Don't buy vega 56-64 , my vegas don't work even 850mv and consumption too much,(7 vgas 1380W from wall),my best findings are 5700nonxt ref. series.
Thanks for advise! Why 5700 nonxt, and why ref.?
) 
Topic: [ANN] TeamRedMiner v0.10.10 - Ironfish/Kaspa/ZIL/Kawpow/Etchash and More - page 50. (Read 211877 times)
January 12, 2020, 04:16:43 PM
) January 12, 2020, 04:15:45 PM
Don't buy vega 56-64 , my vegas don't work even 850mv and consumption too much,(7 vgas 1380W from wall),my best findings are 5700nonxt ref. series.
Thanks for advise! Why 5700 nonxt, and why ref.?) January 12, 2020, 04:12:16 PM
Don't buy vega 56-64 , my vegas don't work even 850mv and consumption too much,(7 vgas 1380W from wall),my best findings are 5700nonxt ref. series.
Thanks for advise! Why 5700 nonxt, and why ref.? January 12, 2020, 04:10:21 PM
Don't buy vega 56-64 , my vegas don't work even 850mv and consumption too much,(7 vgas 1380W from wall),my best findings are 5700nonxt ref. series.
Thanks for advise! Why 5700 nonxt, and why ref.? January 12, 2020, 12:47:25 PM
Don't buy vega 56-64 , my vegas don't work even 850mv and consumption too much,(7 vgas 1380W from wall),my best findings are 5700nonxt ref. series.
Thanks for advise! Why 5700 nonxt, and why ref.? January 12, 2020, 12:43:32 PM
Don't buy vega 56-64 , my vegas don't work even 850mv and consumption too much,(7 vgas 1380W from wall),my best findings are 5700nonxt ref. series.
January 12, 2020, 03:43:06 AM
Does anybody mines eth with vega 56? What speed and power conpsumption it give?
Yes, ~50Mhcore ~1000 , mem ~950
check pbfarmer posts for amdmemorytweak settings.
Thanks for info!
Whant to buy Sapphire Pulse vega 56 for about $350. I should do it?
Might want to look at the pulse 5700 xt instead for ~$410 (or maybe even pulse 5700 for $340?) - assuming you care about power costs / efficiency. Nitro would be even better efficiency-wise, but price jump is significant - not sure it's worth it.
I'm not up to speed on the latest state of the drivers/miners for navi (other than TRM team still waiting on a proper toolchain,) but it seems 50+MH/s for the 5700xt is normal for 2/3 the power of a vega
Exists Asus vega 56 ROG-STRIX Gaming for $400.
January 11, 2020, 09:00:35 PM
Does anybody mines eth with vega 56? What speed and power conpsumption it give?
Yes, ~50Mhcore ~1000 , mem ~950
check pbfarmer posts for amdmemorytweak settings.
Thanks for info!
Whant to buy Sapphire Pulse vega 56 for about $350. I should do it?
Might want to look at the pulse 5700 xt instead for ~$410 (or maybe even pulse 5700 for $340?) - assuming you care about power costs / efficiency. Nitro would be even better efficiency-wise, but price jump is significant - not sure it's worth it.
I'm not up to speed on the latest state of the drivers/miners for navi (other than TRM team still waiting on a proper toolchain,) but it seems 50+MH/s for the 5700xt is normal for 2/3 the power of a vega
January 11, 2020, 02:29:06 PM
Does anybody mines eth with vega 56? What speed and power conpsumption it give?
Yes, ~50Mhcore ~1000 , mem ~950
check pbfarmer posts for amdmemorytweak settings.
Thanks for info!
Whant to buy Sapphire Pulse vega 56 for about $350. I should do it?
January 11, 2020, 02:19:54 PM
Does anybody mines eth with vega 56? What speed and power conpsumption it give?
Yes, ~50Mhcore ~1000 , mem ~950
check pbfarmer posts for amdmemorytweak settings.
January 11, 2020, 02:03:27 PM
Does anybody mines eth with vega 56? What speed and power conpsumption it give?
Yes, ~50Mhcore ~1000 , mem ~950
check pbfarmer posts for amdmemorytweak settings.
January 11, 2020, 02:02:32 PM
Does anybody mines eth with vega 56? What speed and power conpsumption it give?
Yes, ~50Mhcore ~1000 , mem ~950
check pbfarmer posts for amdmemorytweak settings.
January 11, 2020, 01:57:58 PM
Does anybody mines eth with vega 56? What speed and power conpsumption it give?
January 10, 2020, 02:56:18 AM
Hello,
I am sure, somebody asked this question,
is it possible to run this miner with R9 290 cards, i have some of them and would like to run this miner not only with my rx cards.
any way to do this?
No, the miner does not support the Hawaii cards. I am sure, somebody asked this question,
is it possible to run this miner with R9 290 cards, i have some of them and would like to run this miner not only with my rx cards.
any way to do this?
January 09, 2020, 07:30:10 PM
Hello,
I am sure, somebody asked this question,
is it possible to run this miner with R9 290 cards, i have some of them and would like to run this miner not only with my rx cards.
any way to do this?
I am sure, somebody asked this question,
is it possible to run this miner with R9 290 cards, i have some of them and would like to run this miner not only with my rx cards.
any way to do this?
January 09, 2020, 02:23:13 PM
Hey dear dev. any update for amd navi's? other miners have some grin 31 and mtp kernels for navis.
Which miner supports Navi for MTP?
January 08, 2020, 02:49:53 AM
Hey dear dev. any update for amd navi's? other miners have some grin 31 and mtp kernels for navis.
Which miner supports Navi for MTP?
January 07, 2020, 11:34:17 PM
One Vega 56 referent (64 bios, samsung mem) have hardware errors:
[48C, fan 71%] ethash: 48.36Mh/s, avg 48.54Mh/s, pool 47.27Mh/s a:9112 r:0 hw:164
Any recomendations?
txs
[48C, fan 71%] ethash: 48.36Mh/s, avg 48.54Mh/s, pool 47.27Mh/s a:9112 r:0 hw:164
Any recomendations?
txs
Not all memory is the same - some can take more aggressive timings, some less. I would trim back your timings changes to a minimum set (and reduce REF), and build from there:
Code:
--REF 15600 --RFC 248 --RAS 30 --RP 12 --RC 44 --RCDRD 14
This will prob get you to 99.5%+ of your list anyway. If these still don't work - try reducing REF more (try 11700), then maybe RC, then RP - those are your biggest movers.
Also, are you sure you need 850mv for those settings? All of my vegas (including the flashed 56) are running 930cclk/1028mclk @ 800mv for 47.4MH/s.
EDIT: Take a look at your temperatures (esp mem) on the two different cards as well. Higher mem temps cause faster charge decay requiring more frequent refreshes (i.e. lower REF). Mine do just fine w/ REF=15600, but mem temps are all in the high 50's to low 60's.
txs pbfarmer! With your memtweak timings just finished test 24 hour with 0 hw errors ;-)
HBM temperature is low 70's on all cards (can't do much on that, small room with no window for cooling, just one fan, and few holes for fresh air)
Never tried so low mV (800), i don't have power play table for 800, is it possible to running 800 mV with ppt build for 850 mV?
January 06, 2020, 06:56:23 PM
One Vega 56 referent (64 bios, samsung mem) have hardware errors:
[48C, fan 71%] ethash: 48.36Mh/s, avg 48.54Mh/s, pool 47.27Mh/s a:9112 r:0 hw:164
Any recomendations?
txs
[48C, fan 71%] ethash: 48.36Mh/s, avg 48.54Mh/s, pool 47.27Mh/s a:9112 r:0 hw:164
Any recomendations?
txs
Not all memory is the same - some can take more aggressive timings, some less. I would trim back your timings changes to a minimum set (and reduce REF), and build from there:
Code:
--REF 15600 --RFC 248 --RAS 30 --RP 12 --RC 44 --RCDRD 14
This will prob get you to 99.5%+ of your list anyway. If these still don't work - try reducing REF more (try 11700), then maybe RC, then RP - those are your biggest movers.
Also, are you sure you need 850mv for those settings? All of my vegas (including the flashed 56) are running 930cclk/1028mclk @ 800mv for 47.4MH/s.
EDIT: Take a look at your temperatures (esp mem) on the two different cards as well. Higher mem temps cause faster charge decay requiring more frequent refreshes (i.e. lower REF). Mine do just fine w/ REF=15600, but mem temps are all in the high 50's to low 60's.
txs pbfarmer! With your memtweak timings just finished test 24 hour with 0 hw errors ;-)
HBM temperature is low 70's on all cards (can't do much on that, small room with no window for cooling, just one fan, and few holes for fresh air)
Never tried so low mV (800), i don't have power play table for 800, is it possible to running 800 mV with ppt build for 850 mV?
January 05, 2020, 05:12:24 PM
One Vega 56 referent (64 bios, samsung mem) have hardware errors:
[48C, fan 71%] ethash: 48.36Mh/s, avg 48.54Mh/s, pool 47.27Mh/s a:9112 r:0 hw:164
already lowered clocks and mem in Overdrive Ntool:
960/850 core and 1055/850 mem
memtweak:
--CL 20 --RAS 30 --RCDRD 14 --RCDWR 12 --RC 44 --RP 14 --RRDS 3 --RRDL 6 --RTP 5 --FAW 12 --CWL 8 --WTRS 4 --WTRL 9 --WR 14 --REF 17000 --RFC 249
Another card hash 49.1 with same memtweak and 976/850 1075/850 without hw errors.
Any recomendations?
txs
[48C, fan 71%] ethash: 48.36Mh/s, avg 48.54Mh/s, pool 47.27Mh/s a:9112 r:0 hw:164
already lowered clocks and mem in Overdrive Ntool:
960/850 core and 1055/850 mem
memtweak:
--CL 20 --RAS 30 --RCDRD 14 --RCDWR 12 --RC 44 --RP 14 --RRDS 3 --RRDL 6 --RTP 5 --FAW 12 --CWL 8 --WTRS 4 --WTRL 9 --WR 14 --REF 17000 --RFC 249
Another card hash 49.1 with same memtweak and 976/850 1075/850 without hw errors.
Any recomendations?
txs
Not all memory is the same - some can take more aggressive timings, some less. I would trim back your timings changes to a minimum set (and reduce REF), and build from there:
Code:
--REF 15600 --RFC 248 --RAS 30 --RP 12 --RC 44 --RCDRD 14
This will prob get you to 99.5%+ of your list anyway. If these still don't work - try reducing REF more (try 11700), then maybe RC, then RP - those are your biggest movers.
Also, are you sure you need 850mv for those settings? All of my vegas (including the flashed 56) are running 930cclk/1028mclk @ 800mv for 47.4MH/s.
EDIT: Take a look at your temperatures (esp mem) on the two different cards as well. Higher mem temps cause faster charge decay requiring more frequent refreshes (i.e. lower REF). Mine do just fine w/ REF=15600, but mem temps are all in the high 50's to low 60's.
Jump to: