In testing we had people joining with 100-200GH at a crack. How do you think a person who had only 1GH was going to compare to operations of this size? Once the pool went live, we had someone connect with 600GH. The large operations were there either way, a pool simply exposes them.
The network hashrate roughly doubling in the past week would seem to belie your statement to some degree.
The increased sell pressure on the exchanges over the same period also seems evident.
I'm not saying it's bad. Most coins must go through this phase. Most coins have pools. It's just a shame it opens the project up to pro miners who exist only to suck as much value from a coin as possible and take it for themselves. With Sia being a fledgling market, and dual mining almost asking for Sia to be used for "bonus profit taking", it is temporarily retracing the price a bit. But it could turn around at any time, and I would be surprised if the price isn't looking quite a bit better in a month or three.
As mentioned earlier... claymores miner is a good thing. It spreads the coins over bigger number of users than the few miners taking ALL earlier.
Yes, it must suck to be one of those who got huge rewards(and dumps) to now share with many others.
Id rather see 100 small dumps than 1 big one.
Sia's slow diff adjustment opened it for abuse. The diff should gone up immediately and not let the big hashrates get huge rewards for overpower.