Author

Topic: [ANN] TeamRedMiner v0.10.10 - Ironfish/Kaspa/ZIL/Kawpow/Etchash and More - page 126. (Read 211877 times)

sr. member
Activity: 703
Merit: 272
Just testing older 0.36 vs newer 0.37 version for 48 hours.

Better stability (no 0 H/s problematic Vega 56 card after few hours of mining). Same configuration, same driver 18.6.1

Same H/s.

EDIT: lol, and again, go to 0 H/s after 2 days of running :-)

restarting miner fixes it usually, but needs to be tweaked by team

The miner has a quite aggressive style. When you lose a gpu after a few hours or even days there’s no bug per se in the miner, it’s the opencl api and/or driver that stops responding. The only solution (except you lowering clocks) is a redesign of the kernels, although it’s probable this is also more about your psus rather than the gpu clocks. We have the next-level design ready though, we’ll attack it in the near future.

i think you should attack it now.   I see the exact same problem with going to 0 h/s after a day.   It happens on 10 different machines with 470/480/570/580/Vega56/Vega64.  The problem that causes this for me is that when cpu mining, teamredminer does not initialize the gpu and so my hashrate drops to zero.   This only happens with TeamRed.  SRBminer, and CastXMR does not exhibit this problem.
member
Activity: 658
Merit: 86
Just testing older 0.36 vs newer 0.37 version for 48 hours.

Better stability (no 0 H/s problematic Vega 56 card after few hours of mining). Same configuration, same driver 18.6.1

Same H/s.

EDIT: lol, and again, go to 0 H/s after 2 days of running :-)

restarting miner fixes it usually, but needs to be tweaked by team

The miner has a quite aggressive style. When you lose a gpu after a few hours or even days there’s no bug per se in the miner, it’s the opencl api and/or driver that stops responding. The only solution (except you lowering clocks) is a redesign of the kernels, although it’s probable this is also more about your psus rather than the gpu clocks. We have the next-level design ready though, we’ll attack it in the near future.
member
Activity: 658
Merit: 86
What is "Pool xmr-eu1.nanopool.org failed to parse server rpc: {"id":43,"jsonrpc":"2.0","result":{"status":"OK"},"error":null}"

It’s an issue with broken json-rpc implementations on some pools. Add the command line parameter --pool_broken_rpc to work around it.
im using 0.3.6 version, i cant run 0.3.7 with same config
Lower the CN Algo.... I used 8-7 before, but for 0.3.7 i need 7-7 (4GB cards).

Using 15+15 in my rx580 8gb in 0.3.6 , in 0.3.7 crashes when starting with 7+7, 8+8, 14+14 ... 0.3.7 fail

Can you describe the crash that you’re referring to? Is it on startup or after working for a little while? Does the card initialize at all? I think you’re hitting an initialization corner case that should be solved in upcoming 0.3.8, but would love to get more info.
newbie
Activity: 118
Merit: 0
What is "Pool xmr-eu1.nanopool.org failed to parse server rpc: {"id":43,"jsonrpc":"2.0","result":{"status":"OK"},"error":null}"

It’s an issue with broken json-rpc implementations on some pools. Add the command line parameter --pool_broken_rpc to work around it.
im using 0.3.6 version, i cant run 0.3.7 with same config
Lower the CN Algo.... I used 8-7 before, but for 0.3.7 i need 7-7 (4GB cards).

Using 15+15 in my rx580 8gb in 0.3.6 , in 0.3.7 crashes when starting with 7+7, 8+8, 14+14 ... 0.3.7 fail
hero member
Activity: 760
Merit: 500
CryptoZilla
Just testing older 0.36 vs newer 0.37 version for 48 hours.

Better stability (no 0 H/s problematic Vega 56 card after few hours of mining). Same configuration, same driver 18.6.1

Same H/s.

EDIT: lol, and again, go to 0 H/s after 2 days of running :-)

restarting miner fixes it usually, but needs to be tweaked by team
jr. member
Activity: 69
Merit: 5
Just testing older 0.36 vs newer 0.37 version for 48 hours.

Better stability (no 0 H/s problematic Vega 56 card after few hours of mining). Same configuration, same driver 18.6.1

Same H/s.

