Topic: [ANN] Spondoolies-Tech - carrier grade, data center ready mining rigs - page 40. (Read 1260223 times)

Yeah, it looks like greed got the better of a few people at the top. That and the fact that the price of coins tanked right after the release of the SP20. I got the 15 unit special for $5000 w/ free shipping in January and I can still sell the units used for more than I bought them for. I heard they lost money on that deal and it was the last time they have built a miner as far as I know.

To be totally honest I'm almost positive that the SP50 is never going to be finished. I'll believe it when I see a picture of a real one working, not the 3d mock-up and untested theoretical numbers. Its going to be a lot harder to make a perfect working model than most think. Not that they can't, I just don't think that given what I know so far that they ever will.

What specifically, you're using the "I'm simply better than you" argument again.

I actually feel saddened by this putative demise which, hopefully, will not happen.
I enjoyed my SP20s very much with all tuning that was possible.

You're not the only one , who is happy. I am also happy when they do not produce this super monsters or they come too late.
I am also happy, that I sold all  of 17 x  SP20 and when Spondoolies  are sold spare parts at normal prices , then I'd bought a controller for SP20 and get one more sales.
Now I have  a beautiful SP20 empty shell  and rare  fan, for some miner projects.

Yeah, it looks like greed got the better of a few people at the top. That and the fact that the price of coins tanked right after the release of the SP20. I got the 15 unit special for $5000 w/ free shipping in January and I can still sell the units used for more than I bought them for. I heard they lost money on that deal and it was the last time they have built a miner as far as I know.

To be totally honest I'm almost positive that the SP50 is never going to be finished. I'll believe it when I see a picture of a real one working, not the 3d mock-up and untested theoretical numbers. Its going to be a lot harder to make a perfect working model than most think. Not that they can't, I just don't think that given what I know so far that they ever will.

Why did SP take this deal?  If they needed money, take preorders on the SP50.  They had a ton of goodwill they could have cashed in. 

It sounds like anything would have been better than SP getting together with these guys. 

Well, I am not a "financial" person but looking at free EDGAR is seems that Sidie sold to Allen 16.8 mil shares on 9/3/2014 (out of ~24 mil that he had) for $0.0033/share (.33 c/share) or ~55K, which is, of course, a far cry from $4mil. A strange transaction. Was BTCS (or a parental company) almost bankrupt at that time?

On February 5, 2014, we entered into an employment agreement with Timothy Sidie (the “Sidie Employment Agreement”), whereby Mr. Sidie agreed to serve as our former Chief Technology Officer for a period of two (2) years, subject to renewal, in consideration for an annual salary of $140,000. Additionally, under the terms of the Sidie Employment Agreement, Mr. Sidie shall be eligible for an annual bonus if we meet certain criteria, as established by the Board of Directors. Mr. Sidie shall be entitled to participate in all benefits plans we provide to our senior executive. We shall reimburse Mr. Sidie for all reasonable expenses incurred in the course of his employment. In the event Mr. Sidie’s employment is terminated without Cause or by Mr. Sidie with Good Reason (as such term is defined in the Sidie Employment Agreement), Mr. Sidie shall be entitled to a scaled severance package, including scaled salary benefits, 12 months of benefits commensurate to senior executives, and pro-rated bonuses earned. Additionally, pursuant to the terms of the Sidie Employment Agreement, we have agreed to execute and deliver in favor of Mr. Sidie an indemnification agreement and to maintain directors’ and officers’ insurance with terms and in the amounts commensurate with our senior executive.

In connection with his employment with us, we granted Mr. Sidie a five-year non-qualified stock option to purchase up to 1,550,368 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.50 per share (the “Sidie Options”), which options shall vest in twelve (12) equal monthly installments, beginning on the one (1) year anniversary of the date of issuance and every one (1) month anniversary thereafter, provided Mr. Sidie remains continuously engaged as a director or officer of our Company through the applicable vesting date. In the event that Mr. Sidie is removed as a director, officer or employee by us at any time other than for “Cause” or resigns as a director, officer or employee for “Good Reason” the Sidie Options shall immediately vest in full.

On November 7, 2014, we entered into an Option Cancellation and Release Agreement with Tim Sidie pursuant to which Mr. Sidie agreed to return to us for cancellation, options to purchase up to 1,550,368 shares of our common stock, par value $0.001 per share, with an exercise price of $0.50, held by him.

2,560,741 shares consist of 1,050,000 shares of Common Stock and shares issuable upon exercise of warrants to purchase 125,000 shares of Common Stock and 1,385,741 shares of Common Stock not being sold as part of this offering. Timothy Andrew Sidie is our former Chief Technology Officer.

One should make the distinction between Spondoolies - which I DO love for their gear and transparency - and BTCS.

I totally agree with you regarding Spondoolies. But the earning which was quoted by dogie is the one from the BTCS-guys, isn't it? And their corporate past is a little bit weird, to say it moderate.

Finsky makes the point above quite well.... I never said I was not qualified, just that I would not get into it with you since you do not even understand basic terminology, no point in discussing the specifics when you don't have a grasp of the basic terms being used throughout the filings...

I have experience as a financial analyst for a Fortune 500 company...  While dogie's analysis is horrendous as far as the numbers go, his assessment of the situation appears quite accurate.

It is sad to see people so quick to jump on the dogie-hates-spondoolies bandwagon for no other reason

What they do with their business & how much they pay their employees is precisely that - their business.

In the meantime, we can only hope that they do decide to sell retail again, those SP50's are a beast! You all know you want one 

If anyone thinks they have been ripped off by SP-Tech they should open a scam thread like everyone else does instead of peppering this thread with "they earn this" & "they done that" posts.

God I really don't want to get in to it with you again

but if you think that of that $8.9M in compensation, all of it was actually "Paid", you are a complete fool. There is a discernible difference between money that was "paid" and stock options awarded.

What I really can't understand is why Guy and SP-Tech are not deleting more of your whiny OT posts in their thread.

I'd remind you that in any debate, you're not trying to convince your opponent, but the audience.

I for one would like to know more of the technical aspects here. I have a not insignificant amount of stock options in the company I contract to, and it was my understanding that aside from a specific purchase price being guarnateed IN THE EVENT that the company becomes valuable, they're basically a hope for the future, not an actual salary. (No, I don't feel I had it misrepresented to me, I'd just like to know more about it. ) As for this specific case, I've yet to here a serious complaint against Spondoolies that has not been resolved regarding their hardware. Unfortunately, I have no dog in the fight because I couldn't afford the machine that I really wanted Maybe on the used market...

I have experience as a financial analyst for a Fortune 500 company...  While dogie's analysis is horrendous as far as the numbers go, his assessment of the situation appears quite accurate.

All I will say if that if folks on the forum are looking for a real assessment of the filings they need to get someone qualified to review them to weigh in...

Dogie,

Finsky makes the point above quite well.... I never said I was not qualified, just that I would not get into it with you since you do not even understand basic terminology, no point in discussing the specifics when you don't have a grasp of the basic terms being used throughout the filings...

God I really don't want to get in to it with you again, but if you think that of that $8.9M in compensation, all of it was actually "Paid", you are a complete fool.  There is a discernible difference between money that was "paid" and stock options awarded.  Let's put it this way, if the company awarded millions of shares to the management team for their work, but the company tanks and the shares are worth zero, how much did the directors make? Besides, Stock Options are not even Stocks, they are commitments that only create benefit if things go well for the company.  Things are not always as they seem, and the salaries and bonuses they are actually paying their management are not exorbitant by any stretch.

If you disagree on a point then disagree on it, don't claim "I'm better than all of you so I'm right generically, non-specifically and without any evidence and that's it". You're saying that everyone (including you) isn't qualified to read SEC statements, yet you're claiming that my 'interpretation' is wrong - how would you know I'm wrong if you're also not "qualified"?


Kindly explain how the below - directly removed from page 63 of the latest filing - could in any respect be interpreted as 'not insane'. It is not an interpretation, it is 4 numbers directly quoted.

1. Company has $38k of revenue
2. Company has $31k gross profit
3. Company has net loss of $14.7m
4. Management paid themselves $8.9m, or 23500% revenue.