New Telegram channel for everyone
t.me/SignatumReborn
Topic: [ANN] Signatum 2.0 - page 5. (Read 102089 times)
HELLO Somebody can explain me?? I try to build OSX wallet I get this error
CKey::GetPrivKey() const in key.o
CKey::GetPubKey() const in key.o
CKey::Sign(uint256 const&, std::vector >&) const in key.o
CKey::SignCompact(uint256 const&, std::vector >&) const in key.o
CKey::Load(std::vector >&, CPubKey&, bool) in key.o
CPubKey::Verify(uint256 const&, std::vector > const&) const in key.o
...
"typeinfo for boost::detail::thread_data_base", referenced from:
typeinfo for boost::detail::thread_data > > > in alert.o
typeinfo for boost::detail::thread_data >), boost::_bi::list1 > > > > > in init.o
typeinfo for boost::detail::thread_data > > > in init.o
typeinfo for boost::detail::thread_data > > > in init.o
typeinfo for boost::detail::thread_data, boost::_bi::value > > > in net.o
typeinfo for boost::detail::thread_data, boost::_bi::value, boost::_bi::value > > > in net.o
typeinfo for boost::detail::thread_data, boost::_bi::list1 > > > in rpcserver.o
...
"Db::remove(char const*, char const*, unsigned int)", referenced from:
CDB::Rewrite(std::string const&, char const*) in db.o
"boost::thread::detach()", referenced from:
boost::thread::~thread() in alert.o
"_EC_KEY_set_public_key", referenced from:
(anonymous namespace)::CECKey::SetSecretBytes(unsigned char const*) in key.o
(anonymous namespace)::ECDSA_SIG_recover_key_GFp(ec_key_st*, ECDSA_SIG_st*, unsigned char const*, int, int, int) in key.o
"boost::program_options::detail::common_config_file_iterator::common_config_file_iterator(std::set, std::allocator > const&, bool)", referenced from:
boost::program_options::detail::basic_config_file_iterator::basic_config_file_iterator(std::istream&, std::set, std::allocator > const&, bool) in util.o
"vtable for boost::detail::thread_data_base", referenced from:
boost::detail::thread_data_base::thread_data_base() in alert.o
NOTE: a missing vtable usually means the first non-inline virtual member function has no definition.
"_EVP_EncryptFinal_ex", referenced from:
CCrypter::Encrypt(std::vector > const&, std::vector >&) in crypter.o
"_EC_KEY_check_key", referenced from:
CKey::SetPrivKey(std::vector > const&, bool) in key.o
CKey::Load(std::vector >&, CPubKey&, bool) in key.o
"_SHA256_Update", referenced from:
CAddrInfo::GetTriedBucket(uint256 const&) const in addrman.o
CAddrInfo::GetNewBucket(uint256 const&, CNetAddr const&) const in addrman.o
CAddrInfo::GetBucketPosition(uint256 const&, bool, int) const in addrman.o
void WriteCompactSize(CHashWriter&, unsigned long long) in addrman.o
CBlock::BuildMerkleTree() const in init.o
CTransaction::GetHash() const in init.o
void Serialize_impl >(CHashWriter&, std::vector > const&, int, int, boost::integral_constant const&) in init.o
...
(maybe you meant: __Z18HMAC_SHA256_UpdateP18HMAC_SHA256ContextPKvm)
"boost::detail::thread_data_base::~thread_data_base()", referenced from:
boost::detail::thread_data > > >* boost::detail::heap_new_impl > > >, boost::_bi::bind_t > >&>(boost::_bi::bind_t > >&) in alert.o
boost::detail::thread_data > > >::~thread_data() in alert.o
boost::detail::thread_data > > >::~thread_data() in alert.o
boost::detail::thread_data >), boost::_bi::list1 > > > > >* boost::detail::heap_new_impl >), boost::_bi::list1 > > > > >, boost::_bi::bind_t >), boost::_bi::list1 > > > >&>(boost::_bi::bind_t >), boost::_bi::list1 > > > >&) in init.o
boost::detail::thread_data >), boost::_bi::list1 > > > > >::~thread_data() in init.o
boost::detail::thread_data >), boost::_bi::list1 > > > > >::~thread_data() in init.o
boost::detail::thread_data > > >::~thread_data() in init.o
...
"_EC_GROUP_get_order", referenced from:
CKey::Sign(uint256 const&, std::vector >&) const in key.o
(anonymous namespace)::ECDSA_SIG_recover_key_GFp(ec_key_st*, ECDSA_SIG_st*, unsigned char const*, int, int, int) in key.o
"_SSL_new", referenced from:
boost::asio::ssl::detail::engine::engine(ssl_ctx_st*) in rpcclient.o
"boost::system::generic_category()", referenced from:
boost::recursive_mutex::recursive_mutex() in alert.o
boost::unique_lock >::lock() in alert.o
boost::thread::start_thread() in alert.o
boost::mutex::mutex() in alert.o
boost::condition_variable::condition_variable() in alert.o
__GLOBAL__sub_I_alert.cpp in alert.o
__GLOBAL__sub_I_checkpoints.cpp in checkpoints.o
...
ld: symbol(s) not found for architecture x86_64
clang: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see invocation)
make: *** [signatumd] Error 1
MacBook-Pro-de-Polo:src polo$
CKey::GetPrivKey() const in key.o
CKey::GetPubKey() const in key.o
CKey::Sign(uint256 const&, std::vector
CKey::SignCompact(uint256 const&, std::vector
CKey::Load(std::vector
CPubKey::Verify(uint256 const&, std::vector
...
"typeinfo for boost::detail::thread_data_base", referenced from:
typeinfo for boost::detail::thread_data
typeinfo for boost::detail::thread_data
typeinfo for boost::detail::thread_data
typeinfo for boost::detail::thread_data
typeinfo for boost::detail::thread_data
typeinfo for boost::detail::thread_data
typeinfo for boost::detail::thread_data
...
"Db::remove(char const*, char const*, unsigned int)", referenced from:
CDB::Rewrite(std::string const&, char const*) in db.o
"boost::thread::detach()", referenced from:
boost::thread::~thread() in alert.o
"_EC_KEY_set_public_key", referenced from:
(anonymous namespace)::CECKey::SetSecretBytes(unsigned char const*) in key.o
(anonymous namespace)::ECDSA_SIG_recover_key_GFp(ec_key_st*, ECDSA_SIG_st*, unsigned char const*, int, int, int) in key.o
"boost::program_options::detail::common_config_file_iterator::common_config_file_iterator(std::set
boost::program_options::detail::basic_config_file_iterator
"vtable for boost::detail::thread_data_base", referenced from:
boost::detail::thread_data_base::thread_data_base() in alert.o
NOTE: a missing vtable usually means the first non-inline virtual member function has no definition.
"_EVP_EncryptFinal_ex", referenced from:
CCrypter::Encrypt(std::vector
"_EC_KEY_check_key", referenced from:
CKey::SetPrivKey(std::vector
CKey::Load(std::vector
"_SHA256_Update", referenced from:
CAddrInfo::GetTriedBucket(uint256 const&) const in addrman.o
CAddrInfo::GetNewBucket(uint256 const&, CNetAddr const&) const in addrman.o
CAddrInfo::GetBucketPosition(uint256 const&, bool, int) const in addrman.o
void WriteCompactSize
CBlock::BuildMerkleTree() const in init.o
CTransaction::GetHash() const in init.o
void Serialize_impl
...
(maybe you meant: __Z18HMAC_SHA256_UpdateP18HMAC_SHA256ContextPKvm)
"boost::detail::thread_data_base::~thread_data_base()", referenced from:
boost::detail::thread_data
boost::detail::thread_data
boost::detail::thread_data
boost::detail::thread_data
boost::detail::thread_data
boost::detail::thread_data
boost::detail::thread_data
...
"_EC_GROUP_get_order", referenced from:
CKey::Sign(uint256 const&, std::vector
(anonymous namespace)::ECDSA_SIG_recover_key_GFp(ec_key_st*, ECDSA_SIG_st*, unsigned char const*, int, int, int) in key.o
"_SSL_new", referenced from:
boost::asio::ssl::detail::engine::engine(ssl_ctx_st*) in rpcclient.o
"boost::system::generic_category()", referenced from:
boost::recursive_mutex::recursive_mutex() in alert.o
boost::unique_lock
boost::thread::start_thread() in alert.o
boost::mutex::mutex() in alert.o
boost::condition_variable::condition_variable() in alert.o
__GLOBAL__sub_I_alert.cpp in alert.o
__GLOBAL__sub_I_checkpoints.cpp in checkpoints.o
...
ld: symbol(s) not found for architecture x86_64
clang: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see invocation)
make: *** [signatumd] Error 1
MacBook-Pro-de-Polo:src polo$
Cryptovore
@everyone The Signatum coin swap registration period has now officially ended. The first STRAKS payments will be executed according to plan, on the 10th of January. We thank you all for your patience and your continued support and we look forward to building the future of STRAKS alongside our strong and fast growing community.
@everyone The Signatum coin swap registration period has now officially ended. The first STRAKS payments will be executed according to plan, on the 10th of January. We thank you all for your patience and your continued support and we look forward to building the future of STRAKS alongside our strong and fast growing community.
So coin swap has finished already or we have some time to change? I'm still synchronizing my wallet 
I'm sorry, I did not mean it right, as English is not so good, translate but anyway I do not wander as this might be an answer, maybe it's not, maybe it's just a thought ..
where would my greed be in knowing nothing of it?
I have been out of the market for months, I will have minted the sig and let it go ... especially when those responsible have abandoned the project ...
I'm just asking if there's no way, thank you.
where would my greed be in knowing nothing of it?
I have been out of the market for months, I will have minted the sig and let it go ... especially when those responsible have abandoned the project ...
I'm just asking if there's no way, thank you.
Im really having a hard time feeling sorry for those missing the swap because the only reason to hold out this long would be pure greed.
I know I could exchange my coins yesterday, but the deadline was over, I know that you did not have any obligation to do this, but as you have already done, you have already been able to do it, you could extend it for a while, I know how I have many who are lost, who have lost a lot of money, maybe compromise the cornogram a little, but I would gain a lot more in respect and trust in my opinion, of course.
I do not have so many funds so it would end up becoming a great loss.
Thank you for the space and the attention.
I do not have so many funds so it would end up becoming a great loss.
Thank you for the space and the attention.
How do you swap the coins plz? thx 
it not possible anymore, swap signatum to straks is finished yesterday.
How do you swap the coins plz? thx
My friend mined Signatum some months ago in first days after start and he has made good money. I have surprised that Signatum still alive. Could somebody explain how many coins is mined already?
Signatum has died and it's an undead now.
Mining ended at block 100.000, the coins generated with staking is much lesser. I think 120mill coins exists, whereof 80mill was burned already.
They can't fix the wallet (and why would they?, sigt has been dead for a while), because have no access to github etc.
But it works, just the sigt network is crap, because to run a node with other reason than make the swap transaction, you must be a fool.
If you accuse them about money invested in some project, then i think your not aware of the sigt history. IT WAS A PURE SCAM. YOU ARE SCAMMED.
This questions remained:
Is the only purpose of straks to re-value they(strak founders) sigt funds?
Is it a second-skin scam on the sigt poject? (swap process announce pumps sigt price, so they can dump the sigt-shit)
Or is it a legitimate project with real development and community?
I would like to believe the last statement, but i have minor concerns. The most important is: how is it possible, to post in the name of user 'signatum' if signatum and doc stepped down (dump & escaped), and if the access is legit, why after so much time?
And one more thing:
Everybody talks about investors. There was no investors, only poor miners, who had to pay electricity and only got shigt and stupid speculators, who buyed this shit without realizing, it's a copy-paste coin, with nothing added value.
But it works, just the sigt network is crap, because to run a node with other reason than make the swap transaction, you must be a fool.
If you accuse them about money invested in some project, then i think your not aware of the sigt history. IT WAS A PURE SCAM. YOU ARE SCAMMED.
This questions remained:
Is the only purpose of straks to re-value they(strak founders) sigt funds?
Is it a second-skin scam on the sigt poject? (swap process announce pumps sigt price, so they can dump the sigt-shit)
Or is it a legitimate project with real development and community?
I would like to believe the last statement, but i have minor concerns. The most important is: how is it possible, to post in the name of user 'signatum' if signatum and doc stepped down (dump & escaped), and if the access is legit, why after so much time?
And one more thing:
Everybody talks about investors. There was no investors, only poor miners, who had to pay electricity and only got shigt and stupid speculators, who buyed this shit without realizing, it's a copy-paste coin, with nothing added value.
You're right, it was a scam and now a swap and news of a swap will temporarily inflate the price of an otherwise dead coin allowing them to dump the SIGT they had, while not allowing anyone else to dump theirs. They say everyone else must convert to another coin. Not sure if this was the plan all along but it definitely made them more money. There were investors too. The coins I had are lost in limbo somewhere once sent out of the wallet.
Not quite right, because the now pumped sigt price is still very low compared to the price, when sigt was PoW. So not more money, just lesser loss.
And everybody have the option to sell their shigt at Yobit for example.
You have coins in your wallet and can't send it because the network won't sync, or have other problem?
If you already sent, then it will arrive once your transaction are included in a block. If not, your coins are still yours. It's not bitcoin with a full mempool, if your tx is properly propagated, it will be 'mined'.
I also had problems syncing, but i left the node running, went to dinner, and when returned, my node was synced with only some nodes. (that was ~15 days before)
You are right regarding the price. For the wallet/transaction issue, my friend sent his to the exchange two days ago and it's not showing in the wallet nor the exchange. He was just an investor in the coin and is looking to recoup some loss, whatever it may be.
Do you have the txid of that transaction?
Otherwise i'm looked the burn address: https://explorer.signatum.network/address/BSigtBurnAddressDontSendXXXXYQeifa , and looks like ~2/3 of all sigt is burned. If we consider market sentiments, the price increase is not that strange/much with this fact.
And why did you/your friend decided to sell instead of the swap? I'm just curious, how others see the situation.
My friend mined Signatum some months ago in first days after start and he has made good money. I have surprised that Signatum still alive. Could somebody explain how many coins is mined already?
They can't fix the wallet (and why would they?, sigt has been dead for a while), because have no access to github etc.
But it works, just the sigt network is crap, because to run a node with other reason than make the swap transaction, you must be a fool.
If you accuse them about money invested in some project, then i think your not aware of the sigt history. IT WAS A PURE SCAM. YOU ARE SCAMMED.
This questions remained:
Is the only purpose of straks to re-value they(strak founders) sigt funds?
Is it a second-skin scam on the sigt poject? (swap process announce pumps sigt price, so they can dump the sigt-shit)
Or is it a legitimate project with real development and community?
I would like to believe the last statement, but i have minor concerns. The most important is: how is it possible, to post in the name of user 'signatum' if signatum and doc stepped down (dump & escaped), and if the access is legit, why after so much time?
And one more thing:
Everybody talks about investors. There was no investors, only poor miners, who had to pay electricity and only got shigt and stupid speculators, who buyed this shit without realizing, it's a copy-paste coin, with nothing added value.
But it works, just the sigt network is crap, because to run a node with other reason than make the swap transaction, you must be a fool.
If you accuse them about money invested in some project, then i think your not aware of the sigt history. IT WAS A PURE SCAM. YOU ARE SCAMMED.
This questions remained:
Is the only purpose of straks to re-value they(strak founders) sigt funds?
Is it a second-skin scam on the sigt poject? (swap process announce pumps sigt price, so they can dump the sigt-shit)
Or is it a legitimate project with real development and community?
I would like to believe the last statement, but i have minor concerns. The most important is: how is it possible, to post in the name of user 'signatum' if signatum and doc stepped down (dump & escaped), and if the access is legit, why after so much time?
And one more thing:
Everybody talks about investors. There was no investors, only poor miners, who had to pay electricity and only got shigt and stupid speculators, who buyed this shit without realizing, it's a copy-paste coin, with nothing added value.
You're right, it was a scam and now a swap and news of a swap will temporarily inflate the price of an otherwise dead coin allowing them to dump the SIGT they had, while not allowing anyone else to dump theirs. They say everyone else must convert to another coin. Not sure if this was the plan all along but it definitely made them more money. There were investors too. The coins I had are lost in limbo somewhere once sent out of the wallet.
Not quite right, because the now pumped sigt price is still very low compared to the price, when sigt was PoW. So not more money, just lesser loss.
And everybody have the option to sell their shigt at Yobit for example.
You have coins in your wallet and can't send it because the network won't sync, or have other problem?
If you already sent, then it will arrive once your transaction are included in a block. If not, your coins are still yours. It's not bitcoin with a full mempool, if your tx is properly propagated, it will be 'mined'.
I also had problems syncing, but i left the node running, went to dinner, and when returned, my node was synced with only some nodes. (that was ~15 days before)
You are right regarding the price. For the wallet/transaction issue, my friend sent his to the exchange two days ago and it's not showing in the wallet nor the exchange. He was just an investor in the coin and is looking to recoup some loss, whatever it may be.
They can't fix the wallet (and why would they?, sigt has been dead for a while), because have no access to github etc.
But it works, just the sigt network is crap, because to run a node with other reason than make the swap transaction, you must be a fool.
If you accuse them about money invested in some project, then i think your not aware of the sigt history. IT WAS A PURE SCAM. YOU ARE SCAMMED.
This questions remained:
Is the only purpose of straks to re-value they(strak founders) sigt funds?
Is it a second-skin scam on the sigt poject? (swap process announce pumps sigt price, so they can dump the sigt-shit)
Or is it a legitimate project with real development and community?
I would like to believe the last statement, but i have minor concerns. The most important is: how is it possible, to post in the name of user 'signatum' if signatum and doc stepped down (dump & escaped), and if the access is legit, why after so much time?
And one more thing:
Everybody talks about investors. There was no investors, only poor miners, who had to pay electricity and only got shigt and stupid speculators, who buyed this shit without realizing, it's a copy-paste coin, with nothing added value.
But it works, just the sigt network is crap, because to run a node with other reason than make the swap transaction, you must be a fool.
If you accuse them about money invested in some project, then i think your not aware of the sigt history. IT WAS A PURE SCAM. YOU ARE SCAMMED.
This questions remained:
Is the only purpose of straks to re-value they(strak founders) sigt funds?
Is it a second-skin scam on the sigt poject? (swap process announce pumps sigt price, so they can dump the sigt-shit)
Or is it a legitimate project with real development and community?
I would like to believe the last statement, but i have minor concerns. The most important is: how is it possible, to post in the name of user 'signatum' if signatum and doc stepped down (dump & escaped), and if the access is legit, why after so much time?
And one more thing:
Everybody talks about investors. There was no investors, only poor miners, who had to pay electricity and only got shigt and stupid speculators, who buyed this shit without realizing, it's a copy-paste coin, with nothing added value.
You're right, it was a scam and now a swap and news of a swap will temporarily inflate the price of an otherwise dead coin allowing them to dump the SIGT they had, while not allowing anyone else to dump theirs. They say everyone else must convert to another coin. Not sure if this was the plan all along but it definitely made them more money. There were investors too. The coins I had are lost in limbo somewhere once sent out of the wallet.
Not quite right, because the now pumped sigt price is still very low compared to the price, when sigt was PoW. So not more money, just lesser loss.
And everybody have the option to sell their shigt at Yobit for example.
You have coins in your wallet and can't send it because the network won't sync, or have other problem?
If you already sent, then it will arrive once your transaction are included in a block. If not, your coins are still yours. It's not bitcoin with a full mempool, if your tx is properly propagated, it will be 'mined'.
I also had problems syncing, but i left the node running, went to dinner, and when returned, my node was synced with only some nodes. (that was ~15 days before)
They can't fix the wallet (and why would they?, sigt has been dead for a while), because have no access to github etc.
But it works, just the sigt network is crap, because to run a node with other reason than make the swap transaction, you must be a fool.
If you accuse them about money invested in some project, then i think your not aware of the sigt history. IT WAS A PURE SCAM. YOU ARE SCAMMED.
This questions remained:
Is the only purpose of straks to re-value they(strak founders) sigt funds?
Is it a second-skin scam on the sigt poject? (swap process announce pumps sigt price, so they can dump the sigt-shit)
Or is it a legitimate project with real development and community?
I would like to believe the last statement, but i have minor concerns. The most important is: how is it possible, to post in the name of user 'signatum' if signatum and doc stepped down (dump & escaped), and if the access is legit, why after so much time?
And one more thing:
Everybody talks about investors. There was no investors, only poor miners, who had to pay electricity and only got shigt and stupid speculators, who buyed this shit without realizing, it's a copy-paste coin, with nothing added value.
But it works, just the sigt network is crap, because to run a node with other reason than make the swap transaction, you must be a fool.
If you accuse them about money invested in some project, then i think your not aware of the sigt history. IT WAS A PURE SCAM. YOU ARE SCAMMED.
This questions remained:
Is the only purpose of straks to re-value they(strak founders) sigt funds?
Is it a second-skin scam on the sigt poject? (swap process announce pumps sigt price, so they can dump the sigt-shit)
Or is it a legitimate project with real development and community?
I would like to believe the last statement, but i have minor concerns. The most important is: how is it possible, to post in the name of user 'signatum' if signatum and doc stepped down (dump & escaped), and if the access is legit, why after so much time?
And one more thing:
Everybody talks about investors. There was no investors, only poor miners, who had to pay electricity and only got shigt and stupid speculators, who buyed this shit without realizing, it's a copy-paste coin, with nothing added value.
You're right, it was a scam and now a swap and news of a swap will temporarily inflate the price of an otherwise dead coin allowing them to dump the SIGT they had, while not allowing anyone else to dump theirs. They say everyone else must convert to another coin. Not sure if this was the plan all along but it definitely made them more money. There were investors too. The coins I had are lost in limbo somewhere once sent out of the wallet.
They can't fix the wallet (and why would they?, sigt has been dead for a while), because have no access to github etc.
But it works, just the sigt network is crap, because to run a node with other reason than make the swap transaction, you must be a fool.
If you accuse them about money invested in some project, then i think your not aware of the sigt history. IT WAS A PURE SCAM. YOU ARE SCAMMED.
This questions remained:
Is the only purpose of straks to re-value they(strak founders) sigt funds?
Is it a second-skin scam on the sigt poject? (swap process announce pumps sigt price, so they can dump the sigt-shit)
Or is it a legitimate project with real development and community?
I would like to believe the last statement, but i have minor concerns. The most important is: how is it possible, to post in the name of user 'signatum' if signatum and doc stepped down (dump & escaped), and if the access is legit, why after so much time?
And one more thing:
Everybody talks about investors. There was no investors, only poor miners, who had to pay electricity and only got shigt and stupid speculators, who buyed this shit without realizing, it's a copy-paste coin, with nothing added value.
But it works, just the sigt network is crap, because to run a node with other reason than make the swap transaction, you must be a fool.
If you accuse them about money invested in some project, then i think your not aware of the sigt history. IT WAS A PURE SCAM. YOU ARE SCAMMED.
This questions remained:
Is the only purpose of straks to re-value they(strak founders) sigt funds?
Is it a second-skin scam on the sigt poject? (swap process announce pumps sigt price, so they can dump the sigt-shit)
Or is it a legitimate project with real development and community?
I would like to believe the last statement, but i have minor concerns. The most important is: how is it possible, to post in the name of user 'signatum' if signatum and doc stepped down (dump & escaped), and if the access is legit, why after so much time?
And one more thing:
Everybody talks about investors. There was no investors, only poor miners, who had to pay electricity and only got shigt and stupid speculators, who buyed this shit without realizing, it's a copy-paste coin, with nothing added value.
The STRAKS swap opportunity was meant to help OLD Signatum investors after having been scammed by the old developers of Signatum. We expected a "free rider" issue from the outset. To the extent that we continue to observe an excessive abuse of the swap process, we will terminate the swap offering earlier than intended. An olive branch had been offered to the old Signatum investors, but many seem to be foolishly holding out until the last few days, and further, recommending new members of the STRAKS community to swap via Signatum. Please refrain from advising new members of the community to swap into STRAKS. Consider this a final reminder to all OLD Signatum investors to swap as soon as possible, you have at least 24 hours. Take advantage of the swap.
straks scam!!!
straks scam!!!
I'm not sure why there is fear of having new members hold STRAKS unless they already know it's destined to follow the same fate as SIGT. Nothing worse than having more people involved in your scam when you're attempting faux damage control. Just a heads up that this damage control is appearing even more of scam right now. There are a lot of eyes on this and your team. The people who were scammed initially just want to recoup some of their loss. Save face, and allow them to do so. Fix the wallet and let the transactions go through.
The STRAKS swap opportunity was meant to help OLD Signatum investors after having been scammed by the old developers of Signatum. We expected a "free rider" issue from the outset. To the extent that we continue to observe an excessive abuse of the swap process, we will terminate the swap offering earlier than intended. An olive branch had been offered to the old Signatum investors, but many seem to be foolishly holding out until the last few days, and further, recommending new members of the STRAKS community to swap via Signatum. Please refrain from advising new members of the community to swap into STRAKS. Consider this a final reminder to all OLD Signatum investors to swap as soon as possible, you have at least 24 hours. Take advantage of the swap.
straks scam!!!
straks scam!!!
Can the devs please allow people to get their coins out of the wallet today? It's obvious that you're not allowing people to transfer coins. People invested their own money into your project. Money that is now gone. Please fix the wallet issue and allow the transactions to go through.
Same here about syncing problems, maybe another wallet version needed?
https://signatum.org/download/original-qt-wallet/
This one works fine for me. Have tested on 4-s pcs.
I have created signatum.conf
addnode=104.154.193.236
addnode=104.154.76.142
addnode=104.154.94.55
addnode=104.154.95.6
addnode=104.197.145.21
addnode=104.197.159.83
addnode=104.197.80.61
addnode=104.198.232.113
addnode=104.199.11.56
addnode=104.211.186.5
addnode=114.23.150.140:33333
addnode=122.129.64.13
addnode=122.129.64.14
addnode=122.129.64.15
addnode=122.129.64.16
addnode=129.242.71.138:33333
addnode=130.211.127.202
addnode=136.243.50.159:33333
addnode=146.148.55.27
addnode=147.135.220.159:33333
addnode=162.222.176.74
addnode=195.122.243.226:33333
addnode=203.128.6.219
addnode=212.113.231.178:33333
addnode=31.193.131.89:33333
addnode=35.184.121.184
addnode=35.184.49.142
addnode=35.185.18.85
addnode=35.189.14.132
addnode=45.32.102.240
addnode=45.76.92.227
addnode=45.77.235.89:33333
addnode=45.77.51.253
addnode=45.77.51.253:33333
addnode=47.184.192.237:33333
addnode=52.172.209.58
addnode=52.174.102.46
addnode=52.187.13.149
addnode=54.175.225.242
addnode=80.6.164.72:33333
addnode=coinsmarkets.com:33333
addnode=node.611.to:33333
addnode=novaexchange.com:33333
addnode=sigt.suprnova.cc
and have disabled windows firewall.
Quote
The swap procedure has ended already?
U still have about 15 hours.Can you please upload the blockchain to Mega, or another similar serveice?
Jump to: