that caused the inflation. Maybe you haven't followed the coin from start.

Once the inflation was checked, investors got in.

And many that got easy coins in the beginning all dumped even before the hardfork. That is why the price wasn't rising.

There was no shortcut or any of that sort. If there was, then the premine would be much more and all of us would have dumped. If you don't believe, we will give you are wallet details and you can check. Please read the progress of the coin from April 28. Instead of making your own conclusions.

neurorit

member

Activity: 184

Merit: 10

Qidex Exchange

I'm just curious whether somehow you guys are either kidding yourselves or just blinded by petty greed, but do you really expect to attract new investors after cutting the inflation by 67%? Anyone with any wits about them is going to see that as a redflag and avoid putting money into SFR. Ever hear of the notion of fair distribution? Instead your devs tried for a shortcut rewarding early adopters but by doing so you've limited the use of your coin to a pump n dump. Which is exactly what happened. You can't change the rules in the middle of the game and be expected to be taken seriously.

swan77

newbie

Activity: 44

Merit: 0

Quote from: Francecrypto on June 17, 2014, 11:14:41 AM

The coin is actually worth x3 to x5 more so now it's time to get in.

I'm buying now before the price goes up. These cheap prices won't last long.

Francecrypto

full member

Activity: 238

Merit: 100

That's some good news, the coin needs it after yesterday debacle. But i'm confident it will recover. The coin is actually worth x3 to x5 more than his current valuation so now it's time to get in. Remember, this coin is still very alive and dev is working hard on it. There is profit to be made if you get in now. Cool

vipin.khatri20

full member

Activity: 210

Merit: 100

Hi Community members

If you have any concern regarding future of the coin, you can join irc and re assure that your investment is safe in Saffroncoin. Dev is currently working on encrypted chat system, so is little busy. Dev team is fully committed to this coin and will work very hard to make it the best in the market. A new whitepaper will also be posted.

Regards Vipin

vipin.khatri20

full member

Activity: 210

Merit: 100

Hey Dev can you come on irc and discuss about the future of the coin?

saffroncoin

hero member

Activity: 560

Merit: 500

Quote from: kirilvvbg on June 17, 2014, 08:35:40 AM

Any further info 'bout BLAKE, dev?!
Seems like Ocminer is missing some info in order to create a working pool...
But since the difficulty is different from 0.0000 - somebody knows how to mine SFR with Blake...

Or I am wrong, again... Wink

Well some one would have figured out a way. Those that tweak the miners can do it. Current difficulty for Blake is 70 which is a lot for only wallet mining.

The current Blake coins available use 8 round blake algorithm and SFR uses 14 round.

The external miners are configured to mine merged-mined blake so they use 8 rounds.

I guess for the miners to mine SFR blake, it should be configured to use 14 rounds.

I hope ocminer can use this info to tweak the miner.

kirilvvbg

full member

Activity: 213

Merit: 100

Any further info 'bout BLAKE, dev?!
Seems like Ocminer is missing some info in order to create a working pool...
But since the difficulty is different from 0.0000 - somebody knows how to mine SFR with Blake...

Or I am wrong, again... Wink

ocminer

legendary

Activity: 2688

Merit: 1240

Quote from: TizeN85 on June 17, 2014, 05:07:28 AM

Quote from: ocminer on June 17, 2014, 04:59:35 AM

Quote from: JohnJoule on June 17, 2014, 04:30:20 AM

Quote from: ocminer on June 17, 2014, 04:14:53 AM

Quote from: ocminer on June 17, 2014, 03:18:08 AM

Hmm, Algo looks normal to me, it should work with this miner:

https://github.com/kR105/cgminer-alt

or

http://www.blakecoin.org/cgminer-3.7-blake256.tar.gz

You should have a look here @ first post:

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/annblc-blakecoin-blake-256-for-gpufpga-with-merged-mined-pools-stable-net-306894 (look at Pools/cgminer)

You can give it a try @ https://sfr.suprnova.cc you should see accepted shares, if not, quit mining and I'll have to tweak further, I'm currently out and cannot access my rigs for testing :-/

I get accepted shares but the blocks found are rejected.. I cannot see a different block structure at first sight, searching for a difference now

Saffroncoind uses a different Blake algorithm than Blake coin. There exists Blake and Blake-2.

There is no GPU miner released for Saffroncoin's Blake algo, but judging by the difficulty (52), there might be a GPU miner (or a botnet) on it.

I think I've got the Algo right, it seems to be a problem with final block creation, there might be some extra information or a different block header which I'm missing.. Maybe one of the devs has a tip for me, currently I cannot find the difference

Someone have said that's the block height if i'm right

Block Height is calculated automatically as far as I see.. Are there any special stratum versions for this coin ? Maybe I can look there

TizeN85

full member

Activity: 136

Merit: 100

Quote from: ocminer on June 17, 2014, 04:59:35 AM

Quote from: JohnJoule on June 17, 2014, 04:30:20 AM

Quote from: ocminer on June 17, 2014, 04:14:53 AM

Quote from: ocminer on June 17, 2014, 03:18:08 AM

Hmm, Algo looks normal to me, it should work with this miner:

https://github.com/kR105/cgminer-alt

or

http://www.blakecoin.org/cgminer-3.7-blake256.tar.gz

You should have a look here @ first post:

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/annblc-blakecoin-blake-256-for-gpufpga-with-merged-mined-pools-stable-net-306894 (look at Pools/cgminer)

You can give it a try @ https://sfr.suprnova.cc you should see accepted shares, if not, quit mining and I'll have to tweak further, I'm currently out and cannot access my rigs for testing :-/

I get accepted shares but the blocks found are rejected.. I cannot see a different block structure at first sight, searching for a difference now

Saffroncoind uses a different Blake algorithm than Blake coin. There exists Blake and Blake-2.

There is no GPU miner released for Saffroncoin's Blake algo, but judging by the difficulty (52), there might be a GPU miner (or a botnet) on it.

I think I've got the Algo right, it seems to be a problem with final block creation, there might be some extra information or a different block header which I'm missing.. Maybe one of the devs has a tip for me, currently I cannot find the difference

Someone have said that's the block height if i'm right

ocminer

legendary

Activity: 2688

Merit: 1240

Quote from: JohnJoule on June 17, 2014, 04:30:20 AM

Quote from: ocminer on June 17, 2014, 04:14:53 AM

Quote from: ocminer on June 17, 2014, 03:18:08 AM

Hmm, Algo looks normal to me, it should work with this miner:

https://github.com/kR105/cgminer-alt

or

http://www.blakecoin.org/cgminer-3.7-blake256.tar.gz

You should have a look here @ first post:

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/annblc-blakecoin-blake-256-for-gpufpga-with-merged-mined-pools-stable-net-306894 (look at Pools/cgminer)

You can give it a try @ https://sfr.suprnova.cc you should see accepted shares, if not, quit mining and I'll have to tweak further, I'm currently out and cannot access my rigs for testing :-/

I get accepted shares but the blocks found are rejected.. I cannot see a different block structure at first sight, searching for a difference now

Saffroncoind uses a different Blake algorithm than Blake coin. There exists Blake and Blake-2.

There is no GPU miner released for Saffroncoin's Blake algo, but judging by the difficulty (52), there might be a GPU miner (or a botnet) on it.

I think I've got the Algo right, it seems to be a problem with final block creation, there might be some extra information or a different block header which I'm missing.. Maybe one of the devs has a tip for me, currently I cannot find the difference

mishax1

legendary

Activity: 2898

Merit: 1017

List it, vote. https://poloniex.com/coinRequest

JohnJoule

newbie

Activity: 56

Merit: 0

Quote from: ocminer on June 17, 2014, 04:14:53 AM

Quote from: ocminer on June 17, 2014, 03:18:08 AM

Hmm, Algo looks normal to me, it should work with this miner:

https://github.com/kR105/cgminer-alt

or

http://www.blakecoin.org/cgminer-3.7-blake256.tar.gz

You should have a look here @ first post:

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/annblc-blakecoin-blake-256-for-gpufpga-with-merged-mined-pools-stable-net-306894 (look at Pools/cgminer)

You can give it a try @ https://sfr.suprnova.cc you should see accepted shares, if not, quit mining and I'll have to tweak further, I'm currently out and cannot access my rigs for testing :-/

I get accepted shares but the blocks found are rejected.. I cannot see a different block structure at first sight, searching for a difference now

Saffroncoind uses a different Blake algorithm than Blake coin. There exists Blake and Blake-2.

