Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN] TeamRedMiner - Optimized Win/Linux AMD GPU Miner for lyra2z and phi2 - page 24. (Read 85791 times)

jr. member
Activity: 64
Merit: 1
I'm getting this too often: " Pool vtc.suprnova.cc rpc timed out after 69 seconds.  Reconnecting."

Me too - different pool tho.

Lyra2rev3, Win 10, Vega 64.
jr. member
Activity: 73
Merit: 2
That's what i was thinking too but never have messed much with it.
Ok so on GPU P0-P7 and Memory P0-P3 i have them all set to 900mv. Which value would be the core?

I'd start bumping it +5mV at the time, and only for the problematic GPUs. Are you using OverdriveNTool? If so, it's good to run the miner with --bus_reorder so you get a GPU order that matches the PCIe bus id order, which is what ONT is using iirc.

You can also run the miner with --debug and you'll see the current values for clocks and voltages read from ADL. This would be to verify that you have increased the voltage for the correct GPU. Note: I assumed you're running on Windows here, but I believe it would work under linux as well, although you'd have to use other tools to set clocks/voltages of course.

That seemed to do the trick! everything is now running perfectly! Saw another guy get around close to what i got on hash rate so i think i'm good.
newbie
Activity: 49
Merit: 0
I'm getting 58.8Mhs@135Wt with Fury cards in lyra2rev3. Though they are 60CU, not 56.

How can you do this? 135W?  this is info from wattmeter? What settings? I get more 200W  with -125mV !
newbie
Activity: 49
Merit: 0
Does this miner supports old Tahiti GPUs (Radeon 7950/R9 280)?

Unfortunately not, we support GCN 3 and up, Fiji and Tonga being the oldest archs supported.


We wait  kernel  for  hawaii!! This is strong and good GPUs!
newbie
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
Lyra2REv3 TEST

VEGA 56 84mh/s 1408/900 950/910 200w

VEGA 64 air coole 96mhs/s 1408/900 1000/900 200w

rx570 45mh/s 1290/900 2000/880  110w
member
Activity: 658
Merit: 86
That's what i was thinking too but never have messed much with it.
Ok so on GPU P0-P7 and Memory P0-P3 i have them all set to 900mv. Which value would be the core?

I'd start bumping it +5mV at the time, and only for the problematic GPUs. Are you using OverdriveNTool? If so, it's good to run the miner with --bus_reorder so you get a GPU order that matches the PCIe bus id order, which is what ONT is using iirc.

You can also run the miner with --debug and you'll see the current values for clocks and voltages read from ADL. This would be to verify that you have increased the voltage for the correct GPU. Note: I assumed you're running on Windows here, but I believe it would work under linux as well, although you'd have to use other tools to set clocks/voltages of course.
jr. member
Activity: 73
Merit: 2
That's what i was thinking too but never have messed much with it.
Ok so on GPU P0-P7 and Memory P0-P3 i have them all set to 900mv. Which value would be the core?
member
Activity: 658
Merit: 86
Trying out the latest version and the duplicate error have disappeared for me and rejected rate down to almost 0%. Very nice! Hash rate seems to gone up a bit for most my cards.

The only thing i'm trying to fix is that on two of my miners, i have one dead gpu. Not sure if that means i have to mess around with my overclock settings. They all start off ok but anywhere between 1-10 minutes a card just dies and i don't know why.

And I agree with the sentiment that adding some other algorithms like mimble wimble would be pretty nice. The options for amd for new algorithms is sadly lacking.

It sounds like a classic clock tweak situation, they just need some TLC. Lower core clk and/or higher core voltage, try it in small increments.
jr. member
Activity: 73
Merit: 2
Trying out the latest version and the duplicate error have disappeared for me and rejected rate down to almost 0%. Very nice! Hash rate seems to gone up a bit for most my cards.

The only thing i'm trying to fix is that on two of my miners, i have one dead gpu. Not sure if that means i have to mess around with my overclock settings. They all start off ok but anywhere between 1-10 minutes a card just dies and i don't know why.

And I agree with the sentiment that adding some other algorithms like mimble wimble would be pretty nice. The options for amd for new algorithms is sadly lacking.
sr. member
Activity: 1484
Merit: 253
Also, the kernels are designed to handle a downclock of mem all the way down to 300 MHz on Polaris cards and 500 MHz on Vegas, this without hashrate being affected. It probably won't save more than 1-2W per gpu, but always something.
Speed with memory on 300MHz is slower than on full speed... About 1 MH on my RX 580 8Gb

YMMV, the 580 in my test rig handles it fine. It's such a tiny power save anyway, just find the spot where you don't lose perf, I've seen people putting it around 1000-1100 MHz, for example.  Out of curiosity though, is this your 580 driving monitor(s)?

No, to this card not connected anything... With fullspeed memory hashrate is 53MH, with 300MHz memory - 52,2MH. Core clock and voltage the same...
member
Activity: 658
Merit: 86
Also, the kernels are designed to handle a downclock of mem all the way down to 300 MHz on Polaris cards and 500 MHz on Vegas, this without hashrate being affected. It probably won't save more than 1-2W per gpu, but always something.
Speed with memory on 300MHz is slower than on full speed... About 1 MH on my RX 580 8Gb

YMMV, the 580 in my test rig handles it fine. It's such a tiny power save anyway, just find the spot where you don't lose perf, I've seen people putting it around 1000-1100 MHz, for example.  Out of curiosity though, is this your 580 driving monitor(s)?
jr. member
Activity: 71
Merit: 1
Would you guys be able to dev mimblewimble miner? Seriously lacking a good AMD one to compete  Tongue
sr. member
Activity: 1484
Merit: 253
Also, the kernels are designed to handle a downclock of mem all the way down to 300 MHz on Polaris cards and 500 MHz on Vegas, this without hashrate being affected. It probably won't save more than 1-2W per gpu, but always something.
Speed with memory on 300MHz is slower than on full speed... About 1 MH on my RX 580 8Gb
newbie
Activity: 41
Merit: 0
But on my 580 cards memory not 300MHz but on full speed. How I can make downclock of memory?
Use OverdriveNTool
newbie
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
AMD RX580 Pulse 4GB - 54,7MHs on lyra2v3
Nvidia GTX 1070 8GB  - 45,8MHs https://nlpool.nl/bench?algo=lyra2v3&chip=6

 Grin
sr. member
Activity: 1484
Merit: 253
After 2h5m no rejected  Grin impressive!

Thank you! After filtering for a few random rejected shares due to new jobs there shouldn't really be any rejects though, so we're just where things should be Smiley.  

Also, the kernels are designed to handle a downclock of mem all the way down to 300 MHz on Polaris cards and 500 MHz on Vegas, this without hashrate being affected. It probably won't save more than 1-2W per gpu, but always something.
But on my 580 cards memory not 300MHz but on full speed. How I can make downclock of memory?
newbie
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
I use Sapphire TRIXX
but in HWiNFO64 i see GPU Core Voltage 1.000V

member
Activity: 658
Merit: 86
After 2h5m no rejected  Grin impressive!

Thank you! After filtering for a few random rejected shares due to new jobs there shouldn't really be any rejects though, so we're just where things should be Smiley

Also, the kernels are designed to handle a downclock of mem all the way down to 300 MHz on Polaris cards and 500 MHz on Vegas, this without hashrate being affected. It probably won't save more than 1-2W per gpu, but always something.
sr. member
Activity: 419
Merit: 255
undervolt -120

how is this done.
This is how the undervolt is made.
newbie
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
Pages:
Jump to: