I have read the article and i only wonder to few things, NEM dead due to being stolen is too cheap to say, ethereum was massively stolen too, bitcoin too and did they die?
And Universa dead due to management feud, some feud we didnt notice? It fits perfectly for cobinhood but for Universa? If they would write "lack of marketing", missmanagement, too slow progress, alle anderen JA JA JA JA JA JA, but ausgerechnet feud? Cobinhood had much larger marketcap and is dying due to missmanagement, they picked the wrong beast.
And Universa dead due to management feud, some feud we didnt notice? It fits perfectly for cobinhood but for Universa? If they would write "lack of marketing", missmanagement, too slow progress, alle anderen JA JA JA JA JA JA, but ausgerechnet feud? Cobinhood had much larger marketcap and is dying due to missmanagement, they picked the wrong beast.
Yes, I completely agree. Why is NEM considered dead? Many top cryptos were stolen at some point, so what? The same goes for Universa. Why it's dead if there were some disagreements in management. Maybe Bitcoin is also dead if Satoshi left the project
hm..Why people suddenly started to think that cointelegraph is reliable crypto news site? Because of its nice cartoon pics? It never was a good source to trust.
Well, I gotta say that their articles are really easy to read. Maybe that's what people like. But yes, this particular article is low-grade.
That happens quite often with Cointelegraph. Short articles, no analysis.
Universa is well on track, anyone who follows Universa's development and has a few braincells can see that. 
