Since I seem to be the only one[publicly, I sure there are others] with hard cold BTC and cash from my investment; I will continue in my role as the 'unofficial no bullshit' monitor. I will not FUD but since I know the majority here are 'pie in the sky' teens and twenty yr olds. I have to self -appoint myself in this role.
I continue to accumulate maybe up my old level of 700k or up to 10% of coins in issue. I will decide depending on how I see things going in this thread.
Coinviking, I dont agree that 'price guidance has no place in the the whitepaper. As a matter of fact when some here were hyping the 2000,3000,4000% appreciation I only mentioned it once because my 'price guidance' was infinitely more conservative 1000sat by the end of July. Having made over 200btc in the crypto markets and predicting the 50-70% crash via PM, this was my attempt at 'capping the price'. Crypto's encourage pump and dump we should have actually been revolutionary and FUD's Saffron's price as soon as it was over 2000sat. I know some will think that would be crazy but Crypto's are a new world and we have to use unorthodox methods to achieve price stability. No matter the Press Release or Whitepapers, coins that go up 4000% in 4-5days always crash period full stop. If we are not careful it will happen again. Remember its not the Whales that drive up the price. They simply sell into the 'Mania' and buy during the 'Panic'.
I'm 35, so not everyone here are teens lol. Cold realism is good, I see no issues with that Hugh. I know that you are a financially minded individual and from what I can discern, very knowledgeable. The sell on news, was going to happen, if you chose to exercise action on this as you have stated to lock in profits, that's your prerogative. If you sold as much saffron as stated then the bulk of the selling pressure was you divesting your holding based on a quick scan of the Bittrex chart, its rather easy to predict such a drops in price when you contributed so much to it. I don't believe it was premeditated on your part but that as soon as you noticed any indices pointing to downward trend you jumped in. Thats ok, this is crypto. Had you held off and rather bled off your holdings would the price have stabilized, kept increasing or suffered less of a precipitous drop? Guess we will never know. But what's done is done, you did what you felt was the right move for you.
Price stability is somewhat illusiory in crypto given the speculative nature, the lack of measurable fundamentals and their inherent "smallcap" nature. Even bitcoin lacks stability comparable to those of fiats. People will hype and pump and there isn't a whole lot that can be done, many options have been proposed and attempted by other cryptos but at this time, other than say actively FUDDing a coin as you mention, it could work but seriously would damage the community and longterm future prospects of said coin. Saffroncoin has accumulated alot of goodwill, and very little negativity, so actively manipulating prices is not something that we should strive for with short sighted strategies that could do more harm than good.
As far as the WP specifically, official coin docs shouldnt try and predict pricing. There is nothing to supports them unlike business that have revenues etc. It's pure speculation. As I stated on my rather long winded msg, the wp was a solid document but not optimal for the cryptophere. People tend to look at these papers and only spot the red flags.. these being anything that's more or less been associated with previous scamcoins. If you wanted the price guidance, it should have been at the end as a footnote, not the first thing out of the gates, but you are a price/profit minded individual so I understand why it would take prominence over the actual roadmaps established later in the doc. i would have structured the doc along the lines of the 6 cornerstones of the coin. That being said, some of the wording I would have altered such as to approach the subject of new financial influx for future coin support etc as more of a community driven objective via donations like so many other coins have succesfully accomplished rather than using the premine terminology (to be fair triggering a second bulk premine is unheard of, and potentially not even feasible code wise, but thats neither here nor there). I believe that there was mention of a NSF and VISA/Mastercard as well. Let's be frank, the NSF for naut coin is an anomaly because the guy running it is a public figure and as such people see it differently (I hold naut FYI). For saffron to have that in its docs is pointless, it involved central control and ALOT of trust in those operating such a fund, but conflicts with ideals of what saffron seeks to be (democratic, distributed etc). The cards shouldnt be called Visa etc.. as saffron is not in talk with visa or mastercard etc. I understand what you meant by it (preloaded, or loadeable debit cards ala blackcoin.. which are pretty neat) it just comes of as a purecoin fiasco when the mention of Visa or mastercard is uttered.
I believe you are a valuable member of the community as we need people with different view points. I enjoy debate and am not afraid to speak my mind in a respectable and professional manner. Different ideas make for stronger end products because all options have been considered and we dont ignore those that could become missed opportunities. Lets work together on this, as we build up a Dev support group. No more individuals acting unilaterally (myself included), and lets build something that will defy expectations. Are you with me Hugh? That includes you too Vip & Adatrader
I'm am easy to reach, I 'll check on here when I can, I'm also on twitter, or you guys can reach me via good ol' email [email protected]