If this is implemented, it will be automatic. Everyone will have equivalent holdings and genesis holders will have the same number of unused batches at the upload of the new contract. This is relatively far down the road right now, but I believe it's important to consider.
This will really help people who are not tech guy to easily generate their YME.
I read at Novaexchange that tme shall be delisted due to issues unless the matter is addressed by the dev; what have you done towards this problem.
Topic: [ANN] TIMEREUM (TME) VERSION 2.0: "ELIXIR" (ELIX) RELEASED (NEW THREAD) - page 31. (Read 126698 times)
August 20, 2017, 05:38:07 PM
August 20, 2017, 05:30:05 PM
Dev if you or anyone else can apply to Binance, i think TME community can arrange the funds required to register :
https://binance.zendesk.com/hc/en-us/articles/115000822512-Listing-a-Coin-on-Binance-com
https://binance.zendesk.com/hc/en-us/articles/115000822512-Listing-a-Coin-on-Binance-com
August 20, 2017, 05:22:30 PM
Rebranding
I have the intention of rebranding TME under a different, better name. This would likely not occur for 6-12 months. A snapshot of holdings and genesis batches would be taken, and a newer contract deployed.
This would also give the opportunity to make the base token fully compatible and have it implement totalSupply(). This would allow the base token to be traded on EtherDelta and other decentralized exchanges. The situation with Nova has brought to my attention that using only centralized exchanges to trade puts the token holders at the mercy of exchange issues.
This would also give the opportunity to make the base token fully compatible and have it implement totalSupply(). This would allow the base token to be traded on EtherDelta and other decentralized exchanges. The situation with Nova has brought to my attention that using only centralized exchanges to trade puts the token holders at the mercy of exchange issues.
Exchanges
Although I understand the desire to trade, I think that the value of the base token should be based on the delivery of a service. Therefore I am advocating to wait until the new service is released and the base token rebranded to trade the base token. If an exchange picks TME up in the meantime, that is fine. If the community wants to work to put TME on more exchanges, they can. I do understand that NovaExchange gained TME a lot of publicity.
"A snapshot of holdings and genesis batches would be taken", does that mean we'd have to do anything on our end to get this coin if say we are storing everything in myetherwallet? My concern is forgetting to come back in 6 months then finding out that I missed my chance to convert TME to x other coin all due to not checking this forum everyday.
No need to do anything.
So does that mean it'll show up in myetherwallet (or whatever wallet being used) automatically as a new token? You'll send the equivalent (or maybe double
) of this new token to all the addresses that currently own TME? If this is implemented, it will be automatic. Everyone will have equivalent holdings and genesis holders will have the same number of unused batches at the upload of the new contract. This is relatively far down the road right now, but I believe it's important to consider.
Thanks for the update. It sounds like it would be a pretty painless transition for the genesis account holders. That's always a good thing.
August 20, 2017, 05:20:41 PM
Am willing to sell 25k out of my stash. 450sat you either pay for escrow or send btc first. The rule does not apply to sr members in good standing i.e (no negative trust) and up. Send PM
August 20, 2017, 05:18:59 PM
Rebranding
I have the intention of rebranding TME under a different, better name. This would likely not occur for 6-12 months. A snapshot of holdings and genesis batches would be taken, and a newer contract deployed.
This would also give the opportunity to make the base token fully compatible and have it implement totalSupply(). This would allow the base token to be traded on EtherDelta and other decentralized exchanges. The situation with Nova has brought to my attention that using only centralized exchanges to trade puts the token holders at the mercy of exchange issues.
This would also give the opportunity to make the base token fully compatible and have it implement totalSupply(). This would allow the base token to be traded on EtherDelta and other decentralized exchanges. The situation with Nova has brought to my attention that using only centralized exchanges to trade puts the token holders at the mercy of exchange issues.
Exchanges
Although I understand the desire to trade, I think that the value of the base token should be based on the delivery of a service. Therefore I am advocating to wait until the new service is released and the base token rebranded to trade the base token. If an exchange picks TME up in the meantime, that is fine. If the community wants to work to put TME on more exchanges, they can. I do understand that NovaExchange gained TME a lot of publicity.
I bought approximately 7000 TME on NovaExchange prior to halting of trading.
Based on delisting notice, as recommended, I withdrew my 7000 TME off www.novaexchange.com to www.myetherwallet.com
What is the next step? What can I do with these Timereum (TME) tokens?
PS. 6 to 12 months is a long time for investors to wait to get btc back? Can we work on a faster plan.
The service in the roadmap is the current next step.
That 6-12 months number is for the step after the service.
August 20, 2017, 05:11:23 PM
Rebranding
I have the intention of rebranding TME under a different, better name. This would likely not occur for 6-12 months. A snapshot of holdings and genesis batches would be taken, and a newer contract deployed.
This would also give the opportunity to make the base token fully compatible and have it implement totalSupply(). This would allow the base token to be traded on EtherDelta and other decentralized exchanges. The situation with Nova has brought to my attention that using only centralized exchanges to trade puts the token holders at the mercy of exchange issues.
This would also give the opportunity to make the base token fully compatible and have it implement totalSupply(). This would allow the base token to be traded on EtherDelta and other decentralized exchanges. The situation with Nova has brought to my attention that using only centralized exchanges to trade puts the token holders at the mercy of exchange issues.
Exchanges
Although I understand the desire to trade, I think that the value of the base token should be based on the delivery of a service. Therefore I am advocating to wait until the new service is released and the base token rebranded to trade the base token. If an exchange picks TME up in the meantime, that is fine. If the community wants to work to put TME on more exchanges, they can. I do understand that NovaExchange gained TME a lot of publicity.
I bought approximately 7000 TME on NovaExchange prior to halting of trading.
Based on delisting notice, as recommended, I withdrew my 7000 TME off www.novaexchange.com to www.myetherwallet.com
What is the next step? What can I do with these Timereum (TME) tokens?
PS. 6 to 12 months is a long time for investors to wait to get btc back? Can we work on a faster plan.
August 20, 2017, 04:37:34 PM
Sounds dodgy to me.
August 20, 2017, 04:34:21 PM
Rebranding
I have the intention of rebranding TME under a different, better name. This would likely not occur for 6-12 months. A snapshot of holdings and genesis batches would be taken, and a newer contract deployed.
This would also give the opportunity to make the base token fully compatible and have it implement totalSupply(). This would allow the base token to be traded on EtherDelta and other decentralized exchanges. The situation with Nova has brought to my attention that using only centralized exchanges to trade puts the token holders at the mercy of exchange issues.
This would also give the opportunity to make the base token fully compatible and have it implement totalSupply(). This would allow the base token to be traded on EtherDelta and other decentralized exchanges. The situation with Nova has brought to my attention that using only centralized exchanges to trade puts the token holders at the mercy of exchange issues.
Exchanges
Although I understand the desire to trade, I think that the value of the base token should be based on the delivery of a service. Therefore I am advocating to wait until the new service is released and the base token rebranded to trade the base token. If an exchange picks TME up in the meantime, that is fine. If the community wants to work to put TME on more exchanges, they can. I do understand that NovaExchange gained TME a lot of publicity.
I think you posted here that you're gonna work full time on timereum after it will hit exchanges. And now 6-12 for rebranding? Does that mean that the project is dead??? I simply don't understand that long timeline. Now TME got momentum and lots of people know about it. In 6 months everyone will forget it!
Indeed. Based on that estimated timeline this might very well be DOA project. Time is money (literally in the case of TME) and it should be obvious the crypto world isn't going to sit still for 6 - 12 months for a crypto project that got reset before it even got off its first exchange.
It appears my decision to not mine my TME and sell at the ATH or thereabout (and make a sizable ~$1K) was naive. Oh well.
Lol, my post is not meant for you Conier. My guess is you willing to wait it out. it's meant for those that aren't interested in waiting.
But yeah I paid 100sat before it hit the exchange. Now it's been delisted, and there is no exchange, so the price reverts back to what I was paying before it hit the exchange.
If it doesn't suit you. Cry me a river and hold, but for those that hold a large amount and don't feel like holding. I Can buy it off you. Anyway, I will do you a favor and make it all bold
But yeah I paid 100sat before it hit the exchange. Now it's been delisted, and there is no exchange, so the price reverts back to what I was paying before it hit the exchange.
If it doesn't suit you. Cry me a river and hold, but for those that hold a large amount and don't feel like holding. I Can buy it off you. Anyway, I will do you a favor and make it all bold
Bravo!
[ -- snip --]
At 0.000001 BTC. Again, good luck with that.
And oh, you might want to work on your marketing skills.
Lol. Am retracting my offer anyway. I got enough coins for 6-12 months. Rather invest in something that's immediately tangible.
Sure you have and sure you do. I did wish you good luck though.
August 20, 2017, 04:12:46 PM
Rebranding
I have the intention of rebranding TME under a different, better name. This would likely not occur for 6-12 months. A snapshot of holdings and genesis batches would be taken, and a newer contract deployed.
This would also give the opportunity to make the base token fully compatible and have it implement totalSupply(). This would allow the base token to be traded on EtherDelta and other decentralized exchanges. The situation with Nova has brought to my attention that using only centralized exchanges to trade puts the token holders at the mercy of exchange issues.
This would also give the opportunity to make the base token fully compatible and have it implement totalSupply(). This would allow the base token to be traded on EtherDelta and other decentralized exchanges. The situation with Nova has brought to my attention that using only centralized exchanges to trade puts the token holders at the mercy of exchange issues.
Exchanges
Although I understand the desire to trade, I think that the value of the base token should be based on the delivery of a service. Therefore I am advocating to wait until the new service is released and the base token rebranded to trade the base token. If an exchange picks TME up in the meantime, that is fine. If the community wants to work to put TME on more exchanges, they can. I do understand that NovaExchange gained TME a lot of publicity.
"A snapshot of holdings and genesis batches would be taken", does that mean we'd have to do anything on our end to get this coin if say we are storing everything in myetherwallet? My concern is forgetting to come back in 6 months then finding out that I missed my chance to convert TME to x other coin all due to not checking this forum everyday.
No need to do anything.
So does that mean it'll show up in myetherwallet (or whatever wallet being used) automatically as a new token? You'll send the equivalent (or maybe double
) of this new token to all the addresses that currently own TME? If this is implemented, it will be automatic. Everyone will have equivalent holdings and genesis holders will have the same number of unused batches at the upload of the new contract. This is relatively far down the road right now, but I believe it's important to consider.
Ah ok thanks for clearing that up. So I will continue to save my tme
August 20, 2017, 04:11:21 PM
Rebranding
I have the intention of rebranding TME under a different, better name. This would likely not occur for 6-12 months. A snapshot of holdings and genesis batches would be taken, and a newer contract deployed.
This would also give the opportunity to make the base token fully compatible and have it implement totalSupply(). This would allow the base token to be traded on EtherDelta and other decentralized exchanges. The situation with Nova has brought to my attention that using only centralized exchanges to trade puts the token holders at the mercy of exchange issues.
This would also give the opportunity to make the base token fully compatible and have it implement totalSupply(). This would allow the base token to be traded on EtherDelta and other decentralized exchanges. The situation with Nova has brought to my attention that using only centralized exchanges to trade puts the token holders at the mercy of exchange issues.
Exchanges
Although I understand the desire to trade, I think that the value of the base token should be based on the delivery of a service. Therefore I am advocating to wait until the new service is released and the base token rebranded to trade the base token. If an exchange picks TME up in the meantime, that is fine. If the community wants to work to put TME on more exchanges, they can. I do understand that NovaExchange gained TME a lot of publicity.
"A snapshot of holdings and genesis batches would be taken", does that mean we'd have to do anything on our end to get this coin if say we are storing everything in myetherwallet? My concern is forgetting to come back in 6 months then finding out that I missed my chance to convert TME to x other coin all due to not checking this forum everyday.
No need to do anything.
So does that mean it'll show up in myetherwallet (or whatever wallet being used) automatically as a new token? You'll send the equivalent (or maybe double
) of this new token to all the addresses that currently own TME? Yes, I'm confused about this also, does this mean that we will get the equivalent of the new token from what we have remaining of tme? Or can we mine and trade our current batches of tme and start over again when the new token is finished? Basically do we get the same amount of the new token for what we have left of tme at the time of release?
August 20, 2017, 04:08:29 PM
Rebranding
I have the intention of rebranding TME under a different, better name. This would likely not occur for 6-12 months. A snapshot of holdings and genesis batches would be taken, and a newer contract deployed.
This would also give the opportunity to make the base token fully compatible and have it implement totalSupply(). This would allow the base token to be traded on EtherDelta and other decentralized exchanges. The situation with Nova has brought to my attention that using only centralized exchanges to trade puts the token holders at the mercy of exchange issues.
This would also give the opportunity to make the base token fully compatible and have it implement totalSupply(). This would allow the base token to be traded on EtherDelta and other decentralized exchanges. The situation with Nova has brought to my attention that using only centralized exchanges to trade puts the token holders at the mercy of exchange issues.
Exchanges
Although I understand the desire to trade, I think that the value of the base token should be based on the delivery of a service. Therefore I am advocating to wait until the new service is released and the base token rebranded to trade the base token. If an exchange picks TME up in the meantime, that is fine. If the community wants to work to put TME on more exchanges, they can. I do understand that NovaExchange gained TME a lot of publicity.
"A snapshot of holdings and genesis batches would be taken", does that mean we'd have to do anything on our end to get this coin if say we are storing everything in myetherwallet? My concern is forgetting to come back in 6 months then finding out that I missed my chance to convert TME to x other coin all due to not checking this forum everyday.
No need to do anything.
So does that mean it'll show up in myetherwallet (or whatever wallet being used) automatically as a new token? You'll send the equivalent (or maybe double
) of this new token to all the addresses that currently own TME? If this is implemented, it will be automatic. Everyone will have equivalent holdings and genesis holders will have the same number of unused batches at the upload of the new contract. This is relatively far down the road right now, but I believe it's important to consider.
August 20, 2017, 04:05:24 PM
Rebranding
I have the intention of rebranding TME under a different, better name. This would likely not occur for 6-12 months. A snapshot of holdings and genesis batches would be taken, and a newer contract deployed.
This would also give the opportunity to make the base token fully compatible and have it implement totalSupply(). This would allow the base token to be traded on EtherDelta and other decentralized exchanges. The situation with Nova has brought to my attention that using only centralized exchanges to trade puts the token holders at the mercy of exchange issues.
This would also give the opportunity to make the base token fully compatible and have it implement totalSupply(). This would allow the base token to be traded on EtherDelta and other decentralized exchanges. The situation with Nova has brought to my attention that using only centralized exchanges to trade puts the token holders at the mercy of exchange issues.
Exchanges
Although I understand the desire to trade, I think that the value of the base token should be based on the delivery of a service. Therefore I am advocating to wait until the new service is released and the base token rebranded to trade the base token. If an exchange picks TME up in the meantime, that is fine. If the community wants to work to put TME on more exchanges, they can. I do understand that NovaExchange gained TME a lot of publicity.
I think you posted here that you're gonna work full time on timereum after it will hit exchanges. And now 6-12 for rebranding? Does that mean that the project is dead??? I simply don't understand that long timeline. Now TME got momentum and lots of people know about it. In 6 months everyone will forget it!
Priority is on producing the service.
Then, rebranding the base token.
Then, possibility improving the service and adding features.
Project is just getting started. Far from dead.
Not opposed to putting on exchanges. Just giving long term plans.
I would also recommend not to take pause and keep momentum going, where Dev team can work on product development while token still remains active in exchanges, this leaves a trail and history which will be helpful in future as well.
We can make a road map as to when and how this transition will happen but lets keep this momentum going
August 20, 2017, 03:59:16 PM
Rebranding
I have the intention of rebranding TME under a different, better name. This would likely not occur for 6-12 months. A snapshot of holdings and genesis batches would be taken, and a newer contract deployed.
This would also give the opportunity to make the base token fully compatible and have it implement totalSupply(). This would allow the base token to be traded on EtherDelta and other decentralized exchanges. The situation with Nova has brought to my attention that using only centralized exchanges to trade puts the token holders at the mercy of exchange issues.
This would also give the opportunity to make the base token fully compatible and have it implement totalSupply(). This would allow the base token to be traded on EtherDelta and other decentralized exchanges. The situation with Nova has brought to my attention that using only centralized exchanges to trade puts the token holders at the mercy of exchange issues.
Exchanges
Although I understand the desire to trade, I think that the value of the base token should be based on the delivery of a service. Therefore I am advocating to wait until the new service is released and the base token rebranded to trade the base token. If an exchange picks TME up in the meantime, that is fine. If the community wants to work to put TME on more exchanges, they can. I do understand that NovaExchange gained TME a lot of publicity.
"A snapshot of holdings and genesis batches would be taken", does that mean we'd have to do anything on our end to get this coin if say we are storing everything in myetherwallet? My concern is forgetting to come back in 6 months then finding out that I missed my chance to convert TME to x other coin all due to not checking this forum everyday.
No need to do anything.
So does that mean it'll show up in myetherwallet (or whatever wallet being used) automatically as a new token? You'll send the equivalent (or maybe double
) of this new token to all the addresses that currently own TME? August 20, 2017, 03:56:31 PM
Lol, my post is not meant for you Conier. My guess is you willing to wait it out. it's meant for those that aren't interested in waiting.
But yeah I paid 100sat before it hit the exchange. Now it's been delisted, and there is no exchange, so the price reverts back to what I was paying before it hit the exchange.
If it doesn't suit you. Cry me a river and hold, but for those that hold a large amount and don't feel like holding. I Can buy it off you. Anyway, I will do you a favor and make it all bold
But yeah I paid 100sat before it hit the exchange. Now it's been delisted, and there is no exchange, so the price reverts back to what I was paying before it hit the exchange.
If it doesn't suit you. Cry me a river and hold, but for those that hold a large amount and don't feel like holding. I Can buy it off you. Anyway, I will do you a favor and make it all bold
Bravo!
[ -- snip --]
At 0.000001 BTC. Again, good luck with that.
And oh, you might want to work on your marketing skills.
Lol. Am retracting my offer anyway. I got enough coins for 6-12 months. Rather invest in something that's immediately tangible.
August 20, 2017, 03:55:07 PM
Rebranding
I have the intention of rebranding TME under a different, better name. This would likely not occur for 6-12 months. A snapshot of holdings and genesis batches would be taken, and a newer contract deployed.
This would also give the opportunity to make the base token fully compatible and have it implement totalSupply(). This would allow the base token to be traded on EtherDelta and other decentralized exchanges. The situation with Nova has brought to my attention that using only centralized exchanges to trade puts the token holders at the mercy of exchange issues.
This would also give the opportunity to make the base token fully compatible and have it implement totalSupply(). This would allow the base token to be traded on EtherDelta and other decentralized exchanges. The situation with Nova has brought to my attention that using only centralized exchanges to trade puts the token holders at the mercy of exchange issues.
Exchanges
Although I understand the desire to trade, I think that the value of the base token should be based on the delivery of a service. Therefore I am advocating to wait until the new service is released and the base token rebranded to trade the base token. If an exchange picks TME up in the meantime, that is fine. If the community wants to work to put TME on more exchanges, they can. I do understand that NovaExchange gained TME a lot of publicity.
"A snapshot of holdings and genesis batches would be taken", does that mean we'd have to do anything on our end to get this coin if say we are storing everything in myetherwallet? My concern is forgetting to come back in 6 months then finding out that I missed my chance to convert TME to x other coin all due to not checking this forum everyday.
No need to do anything.
August 20, 2017, 03:53:13 PM
Rebranding
I have the intention of rebranding TME under a different, better name. This would likely not occur for 6-12 months. A snapshot of holdings and genesis batches would be taken, and a newer contract deployed.
This would also give the opportunity to make the base token fully compatible and have it implement totalSupply(). This would allow the base token to be traded on EtherDelta and other decentralized exchanges. The situation with Nova has brought to my attention that using only centralized exchanges to trade puts the token holders at the mercy of exchange issues.
This would also give the opportunity to make the base token fully compatible and have it implement totalSupply(). This would allow the base token to be traded on EtherDelta and other decentralized exchanges. The situation with Nova has brought to my attention that using only centralized exchanges to trade puts the token holders at the mercy of exchange issues.
Exchanges
Although I understand the desire to trade, I think that the value of the base token should be based on the delivery of a service. Therefore I am advocating to wait until the new service is released and the base token rebranded to trade the base token. If an exchange picks TME up in the meantime, that is fine. If the community wants to work to put TME on more exchanges, they can. I do understand that NovaExchange gained TME a lot of publicity.
"A snapshot of holdings and genesis batches would be taken", does that mean we'd have to do anything on our end to get this coin if say we are storing everything in myetherwallet? My concern is forgetting to come back in 6 months then finding out that I missed my chance to convert TME to x other coin all due to not checking this forum everyday.
August 20, 2017, 03:44:01 PM
Lol, my post is not meant for you Conier. My guess is you willing to wait it out. it's meant for those that aren't interested in waiting.
But yeah I paid 100sat before it hit the exchange. Now it's been delisted, and there is no exchange, so the price reverts back to what I was paying before it hit the exchange.
If it doesn't suit you. Cry me a river and hold, but for those that hold a large amount and don't feel like holding. I Can buy it off you. Anyway, I will do you a favor and make it all bold
But yeah I paid 100sat before it hit the exchange. Now it's been delisted, and there is no exchange, so the price reverts back to what I was paying before it hit the exchange.
If it doesn't suit you. Cry me a river and hold, but for those that hold a large amount and don't feel like holding. I Can buy it off you. Anyway, I will do you a favor and make it all bold
Bravo!
[ -- snip --]
At 0.000001 BTC. Again, good luck with that.
And oh, you might want to work on your marketing skills.
August 20, 2017, 03:41:53 PM
Rebranding
I have the intention of rebranding TME under a different, better name. This would likely not occur for 6-12 months. A snapshot of holdings and genesis batches would be taken, and a newer contract deployed.
This would also give the opportunity to make the base token fully compatible and have it implement totalSupply(). This would allow the base token to be traded on EtherDelta and other decentralized exchanges. The situation with Nova has brought to my attention that using only centralized exchanges to trade puts the token holders at the mercy of exchange issues.
This would also give the opportunity to make the base token fully compatible and have it implement totalSupply(). This would allow the base token to be traded on EtherDelta and other decentralized exchanges. The situation with Nova has brought to my attention that using only centralized exchanges to trade puts the token holders at the mercy of exchange issues.
Exchanges
Although I understand the desire to trade, I think that the value of the base token should be based on the delivery of a service. Therefore I am advocating to wait until the new service is released and the base token rebranded to trade the base token. If an exchange picks TME up in the meantime, that is fine. If the community wants to work to put TME on more exchanges, they can. I do understand that NovaExchange gained TME a lot of publicity.
I think you posted here that you're gonna work full time on timereum after it will hit exchanges. And now 6-12 for rebranding? Does that mean that the project is dead??? I simply don't understand that long timeline. Now TME got momentum and lots of people know about it. In 6 months everyone will forget it!
Priority is on producing the service.
Then, rebranding the base token.
Then, possibility improving the service and adding features.
Project is just getting started. Far from dead.
Not opposed to putting on exchanges. Just giving long term plans.
August 20, 2017, 03:27:51 PM
Rebranding
I have the intention of rebranding TME under a different, better name. This would likely not occur for 6-12 months. A snapshot of holdings and genesis batches would be taken, and a newer contract deployed.
This would also give the opportunity to make the base token fully compatible and have it implement totalSupply(). This would allow the base token to be traded on EtherDelta and other decentralized exchanges. The situation with Nova has brought to my attention that using only centralized exchanges to trade puts the token holders at the mercy of exchange issues.
This would also give the opportunity to make the base token fully compatible and have it implement totalSupply(). This would allow the base token to be traded on EtherDelta and other decentralized exchanges. The situation with Nova has brought to my attention that using only centralized exchanges to trade puts the token holders at the mercy of exchange issues.
Exchanges
Although I understand the desire to trade, I think that the value of the base token should be based on the delivery of a service. Therefore I am advocating to wait until the new service is released and the base token rebranded to trade the base token. If an exchange picks TME up in the meantime, that is fine. If the community wants to work to put TME on more exchanges, they can. I do understand that NovaExchange gained TME a lot of publicity.
I think you posted here that you're gonna work full time on timereum after it will hit exchanges. And now 6-12 for rebranding? Does that mean that the project is dead??? I simply don't understand that long timeline. Now TME got momentum and lots of people know about it. In 6 months everyone will forget it!
August 20, 2017, 03:25:25 PM
So people will be swapping tokens?
You obviously can't take their genesis addresses, so they will have to spend all their batches?
You obviously can't take their genesis addresses, so they will have to spend all their batches?
In terms of rebranding, you'll still have the same number of unused batches and balance if the switch is made.
People will be converting tokens (TME) to join the service.
Jump to: