Any more substantial comments? Why you think that "This shows that they want to bring the idea to the crowd and see feedback"? I guess it shows that the project is very raw and not elaborated properly. Do you really think that investors are stupid crowd which could be used only for feedbacking? Cmon. there a thousands of ICO preparing and ongoing. Only those who have not just an idea but a real clear concept with all documents worked out properly worth attention. No time for semifinished stuff!
p/s according to your statement, should they close this project immidiately if the feebacks are bad?
What lead you to the conclusion that "the project is raw"? The fact that the we take our responsibilities very seriously and before releasing any documents we double check them as much as we can? The project is actually worken out far more than a lot of other projects around. You will see that if you follow the developent.
As for the feedback and investors. We already have secured sufficient funds within the private placement. And this thread here is not only about trying to find investor while it is rather to have the community informed that we exist. It is not "just the idea". If you are able to read and analyze what is written you should have concluded different: we said that smart contracts are almost ready, website also. WP as well. The sooner the community know of such a project, the better it is. Not sure whether that is narrow mindedness to judge this way or something else. Don't really know. The point is to be as open and transparent as possible.
On the other hand if you come up out of nowhere with the whole package set in place, very same people (like yourself for instance) would accuse us of other different things - like who these guys are and how come they are so well prepared all at once, this is definitely some sort of tricky story, and so on.
We do appreciate your feedback whatsoever. However you are wrong. Thank you anyway!