There is no GPU miner released for Saffroncoin's Blake algo, but judging by the difficulty (52), there might be a GPU miner (or a botnet) on it.

TizeN85

full member

Activity: 136

Merit: 100

So now, what's the next step for saffroncoin, dev?

I read about an exchange in SFR/USD SFR/EUR, I think it's a major idea, and very interesting!
I'm bored of fees between every exchange :
kraken's fees for buying BTC and fees for withdraw to -> bittrex/mintpal/poloniex's fees for buying altcoin with BTC to trade, then fees for selling altcoin to get more BTC, then fees for withdraw to -> kraken and again fees for selling BTC to get EUR and last fees for withdraw to my bank account Angry

.

I've read somewhere that bitcoin ecosystem was made to avoid this fees, but we have more and more fees at every single step of the system... If we go on like this we will finally have fees because of placing a buy/sell order even if we cancel it!

I dream of an exchange like you said in the WP, where we can buy saffron directly in USD/EUR and off course in BTC ( Roll Eyes

), where the fees deserves to saffroincoin ecosystem and help him to grow like a new bitcoin/litecoin in few month/years.
I'll be very happy if in a relatively near future I can buy some materials with saffroncoin on the net!

ocminer

legendary

Activity: 2688

Merit: 1240

Quote from: ocminer on June 17, 2014, 03:18:08 AM

Hmm, Algo looks normal to me, it should work with this miner:

https://github.com/kR105/cgminer-alt

or

http://www.blakecoin.org/cgminer-3.7-blake256.tar.gz

You should have a look here @ first post:

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/annblc-blakecoin-blake-256-for-gpufpga-with-merged-mined-pools-stable-net-306894 (look at Pools/cgminer)

You can give it a try @ https://sfr.suprnova.cc you should see accepted shares, if not, quit mining and I'll have to tweak further, I'm currently out and cannot access my rigs for testing :-/

I get accepted shares but the blocks found are rejected.. I cannot see a different block structure at first sight, searching for a difference now

Watchy312

member

Activity: 193

Merit: 10

"hughjays77" pumped and dumped the shit out of SFR with "smart talk" and insider info.
He dumped an enormous amount of SFR together with a trash "whitepaper", what do you need more?

He made money out of scamming other people and as such is a fucking whore and should be in jail but hell...even in real life whores worse than him get at the top.
That's the sad truth about capitalism but it is so obvious : people with "morals" gets exploited and scammed by people with less "morals" or none at all.
It is especially obvious in ex-soviet states like Russia & China and in...cryptos where "laws" does not apply at all.

However devs are also responsible with this "pump&dump", i'm deceived by them. They gave the power to this guy to destroy the price and as such acted like fools.
With such an info he has been the only one to know, putting aside morals, it was an extremly logic thing for "hughjays77" to dump hard.

qumatru

sr. member

Activity: 322

Merit: 251

bottom was at 800, hopefully with a bit of news and a little less fud we're gonna see some growth soon

TizeN85

full member

Activity: 136

Merit: 100

The price is growing slowly, that's good, we have to grow taking our time like from the start if we want to get a stable and rock solid price!

1000sat seem to be the bottom

ocminer

legendary

Activity: 2688

Merit: 1240

Hmm, Algo looks normal to me, it should work with this miner:

https://github.com/kR105/cgminer-alt

or

http://www.blakecoin.org/cgminer-3.7-blake256.tar.gz

You should have a look here @ first post:

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/annblc-blakecoin-blake-256-for-gpufpga-with-merged-mined-pools-stable-net-306894 (look at Pools/cgminer)

You can give it a try @ https://sfr.suprnova.cc you should see accepted shares, if not, quit mining and I'll have to tweak further, I'm currently out and cannot access my rigs for testing :-/

Topic: [ANN] [SFR] SaffronCoin | Latest Version - 1.4.2/2.6.2 | Mandatory Wallet Update - page 178. (Read 437835 times)