Author

Topic: [ANN] Slimcoin : Proof of Burn NEW BLOCK GEN, Mineable by low power computer! - page 162. (Read 284956 times)

hero member
Activity: 616
Merit: 500
Temporary pool : stratum+tcp://77.237.251.163:6666
You must use my slimminer fork : https://github.com/siklon/slimminer
Code:
./minerd --url=stratum+tcp://77.237.251.163:6666 --userpass=(SLMADDRESS):x -t (THREADS)
full member
Activity: 210
Merit: 100
Crypto Currency Supporter
hello, I find the OP quite lacking, isnt there some sort of guide to lead us through? ty!
full member
Activity: 210
Merit: 100
Digital Crypto Wealth Management Platform
this is a good coin, i will mine it now
hero member
Activity: 686
Merit: 500
FUN > ROI
4 days have passed since launch – as there's no block explorers and the like yet, here's some basic graphs
(if you want to ask anything about a specific graph, please only quote that graph (or refer to it by title), as these posts are relatively big)
Explanation of graphs: topic=613213.msg7044755#msg7044755

Like this post? Donate Slimcoin: STDpqwvEC6banMNzfNYDTuZy8xspHpGuNj
legendary
Activity: 1036
Merit: 1001
I'm getting error.   "WARNING: Checkpoint is too old. Wait for block chain to download, or notify developers of the issue."
Make sure you've got the addnodes list set up - see first post.

Fixed.
Just port forwarding issue.  Thanks buddy.
hero member
Activity: 686
Merit: 500
FUN > ROI
I'm getting error.   "WARNING: Checkpoint is too old. Wait for block chain to download, or notify developers of the issue."
Make sure you've got the addnodes list set up - see first post.
legendary
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000
I'm placing a 0.1BTC bounty if someone reputable compiles the following :

- Static linux binaries (slimminer, slimcoind and -qt), compatible with glibc 2.5(so it works on both old and new linux flavours).
- Windows x64 and X86 binaries (slimminer)

I'll drop another 0.1btc bounty if someone comes up with a patch that lets the wallet mine PoW when encrypted.

legendary
Activity: 1036
Merit: 1001
I'm getting error.   "WARNING: Checkpoint is too old. Wait for block chain to download, or notify developers of the issue."

newbie
Activity: 25
Merit: 0
I burned a day, did not get any coins
This is my conf file, right?

addnode=76.127.202.17
addnode=96.237.174.192
addnode=107.181.250.216
addnode=107.181.250.217
addnode=144.76.142.47
addnode=144.76.142.49
legendary
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000
That is not what i want, i want to setup a burning pool, finally existing out of 1 azure instance foreach account c.q. wallet. So someone creating an account will still have his own 'online' wallet. It is decentralized that way, payouts instantly after a PoB is found, automated, not in the online wallet, but to a user his own wallet which is out of the pool. The goal is to remove the gambling factor and let it payout to people. If there is no demand i can stop coding. Why didn't you guys said so at first  Huh And yes, trust has to be on me, not anonymous.. google my name, find my work or even my house in the Netherlands.

Its only primer crying as he's losing his burn chances asap a PoB pool is online..
I guess is you somehow manage to have all odds concentrated in a transparent system, you'll have loads of participants

OK, dont say i did not warn you.

You intend to run a separate wallet for each user ? Good luck with that!! Smiley))

Go code a PoW pool instead if you want to help the community.

The easiest would be just 1 wallet running on 1 instance. Until it has 1000 coins then i add another instance with a wallet that can go 1000 coins. I'm not sure yet, but if it has to be decentralized i rather run many worker roles. Foreach account 1 wallet makes it easier for statistics, because the burn decay etc is already build in for a single account then.

You are obviously a pool newbie. Please leave the work to someone else. If you want to help, go compile windows slimminer binaries.
sr. member
Activity: 826
Merit: 263
That is not what i want, i want to setup a burning pool, finally existing out of 1 azure instance foreach account c.q. wallet. So someone creating an account will still have his own 'online' wallet. It is decentralized that way, payouts instantly after a PoB is found, automated, not in the online wallet, but to a user his own wallet which is out of the pool. The goal is to remove the gambling factor and let it payout to people. If there is no demand i can stop coding. Why didn't you guys said so at first  Huh And yes, trust has to be on me, not anonymous.. google my name, find my work or even my house in the Netherlands.

Keep going man.  There are no maps for these roads.  Don't be dissuaded by fear.
hero member
Activity: 798
Merit: 500
That is not what i want, i want to setup a burning pool, finally existing out of 1 azure instance foreach account c.q. wallet. So someone creating an account will still have his own 'online' wallet. It is decentralized that way, payouts instantly after a PoB is found, automated, not in the online wallet, but to a user his own wallet which is out of the pool. The goal is to remove the gambling factor and let it payout to people. If there is no demand i can stop coding. Why didn't you guys said so at first  Huh And yes, trust has to be on me, not anonymous.. google my name, find my work or even my house in the Netherlands.

Its only primer crying as he's losing his burn chances asap a PoB pool is online..
I guess is you somehow manage to have all odds concentrated in a transparent system, you'll have loads of participants

OK, dont say i did not warn you.

You intend to run a separate wallet for each user ? Good luck with that!! Smiley))

Go code a PoW pool instead if you want to help the community.

The easiest would be just 1 wallet running on 1 instance. Until it has 1000 coins then i add another instance with a wallet that can go 1000 coins. I'm not sure yet, but if it has to be decentralized i rather run many worker roles. Foreach account 1 wallet makes it easier for statistics, because the burn decay etc is already build in for a single account then.
legendary
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000
That is not what i want, i want to setup a burning pool, finally existing out of 1 azure instance foreach account c.q. wallet. So someone creating an account will still have his own 'online' wallet. It is decentralized that way, payouts instantly after a PoB is found, automated, not in the online wallet, but to a user his own wallet which is out of the pool. The goal is to remove the gambling factor and let it payout to people. If there is no demand i can stop coding. Why didn't you guys said so at first  Huh And yes, trust has to be on me, not anonymous.. google my name, find my work or even my house in the Netherlands.

Its only primer crying as he's losing his burn chances asap a PoB pool is online..
I guess is you somehow manage to have all odds concentrated in a transparent system, you'll have loads of participants

OK, dont say i did not warn you.

You intend to run a separate wallet for each user ? Good luck with that!! Smiley))

Go code a PoW pool instead if you want to help the community.
full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
Quote
This is what i got by listtransactions "*" true, please help me take a look, thanks

Open up your debug.log file and search for
SlimCoinAfterBurner():
              Smallest Hash is ....


SlimCoinAfterBurner():
   Smallest Hash is 000001283c40ad16ebcb3a6680ea9a3e5db023bb48d7e01d77848efa609de544
   by tx de71b3fff0e665d0086a684f6be11303551c7323e414dcac050ac615147b3c6d
   with Block height 1827, transaction depth 1, vout depth 1
   PoB Tartget is 000000064d5e0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
   nBurnBits=1d064d5e, nEffectiveBurnCoins=34075049630 (formatted 34075.04963)
getblocks 3454 to 00000004502126d1e969 limit 500
  getblocks stopping at 3455 00000004502126d1e969 (354 bytes)
Running SlimCoinMiner with 2 transactions in block
Running SlimCoinMiner with 2 transactions in block
getblocks -1 to 00000000000000000000 limit 500
getblocks 3454 to 00000004502126d1e969 limit 500
  getblocks stopping at 3455 00000004502126d1e969 (354 bytes)
Running SlimCoinMiner with 2 transactions in block
Running SlimCoinMiner with 2 transactions in block
getblocks 3455 to 00000004502126d1e969 limit 500
  getblocks stopping at 3455 00000004502126d1e969 (0 bytes)
Running SlimCoinMiner with 2 transactions in block
Running SlimCoinMiner with 2 transactions in block
Running SlimCoinMiner with 2 transactions in block
2014-06-01 15:44:59 UTC hashmeter   7 CPUs   3423 hash/s

This is what i get, thanks

In my qt, i see the maximum block is 3536, not sure why it says:
getblocks stopping at 3455 00000004502126d1e969 (354 bytes)


Hi developer or those who is familar with this, please help me to take a look, thanks.
I am worried that there are some problem with my wallet, or there are some problem with the codes
full member
Activity: 210
Merit: 100
hero member
Activity: 686
Merit: 500
FUN > ROI
I'd say continue your work - let those who want to use it, use it.  Anybody against the very idea can just, y'know, not use it.
sr. member
Activity: 462
Merit: 250
That is not what i want, i want to setup a burning pool, finally existing out of 1 azure instance foreach account c.q. wallet. So someone creating an account will still have his own 'online' wallet. It is decentralized that way, payouts instantly after a PoB is found, automated, not in the online wallet, but to a user his own wallet which is out of the pool. The goal is to remove the gambling factor and let it payout to people. If there is no demand i can stop coding. Why didn't you guys said so at first  Huh And yes, trust has to be on me, not anonymous.. google my name, find my work or even my house in the Netherlands.

Its only primer crying as he's losing his burn chances asap a PoB pool is online..
I guess is you somehow manage to have all odds concentrated in a transparent system, you'll have loads of participants
hero member
Activity: 798
Merit: 500
That is not what i want, i want to setup a burning pool, finally existing out of 1 azure instance foreach account c.q. wallet. So someone creating an account will still have his own 'online' wallet. It is decentralized that way, payouts instantly after a PoB is found, automated, not in the online wallet, but to a user his own wallet which is out of the pool. The goal is to remove the gambling factor and let it payout to people. If there is no demand i can stop coding. Why didn't you guys said so at first  Huh And yes, trust has to be on me, not anonymous.. google my name, find my work or even my house in the Netherlands.
legendary
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000
It's some kind of centralized BANK instead of pool.

Even worse, centralized ANONYMOUS bank. Sure. Not gonna happen my friend. Please dont attempt anything similar again.
sr. member
Activity: 320
Merit: 250
the backend coding is going nicely for a PoB pool, i have most of the code for getting burn information from a wallet.
here a screenshot of the quick watch debug window on my own wallet



Dont bother, no one is going to use a centralized pool for PoB. Thank you for the effort but no thanks.

It's some kind of centralized BANK instead of pool.
Jump to: