@ badman...
Could you tell me what each of these do, and to which algo's each applies to?
"hamsi-expand-big" : "7",
"hamsi-short" : true,
"blake-compact" : true,
"keccak-unroll" : "8",
"luffa-parallel" : true,
I used all 5 and it helped my X11 a bit, but hurt X13 more than it helped X11.
I haven't tried any other algo's yet.
Topic: [ANN] sgminer v5 - optimized X11/X13/NeoScrypt/Lyra2RE/etc. kernel-switch miner - page 176. (Read 877859 times)
August 08, 2014, 07:27:12 PM
August 08, 2014, 06:37:38 PM
is there anyone with a decent 290 profiles.conf ?
try the ones on this pagehttps://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.8075949
and if you want to have everything in just a bat file it's gonna get really complicated when you start adding multiple pools and algo's to it
for instance this is for my 290's
Code:
{
"pools" : [
{
"name" : "X11P2P.com",
"url" : "http://x11p2p.com:7903",
"user" : "XvRs67Wnw1n1Kwtq4ihhTpv699DdJpxdnt+.02",
"pass" : "x",
"priority" : "0",
"no-extranonce" : true,
"profile": "x11"
},
{
"name" : "Kick-Ass.net DRK P2Pool",
"url" : "stratum+tcp://darkcoin.kicks-ass.net:7903",
"user" : "XvRs67Wnw1n1Kwtq4ihhTpv699DdJpxdnt+.02",
"pass" : "x",
"priority" : "0",
"no-extranonce" : true,
"profile": "x11"
},
{
"name" : "MineP.it DRK",
"url" : "STRATUM+TCP://DRK.MINEP.IT:3333",
"user" : "badman74.2",
"pass" : "x",
"priority" : "1",
"profile": "x11"
},
{
"name" : "Xpool X11",
"url" : "stratum+tcp://mine.xpool.ca:8888",
"user" : "XvRs67Wnw1n1Kwtq4ihhTpv699DdJpxdnt",
"pass" : "x",
"priority" : "2",
"profile": "x11"
},
{
"name" : "Xpool Scrypt",
"url" : "stratum+tcp://mine.xpool.ca:7777",
"user" : "XvRs67Wnw1n1Kwtq4ihhTpv699DdJpxdnt",
"pass" : "x",
"priority" : "3",
"profile": "scrypt"
}
],
"profiles" : [
{
"name" : "x11",
"algorithm" : "x11"
},
{
"name" : "x13",
"algorithm" : "x13"
},
{
"name" : "x15",
"algorithm" : "x15"
},
{
"name" : "NIST5",
"algorithm" : "nist5"
},
{
"name" : "scrypt",
"lookup-gap" : "2",
"gpu-threads": "1",
"algorithm" : "zuikkis"
},
{
"name" : "nscrypt",
"lookup-gap" : "2",
"algorithm" : "zuikkis",
"nfactor" : "11"
},
{
"name" : "keccak",
"intensity" : "12",
"gpu-threads": "4",
"algorithm" : "keccak"
},
{
"name" : "qubit",
"algorithm" : "qubitcoin"
},
{
"name" : "quark",
"algorithm" : "quarkcoin"
}
],
"intensity" : "16",
"worksize": "64",
"hamsi-expand-big" : "1",
"hamsi-short" : true,
"blake-compact" : true,
"keccak-unroll" : "8",
"luffa-parallel" : true,
"gpu-fan" : "50-100",
"gpu-engine": "1075",
"gpu-memclock" : "1375",
"gpu-threads" : "2",
"failover-only" : true,
"temp-cutoff" : "94",
"temp-overheat" : "92",
"temp-target" : "88",
"auto-fan" : true,
"auto-gpu" : false,
"api-listen" : true,
"api-allow" : "W:127.0.0.1",
"api-port" : "4028",
"expiry" : "1",
"gpu-dyninterval" : "7",
"hotplug" : "5",
"log" : "5",
"net-delay" : true,
"queue" : "0",
"scan-time" : "1",
"temp-hysteresis" : "5",
"shares" : "0",
"no-submit-stale" : false,
"no-restart" : false,
"failover-switch-delay" : "30",
"show-coindiff" : true,
"kernel-path" : "/usr/local/bin"
}
Code:
{
"pools" : [
{
"name" : "X11P2P.com",
"url" : "http://x11p2p.com:7903",
"user" : "XvRs67Wnw1n1Kwtq4ihhTpv699DdJpxdnt+.02",
"pass" : "x",
"priority" : "0",