EDIT: lol, and again, go to 0 H/s after 2 days of running :-)
jr. member
Activity: 194
Merit: 4
What is "Pool xmr-eu1.nanopool.org failed to parse server rpc: {"id":43,"jsonrpc":"2.0","result":{"status":"OK"},"error":null}"

It’s an issue with broken json-rpc implementations on some pools. Add the command line parameter --pool_broken_rpc to work around it.
im using 0.3.6 version, i cant run 0.3.7 with same config
Lower the CN Algo.... I used 8-7 before, but for 0.3.7 i need 7-7 (4GB cards).
jr. member
Activity: 98
Merit: 6
Anyone have a tip about get optimal hashrates on RX 550 4GB and 560 4GB? I'm getting a little bit more than 400 H/s with both 550/560s, in best case scenario. Running RX 560 at 1200 MHz Core, 1980 MHz Mem. 550 at 1200 MHz Core, 2000 MHz Memory.

TeamRedMiner prefer 2+2 on the 550's and 4+2 on the 560's I think. But I manually set them to 3+3 to 550 and 4+4 to 560... Any help?

In the upcoming version we have made a better optimization run for 550/560s. This is one reason for it being delayed, we wanted to wrap that up properly. Todxx knows more, but afaik the results have been very good in many cases.  So, stay tuned...

Very nice! I'm really seeing forward to this!
newbie
Activity: 118
Merit: 0
What is "Pool xmr-eu1.nanopool.org failed to parse server rpc: {"id":43,"jsonrpc":"2.0","result":{"status":"OK"},"error":null}"

It’s an issue with broken json-rpc implementations on some pools. Add the command line parameter --pool_broken_rpc to work around it.
im using 0.3.6 version, i cant run 0.3.7 with same config
member
Activity: 658
Merit: 86
What is "Pool xmr-eu1.nanopool.org failed to parse server rpc: {"id":43,"jsonrpc":"2.0","result":{"status":"OK"},"error":null}"

It’s an issue with broken json-rpc implementations on some pools. Add the command line parameter --pool_broken_rpc to work around it.
newbie
Activity: 118
Merit: 0
What is "Pool xmr-eu1.nanopool.org failed to parse server rpc: {"id":43,"jsonrpc":"2.0","result":{"status":"OK"},"error":null}"
newbie
Activity: 50
Merit: 0
Guys please fix this:
If my rig have more than 10 gpu I don't get the gpu information like I had in version 0.3.1  Sad

Here is a Rig with 9 GPU, everything looks fine

https://i.imgur.com/jXLtzbt.png



And here is a Rig with 13 GPU

https://i.imgur.com/HnDtGrC.png

I get no GPU info and 3 gpus appear black squares.
Could you fix this please?
Thank you

Hi! Hmm, I'm guessing you have some externally provided HiveOS integration for tdxminer? Since we've changed the output, maybe some log/output parsing is broken now? Do you remember how you set things up way back when for 0.3.1?

still have this problem not showing all gpus...
any update on this?
thanks

I'm no HiveOS expert, but I'm guessing this integration is based on parsing the output from the miner rather than using the sgminer-compatible API that we provide. That output format has changed between versions, and I believe one thing is that the ninth gpu is still printed as "GPU 9" but you now see "GPU10" rather than "GPU 10" to keep things aligned vertically. Hence, I'm guessing there is some script parsing output that now is broken for GPU10 and forth.

However, unless you can point me to the specific implementation you're using, there's not much I can do. I need to see the shell/Python/Perl/awk/sed/whatever script running on your box that is parsing the output. I'm guessing it could be a trivial patch of some regular expression or awk statement. When we have the time we might make sure there's a proper HiveOS custom miner integration ourselves, this time using the API rather than parsing miner output.


sent you a PM mate Wink
member
Activity: 340
Merit: 29
Is it normal that with drivers 18.5.1 I had 1850h/s and now i installed 18.11.2 (for battlefield5) and I have 1130h/s with vega 56

I didnt change shit on config

First, check if the Compute mode is on. Second, from what i have heard, Vegas have issues with drivers past 18.6.1. So you may have to downgrade the drivers.

The 18.6.1 issue was just on xmr-stak/variants, or any other miner using the old wolf codebase which generated opencl kernel binaries at runtime.   I have had no issues w/ any driver version through 18.10.x on other miners including this one - though I can't vouch specifically for 18.11 yet.
member
Activity: 658
Merit: 86
Is it normal that with drivers 18.5.1 I had 1850h/s and now i installed 18.11.2 (for battlefield5) and I have 1130h/s with vega 56

I didnt change shit on config

Well, I'm quite sure we didn't change shit in the miner code either when you switched driver version Smiley.

This is the painful world of trying to develop against AMD's drivers. CN is perhaps the most sensitive algo of all when it comes to mem controller tweaks in the driver, and man do they hack that shit between driver versions sometimes. Unfortunately, AMD's incentives are rather to maximize the frame rate in the latest and greatest games than making sure CN miners are happy. So, there's not that much we can do unfortunately Sad.
member
Activity: 658
Merit: 86
Guys please fix this:
If my rig have more than 10 gpu I don't get the gpu information like I had in version 0.3.1  Sad

Here is a Rig with 9 GPU, everything looks fine





And here is a Rig with 13 GPU



I get no GPU info and 3 gpus appear black squares.
Could you fix this please?
Thank you

Hi! Hmm, I'm guessing you have some externally provided HiveOS integration for tdxminer? Since we've changed the output, maybe some log/output parsing is broken now? Do you remember how you set things up way back when for 0.3.1?

still have this problem not showing all gpus...
any update on this?
thanks

I'm no HiveOS expert, but I'm guessing this integration is based on parsing the output from the miner rather than using the sgminer-compatible API that we provide. That output format has changed between versions, and I believe one thing is that the ninth gpu is still printed as "GPU 9" but you now see "GPU10" rather than "GPU 10" to keep things aligned vertically. Hence, I'm guessing there is some script parsing output that now is broken for GPU10 and forth.

However, unless you can point me to the specific implementation you're using, there's not much I can do. I need to see the shell/Python/Perl/awk/sed/whatever script running on your box that is parsing the output. I'm guessing it could be a trivial patch of some regular expression or awk statement. When we have the time we might make sure there's a proper HiveOS custom miner integration ourselves, this time using the API rather than parsing miner output.

member
Activity: 658
Merit: 86
Anyone have a tip about get optimal hashrates on RX 550 4GB and 560 4GB? I'm getting a little bit more than 400 H/s with both 550/560s, in best case scenario. Running RX 560 at 1200 MHz Core, 1980 MHz Mem. 550 at 1200 MHz Core, 2000 MHz Memory.

TeamRedMiner prefer 2+2 on the 550's and 4+2 on the 560's I think. But I manually set them to 3+3 to 550 and 4+4 to 560... Any help?

In the upcoming version we have made a better optimization run for 550/560s. This is one reason for it being delayed, we wanted to wrap that up properly. Todxx knows more, but afaik the results have been very good in many cases.  So, stay tuned...
newbie
Activity: 50
Merit: 0
Guys please fix this:
If my rig have more than 10 gpu I don't get the gpu information like I had in version 0.3.1  Sad

Here is a Rig with 9 GPU, everything looks fine

https://i.imgur.com/jXLtzbt.png



And here is a Rig with 13 GPU

https://i.imgur.com/HnDtGrC.png

I get no GPU info and 3 gpus appear black squares.
Could you fix this please?
Thank you

Hi! Hmm, I'm guessing you have some externally provided HiveOS integration for tdxminer? Since we've changed the output, maybe some log/output parsing is broken now? Do you remember how you set things up way back when for 0.3.1?

still have this problem not showing all gpus...
any update on this?
thanks
member
Activity: 190
Merit: 59
Is it normal that with drivers 18.5.1 I had 1850h/s and now i installed 18.11.2 (for battlefield5) and I have 1130h/s with vega 56

I didnt change shit on config

you probably had power tables before. now that you installed the driver, your power table is overwritten and vega hashes bad and consumes a lot. I am not sure how to connect good miner vega and good gaming vega into same PC. Try to apply power table and see if your vega now hashes correct, and if the game plays alright (nowthe game will probably have reduced performance)
jr. member
Activity: 194
Merit: 4
Is it normal that with drivers 18.5.1 I had 1850h/s and now i installed 18.11.2 (for battlefield5) and I have 1130h/s with vega 56

I didnt change shit on config

First, check if the Compute mode is on. Second, from what i have heard, Vegas have issues with drivers past 18.6.1. So you may have to downgrade the drivers.
jr. member
Activity: 98
Merit: 6
Anyone have a tip about get optimal hashrates on RX 550 4GB and 560 4GB? I'm getting a little bit more than 400 H/s with both 550/560s, in best case scenario. Running RX 560 at 1200 MHz Core, 1980 MHz Mem. 550 at 1200 MHz Core, 2000 MHz Memory.

TeamRedMiner prefer 2+2 on the 550's and 4+2 on the 560's I think. But I manually set them to 3+3 to 550 and 4+4 to 560... Any help?
Jump to: