Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN] ZenithCoin (ZTC) Market Making Sustainable Crypto Currency - page 11. (Read 35767 times)

sr. member
Activity: 294
Merit: 250
The site has some funny tidbits.

Quote
One may make a strong case that allocating 50% of shares to miners to be actually overly generous.

Indeed! Miners should also invite "devs" to have dinner at their house, donate some blood to them and, who knows, offer their sisters or wives (make that a AND instead of OR to those truly dedicated to the "cause") as "development donations".


Quote
Security will be built into the code to ensure an ability to charge back purchases within 24 hours.   The main purpose of this mechanism is to prevent coins from being stolen.

Here we go - reverse chargebacks, the Pandora's box of crypto currencies.

That will be fun Cheesy
So if I pay you, and you pay another one, and that other one pays another one too and my first payment is charged back, will the other transactions be charged back too?

If they do: fail
If they don't: transfer coins to another wallet a few times

You will have to wait for the details of how this is to be done.

It will be removed from the coming hardfork Smiley

Enough of this 'hard fork' charade.    Thank you for test mining ZenithCoin.
legendary
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1002
Waves | 3PHMaGNeTJfqFfD4xuctgKdoxLX188QM8na
The site has some funny tidbits.

Quote
One may make a strong case that allocating 50% of shares to miners to be actually overly generous.

Indeed! Miners should also invite "devs" to have dinner at their house, donate some blood to them and, who knows, offer their sisters or wives (make that a AND instead of OR to those truly dedicated to the "cause") as "development donations".


Quote
Security will be built into the code to ensure an ability to charge back purchases within 24 hours.   The main purpose of this mechanism is to prevent coins from being stolen.

Here we go - reverse chargebacks, the Pandora's box of crypto currencies.

That will be fun Cheesy
So if I pay you, and you pay another one, and that other one pays another one too and my first payment is charged back, will the other transactions be charged back too?

If they do: fail
If they don't: transfer coins to another wallet a few times

You will have to wait for the details of how this is to be done.

It will be removed from the coming hardfork Smiley
sr. member
Activity: 294
Merit: 250
The site has some funny tidbits.

Quote
One may make a strong case that allocating 50% of shares to miners to be actually overly generous.

Indeed! Miners should also invite "devs" to have dinner at their house, donate some blood to them and, who knows, offer their sisters or wives (make that a AND instead of OR to those truly dedicated to the "cause") as "development donations".


Quote
Security will be built into the code to ensure an ability to charge back purchases within 24 hours.   The main purpose of this mechanism is to prevent coins from being stolen.

Here we go - reverse chargebacks, the Pandora's box of crypto currencies.

That will be fun Cheesy
So if I pay you, and you pay another one, and that other one pays another one too and my first payment is charged back, will the other transactions be charged back too?

If they do: fail
If they don't: transfer coins to another wallet a few times

You will have to wait for the details of how this is to be done.
sr. member
Activity: 294
Merit: 250
LOL. It is not good to hijack coin from the developer. Grin
Because coin without active developer is dead "a priori".

Agree, not sure why folks are still pushing this hijack idea.
legendary
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1002
Waves | 3PHMaGNeTJfqFfD4xuctgKdoxLX188QM8na
The site has some funny tidbits.

Quote
One may make a strong case that allocating 50% of shares to miners to be actually overly generous.

Indeed! Miners should also invite "devs" to have dinner at their house, donate some blood to them and, who knows, offer their sisters or wives (make that a AND instead of OR to those truly dedicated to the "cause") as "development donations".


Quote
Security will be built into the code to ensure an ability to charge back purchases within 24 hours.   The main purpose of this mechanism is to prevent coins from being stolen.

Here we go - reverse chargebacks, the Pandora's box of crypto currencies.

That will be fun Cheesy
So if I pay you, and you pay another one, and that other one pays another one too and my first payment is charged back, will the other transactions be charged back too?

