Topic: [ANN] xxxxx - page 84. (Read 175982 times)
Thanks.
when bounties are going to be released ? any specific day for that. WCX idea is good but only i can participate in bounties system no enough money for ICO .
They are already giving out bounties depending on which bounty you participated. It ill be credited in your account if it's verified but you can't use it at the moment since they have not officially launched their service yet. I'd suggest you follow their signup page and read their whitepaper for details.
when bounties are going to be released ? any specific day for that. WCX idea is good but only i can participate in bounties system no enough money for ICO .
I like this and totally believe that world need such project.
Will donate before ICO.
Participate in bounty WCX.
Will donate before ICO.
Participate in bounty WCX.
Password reset is broken 
When I click on 'Send Password Reset Email', it says 'Email is invalid.'.
When I try to register again with the same e-mail address, it says that the e-mail address already exists.
Please advise.
When I click on 'Send Password Reset Email', it says 'Email is invalid.'.When I try to register again with the same e-mail address, it says that the e-mail address already exists.
Please advise.
Please contact [email protected] for assistance.
---
Thank you all for your continued support! Here are some updates:
→ The whitepaper will soon be available in 12 languages, including Russian. They are set to be published on the site within the next day or so. If you want to help translate it into your language, you can join our translation project here.
→ Spots for Pre-ICO bulk buying (15% discount) of WCX Tokens are flying fast. Almost $2.5M already committed! If you still haven't reserved and are planning to buy 250,000 WCXT or more, you can do so here.
→ Spots for the WCX Beta Program are also flying fast. Available spots for English are 90% full, Russian 75% full, and Vietnamese 70% full. You can apply to join the Beta Program here to get early access to WCX.
I have just tried it again. Seems that this issue is fixed now. I was finally able to reset my password. Thanks!
Is somewhere clearly information about receiving tokens from Sign Up Promotion? When exactly we can receive it?
Besides Sign Up Promotion developers planning to do some more Bounties?
Besides Sign Up Promotion developers planning to do some more Bounties?
Update: Only 10 spots left for the WCX Beta Program (English). If you still haven't reserved a spot, you can do so here.
I just registered for the WCX Beta Program. I can't wait to test out the system. I hope it is pretty easy to navigate.
nvm
Read the news pieces and all looks quite good but it would be better if the teams identities were displayed on the OP
Also what is the pre-ICO price per token?
Also what is the pre-ICO price per token?
Update: Only 10 spots left for the WCX Beta Program (English). If you still haven't reserved a spot, you can do so here.
there is no airdrop or special bounty if i participate in the beta programm? just testing the exchange, huh?
Read above I already answered. In exchange like WCX team members hold private key, so there is security risk in revealing ID. In Tezos ICO etc there is no risk for team members.
Does poloniex, Kraken, and other big exchanges have secret unnamed officers/devs (leadership with access to private keys?) and no safetey/security protocols other than not publicly naming the leadership with access? Like thieves couldn't easily figure that out? "Hmm, who's there that isn't publicly listed..."
You say poloniex owners are not known. Are the owners the ONLY ones with access to funds? Really? (also, they look to be having solvency problems, so yeah, it's good to be unknown'.)
Or, is what you're telling us is that WCX, that wants to do daily volume of $1B and more, has no security/saftey system in place and just hopes that those few unnamed guys lurking around the office (that everybody that works there knows) don't get mugged (or have heart attacks) at which point WCX loses billions of dollars worth of coins?
That's a terrible, terrible system if that's what you're arguing for.
Good so you agree they shouldn't reveal private key owners... It would indeed be fucking stupid. Yes Poloniex owners and leadership etc are not known, in fact nobody at Poloniex is known. I'm not saying WCX has to not reveal anyone, they can reveal parts of their team with no access to customer funds as I said in previous post.
The thing is we don't want or need to know who is holding private keys. We just want to know the team that is making the WCX exchange and their experience, past projects, what they have done before WCX etc. Like any investor before handing out the money.
Yeah i think this is totaly right, i mean knowing the team behind development of wcx exchange does not necessary void any security measure especially those without private keys. As much as protecting the security of investment so also investors are cautious not throw money into bad investment. Just saying.
PS:- really want this project to worth my investment.
Update: Only 10 spots left for the WCX Beta Program (English). If you still haven't reserved a spot, you can do so here.
@polkacoin the owner of poloniex is known and they are based in the United States. For not knowing this your spam to me now
Haha you actually believe Poloniex owner is that piano player Tristan? Based on his "linkedin" he is a 7 year piano player, 0 experience in developing software, or any expertise in security. Those piano skills sure have helped him run an exchange.
Sure based in the US, ever been to their headquarters? Address? You've played yourself. They're smart keeping things under wraps TBH. It works so far, they are largest exchange and never had a breach.
Obscurity plays a huge part in security.
Read above I already answered. In exchange like WCX team members hold private key, so there is security risk in revealing ID. In Tezos ICO etc there is no risk for team members.
Does poloniex, Kraken, and other big exchanges have secret unnamed officers/devs (leadership with access to private keys?) and no safetey/security protocols other than not publicly naming the leadership with access? Like thieves couldn't easily figure that out? "Hmm, who's there that isn't publicly listed..."
You say poloniex owners are not known. Are the owners the ONLY ones with access to funds? Really? (also, they look to be having solvency problems, so yeah, it's good to be unknown'.)
Or, is what you're telling us is that WCX, that wants to do daily volume of $1B and more, has no security/saftey system in place and just hopes that those few unnamed guys lurking around the office (that everybody that works there knows) don't get mugged (or have heart attacks) at which point WCX loses billions of dollars worth of coins?
That's a terrible, terrible system if that's what you're arguing for.
Good so you agree they shouldn't reveal private key owners... It would indeed be fucking stupid. Yes Poloniex owners and leadership etc are not known, in fact nobody at Poloniex is known. I'm not saying WCX has to not reveal anyone, they can reveal parts of their team with no access to customer funds as I said in previous post.
The thing is we don't want or need to know who is holding private keys. We just want to know the team that is making the WCX exchange and their experience, past projects, what they have done before WCX etc. Like any investor before handing out the money.
Exactly sud
@polkacoin the owner of poloniex is known and they are based in the United States. For not knowing this your spam to me now
Read above I already answered. In exchange like WCX team members hold private key, so there is security risk in revealing ID. In Tezos ICO etc there is no risk for team members.
Does poloniex, Kraken, and other big exchanges have secret unnamed officers/devs (leadership with access to private keys?) and no safetey/security protocols other than not publicly naming the leadership with access? Like thieves couldn't easily figure that out? "Hmm, who's there that isn't publicly listed..."
You say poloniex owners are not known. Are the owners the ONLY ones with access to funds? Really? (also, they look to be having solvency problems, so yeah, it's good to be unknown'.)
Or, is what you're telling us is that WCX, that wants to do daily volume of $1B and more, has no security/saftey system in place and just hopes that those few unnamed guys lurking around the office (that everybody that works there knows) don't get mugged (or have heart attacks) at which point WCX loses billions of dollars worth of coins?
That's a terrible, terrible system if that's what you're arguing for.
Good so you agree they shouldn't reveal private key owners... It would indeed be fucking stupid. Yes Poloniex owners and leadership etc are not known, in fact nobody at Poloniex is known. I'm not saying WCX has to not reveal anyone, they can reveal parts of their team with no access to customer funds as I said in previous post.
The thing is we don't want or need to know who is holding private keys. We just want to know the team that is making the WCX exchange and their experience, past projects, what they have done before WCX etc. Like any investor before handing out the money.
As I explained before I think that would be really big security risk to reveal that, especially if they want to be global player long term, but I don't know maybe they will. In any case since the exchange will be ready before the ICO, so we can have the product, customers, traction, etc. to judge if you want to buy more into ICO.
Read above I already answered. In exchange like WCX team members hold private key, so there is security risk in revealing ID. In Tezos ICO etc there is no risk for team members.
Does poloniex, Kraken, and other big exchanges have secret unnamed officers/devs (leadership with access to private keys?) and no safetey/security protocols other than not publicly naming the leadership with access? Like thieves couldn't easily figure that out? "Hmm, who's there that isn't publicly listed..."
You say poloniex owners are not known. Are the owners the ONLY ones with access to funds? Really? (also, they look to be having solvency problems, so yeah, it's good to be unknown'.)
Or, is what you're telling us is that WCX, that wants to do daily volume of $1B and more, has no security/saftey system in place and just hopes that those few unnamed guys lurking around the office (that everybody that works there knows) don't get mugged (or have heart attacks) at which point WCX loses billions of dollars worth of coins?
That's a terrible, terrible system if that's what you're arguing for.
Good so you agree they shouldn't reveal private key owners... It would indeed be fucking stupid. Yes Poloniex owners and leadership etc are not known, in fact nobody at Poloniex is known. I'm not saying WCX has to not reveal anyone, they can reveal parts of their team with no access to customer funds as I said in previous post.
The thing is we don't want or need to know who is holding private keys. We just want to know the team that is making the WCX exchange and their experience, past projects, what they have done before WCX etc. Like any investor before handing out the money.
Good so you agree they shouldn't reveal private key owners...
If you're not going to actually read what I said, no need to respond.
Read above I already answered. In exchange like WCX team members hold private key, so there is security risk in revealing ID. In Tezos ICO etc there is no risk for team members.
Does poloniex, Kraken, and other big exchanges have secret unnamed officers/devs (leadership with access to private keys?) and no safetey/security protocols other than not publicly naming the leadership with access? Like thieves couldn't easily figure that out? "Hmm, who's there that isn't publicly listed..."
You say poloniex owners are not known. Are the owners the ONLY ones with access to funds? Really? (also, they look to be having solvency problems, so yeah, it's good to be unknown'.)
Or, is what you're telling us is that WCX, that wants to do daily volume of $1B and more, has no security/saftey system in place and just hopes that those few unnamed guys lurking around the office (that everybody that works there knows) don't get mugged (or have heart attacks) at which point WCX loses billions of dollars worth of coins?
That's a terrible, terrible system if that's what you're arguing for.
Good so you agree they shouldn't reveal private key owners... It would indeed be fucking stupid. Yes Poloniex owners and leadership etc are not known, in fact nobody at Poloniex is known. I'm not saying WCX has to not reveal anyone, they can reveal parts of their team with no access to customer funds as I said in previous post...
BUT that needs to be controlled as well because bad actors with knowledge of team/residences of team members can use those to get to private key holders, which again puts customer funds in danger. WCX wants to go very big, global exchange, security should be at forefront of their priorities, from the start. If they wanna do it right and be a big player on the long term. Security is tough tough business
WCX on the right path so far IMO. Jump to: