Sup
wakhid mukti
Thanks wakhid; yet to be great.
I think we need to make it very very easy to mine - i'm thinking
one-click mining, or have the wallet set to mine on one thread
automatically as a default. You can have the wallet connect to
a pool (if solo-mining is not an option). I'm not sure how to get
auto-payments to the wallet, maybe the wallet could create an
address just for receiving mining payments.
If that won't work, how about an "anonymous" pool, which requires
only a magi address, and some simplified mining software to go
with it. Getting past antivirus without triggering it is also an issue.
We should make it so anyone, even without technical skills, can mine.
Thanks for the suggestions, Coins-R-Us; I got the point, easy mining. I thought about a plan of wallet improvement and integrating mining into the wallet; by simple clicking enables both PoW and PoS. One of the options and what I wanted to do all along is the P2Pool, which will enable mining to address. Kindly some one would offer such a pool, or I'd do any ways. I also like to see any other opinions coming up.
..., maybe magi will be one of the few that really is for anybody.
I hope this is the scene of magi in the near future.
I'd avoid talking much before delivery, and to avoid frustrating community, the same reason for "No ETA"; but a simple route for the current release, a speeding wallet seems running well; I got sync done in the past few days, everything seems running okay, wallet comes up in a minute or so. I'll get another improvement done plus few minor fixes, then release candidates.
Yea bud, you have some good points. I'd take the route of revising the monetary system to make magi healthy; however, I'd resist to make changes for the sake of coin value, very much a scene of pure PoS coins and the like, which, I believe not helping coin value in the long run but a possibility of leading to centralization, let alone fail to catch the interests of miners. In general, the majority of the coins should be distributed through a de-centralized way in a significant long period, over which sufficient miners join the party and get a share. One of the conclusions that the total coins generated, e.g., through PoW, should be much greater than PoS, can thus be drawn; same for why mining should stay low. For this reason, I would not think 2% PoW over 3% PoS is a good combination. Though I tend to stick to PoW, a "smart" bridge of PoW and PoS can be a go, for example, when mining goes misbehaving. I do have to re-evaluate the number of coins being distributed, but most likely I suggest to make no changes for consistency throughout.