As it was mentioned before, we didn't want to use bitcointalk. We welcomed, and even asked for questions to be sent directly to wampumcoin.com
I see, a person who holds everyone to explain why they're not perfect. Should I assume that you include yourself? Yes, I'm a majority shareholder of bitcoin corporation, who owns the pool.
I handle the paperwork for the corporation, but I don't run the pool. Brad does, but at the end of the day, it's on me. The coins were not stolen.
"a readiness to believe things". Credulous. So I said YOU WERE NOT, but you're all over me about a dictionary. You can dish it out, that's for sure.
The coin assets were sold to BC and contrary to this story being true and that reason being not, I've learned the hard way some things that need to be done. I most certainly had a window where I could have killed the original fork completely when I saw the problems, but I wanted and pretty much still do, want to give it my best and if goes down, it'll be with a fight on my end.
As for name dropping, I didn't object to my people dropping them, because they're based on 100% absolute truth and for the crap us four little guys were dealing with I was like "tell it". But, as you can see a little, I have no problem with saying "I was wrong", or "I apologize, let me make it right" if I'm convinced I should.
I don't think that a lot of long term businesses like to spend a lot of time logging in to a 3rd party system to defend itself or do damage control and when they can't make it, it's held against them. I've seen it happen to some sites here who had to subsequently get away and went on to be successful and spend their time bring productive in other areas. And I think that's what happening here. Perhaps I'm wrong.
Peter
On that and that point only. As for the rest of the issues, your actions will speak louder than words.