If YES is voted and you only distribute 24 million SWARM, the investors are essentially only getting 24% equity in the company, and the founders are holding on to the other 76% instead of 8%? Is the company able to vote with those SWARM? Will us investors still get our 92% if 68 million SWARM are not being distributed?
That's not quite correct. Swarm will not be able to use the 68,000,000 SWARM. They will be held in a special locked account. As with anything on the blockchain, you can easily see where they are and if they have moved.
It seems like we should be getting our equity, distribute all 92 million, and then later be able to vote if we want to give some of our equity away to raise more money.
This makes sense conceptually but in a decentralized system like Counterparty once an asset is locked, it is locked forever. Right now there is no possible way to take back SWARM from people who have it or to issue more SWARM. I think that's generally a good thing, but it does make any sort of system such as you describe more or less impossible.
