[ANN] TIMEREUM (TME) VERSION 2.0: "ELIXIR" (ELIX) RELEASED (NEW THREAD) - page 30.

Daedalus27

full member

Activity: 167

Merit: 100

The Matrix lost my mind through the cracks!

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: buriks on August 20, 2017, 10:03:43 PM

Quote from: ever_3x on August 20, 2017, 08:18:33 PM

i am withdrawall my TME to myetherwallet no problem
it is save now in myether Grin

good solution for withdrawall TME to myetherwallet
waiting listed exchange other Wink

yups, that's good solution.
but the best solution is TME can trade normally again on NovaExchange Grin

If TME were allowed to trade normally on www.NovaExchange.com it would be 2500 to 5000 sats

buriks

sr. member

Activity: 826

Merit: 303

Quote from: ever_3x on August 20, 2017, 08:18:33 PM

i am withdrawall my TME to myetherwallet no problem
it is save now in myether Grin

good solution for withdrawall TME to myetherwallet
waiting listed exchange other Wink

samantadegrenet

hero member

Activity: 686

Merit: 500

Quote from: ever_3x on August 20, 2017, 08:18:33 PM

i am withdrawall my TME to myetherwallet no problem
it is save now in myether Grin

did also with mine tme and it was nto a problem too!

TimereumDev

member

Activity: 84

Merit: 10

Quote from: Pipshunter on August 20, 2017, 08:45:08 PM

i have 2 stuck transaction , whelp me please,\.
here the hash

https://etherscan.io/tx/0x9bb0e5dc21a22fd4d1f1753dec555cd956bb931614e7c45c6d8bc39e184e1767

https://etherscan.io/tx/0x9f011a85fccb8bd02ca2836c16df6dc1acd8b8f4e99f1d1467320241b8da45f9

im sending my token to my child address and boom out if gas he say.
beeen there for 5 days plus.
if possible you can send them back to their parent wallet i will be so grateful thanks.

You should resend these transactions with more gas.

Pipshunter

sr. member

Activity: 700

Merit: 252

i have 2 stuck transaction , whelp me please,\.
here the hash

https://etherscan.io/tx/0x9bb0e5dc21a22fd4d1f1753dec555cd956bb931614e7c45c6d8bc39e184e1767

https://etherscan.io/tx/0x9f011a85fccb8bd02ca2836c16df6dc1acd8b8f4e99f1d1467320241b8da45f9

im sending my token to my child address and boom out if gas he say.
beeen there for 5 days plus.
if possible you can send them back to their parent wallet i will be so grateful thanks.

ever_3x

hero member

Activity: 909

Merit: 500

i am withdrawall my TME to myetherwallet no problem
it is save now in myether Grin

TimereumDev

member

Activity: 84

Merit: 10

Quote from: albrots on August 20, 2017, 08:00:59 PM

Quote from: TimereumDev on August 20, 2017, 07:56:35 PM

Quote from: Glok17 on August 20, 2017, 07:19:53 PM

Quote from: TimereumDev on August 20, 2017, 06:48:45 PM

Quote from: Adriano2010 on August 20, 2017, 06:25:52 PM

Dev any answer from other exchanges(shapeshift..)? Cryptopia can be a solution but i don't know if we can gather fast fee to pay.
Do you want to rewrite full code for TME or for new lending tokens?

No word from Shapeshift yet.

I think at some point renaming TME and making it fully ERC-20 compatible will save a lot of trouble later on. Shouldn't be a problem for places like Cryptopia or Livecoin, but in the long run will be a good idea.

The lending token service is being developed.

Can you please explain what kind of problems Nova could have with TME? Are these specific problems? Did Nova contact you to solve the problems?

I would be really glad if we can get TME listed on Cryptopia.

After contacting Nova, Nova informed me of the problem, but as of yet has not moved forward to solve the problem (despite my request to do so).

According to Nova, deposits were getting "stuck." That is all the information I have. I have three guesses as to why this might be:

1. TME's transfer function is slightly more expensive than average, due to the parent-child checks. If an insufficient amount of gas were provided, a withdrawal transaction could run out of gas and the deposit would appear "stuck." This seems like a trivial problem to solve, however.

2. Lack of full ERC-20 compatibility. Without knowing exactly how Nova's wallet is managed under the hood, it's not possible to know whether this had a role or not.

3. High volume. Just another guess.

how about many user are invested there *nova* they can't withdraw their TME totally

I do not think TME will be "lost" to any Nova accounts. If anyone is having trouble withdrawing TME I would like to know that, however, as that could help show what the problem is. I'm not receiving any communication from Nova (as of today), so this is sort of a black box problem at this point.

albrots

sr. member

Activity: 534

Merit: 250

Quote from: TimereumDev on August 20, 2017, 07:56:35 PM

Quote from: Glok17 on August 20, 2017, 07:19:53 PM

Quote from: TimereumDev on August 20, 2017, 06:48:45 PM

Quote from: Adriano2010 on August 20, 2017, 06:25:52 PM

Dev any answer from other exchanges(shapeshift..)? Cryptopia can be a solution but i don't know if we can gather fast fee to pay.
Do you want to rewrite full code for TME or for new lending tokens?

No word from Shapeshift yet.

I think at some point renaming TME and making it fully ERC-20 compatible will save a lot of trouble later on. Shouldn't be a problem for places like Cryptopia or Livecoin, but in the long run will be a good idea.

The lending token service is being developed.

Can you please explain what kind of problems Nova could have with TME? Are these specific problems? Did Nova contact you to solve the problems?

I would be really glad if we can get TME listed on Cryptopia.

After contacting Nova, Nova informed me of the problem, but as of yet has not moved forward to solve the problem (despite my request to do so).

According to Nova, deposits were getting "stuck." That is all the information I have. I have three guesses as to why this might be:

1. TME's transfer function is slightly more expensive than average, due to the parent-child checks. If an insufficient amount of gas were provided, a withdrawal transaction could run out of gas and the deposit would appear "stuck." This seems like a trivial problem to solve, however.

2. Lack of full ERC-20 compatibility. Without knowing exactly how Nova's wallet is managed under the hood, it's not possible to know whether this had a role or not.

3. High volume. Just another guess.

how about many user are invested there *nova* they can't withdraw their TME totally

TimereumDev

member

Activity: 84

Merit: 10

Quote from: Glok17 on August 20, 2017, 07:19:53 PM

Quote from: TimereumDev on August 20, 2017, 06:48:45 PM

Quote from: Adriano2010 on August 20, 2017, 06:25:52 PM

Dev any answer from other exchanges(shapeshift..)? Cryptopia can be a solution but i don't know if we can gather fast fee to pay.
Do you want to rewrite full code for TME or for new lending tokens?

No word from Shapeshift yet.

I think at some point renaming TME and making it fully ERC-20 compatible will save a lot of trouble later on. Shouldn't be a problem for places like Cryptopia or Livecoin, but in the long run will be a good idea.

The lending token service is being developed.

Can you please explain what kind of problems Nova could have with TME? Are these specific problems? Did Nova contact you to solve the problems?

I would be really glad if we can get TME listed on Cryptopia.

After contacting Nova, Nova informed me of the problem, but as of yet has not moved forward to solve the problem (despite my request to do so).

According to Nova, deposits were getting "stuck." That is all the information I have. I have three guesses as to why this might be:

1. TME's transfer function is slightly more expensive than average, due to the parent-child checks. If an insufficient amount of gas were provided, a withdrawal transaction could run out of gas and the deposit would appear "stuck." This seems like a trivial problem to solve, however.

2. Lack of full ERC-20 compatibility. Without knowing exactly how Nova's wallet is managed under the hood, it's not possible to know whether this had a role or not.

3. High volume. Just another guess.

xiaohang07

sr. member

Activity: 392

Merit: 253

Open and Transparent Science Powered By Blockchain

Quote from: breezeattack on August 20, 2017, 03:59:16 PM

Quote from: TimereumDev on August 20, 2017, 03:55:07 PM

Quote from: breezeattack on August 20, 2017, 03:53:13 PM

Quote from: TimereumDev on August 20, 2017, 02:47:08 PM

Rebranding

I have the intention of rebranding TME under a different, better name. This would likely not occur for 6-12 months. A snapshot of holdings and genesis batches would be taken, and a newer contract deployed.
This would also give the opportunity to make the base token fully compatible and have it implement totalSupply(). This would allow the base token to be traded on EtherDelta and other decentralized exchanges. The situation with Nova has brought to my attention that using only centralized exchanges to trade puts the token holders at the mercy of exchange issues.

Exchanges

Although I understand the desire to trade, I think that the value of the base token should be based on the delivery of a service. Therefore I am advocating to wait until the new service is released and the base token rebranded to trade the base token. If an exchange picks TME up in the meantime, that is fine. If the community wants to work to put TME on more exchanges, they can. I do understand that NovaExchange gained TME a lot of publicity.

"A snapshot of holdings and genesis batches would be taken", does that mean we'd have to do anything on our end to get this coin if say we are storing everything in myetherwallet? My concern is forgetting to come back in 6 months then finding out that I missed my chance to convert TME to x other coin all due to not checking this forum everyday.

No need to do anything.

So does that mean it'll show up in myetherwallet (or whatever wallet being used) automatically as a new token? You'll send the equivalent (or maybe double Wink

) of this new token to all the addresses that currently own TME?

Really good to hear that! This is truely a timely update. It is nice if TME can be traded on another exchange.

Glok17

full member

Activity: 319

Merit: 100

Quote from: TimereumDev on August 20, 2017, 06:48:45 PM

Quote from: Adriano2010 on August 20, 2017, 06:25:52 PM

Dev any answer from other exchanges(shapeshift..)? Cryptopia can be a solution but i don't know if we can gather fast fee to pay.
Do you want to rewrite full code for TME or for new lending tokens?

No word from Shapeshift yet.

I think at some point renaming TME and making it fully ERC-20 compatible will save a lot of trouble later on. Shouldn't be a problem for places like Cryptopia or Livecoin, but in the long run will be a good idea.

The lending token service is being developed.