If they do: fail
If they don't: transfer coins to another wallet a few times and fail too
full member
Activity: 156
Merit: 100
I feel like the hijacked launch would be more fair than trying to restart things.

Letting it ride shows you weren't trying to tune in your setup or planning a major stash or anything shady.

What are your reasons at this point for wanting to start it over?

~richgene

A launch that is perceived to be fair is in the best interest of this coin.  

If some miners want to jump the line, well all I can say is that their coins aren't going to be valid if they tampered with the original source code.

You are not in control and/or relevant for this coin anymore; we took over.

Support this launch or start over with a new coin, it's your choice.

You and eagle should first pause your mining operations,  allow us to verify the binary and we can negotiate if the coins you have already mined are to be made official.


I got abouyt 2037  blocks >..< and you want to start it again ?
sr. member
Activity: 435
Merit: 250
The site has some funny tidbits.

Quote
One may make a strong case that allocating 50% of shares to miners to be actually overly generous.

Indeed! Miners should also invite "devs" to have dinner at their house, donate some blood to them and, who knows, offer their sisters or wives (make that a AND instead of OR to those truly dedicated to the "cause") as "development donations".


Quote
Security will be built into the code to ensure an ability to charge back purchases within 24 hours.   The main purpose of this mechanism is to prevent coins from being stolen.

Here we go - reverse chargebacks, the Pandora's box of crypto currencies.
legendary
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1002
Waves | 3PHMaGNeTJfqFfD4xuctgKdoxLX188QM8na
I feel like the hijacked launch would be more fair than trying to restart things.

Letting it ride shows you weren't trying to tune in your setup or planning a major stash or anything shady.

What are your reasons at this point for wanting to start it over?

~richgene

A launch that is perceived to be fair is in the best interest of this coin.  

If some miners want to jump the line, well all I can say is that their coins aren't going to be valid if they tampered with the original source code.

You are not in control and/or relevant for this coin anymore; we took over.

Support this launch or start over with a new coin, it's your choice.

You and eagle should first pause your mining operations,  allow us to verify the binary and we can negotiate if the coins you have already mined are to be made official.

I'm mining PhenixCoin atm, so I already stopped mining Smiley I mined 534 blocks and got 10 for free in a giveaway.
And if you doubt the binary, compile and launch your own binary. I will run it in sandbox again and scan it anyway.

If you didn't want a launch, why did you release the source, create a genesis block and state the launch is at the first of june? Smiley

It's not that I worry about my 3 hours of mining and 534 lousy blocks that will never be worth a penny because of all the crapcoins that are launched atm.
It's the fact that you made a mistake by stating an already passed date, release the chain to public and then say "oh sorry, mistake, start over!".

Imagine if Satoshi would do that with Bitcoin...
sr. member
Activity: 294
Merit: 250
I feel like the hijacked launch would be more fair than trying to restart things.

Letting it ride shows you weren't trying to tune in your setup or planning a major stash or anything shady.

What are your reasons at this point for wanting to start it over?

~richgene

A launch that is perceived to be fair is in the best interest of this coin.  

If some miners want to jump the line, well all I can say is that their coins aren't going to be valid if they tampered with the original source code.

You are not in control and/or relevant for this coin anymore; we took over.

Support this launch or start over with a new coin, it's your choice.

You and eagle should first pause your mining operations,  allow us to verify the binary and we can negotiate if the coins you have already mined are to be made official.
legendary
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1002
Waves | 3PHMaGNeTJfqFfD4xuctgKdoxLX188QM8na
I feel like the hijacked launch would be more fair than trying to restart things.

Letting it ride shows you weren't trying to tune in your setup or planning a major stash or anything shady.

What are your reasons at this point for wanting to start it over?

~richgene

A launch that is perceived to be fair is in the best interest of this coin.  

If some miners want to jump the line, well all I can say is that their coins aren't going to be valid if they tampered with the original source code.

