[ANN] [XMG] MAGI | CPU mining | mPoW | mPoS | [MagiPay] - page 1034.

Spexx

sr. member

Activity: 350

Merit: 250

Mining Co-operative

Quote from: NewtonsMthd on January 29, 2015, 06:02:05 PM

Quote from: joelao95 on January 29, 2015, 02:47:30 PM

Quote from: NewtonsMthd on January 29, 2015, 01:18:01 PM

Any way to check via the command line? Didn't see anything in the header files.

USE: getinfo, and locate a line "expected time ...", notice the expected time is only an estimate.

There is no "expected time..." line in the getinfo output...

I think Joe meant to say use getmininginfo Wink

Mergesort

full member

Activity: 140

Merit: 100

Quote from: Spexx on January 29, 2015, 05:33:05 PM

Quote from: Mergesort on January 29, 2015, 05:19:35 PM

I got a i5 2500 @ ~4,5ghz. right now i am getting ~55khs/s, is that normal or is there a way to improve my rate?

Is that overclocked?

I would expect you to be able to get a bit more out of it than 55 Kh/s. What operating system do you have and what minerd are you using?

yes it's overclocked, iam on widows 8.1 and iam using your latest 64 bit miner. Would -e cpu_efficiency improve anything

NewtonsMthd

newbie

Activity: 19

Merit: 0

Quote from: joelao95 on January 29, 2015, 02:47:30 PM

Quote from: NewtonsMthd on January 29, 2015, 01:18:01 PM

Any way to check via the command line? Didn't see anything in the header files.

USE: getinfo, and locate a line "expected time ...", notice the expected time is only an estimate.

There is no "expected time..." line in the getinfo output...

hefty

full member

Activity: 168

Merit: 100

Quote from: Spexx on January 29, 2015, 05:33:05 PM

Quote from: Mergesort on January 29, 2015, 05:19:35 PM

I got a i5 2500 @ ~4,5ghz. right now i am getting ~55khs/s, is that normal or is there a way to improve my rate?

Is that overclocked?

I would expect you to be able to get a bit more out of it than 55 Kh/s. What operating system do you have and what minerd are you using?

thats 13,75 per core thats faster than any amd per core at that clock i5 4690k is hashing 15 per core at 4.6 ghz
i think thats about that but i cant be sure i dont have that cpu, i think that hyperthreaded intels are best with these miners although they have same number of physical cores they give 35/40% better hash.

Spexx

sr. member

Activity: 350

Merit: 250

Mining Co-operative

Quote from: Mergesort on January 29, 2015, 05:19:35 PM

I got a i5 2500 @ ~4,5ghz. right now i am getting ~55khs/s, is that normal or is there a way to improve my rate?

Is that overclocked?

I would expect you to be able to get a bit more out of it than 55 Kh/s. What operating system do you have and what minerd are you using?

The Frisian

legendary

Activity: 1019

Merit: 1003

Senior Developer and founder of ViMeAv ICT

the block amount is already gone down,
because of the new miners, i suppose

Spexx

sr. member

Activity: 350

Merit: 250

Mining Co-operative

Quote from: hefty on January 29, 2015, 05:01:40 PM

your first miner is still the fastest one on haswells , but only if you load 8 instances for 8 threads this one is fastest one if you load only one instance for 8 threads , but it gives me 2 more khash on phenom than your first one, i need to test on others

Thanks for the feedback, which is always appreciated.

Yeah that first 64 bit one built with Cygwin64 was not bad at all, except for the multiple threads issue and all the required dll files. This latest version matches the performance without the issues. I will be playing around with AVX and AVX2 support to see what I can do to improve matters there.

I just received some very generous donations. Thank you! I love this coin

Mergesort

full member

Activity: 140

Merit: 100

I got a i5 2500 @ ~4,5ghz. right now i am getting ~55khs/s, is that normal or is there a way to improve my rate?

hefty

full member

Activity: 168

Merit: 100

Quote from: Spexx on January 29, 2015, 04:52:58 PM

Quote from: JasonXtreme on January 29, 2015, 04:05:30 PM

EDIT: And yet I get 56.5Khash/s using only 5 of my 8 threads... Undecided

This should mean I could get about 80 running full speed, no?

No, unfortunately, not quite. With 5/8 running there is very little competition for CPU time and you will see a high hashrate per thread. As you load up towards the maximum 8/8 then the hashrate per thread will reduce a bit, although running 8/8 will give you maximum total hashrate.

your first miner is still the fastest one on haswells , but only if you load 8 instances for 8 threads this one is fastest one if you load only one instance for 8 threads , but it gives me 2 more khash on phenom than your first one, i need to test on others

Spexx

sr. member

Activity: 350

Merit: 250

Mining Co-operative

Quote from: JasonXtreme on January 29, 2015, 04:05:30 PM

EDIT: And yet I get 56.5Khash/s using only 5 of my 8 threads... Undecided

This should mean I could get about 80 running full speed, no?

No, unfortunately, not quite. With 5/8 running there is very little competition for CPU time and you will see a high hashrate per thread. As you load up towards the maximum 8/8 then the hashrate per thread will reduce a bit, although running 8/8 will give you maximum total hashrate.

jawitech

full member

Activity: 196

Merit: 100

Quote from: JasonXtreme on January 29, 2015, 04:05:30 PM

This one is a beast Cheesy

I agree. With the improved miners from wolf0 and Joe I doubled my hashrate but yours gets the most out of my crappy old AMD without the problem with the 2 others that my windows gets problems. Spexx, you're a f*cking genius Kiss

That deserves some donations!

Spexx:
9EQ342ssXSxmpDURs6XNxAajB14DQzJDNX

kondiomir

legendary

Activity: 1568

Merit: 1000

Twitter @Acimirov

Quote from: 111magic on January 29, 2015, 03:22:29 PM

Magi on Bitcoin event 2015 in Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

LOL Quite impressive! Another proof that this project have proffesional hard working team and a bright future!!
Keep the good job guys!! I'm with you! Cool

hefty

full member

Activity: 168

Merit: 100

Keep them coming spexx , thank You Grin

Great vid guys, thanks for sharing

JasonXtreme

newbie

Activity: 28

Merit: 0

Quote from: Spexx on January 29, 2015, 03:52:27 PM

Windows 64 bit miner

I have updated this with a newer, smaller, slightly faster minerd.exe and it performs better with multiple threads too.

https://www.dropbox.com/s/ydk8z59wwgysh1e/Spexx-Wolf0-V2-generic-Win64-XMGminerd.zip

It is around 1.5 percent faster than the previous offering.

I have tried to build something for AVX and AVX2 instruction set support but I get a slightly slower minerd.exe when I do that. It is really quite odd!

This latest miner code responds to compiler flags in a completely different way to the earlier code. I do not know if this would work for Linux but I get faster code using -Os than with -Ofast.

Happy hashing Cheesy

This one is a beast Cheesy

Getting 67KHash/s on my i7 3610QM, not that that is a laptop processor Cheesy

EDIT: And yet I get 56.5Khash/s using only 5 of my 8 threads... Undecided

This should mean I could get about 80 running full speed, no?

Spexx

sr. member

Activity: 350

Merit: 250

Mining Co-operative

Windows 64 bit miner

I have updated this with a newer, smaller, slightly faster minerd.exe and it performs better with multiple threads too.

https://www.dropbox.com/s/ydk8z59wwgysh1e/Spexx-Wolf0-V2-generic-Win64-XMGminerd.zip

It is around 1.5 percent faster than the previous offering.

I have tried to build something for AVX and AVX2 instruction set support but I get a slightly slower minerd.exe when I do that. It is really quite odd!

This latest miner code responds to compiler flags in a completely different way to the earlier code. I do not know if this would work for Linux but I get faster code using -Os than with -Ofast.

Happy hashing Cheesy

xms

full member

Activity: 223

Merit: 100

nice,

magi is here to stay!

joelao95

legendary

Activity: 1190

Merit: 1009

Coin of the Magi!

Magically speedy

Here is the youtube link:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mh-OuU5T5nk&index=1&list=PL0y236gxG0OrL509-cpNjvjSl-1cnplOH
(at 4:02 or so)

111magic

legendary

Activity: 1750

Merit: 1005

Magi on Bitcoin event 2015 in Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

joelao95

legendary

Activity: 1190

Merit: 1009

Coin of the Magi!

Quote from: hefty on January 29, 2015, 03:08:33 PM

Thank You, if/when you have time, its really not necesary if its complex and it will take you much time. I am checking that pool last few days once a day "We are currently not accepting new user registrations" i tought it was official pool and that you need invite or something nevermind then.

I'll check with Historical, he is running this pool.

hefty

full member

Activity: 168

Merit: 100

Quote from: joelao95 on January 29, 2015, 02:47:30 PM

Quote from: hefty on January 29, 2015, 01:07:26 PM

so how to calculate reward of xmg, you are dev right how to get invitation to official magi pool or when will registrations open

It's kinda with complex math calculation, if you really want to see how calculation is done, I can post that. are you talking this pool? http://www.magipool.info. (looks like it's down, I'll check with operator)

Quote from: NewtonsMthd on January 29, 2015, 01:18:01 PM

Any way to check via the command line? Didn't see anything in the header files.

USE: getinfo, and locate a line "expected time ...", notice the expected time is only an estimate.

Thank You, if/when you have time, its really not necesary if its complex and it will take you much time. I am checking that pool last few days once a day "We are currently not accepting new user registrations" i tought it was official pool and that you need invite or something nevermind then.

Topic: [ANN] [XMG] MAGI | CPU mining | mPoW | mPoS | [MagiPay] - page 1034. (Read 2375939 times)