Can you please explain what kind of problems Nova could have with TME? Are these specific problems? Did Nova contact you to solve the problems?

I would be really glad if we can get TME listed on Cryptopia.

Adriano2010

hero member

Activity: 1414

Merit: 516

Quote from: TimereumDev on August 20, 2017, 06:48:45 PM

Quote from: Adriano2010 on August 20, 2017, 06:25:52 PM

Dev any answer from other exchanges(shapeshift..)? Cryptopia can be a solution but i don't know if we can gather fast fee to pay.
Do you want to rewrite full code for TME or for new lending tokens?

No word from Shapeshift yet.

I think at some point renaming TME and making it fully ERC-20 compatible will save a lot of trouble later on. Shouldn't be a problem for places like Cryptopia or Livecoin, but in the long run will be a good idea.

The lending token service is being developed.

We should donate to gather funds for cryptopia then because livecoin fee is too high now (4BTC).

TimereumDev

member

Activity: 84

Merit: 10

Quote from: sammrheza on August 20, 2017, 06:39:16 PM

so we need to wait approx. 6 - 12 months to trade tme after rebranding ? Undecided

, quite a long time

I'm not opposed to putting it on another exchange if a good alternative is found.

TimereumDev

member

Activity: 84

Merit: 10

Quote from: Adriano2010 on August 20, 2017, 06:25:52 PM

Dev any answer from other exchanges(shapeshift..)? Cryptopia can be a solution but i don't know if we can gather fast fee to pay.
Do you want to rewrite full code for TME or for new lending tokens?

No word from Shapeshift yet.

I think at some point renaming TME and making it fully ERC-20 compatible will save a lot of trouble later on. Shouldn't be a problem for places like Cryptopia or Livecoin, but in the long run will be a good idea.

The lending token service is being developed.

sammrheza

sr. member

Activity: 448

Merit: 265

so we need to wait approx. 6 - 12 months to trade tme after rebranding ? Undecided

, quite a long time

Coiner_

full member

Activity: 224

Merit: 102

Quote from: fonship on August 20, 2017, 05:30:05 PM

Dev if you or anyone else can apply to Binance, i think TME community can arrange the funds required to register :
https://binance.zendesk.com/hc/en-us/articles/115000822512-Listing-a-Coin-on-Binance-com

I've been saying this for 10 pages now and that was when the daily volume was significant. Now that it's 0, good luck with question 9.

I did try to get in contact with them but their contact form is in Chinese so no luck.

Adriano2010

hero member

Activity: 1414

Merit: 516

Dev any answer from other exchanges(shapeshift..)? Cryptopia can be a solution but i don't know if we can gather fast fee to pay.
Do you want to rewrite full code for TME or for new lending tokens?

Daedalus27

full member

Activity: 167

Merit: 100

The Matrix lost my mind through the cracks!

Quote from: TimereumDev on August 20, 2017, 05:43:54 PM

Quote from: tinyteapot on August 20, 2017, 05:38:07 PM

If this is implemented, it will be automatic. Everyone will have equivalent holdings and genesis holders will have the same number of unused batches at the upload of the new contract. This is relatively far down the road right now, but I believe it's important to consider.

This will really help people who are not tech guy to easily generate their YME.

I read at Novaexchange that tme shall be delisted due to issues unless the matter is addressed by the dev; what have you done towards this problem.

I've emailed them multiple times offering help. They claimed that deposits were occasionally getting "stuck." Nova did not seem to want to investigate (citing lack of time). It's unclear to me why TME was able to trade fine until they delisted it.

This information provided by the Timereum Dev is good because it gets to the issue.

The issue: NovaExchange is not helping Timereum (TME) and short changing (causing loss of funds) to TME traders.

I am dissappointed in NovaExchange for this.

TME easily had potential to reach 5000 sats + but technical issues and Novaexchange delisting stopped this coin being successful.

TME traders should complain to NovaExchange?

ArkMage

full member

Activity: 170

Merit: 100

Quote from: TimereumDev on August 20, 2017, 05:18:59 PM

The service in the roadmap is the current next step.
That 6-12 months number is for the step after the service.

Really good to hear that! I'm so tired of ICOs around. I wish we can get a nice project without ICO. I have a very good feeling about TME!

TimereumDev

member

Activity: 84

Merit: 10

Quote from: tinyteapot on August 20, 2017, 05:38:07 PM

If this is implemented, it will be automatic. Everyone will have equivalent holdings and genesis holders will have the same number of unused batches at the upload of the new contract. This is relatively far down the road right now, but I believe it's important to consider.

This will really help people who are not tech guy to easily generate their YME.

I read at Novaexchange that tme shall be delisted due to issues unless the matter is addressed by the dev; what have you done towards this problem.

I've emailed them multiple times offering help. They claimed that deposits were occasionally getting "stuck." Nova did not seem to want to investigate (citing lack of time). It's unclear to me why TME was able to trade fine until they delisted it.

Topic: [ANN] TIMEREUM (TME) VERSION 2.0: "ELIXIR" (ELIX) RELEASED (NEW THREAD) - page 30. (Read 126689 times)