You are not in control and/or relevant for this coin anymore; we took over.

Support this launch or start over with a new coin, it's your choice.
sr. member
Activity: 294
Merit: 250
I feel like the hijacked launch would be more fair than trying to restart things.

Letting it ride shows you weren't trying to tune in your setup or planning a major stash or anything shady.

What are your reasons at this point for wanting to start it over?

~richgene

A launch that is perceived to be fair is in the best interest of this coin.   

If some miners want to jump the line, well all I can say is that their coins aren't going to be valid if they tampered with the original source code.
sr. member
Activity: 294
Merit: 250
In the footer of the Zenithcoin page, it says FrictionlessCoin.

Now that the community has taken ZenithCoin and run with it, why don't you just re-release it with your originally intended name or the name for whatever WordPress coin theme you used?

~richgene

The biq question here is whether this hijacked launch was a fair launch or not.   

This is a good pre-launch test in my opinion.

You simply were not stay in launch ...

Quote
{
"version" : 70200,
"protocolversion" : 60002,
"walletversion" : 60000,
"balance" : ".00000000",
"blocks" : 9321,
"connections" : 2,
"proxy" : "",
"difficulty" : 0.01562500,
"testnet" : false,
"keypoololdest" : ,
"keypoolsize" : 101,
"paytxfee" : "0.00000000",
"errors" : ""
}

Well that's a nice collection of newly minted *test* ZTC.

I suggest waiting for the official launch.  

  
member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
I feel like the hijacked launch would be more fair than trying to restart things.

Letting it ride shows you weren't trying to tune in your setup or planning a major stash or anything shady.

What are your reasons at this point for wanting to start it over?

~richgene
hero member
Activity: 518
Merit: 500
LOL. It is not good to hijack coin from the developer. Grin
Because coin without active developer is dead "a priori".
full member
Activity: 182
Merit: 100
In the footer of the Zenithcoin page, it says FrictionlessCoin.

Now that the community has taken ZenithCoin and run with it, why don't you just re-release it with your originally intended name or the name for whatever WordPress coin theme you used?

~richgene

The biq question here is whether this hijacked launch was a fair launch or not.   

This is a good pre-launch test in my opinion.

You simply were not stay in launch ...

Quote
{
"version" : 70200,
"protocolversion" : 60002,
"walletversion" : 60000,
"balance" : ".00000000",
"blocks" : 9321,
"connections" : 2,
"proxy" : "",
"difficulty" : 0.01562500,
"testnet" : false,
"keypoololdest" : ,
"keypoolsize" : 101,
"paytxfee" : "0.00000000",
"errors" : ""
}
sr. member
Activity: 294
Merit: 250
In the footer of the Zenithcoin page, it says FrictionlessCoin.

Now that the community has taken ZenithCoin and run with it, why don't you just re-release it with your originally intended name or the name for whatever WordPress coin theme you used?

~richgene

The biq question here is whether this hijacked launch was a fair launch or not.   

This is a good pre-launch test in my opinion.
member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
In the footer of the Zenithcoin page, it says FrictionlessCoin.

Now that the community has taken ZenithCoin and run with it, why don't you just re-release it with your originally intended name(or was that the name for whatever WordPress coin theme you used)?

~richgene
legendary
Activity: 980
Merit: 1000
This has got to be a first!   Alt-coin hijacked prior to official launch!
Negative. Elacoin Cheesy
sr. member
Activity: 294
Merit: 250
ZenithCoin is launched, community take-over! Start mining now while diff is low Smiley

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ann-zenithcoin-v1-is-launched-226112

This has got to be a first!   Alt-coin hijacked prior to official launch!
legendary
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1002
Waves | 3PHMaGNeTJfqFfD4xuctgKdoxLX188QM8na
ZenithCoin is launched, community take-over! Start mining now while diff is low Smiley

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ann-zenithcoin-v1-is-launched-226112
Pages:
Jump to: