On the question of being trustworthy and well intentioned, let's compare TorBroker to Silk Road, another anonymously run business that has proven to be trustworthy. Silk Road holds modest amounts of user funds for relatively short periods of time, whereas TorBroker is designed to hold large amounts of savings for long periods of time. This gives TorBroker a much greater incentive to take the money and run at some point. The ratio of funds held : future possible profits is much higher than Silk Road.
Holding large amounts of savings for long periods of time is one way to use our service but far from the only one. It is entirely possible to deposit today, enter a position for 1 day, and then cash out gains. With our upcoming support for leveraged trading this will be even more attractive.
In fact, from the general security principle of decentralization, we want to encourage customers to hold their own funds if they are not actively trading.
Also note that it is currently not possible to hold Bitcoin balances at TorBroker - all balances and positions are denominated in USD. If we wanted to build up a large amount of customer holdings to run away with, we would probably have allowed customers to keep balances in BTC, because our target segment is generally long BTC.
However, we think the most important argument for our trustworthiness is the transparency of our business model. With a 1% commission on all trades (with a current minimum of $10), it is simply much more profitable for us to run a long term sustainable business than to deceive our customers.
If they cannot remain anonymous, they will likely be shut down and depositor funds will be very much at risk. TorBroker states that they sell the bitcoins for dollars, deposit them in a brokerage account and purchase the underlying security. This is traceable activity subject to AML requirements and would be difficult to hide long term. Law enforcement could open TorBroker accounts, make trades and try to find the corresponding trades made through mainstream brokerages.
Even though the activity of TorBroker is in a grey zone because ownership of securities are never legally transferred from us to customers and thus not a subject for law enforcement to scrutinize, this is a very important issue to raise and something that we have thought extensively about and which we will address in the following way:
All activity in the regulated markets is registered and potentially subject to examination by suspecting regulatory parties. In order to prevent third parties from linking the trading activity at TorBroker to activity in the real markets, TorBroker will randomly split all orders up and execute these through different legal entities on different brokers. Significant activity also allows us to subtract opposite customer positions from each other, obfuscating even further the origin of our activity in the regulated markets.
In this way the trading activity of TorBroker will “show up” in the real market as an unintelligible and untraceable mosaic of transactions by various smaller entities. TorBroker has a huge vested interest in evading the potential wrath of regulators and we will carefully seek to minimize the systemic risks of our service.