"no-extranonce" : true,
"profile": "x11"
},
{
"name" : "Kick-Ass.net DRK P2Pool",
"url" : "stratum+tcp://darkcoin.kicks-ass.net:7903",
"user" : "XvRs67Wnw1n1Kwtq4ihhTpv699DdJpxdnt+.02",
"pass" : "x",
"priority" : "0",
"no-extranonce" : true,
"profile": "x11"
},
{
"name" : "MineP.it DRK",
"url" : "STRATUM+TCP://DRK.MINEP.IT:3333",
"user" : "badman74.1",
"pass" : "x",
"priority" : "1",
"profile": "x11"
},
{
"name" : "Xpool X11",
"url" : "stratum+tcp://mine.xpool.ca:8888",
"user" : "XvRs67Wnw1n1Kwtq4ihhTpv699DdJpxdnt",
"pass" : "x",
"priority" : "2",
"profile": "x11"
}
],
{
"profiles" : [
{
"name" : "x11",
"xintensity" : "64",
"algorithm" : "x11"
},
{
"name" : "x13",
"algorithm" : "x13"
},
{
"name" : "x14",
"algorithm" : "x14"
},
{
"name" : "x15",
"algorithm" : "x15"
},
{
"name" : "NIST5",
"algorithm" : "nist5"
},
{
"name" : "scrypt",
"lookup-gap" : "2",
"gpu-engine": "1000,1000",
"gpu-memclock" : "1250,1250",
"gpu-powertune" : "0",
"gpu-threads": "1",
"algorithm" : "zuikkis"
},
{
"name" : "nscrypt",
"lookup-gap" : "2",
"gpu-engine": "1000,1000",
"gpu-memclock" : "1250,1250",
"gpu-powertune" : "0",
"algorithm" : "zuikkis",
"nfactor" : "11"
},
{
"name" : "keccak",
"intensity" : "12",
"gpu-threads": "4",
"algorithm" : "keccak"
},
{
"name" : "qubit",
"intensity" : "14",
"algorithm" : "qubitcoin"
},
{
"name" : "quark",
"intensity" : "14",
"algorithm" : "quarkcoin"
}
],
"intensity" : "16",
"worksize": "64",
"hamsi-expand-big" : "7",
"hamsi-short" : true,
"blake-compact" : true,
"keccak-unroll" : "8",
"luffa-parallel" : true,
"gpu-fan" : "50-100",
"gpu-engine": "1040,1040",
"gpu-memclock" : "1375,1375",
"gpu-threads" : "2",
"failover-only" : true,
"temp-cutoff" : "96",
"temp-overheat" : "94",
"temp-target" : "85",
"auto-fan" : true,
"auto-gpu" : false,
"api-allow" : "W:127.0.0.1",
"api-listen" : true,
"api-port" : "4028",
"expiry" : "1",
"gpu-dyninterval" : "7",
"hotplug" : "5",
"net-delay" : true,
"queue" : "0",
"scan-time" : "1",
"temp-hysteresis" : "5",
"shares" : "0",
"no-submit-stale" : false,
"no-restart" : false,
"failover-switch-delay" : "30",
"show-coindiff" : true,
"remove-disabled" : true
}
August 08, 2014, 05:45:46 PM
is there anyone with a decent 290 profiles.conf ?
try the ones on this pagehttps://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.8075949
August 08, 2014, 01:06:35 PM
August 07, 2014, 10:42:07 PM
is there anyone with a decent 290 profiles.conf ?
try the ones on this pagehttps://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.8075949
August 07, 2014, 08:56:14 PM
is there anyone with a decent 290 profiles.conf ?
August 07, 2014, 06:39:30 PM
You're killing your performance using I:20 and worksize:128, go down to I:17 and worksize:64
platinum4, thank you! It was a test with different intensity values, really I use 17-18.
My 7850 have a little bit higher hashrate with worksize 128, than with 64. Does worksize 128 have a hidden disadvantages, for example higher reject rate, or not?
If anybody interested, I obtain the following results for my 7850 (at engine clock is 1180 MHz):
x11 - 2,3 Mh/s (worksize:128, I:18, gpu-threads:2)
x13 - 1,8 Mh/s (worksize:128, I:17, gpu-threads:2)
x15 - 1,5 Mh/s (worksize:128, I:17, gpu-threads:2)
Its funny.
I have a bunch of 270x among a few other cards, and they run so much better @ I 16 WS 64. If I bump either one of those the hash goes down. Like with that setting I can get around 3 MH on x11 per card with those settings.... if I bump up the I.... it goes down to 2.9.... and 2.8 if I just bump up the WS... I dont know why.
August 07, 2014, 05:55:03 PM
You're killing your performance using I:20 and worksize:128, go down to I:17 and worksize:64
platinum4, thank you! It was a test with different intensity values, really I use 17-18.
My 7850 have a little bit higher hashrate with worksize 128, than with 64. Does worksize 128 have a hidden disadvantages, for example higher reject rate, or not?
If anybody interested, I obtain the following results for my 7850 (at engine clock is 1180 MHz):
x11 - 2,3 Mh/s (worksize:128, I:18, gpu-threads:2)
x13 - 1,8 Mh/s (worksize:128, I:17, gpu-threads:2)
x15 - 1,5 Mh/s (worksize:128, I:17, gpu-threads:2)
Its funny.
I have a bunch of 270x among a few other cards, and they run so much better @ I 16 WS 64. If I bump either one of those the hash goes down. Like with that setting I can get around 3 MH on x11 per card with those settings.... if I bump up the I.... it goes down to 2.9.... and 2.8 if I just bump up the WS... I dont know why.
August 07, 2014, 01:19:10 PM
You're killing your performance using I:20 and worksize:128, go down to I:17 and worksize:64
platinum4, thank you! It was a test with different intensity values, really I use 17-18.
My 7850 have a little bit higher hashrate with worksize 128, than with 64. Does worksize 128 have a hidden disadvantages, for example higher reject rate, or not?
If anybody interested, I obtain the following results for my 7850 (at engine clock is 1180 MHz):
x11 - 2,3 Mh/s (worksize:128, I:18, gpu-threads:2)
x13 - 1,8 Mh/s (worksize:128, I:17, gpu-threads:2)
x15 - 1,5 Mh/s (worksize:128, I:17, gpu-threads:2)
August 07, 2014, 09:03:59 AM
You're killing your performance using I:20 and worksize:128, go down to I:17 and worksize:64
August 07, 2014, 08:35:37 AM
Hi, all!
Here is a BUG REPORT :-)
I want to set different voltages for GPUs. The string for config file is: "gpu-vddc" : "1.14,1.14,1.15"
If I place this string in a common section, all cards will have first voltage in a list (1.14v).
If I place this string in a profile brackets, all works ok (cards will have voltages according to list).
All other strings (gpu-engine, gpu-memclock) works ok in any place.
Here are fragments of profiles.conf:
This set 1.14v to all cards:
This set 1.14, 1.14, 1.15 v to cards:
Early versions of sgminer5 didn't have this bug.
Here is a BUG REPORT :-)
I want to set different voltages for GPUs. The string for config file is: "gpu-vddc" : "1.14,1.14,1.15"
If I place this string in a common section, all cards will have first voltage in a list (1.14v).
If I place this string in a profile brackets, all works ok (cards will have voltages according to list).
All other strings (gpu-engine, gpu-memclock) works ok in any place.
Here are fragments of profiles.conf:
This set 1.14v to all cards:
Code:
{
"profiles" : [
{
"name" : "x11",
"algorithm" : "darkcoin-mod",
"intensity" : "17,18,20",
"gpu-threads" : "2,2,2",
"worksize": "64,128,128"
}
],
"gpu-vddc" : "1.14,1.14,1.15",
"gpu-engine": "1100,1180,1200"
}
This set 1.14, 1.14, 1.15 v to cards:
Code:
{
"profiles" : [
{
"name" : "x11",
"algorithm" : "darkcoin-mod",
"intensity" : "17,18,20",
"gpu-threads" : "2,2,2",
"worksize": "64,128,128",
"gpu-vddc" : "1.14,1.14,1.15"
}
],
"gpu-engine": "1100,1180,1200"
}
Early versions of sgminer5 didn't have this bug.
August 06, 2014, 09:12:08 PM
i get 3.6-3.7mh/s(x15) from 290 with 1050-1350 how can get 4mh/s?
pretty sure you have to be running a 290x to get over 4mh/s on x15
i tought mining power of 290 same with a 290x because i get almost same hash with other algosand that translates down though the other algo's as well
Badman74,
Your MOD version seems to me like it gets stuck on a coin more than the official. Two of my rigs today were stuck on x15 for hours while my third switched to nist5 no problem. Thoughts?
{
"pools" : [
{
"url" : "stratum+tcp://stratum.nicehash.com:4336",
"user" : "13fS5x7",
"pass" : "x",
"profile" : "x11",
"name" : "nicehashx11"
},
{
"url" : "stratum+tcp://stratum.nicehash.com:4337",
"user" : "13fSzQkx7",
"pass" : "x",
"profile" : "x13",
"name" : "nicehashx13"
},
{
"url" : "stratum+tcp://stratum.nicehash.com:4338",
"user" : "13fS58x7",
"pass" : "x",
"profile" : "keccak",
"name" : "keccak"
},
not sure if this is the actual problem as the pools stratum should open the stratum for the most profitable and close it for the others... so all i can think of is to check your password settings and also make sure the are all on 4xxx ports not 3xxx
edit: i didn't make any changes to that portion of the code, my changes were almost exclusively in the .cl files
August 06, 2014, 08:55:02 PM
i get 3.6-3.7mh/s(x15) from 290 with 1050-1350 how can get 4mh/s?
pretty sure you have to be running a 290x to get over 4mh/s on x15 i tought mining power of 290 same with a 290x because i get almost same hash with other algosand that translates down though the other algo's as well
Badman74,
Your MOD version seems to me like it gets stuck on a coin more than the official. Two of my rigs today were stuck on x15 for hours while my third switched to nist5 no problem. Thoughts?
{
"pools" : [
{
"url" : "stratum+tcp://stratum.nicehash.com:4336",
"user" : "13fS5x7",
"pass" : "x",
"profile" : "x11",
"name" : "nicehashx11"
},
{
"url" : "stratum+tcp://stratum.nicehash.com:4337",
"user" : "13fSzQkx7",
"pass" : "x",
"profile" : "x13",
"name" : "nicehashx13"
},
{
"url" : "stratum+tcp://stratum.nicehash.com:4338",
"user" : "13fS58x7",
"pass" : "x",
"profile" : "keccak",
"name" : "keccak"
},
August 06, 2014, 07:26:24 PM
i get 3.6-3.7mh/s(x15) from 290 with 1050-1350 how can get 4mh/s?
pretty sure you have to be running a 290x to get over 4mh/s on x15 i tought mining power of 290 same with a 290x because i get almost same hash with other algosand that translates down though the other algo's as well
August 06, 2014, 05:15:36 PM
i get 3.6-3.7mh/s(x15) from 290 with 1050-1350 how can get 4mh/s?
pretty sure you have to be running a 290x to get over 4mh/s on x15 i tought mining power of 290 same with a 290x because i get almost same hash with other algosand that translates down though the other algo's as well
August 06, 2014, 05:08:09 PM
August 06, 2014, 04:57:15 PM
August 06, 2014, 04:37:39 PM
August 06, 2014, 04:27:37 PM
August 06, 2014, 04:17:08 PM
i get 3.6-3.7mh/s(x15) from 290 with 1050-1350 how can get 4mh/s?
Code:
{
"profiles" : [
{
"name" : "x11",
"algorithm" : "darkcoin-mod",
"xintensity" : "64",
"gpu-threads" : "2",
"worksize": "64"
},
{
"name" : "x13",
"algorithm" : "marucoin-mod",
"xintensity" : "51",
"gpu-threads" : "2",
"worksize": "64"
},
{
"name" : "x15",
"algorithm" : "bitblock",
"xintensity" : "51",
"gpu-threads" : "2",
"worksize": "64"
},
{
"name" : "nist5",
"algorithm" : "talkcoin-mod",
"intensity" : "16",
"gpu-threads" : "2",
"worksize": "64"
}
],
"default-profile": "x15",
"hamsi-expand-big" : "7",
"hamsi-short" : true,
"blake-compact" : true,
"keccak-unroll" : "8",
"luffa-parallel" : true,
"shaders" : "2560",
"gpu-fan" : "60",
"gpu-powertune" : "25",
"gpu-engine" : "1050",
"gpu-memclock" : "1400",
"gpu-vddc" : "0",
"auto-fan" : true,
"failover-only" : true,
"expiry" : "1",
"gpu-dyninterval" : "7",
"hotplug" : "5",
"log" : "5",
"queue" : "0",
"scan-time" : "1",
"temp-hysteresis" : "2",
"shares" : "0",
"no-submit-stale" : false,
"no-restart" : true,
"failover-switch-delay" : "30",
"show-coindiff" : true,
"remove-disabled" : true,
"extranonce-subscription" : true
}Jump to: