Topic: [ANN] Zcoin (XZC) - Implementing ZKP privacy without trusted setup - page 248. (Read 663504 times)
February 11, 2017, 02:37:44 AM
I like the technology behind XZC, is it more anonymous than zcash? Zcash is too expensove, I don't like it. We need to go to buy more XZC, it is a cheap way to keep anonymous, and everyone can afford this.
February 11, 2017, 02:34:16 AM
Seems like a failed launch.
Forks on every pool.
Forks on every pool.
February 11, 2017, 02:28:54 AM
Who is real port 
1596 or 1569 ?
.
1596 or 1569 ?
.
February 11, 2017, 02:25:07 AM
sgminer don't work for me... 
February 11, 2017, 02:13:28 AM
auto switch so dont worry
February 11, 2017, 01:40:21 AM
ocminer,
1569 seems completely down but 1596 still is up... will 1596 be automatically switched or should we connect to 1569 instead?
Because its going to get really cold in the room if I leave it connected to 1569 since the miners will be in idle.
1569 seems completely down but 1596 still is up... will 1596 be automatically switched or should we connect to 1569 instead?
Because its going to get really cold in the room if I leave it connected to 1569 since the miners will be in idle.
February 10, 2017, 11:28:58 PM
2.0 wallet .
empty wallet can sync .
not empty cannot sync , but can show coin quantity , why ? need to do ?
(sync finish at 20426，close wallet , then input backup wallet.bat , after cannot sync ,stop at 20426 block , but can show coin quantity and 6 connection )
empty wallet can sync .
not empty cannot sync , but can show coin quantity , why ? need to do ?
(sync finish at 20426，close wallet , then input backup wallet.bat , after cannot sync ,stop at 20426 block , but can show coin quantity and 6 connection )
February 10, 2017, 11:18:32 PM
Well we got to block 20500 without some amd miner
Will the dev want to earn more with their nvidia cards or some private miner amd ? Reply to the dev community.Miners just for some, not for others. Weird, this stance of yours.
Good luck with your currency.
February 10, 2017, 10:23:38 PM
February 10, 2017, 10:15:33 PM
waiting for block 20500 to arrive is like watching paint dry...... how many hours that I have to wait ( approximately )
February 10, 2017, 10:13:13 PM
how do i set up the cpu miner download. will there be wiki for linux like the first one
ok im gone to assume the dependencies are the same and i just need to delete the old cpuminer file and use the new git clone and follow the same instructions ? February 10, 2017, 09:24:29 PM
this coin is kicking some ass on price
February 10, 2017, 08:56:15 PM
Hey, anyone have a bootstrap or just the blockchain uploaded somewhere?
Syncing is painfully slow.
Syncing is painfully slow.
i believe they said bootstrapping this wallet is currently not possible. I had tried to upload my copy of all the files for another user and it just mugged up his whole wallet :/ (user said it's known btc-core issues tho that should have been fixed). Either way, i dont recommend it haha but you can find people in the #general working on the same thing maybe you can find what you need there
Will you be solo mining?
i will NOT be personally. i just prefer the security of pool mining, in that i dont have to worry about the stuff people have been fighting with for seemingly 2 weeks with this coin :/ the wallets has serious issues. they said they are working on it tho, just been "busy" idk, im not part of the project just another miner so i cant say if their just fucking the dog on it or not ;p
February 10, 2017, 08:22:56 PM
Hey, anyone have a bootstrap or just the blockchain uploaded somewhere?
Syncing is painfully slow.
Syncing is painfully slow.
i believe they said bootstrapping this wallet is currently not possible. I had tried to upload my copy of all the files for another user and it just mugged up his whole wallet :/ (user said it's known btc-core issues tho that should have been fixed). Either way, i dont recommend it haha but you can find people in the #general working on the same thing maybe you can find what you need there
Will you be solo mining?
February 10, 2017, 08:20:28 PM
Hey, anyone have a bootstrap or just the blockchain uploaded somewhere?
Syncing is painfully slow.
Syncing is painfully slow.
i believe they said bootstrapping this wallet is currently not possible. I had tried to upload my copy of all the files for another user and it just mugged up his whole wallet :/ (user said it's known btc-core issues tho that should have been fixed). Either way, i dont recommend it haha but you can find people in the #general working on the same thing maybe you can find what you need there
February 10, 2017, 07:56:51 PM
Hey, anyone have a bootstrap or just the blockchain uploaded somewhere?
Syncing is painfully slow.
Syncing is painfully slow.
February 10, 2017, 07:50:42 PM
how do i set up the cpu miner download. will there be wiki for linux like the first one
February 10, 2017, 07:48:01 PM
Is this faster than the Djm miner?
OK, its all here now, separate source for linux (https://mega.nz/#!7FQWxJya!zgZCqjpeNzc_UZQYTcGz2rYogKwnlYu-1ILzKQdpSRY) included.
It can be compiled on windows too, striped everything, left only lyra2z algo, so it can't be used for anything else.
https://mega.nz/#F!HRoSACxY!rF7r9kD9O7dJr-i8oEs3wA
It can be compiled on windows too, striped everything, left only lyra2z algo, so it can't be used for anything else.
https://mega.nz/#F!HRoSACxY!rF7r9kD9O7dJr-i8oEs3wA
this is CPU miner, djm has GPU miner
Do you have any idea about hash rate on a Intel Celeron J1800? Since apparently gpu mining is pretty pointless. Edit: Never mind. Without optimized AMD miner I have no interest what so ever in this coin.
seems like it's gone full circle, the point of the algo swap was to make CPUs less efficient by adding GPUs, and yet an entire rig = 1 CPU. And no optimized AMD miners means only an exclusive group can mine it. hmmm EDIT: 1 rig = 2 CPUs, 1 Nvidia rig = 10 CPUs, it's a shite state of affairs at present but it may turn around, maybe even claymore will show his face?
Based on the cpu ratio between zcoin and lyra2v2, considering all things equal zcoin on cuda would be about half the
lyra2v2 hash rate on cuda. But it's orders of magnitude slower. Obviously all things are not equal. The zcoin memory matrix is still
many times larger than lyra2v2, though not nearly as large as before, as evidenced by the dramatic increase in hash rate
from the previous version. Maybe it's still too large for GPUs to mine efficiently.
I'm still not sure it was a wise decision to put so much effort into an interim solution.
ya its funny that the COIN DEVS can't code an 90% optimized miner for the algo THEY chose
February 10, 2017, 07:26:21 PM
Quote
2017-02-11 00:23:06 c2012495082d89d00ff7f4dea60443d42a4aec921d173594dde3b6f778febae3 from 46.101.31.112:8168 /Satoshi:0.8.7.2/ was not accepted into the memory pool
2017-02-11 00:23:09 received block dbb1f60bf48af90e1ab1db93d1b08ecd8818dfa25f9d7cae6c52d628ad83a448
2017-02-11 00:23:09 ERROR: CTransaction::CheckTransaction() : Error: Node does not have mint zerocoin to verify, please wait until
2017-02-11 00:23:09 ERROR: CheckBlock() : CheckTransaction failed
2017-02-11 00:23:09 ERROR: ProcessBlock() : CheckBlock FAILED
2017-02-11 00:23:09 received block dbb1f60bf48af90e1ab1db93d1b08ecd8818dfa25f9d7cae6c52d628ad83a448
2017-02-11 00:23:09 ERROR: CTransaction::CheckTransaction() : Error: Node does not have mint zerocoin to verify, please wait until
2017-02-11 00:23:09 ERROR: CheckBlock() : CheckTransaction failed
2017-02-11 00:23:09 ERROR: ProcessBlock() : CheckBlock FAILED
Cant synced
how to fix it?
Quote
"version" : 80704,
"protocolversion" : 90020,
"walletversion" : 60000,
"balance" : 0.00000000,
"blocks" : 20445,
"timeoffset" : -1,
"connections" : 8,
"proxy" : "",
"difficulty" : 0.02085286,
"testnet" : false,
"keypoololdest" : 1486394063,
"keypoolsize" : 101,
"paytxfee" : 0.00000000,
"mininput" : 0.00001000,
"errors" : ""
"protocolversion" : 90020,
"walletversion" : 60000,
"balance" : 0.00000000,
"blocks" : 20445,
"timeoffset" : -1,
"connections" : 8,
"proxy" : "",
"difficulty" : 0.02085286,
"testnet" : false,
"keypoololdest" : 1486394063,
"keypoolsize" : 101,
"paytxfee" : 0.00000000,
"mininput" : 0.00001000,
"errors" : ""
February 10, 2017, 06:13:59 PM
Is this faster than the Djm miner?
OK, its all here now, separate source for linux (https://mega.nz/#!7FQWxJya!zgZCqjpeNzc_UZQYTcGz2rYogKwnlYu-1ILzKQdpSRY) included.
It can be compiled on windows too, striped everything, left only lyra2z algo, so it can't be used for anything else.
https://mega.nz/#F!HRoSACxY!rF7r9kD9O7dJr-i8oEs3wA
It can be compiled on windows too, striped everything, left only lyra2z algo, so it can't be used for anything else.
https://mega.nz/#F!HRoSACxY!rF7r9kD9O7dJr-i8oEs3wA
this is CPU miner, djm has GPU miner
Do you have any idea about hash rate on a Intel Celeron J1800? Since apparently gpu mining is pretty pointless. Edit: Never mind. Without optimized AMD miner I have no interest what so ever in this coin.
seems like it's gone full circle, the point of the algo swap was to make CPUs less efficient by adding GPUs, and yet an entire rig = 1 CPU. And no optimized AMD miners means only an exclusive group can mine it. hmmm EDIT: 1 rig = 2 CPUs, 1 Nvidia rig = 10 CPUs, it's a shite state of affairs at present but it may turn around, maybe even claymore will show his face?
Based on the cpu ratio between zcoin and lyra2v2, considering all things equal zcoin on cuda would be about half the
lyra2v2 hash rate on cuda. But it's orders of magnitude slower. Obviously all things are not equal. The zcoin memory matrix is still
many times larger than lyra2v2, though not nearly as large as before, as evidenced by the dramatic increase in hash rate
from the previous version. Maybe it's still too large for GPUs to mine efficiently.
I'm still not sure it was a wise decision to put so much effort into an interim solution.
Jump to: