Author

Topic: [ANN] Signatum - New Algorithm - Fair Launch - No Premine - page 414. (Read 823858 times)

newbie
Activity: 24
Merit: 0
guys, anyone having issues with TDP? I mean, ups and downs, not stable. using sp3 here, but with all the others same issue.
newbie
Activity: 29
Merit: 0
Nice project. Does anybody know when can we expect signatum to hit big exchanges like poloniex or bittrex? I will not sell it jet but it will be nice to have it on big exchange
I don't expect it to be listed on Polo anytime soon, they can barely handle their system running with the coins they have listed till now, but bittrex shouldn't be long..
full member
Activity: 140
Merit: 100
Nice project. Does anybody know when can we expect signatum to hit big exchanges like poloniex or bittrex? I will not sell it jet but it will be nice to have it on big exchange
jr. member
Activity: 44
Merit: 2
signatum rich list.   it looks pretty fair. unfortunately i am not in this list now.

http://explorer.signatum.io/richlist
full member
Activity: 280
Merit: 101
My line of thinking is basically that this is still a very virginal industry. I'm completely unconvinced that Zcash or Monero are better or more secure. All altcoins are yet equally to stand test of time... for that reason it makes sense to enter into equal amount of risk at a much lower entry price than at a much higher entry price. A couple of years from now we will know which altcoin had the most amount of bag holders - and I think we will all be very surprised - any one of them could have a ton of surprises up their sleeve.

At worst I will only lose $100 worth of electricity with Signatum, what a travesty Smiley

As for people claiming that Monero or Zcash is better, more secure and so on - that's what they all say... nobody knows that yet.

As for dumping this coin, it's just dumping it into another crypto - and how do you know it's better? I think even the best cryptographers would find it difficult to make a deep risk assessment of one crypto currency over another - they are all at the same level right now.

Look at QRL project, those guys are really thinking 10 steps ahead, mainnet launch in sep/oct,  if signatum won't rise by then, I will sell it in favor of QRL
QRL is maybe a good project on the paper, but I all I've seen until now is a internal war (classical ICO : we take the money then we fight, and we don't give a fuck about people who invested in) and a classical PoS test, nothing that can change the game so far. Also I am a little sceptical when I heard the word "quantum resistant". Hope things will go on a better way from now.

That's not true, they hired a social media manager 1 month before ICO, he got greedy and demenfed 33% of all funds, got fired, got upset and used social media to justify his hit article on medeum, devs didn't touch ICO funds yet, founderbis financings the project out of his pocket
I don't know and I don't care about what happened, not my business. When you start working on a such project, that kind of things would not happen, especially when you ask people to bring funds. I still have interest in QRL however, I just wait for more concrete stuff now after the drama.
newbie
Activity: 29
Merit: 0
My line of thinking is basically that this is still a very virginal industry. I'm completely unconvinced that Zcash or Monero are better or more secure. All altcoins are yet equally to stand test of time... for that reason it makes sense to enter into equal amount of risk at a much lower entry price than at a much higher entry price. A couple of years from now we will know which altcoin had the most amount of bag holders - and I think we will all be very surprised - any one of them could have a ton of surprises up their sleeve.

At worst I will only lose $100 worth of electricity with Signatum, what a travesty Smiley

As for people claiming that Monero or Zcash is better, more secure and so on - that's what they all say... nobody knows that yet.

As for dumping this coin, it's just dumping it into another crypto - and how do you know it's better? I think even the best cryptographers would find it difficult to make a deep risk assessment of one crypto currency over another - they are all at the same level right now.

Look at QRL project, those guys are really thinking 10 steps ahead, mainnet launch in sep/oct,  if signatum won't rise by then, I will sell it in favor of QRL
QRL is maybe a good project on the paper, but I all I've seen until now is a internal war (classical ICO : we take the money then we fight, and we don't give a fuck about people who invested in) and a classical PoS test, nothing that can change the game so far. Also I am a little sceptical when I heard the word "quantum resistant". Hope things will go on a better way from now.

That's not true, they hired a social media manager 1 month before ICO, he got greedy and demenfed 33% of all funds, got fired, got upset and used social media to justify his hit article on medeum, devs didn't touch ICO funds yet, founderbis financings the project out of his pocket
full member
Activity: 280
Merit: 101
My line of thinking is basically that this is still a very virginal industry. I'm completely unconvinced that Zcash or Monero are better or more secure. All altcoins are yet equally to stand test of time... for that reason it makes sense to enter into equal amount of risk at a much lower entry price than at a much higher entry price. A couple of years from now we will know which altcoin had the most amount of bag holders - and I think we will all be very surprised - any one of them could have a ton of surprises up their sleeve.

At worst I will only lose $100 worth of electricity with Signatum, what a travesty Smiley

As for people claiming that Monero or Zcash is better, more secure and so on - that's what they all say... nobody knows that yet.

As for dumping this coin, it's just dumping it into another crypto - and how do you know it's better? I think even the best cryptographers would find it difficult to make a deep risk assessment of one crypto currency over another - they are all at the same level right now.

Look at QRL project, those guys are really thinking 10 steps ahead, mainnet launch in sep/oct,  if signatum won't rise by then, I will sell it in favor of QRL
QRL is maybe a good project on the paper, but I all I've seen until now is a internal war (classical ICO : we take the money then we fight, and we don't give a fuck about people who invested in) and a classical PoS test, nothing that can change the game so far. Also I am a little sceptical when I heard the word "quantum resistant". Hope things will go on a better way from now.
member
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
My line of thinking is basically that this is still a very virginal industry. I'm completely unconvinced that Zcash or Monero are better or more secure. All altcoins are yet equally to stand test of time... for that reason it makes sense to enter into equal amount of risk at a much lower entry price than at a much higher entry price. A couple of years from now we will know which altcoin had the most amount of bag holders - and I think we will all be very surprised - any one of them could have a ton of surprises up their sleeve.

At worst I will only lose $100 worth of electricity with Signatum, what a travesty Smiley

As for people claiming that Monero or Zcash is better, more secure and so on - that's what they all say... nobody knows that yet.

As for dumping this coin, it's just dumping it into another crypto - and how do you know it's better? I think even the best cryptographers would find it difficult to make a deep risk assessment of one crypto currency over another - they are all at the same level right now.

Look at QRL project, those guys are really thinking 10 steps ahead, mainnet launch in sep/oct,  if signatum won't rise by then, I will sell it in favor of QRL

Thanks for the intro, that actually looks interesting Smiley
newbie
Activity: 29
Merit: 0
My line of thinking is basically that this is still a very virginal industry. I'm completely unconvinced that Zcash or Monero are better or more secure. All altcoins are yet equally to stand test of time... for that reason it makes sense to enter into equal amount of risk at a much lower entry price than at a much higher entry price. A couple of years from now we will know which altcoin had the most amount of bag holders - and I think we will all be very surprised - any one of them could have a ton of surprises up their sleeve.

At worst I will only lose $100 worth of electricity with Signatum, what a travesty Smiley

As for people claiming that Monero or Zcash is better, more secure and so on - that's what they all say... nobody knows that yet.

As for dumping this coin, it's just dumping it into another crypto - and how do you know it's better? I think even the best cryptographers would find it difficult to make a deep risk assessment of one crypto currency over another - they are all at the same level right now.

Look at QRL project, those guys are really thinking 10 steps ahead, mainnet launch in sep/oct,  if signatum won't rise by then, I will sell it in favor of QRL
member
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
My line of thinking is basically that this is still a very virginal industry. I'm completely unconvinced that Zcash or Monero are better or more secure. All altcoins are yet equally to stand test of time... for that reason it makes sense to enter into equal amount of risk at a much lower entry price than at a much higher entry price. A couple of years from now we will know which altcoin had the most amount of bag holders - and I think we will all be very surprised - any one of them could have a ton of surprises up their sleeve.

At worst I will only lose $100 worth of electricity with Signatum, what a travesty Smiley

As for people claiming that Monero or Zcash is better, more secure and so on - that's what they all say... nobody knows that yet.

As for dumping this coin, it's just dumping it into another crypto - and how do you know it's better? I think even the best cryptographers would find it difficult to make a deep risk assessment of one crypto currency over another - they are all at the same level right now.
sr. member
Activity: 490
Merit: 250
Why is nobody here willing to provide an explanation of the core value proposition of this coin?
Everybody has their owns I think, but personally my interests go to the hybrid PoW / PoS system with a decent PoW max supply, the fact that it is already implemented (when ETH still doesn't know where it goes), the fair launch and pretty good wealth distribution when 90% of new altcoins come with a 10-20% premine and a TOP 25 (when not top 10) over 50% in the richlist, or their fucking masternode hype creating whales... The TOR integration, and see what the devs are planning on the long run, it seems there will be some fresh news tomorrow, wait and see.

Finally someone with at least a few words of info. Thank you!
full member
Activity: 280
Merit: 101
Last chance to exit of skumcoin  Wink
Noob mad because he put 1 BTC to buy ATH with the hope to become a millionaire in one day.
newbie
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
Last chance to exit of skumcoin  Wink
full member
Activity: 280
Merit: 101
Why is nobody here willing to provide an explanation of the core value proposition of this coin?
Everybody has their owns I think, but personally my interests go to the hybrid PoW / PoS system with a decent PoW max supply, the fact that it is already implemented (when ETH still doesn't know where it goes), the fair launch and pretty good wealth distribution when 90% of new altcoins come with a 10-20% premine and a TOP 25 (when not top 10) over 50% in the richlist, or their fucking masternode hype creating whales... The TOR integration, and see what the devs are planning on the long run, it seems there will be some fresh news tomorrow, wait and see.
newbie
Activity: 29
Merit: 0
Why is nobody here willing to provide an explanation of the core value proposition of this coin?
Because there is none.. I mine this coin, but just to dump it at the right time, I don't see anything special in this coin)
newbie
Activity: 29
Merit: 0
So what will be at 2.08?

It's the end of the world as we know it (c)

The'll post their White paper on that page)) Huge event ))))
sr. member
Activity: 490
Merit: 250
Why is nobody here willing to provide an explanation of the core value proposition of this coin?
hero member
Activity: 796
Merit: 505
Fact is, that from 7950 -> 2xx -> 3xx -> 4xx -> 5xx cards changed very little in their architecture, AMD is working mainly on power efficiency and adds more RAM.

Only new card from AMD last times is Fury, and now little tweked Fury, read Vega.
full member
Activity: 319
Merit: 100
This is suited more for Nvidia GPU's rather than AMD. It may be that your R 390x's are just too outdated (Please correct me if I am wrong).
People have also reported that their RX470/480 is only giving them 5 -10mh per card.
Might be worth sticking to Ether or something else that uses suitable algo.

It's just Nvidia miner developers are more active. I wish some pro AMD miner will take a look at the miner and fix it. I will even ready to pay a fee, just let my old AMD card hash signatum Smiley
member
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
I checked out video about the White Paper - I like everything. So think a great future for this coin... it will be either in top 50 or even top 20 coins next year. Market cap should increase significantly - it can capture its share in the current market, but we will also likely have great expansion of the crypto community - so you can easily have 50 to 100 million market cap in 2018 already. Stick to the plan guys. This should be great.

I'm not selling my Sigt Smiley Out of all of the recently released coins, this is the only one imo that can go into top 20.
Jump to: