Topic: [ANN] Temple Coin has an International Human Rights Case Against TX, CO & DEA (Read 486 times)

Yesterday I called the Colorado DEA Office, and they said they are going to try to find out more about my Exemption Request for me. I just called the DEA 1-800 Registration Number, and they are going to have someone call me back within 48 hrs. And just after that I called the 202 number, like the Washington DC Office, and they put me through to the voicemail of a Chemical Analyst, and I assume that she is going to try to figure out what I am talking about (because none of them seem to know what I am talking about).

So, now there are 3 people supposedly trying to figure out what is going on with my Exemption Request. So I should get a response soon. If not, I will just take them to Federal Court.

And we will do the same as the Ethiopian Zion Coptic Church and Force them to respond, but now we have the Federal Registration for Marijuana, opened up in 2016, so the DEA will be forced to allow the Religious Use, because their only argument before was "The Law is being applied equally to everyone" and now Companies can Register, so they need to apply that Law Equally too.

Btw, if anyone is wondering "Didn't you file a Human Rights Court thing?", yes, but the Human Rights Court might not respond until I get a Final Decision from the Court and everything. So I have to take these Agencies to Federal Court, and get denied. THEN the International Court kicks in. I just contacted them early to see if they would tell the DEA to do their jobs and review everything fairly under the guidelines, and also so the Intentional Court could start keeping tabs on what is going on, so they can have a little understanding of it and not have it just thrown at them all at once after we go to Federal Court. They can even watch the Federal Courts now.

I just sent this to the NSA

This is really just to get you guys ready for our Federal Court Case, but if you treat it as an Appeal, I would appreciate it.

Privacy Act

The Privacy Act (PA) protects an individual's privacy by putting controls on federal agencies in the collection, use, maintenance, and dissemination of personal information. In addition, it entitles individuals to access federal agency records or to request an amendment to records that are maintained in a file retrievable by an individual's name or personal identifier, except to the extent that information is exempt from release. Individual, in the context of the Privacy Act, is defined as a U.S. citizen or an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence. The Privacy Act also requires that agency records be accurate, relevant, timely, and complete, and amendments are limited to these criteria. However, amendments are normally restricted to correcting factual errors and not matters of official judgments, such as performance ratings, or subjective judgments that reflect an individual's observation, evaluation, or opinion.


Flast v. Cohen, 392 U.S. 83 (1968)

The "Intelligence Community" uses more Cryptography and Dark Web Applications than anyone in the World, that is why they didn't care what Hillary was doing, they do the same thing all the time.

They used to put like a News Paper or something at your house, with a Clock on the third page with the Hands pointing to the time you were supposed to go sit on the Bench.

Now they use the same Apps they try to tell you not to use because they are for ISIS.

These are articles about the NSA's Program called PRISM, where they use Google, Facebook, Yahoo, etc servers to collect information about you:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2013/06/12/heres-everything-we-know-about-prism-to-date/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PRISM_(surveillance_program)
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/mar/08/fbi-changes-privacy-rules-accessing-nsa-prism-data
http://www.vocativ.com/295204/nsa-prism/
http://abcnews.go.com/topics/news/nsa-prism.htm

If you want to submit a FOIA (Freedom of Information Act request in order to get record from the NSA about you) here is how to do that. The Privacy Act Request is the Normal one to use (the 3rd one here) but you can file both. The top is a sample letter so that you have a template.
http://www.nfoic.org/sample-foia-request-letters
http://m.nsa.gov/resources/everyone/foia/submit-foia-request/
http://m.nsa.gov/resources/everyone/foia/submit-privacy-act-request/

This is how to file a Consumer Complaint about any Company that has given away your information, this must be filed before a lawsuit.
https://www.usa.gov/consumer-complaints

EPCA (Privacy Act)
https://epic.org/privacy/ecpa/
https://epic.org/privacy/laws/privacy_act.html
"Individuals who violate ECPA face up to five years in prison and fines up to $250,000. Victims are also entitled to bring civil suits and recover actual damages, in addition to punitive damages and attorney's fees, for violations."

FISA (Foreign Surveillance law where the FISA courts come from)
http://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?path=/prelim@title50/chapter36&edition=prelim
https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/110/hr6304/text


Applications of the Privacy Act
https://www.rosen.com/divorce/divorcearticles/electronic-communications-privacy-act/
http://www.jurist.org/hotline/2014/01/khaliah-barnes-privacy-act.php


42 U.S. Code § 1983 (Lawsuit for Violation of Rights)

18 U.S. Code § 242 (Criminal Charges for Government Officers using their status to infringe on personal Rights)

28 USC § 1442 (Bringing a Lawsuit against Government Officers)

Title II Rule 3 & 5 (Procedure for Suing Government Agencies)

Flast V Cohen (You can sue the Government for misuse of tax funds)

Katz V United States (Reasonable expectation of Privacy)

United States V United States District Court (Wiretapping)

Riley V California (Cell Phone Records)

United States V Guest (Protection from Government Conspiracies)

Watkins V United States (Congress' Power is not Unlimited)

Buckley V Fitzsimmons (No Immunity for Illegal investigations)

Hanrahan V Hampton (Example of an Extensive Government Conspiracy hashed out in Court for 20 years)

Include facts and damages in your claim. Your administrative claim must include the exact amount of money damages you are claiming, as well as enough facts about your case to allow the federal agency to investigate the merits of your claim. Using a SF 95 form will help ensure that you've included all of the necessary information.

The agency has six months to respond. Once your claim is submitted, the federal agency has six months to rule on it. In some cases, the federal agency may "admit" your claim (that is, agree that your claim is valid) and agree to pay you some or all of the money damages you demanded, and you may not need to go to court.

You then have six months to file a lawsuit. If the federal agency rejects your claim or refuses to pay all the money damages you demanded, you have six months from the date on which the decision is mailed to you to file a lawsuit. Again, file your lawsuit as soon as possible after receiving this decision to avoid any chance of having your lawsuit dismissed as untimely.

You don't have to sue until the agency rules on your claim. If the federal agency fails to rule on your administrative claim within six months, you have the choice of either awaiting the agency's decision or going ahead with your lawsuit. As long as the federal agency is still considering your claim, there is no time limit for you to file a law suit in federal court; the six-month time limit only begins to run once the agency has ruled on your claim.

Once you have gone through the procedures listed above -- a process known as "exhausting your administrative remedies" -- you are eligible to file a lawsuit in court to pursue money damages from the government.

Examples of Government Corruption
https://www.aclu.org/news/fbi-audit-exposes-widespread-abuse-patriot-act-powers
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/james-whitey-bulgers-capture-could-cause-trouble-inside-the-fbi/2011/06/24/AGis2cjH_story.html

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2011/mar/17/us-spy-operation-social-networks
“The discovery that the US military is developing false online personalities – known to users of social media as "sock puppets" – could also encourage other governments, private companies and non-government organisations to do the same.
The Centcom contract stipulates that each fake online persona must have a convincing background, history and supporting details, and that up to 50 US-based controllers should be able to operate false identities from their workstations "without fear of being discovered by sophisticated adversaries".”
https://www.liveleak.com/view?i=ec5_14273491

ECPA Case law
Steve Jackson Games, Incorporated, et al. v. Secret Service, et al., 36 F.3d 457 (5th Cir. 1994)
Microsoft Corp. v. United States, No. 14-2985 (2d Cir. 2017)

4th Amendment Case Law
Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347 (1967)
Soldal v. Cook County 506 U.S. 56 (1992)
United States v. Jones, 132 S.Ct. 945 (2012)
Florida v. Jardines 569 U.S. ___ (2013)

There is no immunity for investigative activities Buckley v. Fitzsimmons 509 U.S. 259 (1993)

Government Agencies may not reveal private information during investigations Watkins v. United States, 354 U.S. 178 (1957)

They are known to spy on the citizens on the United States
https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/110/hr6304/text
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2013/06/12/heres-everything-we-know-about-prism-to-date/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PRISM_(surveillance_program)
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/mar/08/fbi-changes-privacy-rules-accessing-nsa-prism-data
http://www.vocativ.com/295204/nsa-prism/
http://abcnews.go.com/topics/news/nsa-prism.htm

both have the capability to turn cell phones and other devices into spying devices Riley v. California 573 U.S. ___ (2014); United States v. United States Dist. Ct. 407 U.S. 297 (1972)
https://wikileaks.org/ciav7p1/

both have the capability to spy through walls using FLIR technology Kyllo v. United States, 533 U.S. 27 (2001)
http://www.flir.com/home/

Warrants can be retrieved and acted on illegally (Overbroad warrants, Malicious Warrants, etc), and those acting on them are liable for doing so Messerschmidt, et al. v. Millender, et al. 565 U.S. ___ (2012)
Defendant and Defendant 2 are both known to abuse their capabilities and retrieve illegal warrants to do so
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2015/02/23/court-invalidates-cell-phone-warrant-as-overbroad/
http://archive.wired.com/politics/law/news/2007/07/exigentinvestigation
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/418/323/case.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steve_Kurtz
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brandon_Mayfield
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Controversial_invocations_of_the_Patriot_Act
https://www.aclu.org/news/fbi-audit-exposes-widespread-abuse-patriot-act-powers
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/james-whitey-bulgers-capture-could-cause-trouble-inside-the-fbi/2011/06/24/AGis2cjH_story.html
http://www.cnn.com/2015/05/30/politics/what-happens-if-the-patriot-act-provisions-expire/
http://highered.mheducation.com/sites/0072564938/student_view0/chapter4/chapter_outline.html
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/241
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abuse_of_process

Government Agents must be held to a higher standard than other citizens due to the fact that they are acting under Color of Law Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971)
Color of Law
The act of a state officer, regardless of whether or not the act is within the limits of his or her authority, is considered an act under color of law if the officer purports to be conducting himself or herself in the course of official duties. Under the civil rights act of 1871 (42 U.S.C.A. Section 1983), color of law is synonymous with State Action, which is conduct by an officer that bears a sufficiently close nexus to a state so that the action is treated as though it is by the state.


Types of Police misconduct include false confession, false arrest, false evidence, false imprisonment, intimidation, police brutality, police corruption, racial profiling, surveillance abuse, witness tampering, and off-duty misconduct.
Others include:
1. Noble Cause corruption, where an officer believes that a good outcome justifies his bad behavior.
2. Selective Enforcement, allowing friends, family and other officers to break the law.
3. Abuse of Power, using the badge to get in to places you would otherwise not be invited or allowed, discounts, etc.
4. Police Perjury, blatant lying under oath and/or to other authorities to cover wrongdoing.
5. Violation by Officers of police procedural policy.
Laws intended to protect against abuse of authority include the 4th Amendment to the Constitution, which prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures; the 14th Amendment to the Constitution, which includes due process and equal protection clauses; the Civil Rights Act of 1871; and the Federal Tort Claims Act.

Noble Cause corruption:
Corruption caused by the adherence to a teleological ethical system (ex: By their fruits you shall know them; pulling over anyone with larger rims on their car), suggesting that the person "will utilize unethical, and sometimes illegal, means to obtain a desired result," a result which appears to benefit the greater good.

Flast V Cohen

https://epic.org/privacy/ecpa/
Individuals who violate ECPA face up to five years in prison and fines up to $250,000. Victims are also entitled to bring civil suits and recover actual damages, in addition to punitive damages and attorney's fees, for violations.

This is the closest they get to asking for exemption, and I asked for "Any and all records, from any and every Agency". So the OGIS claims that some things can be released, but there are exemptions, and the NSA claims:

Moreover, even admitting that the Agency either does or does not possess records on an individual could enable that person to assess whether he or she was under surveillance or had successfully evaded it. Were the Agency to do so in the case of any one person requesting intelligence records--even an individual who poses no risk to U.S. National Security--- the Agency would have to do so for all persons making such requests. This would include, for example, international Terrorists and/or persons working as agents for foreign powers. As stated in the Agency's response to your request, acknowledging the existence of or non-existence of any such information on any individual is, and must remain, a classified matter.

I just got off the phone with the OGIS - Office of Government Information Services, and they said "There are exemptions" for the NSA, and I know that, but the NSA is not claiming an exemption, they claimed that they can not give out records to me, because then they would have to give them out to everybody. So they are not claiming an exemption, and the Federal Judge will make them release it. I am going to call the OGIS again next week and see where they are, because they said they just got it, so they don't know what's going on yet. So I will call them next week and see what is going on, and I will file in Federal Court right after I file the DEA Petition Case.

The Shaivite Temple Marijuana Breeding Program
http://shaivitetemple.org/Forum/topic/the-shaivite-temple-marijuana-breeding-program/

Anyone who thinks that the FBI Secret Society thing doesn't make any sense, many FBI Agents are Mormon; and Mormons have Initiations, and Levels, just like a Secret Society. Where each Level holds new Responsibilities (that is the lesson of Masonry aka Temple Building, you are the Temple).

And these same people who say that there could never be corruption in the FBI, are the same people who said the President and his whole Family would be in jail by now.

People hear the word "Corruption" and they don't really understand what it means. And you hear "Mexico is corrupt" and that the Politicians are tied to or are the Cartels in some Cities and States, and Bribe Federal Officers (Federales) to let things through. But even that does not explain "Corruption". Corruption is deep, and there is usually a History behind it.

I am going to explain some Corruption that most Americans have never heard of, and explain it in some detail so that you can understand Corruption better. And you have to really read the whole thing to understand this. If you are an Exxon or GE Executive living in Nigeria from another Country, or even if you are a person who is Wealthy because of Colonization, you are at risk in Nigeria and have to live on a Compound with Bodyguards riding around with you. And it is partially money, but it's not just money, money is just the part that everyone can understand on it's face.

In Nigeria there are something called Confraternaties. Confraternaties started as 1 single group called the Pyrates, and they opposed the Colonization of Nigeria, and the Elitist Wealthy Students attending the Universities in Nigeria. At first it was just 1 group, and it started on a Campus, but over 20 years it spread through the Campuses, and they had stringent Membership rules that included Intellectual Standards, but then a few Members who were kicked out formed a new group stating that the Pyrates were Elitist (the late 1960s). They called their organization the Seadogs. And over the next decade groups formed all over the Country in all of the 300 Universities. Then there was a Civil War in the 80s, and the groups changed.

The Military won the Civil War and took control of the Country, and they saw the Confraternaties as allies against the Student Unions and Teachers Unions, and they began arming the Confraternaties. And at this time the Confraternaties began having Gunfights with each other, and with Student groups, and targeting the people running the Schools. The Campus Family/Campus Mafia was formed, which was a kind of Anti-Confraternaty organization, and they styled themselves after the Italia Mafia. There was a National Crackdown on Witchcraft and Voodoo, and the Confraternaties were pushed out of the Campuses at this time and began to establish themselves as much larger organizations.

2 Confraternaties then created a "Street and Creek" wing, which began to take over Territory as their own, and then all Female Confraternaties also began to form. And the Confraternaties began doing Voodoo ceremonies before all violent activities. And at this time the groups became much more tribe or ethnicity based, but not all of them, and they are all different in various ways.

In 1999 the Military Commander died, and the Government went back to being a Democratic Republic. The groups still have conflicts with Campus groups, and kidnap Oil Executives, and have extensive Political and Military connections, and recruit at the college Campuses. And just 1 Confraternity claims to have 12 members of 1 of the Nigerian State Houses as not just supporters, but Members.

So while Oil Executives, and GE Executives, and Wealthy people in Nigeria who made their money from Colonization are living on Compounds, anyone around them could be susceptible to a bribe, or could secretly be a Member of one of these groups.

That is Corruption. But they are there for a reason, and are "Righteous" in their Corruption.

My dispute is that the NSA FOIA office claims that if they were to give me my Records (after violating my 4th Amendment, under the guise that they are collecting the records for me, and I can access them; which is what they said when Edward Snowden told us about the PRISM program), then they would also have to give suspected Terrorists their Records.

And my dispute is "Yes", if the suspected terrorist has not had rights taken away by Due Process and Conviction, then they have to give them their records too. That is correct, they are correct about that. And that is not an argument against giving me my Records.

This is from the NSA Website, and is simply being completely ignored by the NSA

https://www.nsa.gov/resources/everyone/foia/
The Privacy Act (PA) protects an individual's privacy by putting controls on federal agencies in the collection, use, maintenance, and dissemination of personal information. In addition, it entitles individuals to access federal agency records or to request an amendment to records that are maintained in a file retrievable by an individual's name or personal identifier, except to the extent that information is exempt from release. Individual, in the context of the Privacy Act, is defined as a U.S. citizen or an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence. The Privacy Act also requires that agency records be accurate, relevant, timely, and complete, and amendments are limited to these criteria. However, amendments are normally restricted to correcting factual errors and not matters of official judgments, such as performance ratings, or subjective judgments that reflect an individual's observation, evaluation, or opinion.

I just called the NSA Inspector General because I called him when I appealed last year and he said that he couldn't do anything until after the Appeal. And this time, he said "I am just going to leave it with them" because they told me to take it to a Federal Judge.

So I think the issue here is that they just don't know the law, and don't want to do anything until a Judge tells them to, because no one has ever done this before.

I can't believe I am the first person to ever Call the NSA FOIA Liaison office, and not accept the answer that "We exist to tell you that we aren't sure about anything"; but apparently I am the first one to not accept that answer, and my Federal Case against the NSA will be precedent setting.

FBI Memo, written by J. Edgar Hoover on October 11, 1919

MEMORANDUM FOR MR. RIDGELY.

I am transmitting herewith a communication which has come to my attention from the Panama Canal, Washington office, relative to the activities of MARCUS GARVEY. Garvey is a West-Indian negro and in addition to his activities in endeavoring to establish the Black Star Line Steamship Corporation he has also been particularly active among the radical elements in New York City in agitating the negro movement. Unfortunately, however, he has not as yet violated any federal law whereby he could be proceeded against on the grounds of being an undesirable alien, from the point of view of deportation. It occurs to me, however, from the attached clipping that there might be some proceeding against him for fraud in connection with his Black Star Line propaganda and for this reason I am transmitting the communication to you for your appropriate attention.

The following is a brief statement of Marcus Garvey and his activities:

Subject a native of the West Indies and one of the most prominent negro agitators in New York;

He is a founder of the Universal Negro Improvement Association and African Communities League;

He is the promulgator of the Black Star Line and is the managing editor of the Negro World;

He is an exceptionally fine orator, creating much excitement among the negroes through his steamship proposition;

In his paper the "Negro World" the Soviet Russian Rule is upheld and there is open advocation of Bolshevism.

Respectfully,

J.E. Hoover

So, our Coin has an International Human Rights Case against 2 States and the DEA, and we are going to have a Religious Marijuana Exemption very soon.

TL;DR Version: Temple Coin is part of the First Federally Recognized Religious Marijuana Program

so what's this all about? why is it in the ANN section?too much words that i don't want to read anymore. 

I thought I would mention this so everyone can understand the world a little better.

The first Molecule to ever be Isolated from a plant, and put into the "Scientific Literature" was Coniine. And the first Molecule ever Synthesized was Urea in the early 1800s. Then in 1898 Cocaine was synthesized, and the study of Cocaine launched Science forward the same way the discovery of DNA did, then Bayer invented Heroine. And everyone knows about Coca Cola being part of this, and Cocaine being the mechanism that created American Advertising, up until the 1970s there were Commercials for Cocaine Paraphernalia on TV; and they made a law about it in the 70s. Then in the 40s-50s LSD changed Science again, just like the discovery of DNA. And now we have Maps of the Serotonin Receptors from David E Nichols, and classifications of Chemicals, and now even the US Government, who is usually years behind in legislating technology, has detailed lists of Molecules, and knows about "Isomers" and all kind of stuff that they had no clue about for the longest time (which they mainly learned by watching Sasha Shulgin). That is how we got where we are with Organic Chemistry. Before that, all of these were Religious Rituals.

The American Declaration of the Rights and Duties of Man
Article 13- Right to the Benefits of Culture
Every person has the right to take part in the cultural life of the community, to enjoy the arts, and to participate in the benefits that result from intellectual progress, especially scientific discoveries. He likewise has the right to the protection of his moral and material interests as regards his inventions or any literary, scientific or artistic works of which he is the author.

New Branches do not lose Status; and Decisions made in Hierarchical Religious Structures are Binding in Civil Court
(via Presbyterian Church v. Hull Church 393 U.S. 440 (1969))

“The law knows no heresy, and is committed to the support of no dogma, the establishment of no sect. . . . All who unite themselves to such a body [the general church] do so with an implied consent to [its] government, and are bound to submit to it. But it would be a vain consent, and would lead to the total subversion of such religious bodies, if anyone aggrieved by one of their decisions could appeal to the secular courts and have them [sic] reversed. It is of the essence of these religious unions, and of their right to establish tribunals for the decision of questions arising among themselves, that those decisions should be binding in all cases of ecclesiastical cognizance, subject only to such appeals as the organism itself provides for."


Meaning of the Phrase: Sincere Religious Belief; and All Religions deserve exemptions
(via Wisconsin v. Yoder U.S. 205 (1972))

"Within that phrase would come all sincere religious beliefs which are based upon a power or being, or upon a faith to which all else is subordinate or upon which all else is ultimately dependent. The test might be stated in these words: a sincere and meaningful belief which occupies in the life of its possessor a place parallel to that filled by the God of those admittedly qualifying for the exemption comes within the statutory definition. This construction avoids imputing to Congress an intent to classify different religious beliefs, exempting some and excluding others, and is in accord with the well established congressional policy of equal treatment for those whose opposition to service is grounded in their religious tenets."

Also, this may be hard for some people to understand, but the 1st amendment was incorporated into the States, and is basically a "person" for legal purposes. So the 1st amendment is a separate plaintiff or defendant from yourself in your case
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/330/1/

Petitions can be submitted to solve the Entanglement Problem, as per #6 in the DEA RFRA Guidelines (The DEA just has to follow their own Guidelines)

6. Applicability of DEA Regulations.
A Petitioner whose petition for Religious Exemption from the Controlled Substances Act is granted remains bound by all applicable laws and Controlled Substances Act regulations governing registration, labeling and packaging, quotas, recordkeeping and reporting, security and storage, and periodic inspections, among other things. See 21 C.F.R. Sections 1300-1316. A Petitioner who seeks exemption from applicable CSA regulations (as opposed to the CSA itself) may petition under C.F.R. Section 1307.03. Such petition must separately address each regulation from which the petitioner seeks exemption and provide a statement of the reasons for each exemption sought.

And if the DEA tries to respond and say that "To follow the Guidelines we put out after Gonzales V O Centro would cause too much entanglement between the DEA and your Religion" as a means to deny me. Then I will use that as Evidence in Federal Court to get the Controlled Substances Act overturned, the same way the Marihuana Tax Act was overturned because it violated the 5th Amendment to not incriminate yourself. A Law can't block something from happening by being written in a way that causes it to violate the Constitution. In that situation the Law just has to be overturned.

And if anyone is wondering what the DEA has the Legal Rights to do in this situation (they are not free to do as they wish here), read this
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/403/602/case.html

Also, this should be considered, since we are growing "Low THC" Marijuana, for THCv content, not for THC content. And I am breeding strains for their THCv Content. Meaning that we are growing "Hemp" and we are making "Industrial Hemp", with High THCv and Low or No THC.

(2) Industrial hemp
The term “industrial hemp” means the plant Cannabis sativa L. and any part of such plant, whether growing or not, with a delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis

 DEAs rules, that they aren't following.

D. Processing Timeframes
It is important to act expeditiously on applications for Schedule I research. The timeframes for DEA’s and FDA’s processing of Schedule I research applications are specified in the regulations. DEA forwards complete Schedule I research protocols to the FDA within seven days of receipt; FDA notifies DEA of its determination regarding the merits of the protocol within 30 days; and DEA issues a certificate within 10 days of receiving the FDA’s notice. 21 C.F.R. 1301.32(c). It should be noted that although many clinical researchers may be subject to a standardized protocol, thereby streamlining the process, some researchers must also meet institutional and State requirements prior to approval. DEA works closely with researchers to assist with the expeditious completion of their protocol submission and registration application. 

And btw, here is the reason I ask for a Statement by the IACHR. I have spent years studying US Case Law for Religious Substance use, and the point it has gotten to is summed up in 1 case, Gonzales V O Centro from 2006.
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/546/418/

In Gonzales V O Centro, what happened was that a group called The Center of the Union of the Spirit and Beneficial Plants (Centro Espírita Beneficente União do Vegetal) was arrested with 300 Gallons of Ayahuasca.

First they said, "We have a 1st Amendment Right"

The DEA responded "Public Welfare, we have a Responsibility to uphold neutral Laws"

O Centro responded with DEA Form 225, showing that there is a process for this.

The DEA Responded with the UN Psychotropics Convention.

The Court said Ayahuasca is not covered by the Convention.

So that is where it ended, and that is where we are. So from here, a clear Statement needs to be made by an International Body as to what the rights of Citizens of Signatories are regarding the Conflict between the UN Declaration of Human Rights, and the UN Psychotropics Convention.

The argument in US Courts has gotten into these Treaties, it is not longer in US Law and the DEA has no argument in US Law.