Author

Topic: 🤖[ANN][BIS]Bismuth 2.0 - Beyond DeFi - page 154. (Read 156344 times)

legendary
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1001
Fucker of "the system"
well im def on a fork BH 18742

mad coins tho lol
hero member
Activity: 521
Merit: 500
51% attack owning the chain but with a different timespan and the most of the coin making all node rejecting new block mined ? Possible ?
Possible..
hero member
Activity: 661
Merit: 500
51% attack owning the chain but with a different timespan and the most of the coin making all node rejecting new block mined ? Possible ?
sr. member
Activity: 445
Merit: 250
There is BismuthTools online

http://bismuth.hashpool.eu:8080/
sr. member
Activity: 278
Merit: 258
Twitter: @maccaspacca1
This is silly. I'm struggling just to keep my client up to date with the blockchain.

I still never got an answer how to backup my wallet to save the few blocks I managed to mine yesterday.
But it might not matter as I'm getting the notion it's not worth it.

If this coin is ever fixed, it better relaunch.

Just backup your privatekey.der (like you backup wallet.dat of other wallets)

Backup privkey.der AND pubkey.der - both are needed.
hero member
Activity: 756
Merit: 579
This is silly. I'm struggling just to keep my client up to date with the blockchain.

I still never got an answer how to backup my wallet to save the few blocks I managed to mine yesterday.
But it might not matter as I'm getting the notion it's not worth it.

If this coin is ever fixed, it better relaunch.

Just backup your privatekey.der (like you backup wallet.dat of other wallets)
member
Activity: 80
Merit: 10
a72ee0df3ea55616df36fc9d8bdad28310013b0d383216d44572aca2

It is strange that this address accounted for 90%+ Cry

All the people do not seem to be in the same block Huh
legendary
Activity: 2165
Merit: 1002
This is silly. I'm struggling just to keep my client up to date with the blockchain.

I still never got an answer how to backup my wallet to save the few blocks I managed to mine yesterday.
But it might not matter as I'm getting the notion it's not worth it.

If this coin is ever fixed, it better relaunch.
legendary
Activity: 2688
Merit: 1240
Trying to sync from scratch I get:

Code:
2017-05-02 15:54:06,492 execute(148) Retrying database execute due to no such table: transactions
2017-05-02 15:54:06,506 execute(148) Retrying database execute due to no such table: transactions
2017-05-02 15:54:06,513 execute(148) Retrying database execute due to no such table: transactions
2017-05-02 15:54:06,525 execute(148) Retrying database execute due to no such table: transactions
2017-05-02 15:54:06,527 execute(148) Retrying database execute due to no such table: transactions
2017-05-02 15:54:06,528 execute(148) Retrying database execute due to no such table: transactions
2017-05-02 15:54:06,571 execute(148) Retrying database execute due to no such table: transactions
2017-05-02 15:54:06,576 execute(148) Retrying database execute due to no such table: transactions
2017-05-02 15:54:06,584 execute(148) Retrying database execute due to no such table: transactions
2017-05-02 15:54:06,592 execute(148) Retrying database execute due to no such table: transactions
2017-05-02 15:54:06,607 execute(148) Retrying database execute due to no such table: transactions
2017-05-02 15:54:06,614 execute(148) Retrying database execute due to no such table: transactions
2017-05-02 15:54:06,626 execute(148) Retrying database execute due to no such table: transactions
2017-05-02 15:54:06,629 execute(148) Retrying database execute due to no such table: transactions

Use the latest version 3.13 for GitHub:
https://github.com/hclivess/Bismuth/releases/tag/3.13

I still have this problem...
legendary
Activity: 1134
Merit: 1003
sr. member
Activity: 248
Merit: 250
This is just a testnet?

I am hoping it is lol
As the github to download says pre-release
legendary
Activity: 1134
Merit: 1003
This is just a testnet?
full member
Activity: 134
Merit: 100
If you guys haven't installed the BismuthTools, I highly recommend it. Very nice to have!



A good example of the addresses that are instamining this. I suppose someone out there thought of a way to trick the network into giving them all of the coins. Looks like two addresses are stealing them all. fuckers. lol.
sr. member
Activity: 248
Merit: 250
Here is my observation, Last night i let it to mine on a i7 6700k and not a single block mined, and at the same time on a old laptop with 3 threads it mined 24 blocks.
So its not the speed of the CPU it seems.

Same operating system ?

yes same operating system.
hero member
Activity: 661
Merit: 500
Here is my observation, Last night i let it to mine on a i7 6700k and not a single block mined, and at the same time on a old laptop with 3 threads it mined 24 blocks.
So its not the speed of the CPU it seems.

Same operating system ?
member
Activity: 116
Merit: 10
Quack.
my bismuth node is up and syncing 0/
hero member
Activity: 752
Merit: 500
If you guys haven't installed the BismuthTools, I highly recommend it. Very nice to have!

sr. member
Activity: 248
Merit: 250
Here is my observation, Last night i let it to mine on a i7 6700k and not a single block mined, and at the same time on a old laptop with 3 threads it mined 24 blocks.
So its not the speed of the CPU it seems.
legendary
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1001
Fucker of "the system"
Quote
Total tokens: 99,999,980 (1,099,99,978 including dev rewards)

 Really?! Only 10% to be distributed via mining ?

Just an separator of thousands mistake i think...
The correct is 1,099,990,978, not 1,099,99,978 ... i suppose


99,999,980 + 10% =109,999,978



Yes this is correct.
At testnet dev was very helpful and honest. I don't think that he gonna leave this situation like this...

+1  i think we should just relaunch generating the new genesis with new updated software from p2
member
Activity: 89
Merit: 10
Quote
Total tokens: 99,999,980 (1,099,99,978 including dev rewards)

 Really?! Only 10% to be distributed via mining ?

Just an separator of thousands mistake i think...
The correct is 1,099,990,978, not 1,099,99,978 ... i suppose


99,999,980 + 10% =109,999,978



Yes this is correct.
At testnet dev was very helpful and honest. I don't think that he gonna leave this situation like this...
Jump to: