Topic: [ANN] [TOR] Torcoin - X11 PoW - Tor Integrated Crypto - Torcoin.org - page 37. (Read 125364 times)

I doubt the admins care.  The funny thing is, it specifically states on the torcoin.org website which branch of the QT wallet opens a TOR node and which does not.  So the feedback is not only FUD, but it's also just plain wrong.

what the hell? let the admins know that they need to investigate this matter.

Some asshole was paid by rival coin to give me neg. trust for no reason. I have never traded on here or engaged in any transactions.  Just a FUD trust score, to go with the FUD in the thread.  Doesn't bother me - look at the TorCoin price today :-)

ibminer left him red feedback because it wasn't stated the tor branch needs to be downloaded for tor to be integrated


That's very untrue because what the hell are all the people doing here then 
It's just that on bitcointalk you'll get a lot of comments from people who aren't investing in the said project

But there are ofcourse those who will.

keep in mind the amount of FUD on the Dash thread (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1864282.new#new) far outweighs the FUD on the TorCoin thread ..

and look at the price of Dash :-)

Conclusion; almost no crypto investing comes from Bitcointalk

trust -2, trade with extreme caution? what happened there? 

Lol it IS integrated.  As shown on the website:

'Download the latest version of TorCoin

Download the fully TOR-integrated linux version here
This will create a Tor node, so make sure that Tor is legal in your country before using '

MacOS and windows are NOT yet integrated, but will be soon (under 2 weeks)

TorCoin very strong today on heavy trading ..

as you can see, the FUD here has zero effect :-)

I can not set up my BAIKAL for coin mining. Please skip the working pools. Maybe I'm doing something wrong 

For the record, before I did a re-analysis of the mac qt, the last scan was done yesterday. I'm curious as to why nobody posted the results of the Mac wallet here?

Technically, if the developer is claiming that the product is doing one thing, while the actual product is doing another, it is a scam.

Merriam Webster defines a "scam" as:




Because OP is claiming that the QT wallet is fully integrated with the Tor network, and it is not, it could be considered "scammy". OP, for transparency, you should write a disclaimer or a clause on the top post explaining that a tor-integrated wallet will be available at a certain time.

I'm not one to easily give in to negativity and "fud" (if you wanna call it that), but @SysFailure0x5a has provided a lot of facts that have gone unanswered by the OP.

I know that there isn't much of an effect on your traffic via this forum, but transparency is extremely important at the launch of a product. I don't mean to continue harping on the issue, but I'm just speaking my mind.

I bought a good amount of TOR a few days ago for $0.95, so good to see that I'm already in the black.

I'm currently using a Mac with macOS Sierra (Version 10.12.4) installed, and I'm comfortably running the wallet that I downloaded from torcoin.org. Why? Because as far as I'm concerned, there is no threat to Mac users running the wallet, as per virustotal.com's analysis of the Mac wallet. Check for yourself: https://virustotal.com/en/file/47ce6dd660a6820ea911f5ae4942c394ab83281fac4cc9baeb2278603b3d6317/analysis/1495141363/




All in all, I've come to my own conclusion about this dilemma, and it's as follows:

Fuck PC. It's all about Mac.

Yeah, same thing with me, guess we'll see in a while  

https://www.virustotal.com/hr/file/d2efdd54f98bd45c7dc572ad84b071ccfdf20b9f25757ff052b96721d5e1e1d2/analysis/

Also, note that ESET and Bitdefender mark the file as safe as the analysis is updated to 1 hour ago instead of 1 week ago

I was redirected to this url: https://secure.avg.com/submit-sample.tpl-stdfull
I don't know if it did actually send the false positive claim.

So you didn't get the same blank page as I did? 

Leave your TOR addy

Great news!
Now I am confident to download the wallet without any trouble.

I am going to submit that right now, will update once done.

Edit: submitted the false positive claim

The problem with Poloniex is paying won't get us listed there just like that, we gotta show we have a dedicated community and nice trading volume.
I believe we have already created a decent community for this coin!

All we gotta do now is get some trades going

Anyways, we've got new vids coming from the Torcoin challenge!

https://youtu.be/oUmJVBXS2Ho

https://youtu.be/AglkL4J9IiM

I have already gotten 1 antivirus reply!

http://prntscr.com/f9dpkl





0.5 TOR to the one who submits the file to
https://secure.avg.com/submit-sample

Insert the link
https://torcoin.org/TorCoinWindows1.0.zip

And upload the same zip, adding to the comments that the Torcoin-qt.exe gets detected as malicious.

oh you are right, i just forget about it but the volume on nova is very bad, i only use c-cex for now, well then i think we can aim higher with poloniex and skip cryptopia if there are funds to run a signature campaign there should be also funds for listen this coin on poloniex

Thank you very much Iluvbitcoins for your response to me and on the thread here, rest assured you are a trusted guy really. Now I am not worried anymore.

EDIT: BTW, I also scanned it with Avira and there's no threat found.

We already are at NovaExchange


True, some people might dump it, but it's important to get users involved with Torcoin, aka. to create a community!

After all a coin is as good as its community is

bittrex and poloniex are too expensive better to try with novaexchange first, they require only to vote to get your coin listed, while the other require you to pay 1 btc or more