Coinmarketcap is a popular website but they are no authority nor they are someone to be considered seriously. No team, rigged info etc... You can google who they are yourself.
We are selling our coin from our website. 12 mln STB sold already. We have our own algorithm based on min purchase of STB 100 and max 1000 per person. I am not the one to explain you how exactly it works as it was developed by a special team. The more we sell the more it goes up. It is not like with BTC, where only 1mln are on the market and the rest just stays somewhere with no use.
stop making comparison with BTC at least. BTC is the sole owner of crypto market and there is hardly anyone who is familiar with your coin. Try to register your coin on some reputable exchange so there is credibility of your token. No one will believe such stats if you only sale coin on your website.
Comparison and Difference are commonly used in relevance to two or more objects. However, when comparing something, two or more things are compared against each other. This means that one tries to find similarities between the objects.
Whereas differentiating some objects construes that one is trying to find differences, unlikeness, or dissimilarities between the objects.
There is a bit of confusion among people's minds regarding the terms, Comparisons, and Difference. People generally take these terms for granted and use them haphazardly without really realizing the actual definition or usage of the words.
If people in the media cannot decide whether they are in the business of reporting news or manufacturing propaganda, it is all the more important that the public understand that difference, and choose their news sources accordingly.
~snip~
Thanks for the detailed explanation. You claimed Stabila is a decentralized cryptocurrency where others can deploy the contract. But it requires a license and you will review that, and the gas fee or deployment fee is worth $1000 STB. Do you think the fee is reasonable and license a kind of centralization? I think so. You guys make things more complicated where your competitors offer more cheap and reliable service. I think you should research more about your plan and make the right decision. Good luck.
One chooses strategy(quality), and the other chooses tactics(quantity). Strategy is always the winner as it contains a marathon with well-defined tactics, while tactics is a sprint and does not contain anything except a tactic.
The primary difference between quality and quantity is the contrasting theory of subjectivity versus objectivity. Quality is subjective, which refers to the value of an item that can vary based on an individual's personal feelings, opinions, and biases. It is conditional, meaning its worth fluctuates based on circumstances and audience.
Quantity is objective and represents a fact that is not swayed or influenced by personal feelings and sentiments. The amount of something is simply a number. Quantity only changes when there is a change in the number of items that are present. You can remove an item to lower the quantity or add an item to increase the quantity.
When considering the differences between quality and quantity in crypto projects, people often consider which one is more significant or more important to rely on. Ultimately, it depends on the type of project, the target audience, and what the project producers want to achieve.
Licensing is the process of auditing and assurance that the users will not get scammed. I cannot see downturns here. The consumer deserves some sort of protection)
Deploying a smart contract is $18,000 at the current rate. Stabila is the platform to exclude useless projects. Congesting the blockchain with crap will make the blockchain useless.
~snip~
Thanks for the detailed explanation. You claimed Stabila is a decentralized cryptocurrency where others can deploy the contract. But it requires a license and you will review that, and the gas fee or deployment fee is worth $1000 STB. Do you think the fee is reasonable and license a kind of centralization? I think so. You guys make things more complicated where your competitors offer more cheap and reliable service. I think you should research more about your plan and make the right decision. Good luck.
According to his previous reply to a post this is a way of ensuring that scam projects don't find easy access to launch on the stabila network since stabila is here to fight scams and set the record straight,
So probably by imposing such amount it will scare off scam project and most likely potential project as well,
Aside from high fees to pay, a license will be issued to a potential project which most likely will be reviewed manually, lol, what happened when there are many requests and this network is supposed to be better than the rest according to the dev, will you keep them waiting by undergoing manual review?
Stabila has a team of smart contract experts. Licensing a contract will not take more than 72 hours, including testing. However, Stabila is not trying to achieve quantity effect. We would instead allow only quality projects. I cannot see someone lose patience in 72H. Increasing satisfaction comes with little wait.
According to his previous reply to a post this is a way of ensuring that scam projects don't find easy access to launch on the stabila network since stabila is here to fight scams and set the record straight,
So probably by imposing such amount it will scare off scam project and most likely potential project as well,
Aside from high fees to pay, a license will be issued to a potential project which most likely will be reviewed manually, lol, what happened when there are many requests and this network is supposed to be better than the rest according to the dev, will you keep them waiting by undergoing manual review?
To be honest I support how they want to prevent scams. But where regulating token deployment by the team or by a centralized organization then the entire ecosystem is wouldn't be decentralized. There are some alternatives to prevent scams like doxxed team or verifying KYC by Launchpad. But do you think they succeed to prevent scams? People just hire someone to verify KYC and skip with the fund. Then nothing happened later on. For a few days, People will cry then forget. So I don't think this would a valid reason to issue the license and high deployment fees.
Stabila is a DAO. It relies on code only. If you don't make sure you allow quality code only you will become Ethereum). Nobody wants it anymore.
According to his previous reply to a post this is a way of ensuring that scam projects don't find easy access to launch on the stabila network since stabila is here to fight scams and set the record straight,
So probably by imposing such amount it will scare off scam project and most likely potential project as well,
Aside from high fees to pay, a license will be issued to a potential project which most likely will be reviewed manually, lol, what happened when there are many requests and this network is supposed to be better than the rest according to the dev, will you keep them waiting by undergoing manual review?
To be honest I support how they want to prevent scams. But where regulating token deployment by the team or by a centralized organization then the entire ecosystem is wouldn't be decentralized. There are some alternatives to prevent scams like doxxed team or verifying KYC by Launchpad. But do you think they succeed to prevent scams? People just hire someone to verify KYC and skip with the fund. Then nothing happened later on. For a few days, People will cry then forget. So I don't think this would a valid reason to issue the license and high deployment fees.
This space is not 100% free of scams or fraudulent activities, no matter how hard anyone tries to get rid of such projects others will keep coming,
The idea of regulating the whole token deployment process by the team will definitely keep some potential projects away from using the network, the use of blockchain is to make things much easier and not do things manually again.
From the post I read above, I think the stabila dev team really need to have a rethink about the direction of their project in terms of connecting to other projects, I read somewhere above the dev thoughts about cmc and cg, it is not up to you to make it right or point out their flaws because every project has them, but the goal is to be in these sites where people frequently view crypto-related projects to give exposure to stabila as well, if you keep your project away from these sites, am afraid this project will not get the need exposure to reach as many users as possible.
Quality vs Quantity again. "Under the pavement, the dirt is dreaming of grass."
The death of quality foreshadows the death of humanity. What is the point of humanity if it does not produce the highest quality and excellence? A humanity that is not ascending is descending. As it is, the crushing weight of averageness and mediocrity presses down on everything and makes all high things flat, drab, and dull. All the tall poppies have to die. The only tall poppies the mediocre like are those associated with wealth, beauty, and fame. They despise the intelligent, the artistic, and the technical.
