Syscoin is 2.0 with pow instead of pos..
Whichever consensus algo wins will pay to investors. Put a few eggs in each basket bitshares syscoin etc and you shall come out on top.
Calling ppl out for speculative reasons is just dumb once price rises... this coin is 2.0 with devs and a growing team. If your scared goto church.
Not scared, just not stupid, go to church? Wouldn't you think that first world government is a bit on the obsolete side? They are still bent on world domination and shaping recorded history to their liking, not really my thing beyond the aspect that church is a forgiveness convenience store for the mob for obvious reasons, and certainly not the right direction if one seeks truth.
World domination? proof? Too big and inefficient yes.. conspiracy? no..
There is development going u should spread your basket u dont know which one will take full network effect with bitcoin
The bible; your either with ('X' translations.edition definition of) God or with the other bad guy nut job, oh and by the way they are both in kahoots. Officially, Columbus discovered America for Spain and Catholicism, pay no attention to the Phonecian coin with the map of the new world on it. Catholicism orders destruction of Mayan written records, attacks Nights Templar and on into the Mason's. Kind of funny the Pope these days, "Tells mob it is not too late", was that the left hand talking to the right?. Hitler was the son of an Austrian born devout Catholic woman, shares quite a bit of common ground with Mussolini and where is the Vatican? And finally, religion does not run a democracy, neither does the mob.
Need I go on?
All the alts are reliant on BTC for their value, when/if BTC falls, so will the rest unless another coin is adopted community wide and exchange rates with a state backed currency are established.
Bible? What about other religions? I guess thry are all wrong too? Your interpretations of the bible has nothing to do with world domination unless everyone think the same way.. This is just speculation on your part. Again im giving you sound advice so if you fail to understand then im afraid noone can help you.
Yep, right there in the Wiki quoting the Bible, and under "World_domination" to boot.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_dominationIn certain religions, religious fundamentalists may also seek the conversion (peaceful or forced) of as many people as possible to their own religion, without restrictions of national or ethnic origin. This type of spiritual domination is usually seen as distinct from the temporal dominion, although there have been instances of efforts begun as holy wars devolving into the pursuit of wealth, resources, and territory. In Christianity, one eschatological view is that a false religion, led by false prophets who achieve world domination by inducing nearly universal worship of a false deity, is a prerequisite to end times described in the Book of Revelations. As one author put it, "f world domination is to be obtained, the masses of little people must be brought on board with religion".[11]
In some instances, speakers have accused nations or ideological groups of seeking world domination, even where those entities have denied that this was their goal. For example, J. G. Ballard quoted Aldous Huxley as having said of the United States entering the First World War, "I dread the inevitable acceleration of American world domination which will be the result of it all...Europe will no longer be Europe".[12] More recently, Geert Wilders argued in 2012 that "Islam is an ideology aiming for world domination rather than a religion",[13] and in 2008 characterized the 2008 Israel–Gaza conflict as a proxy action by Islam against the West, contending that "[t]he end of Israel would not mean the end of our problems with Islam, but only... the start of the final battle for world domination".[14]
So ya think the Pope will "execute order 66" on Wikipedia now?
All religion follows a common framework, whether it be the Torah, Koran, Bible, so VAR; religious text=X, while X is not in itself evil other than an example of written record of history shaped to the respective religion's liking with truth hidden behind metaphor, and an excellent example of controversy, it has been and is still used for deceptive purposes by it's peddlers. They do say the devil would be a vision in white.
I do not appreciate manipulative, passive aggressive, deceptive, or out right vile qualities in people. Probably why I conceptually didn't fight a divorce, and why I put that thing right back where I found it. I have studied the Bible, I have looked into many religions, even been told by a Jehovah's Witness that if I ever said anything bad about Jehovah's Witness', Jehovah would kill me. Personally, that sounded like it came from someone that didn't want to leave the property under his own power due to the sucking chest wound left by a 12ga at point blank. Needless to say, I was not exactly interested in their pitch after that, and patiently awaiting being threatened again so that I could act on it after careful thought on the first one, as my parents bought into it. Fascist, first world government is my take on it, and someone that bites at that is likely to need more help that I do. I do not take issues of the sword lightly, but I have no problem taking it up against those that would threaten me by way of setup with street justice, or use of the same against my family.
